Pro-free speech social media site is target of centuries-old anti-Christian persecution
Once an entity falls in the sites of these organizations, their allies in mass media, legislatures and even the judiciary and finance (Gab has been deprived of banking services) fall into lockstep with a desired agenda, since they either share religio-ethnic kinship, are politically compromised, or they fear being accused of “anti-semitism.” Former Georgia Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney famously explained this dynamic over a decade ago.
Louis Farrakhan likewise experienced similar political pressure in the 1990s because of the Nation of Islam’s The Secret History of Blacks and Jews, an influential books series highlighting Jewish involvement in the slave trade that, as Farrakhan explains below, relies solely on the research of Jewish scholars.
Genuine free speech cannot be tolerated because it stands in the way of far-reaching political designs being imposed on America, readily evidenced in the country’s fraudulent elections and illegitimate, senile president who is proceeding to institute a demographic makeover of the country via illegal immigration alongside profligate “Green New Deal” cronyism, both of which are against the popular will.
Gab founder Andrew Torba writes:
Over the course of five years Gab has been attacked and smeared by many different Jewish groups including the ADL for simply defending free speech online. Now today [April 9] the ADL is trying to cancel Tucker Carlson for daring to speak the truth about the reality of demographic replacement that is absolutely and unequivocally going on in The West. These are not “hateful” statements, they objective facts that can no longer be ignored.
The ADL wants the government to throw me in jail and shut down Gab for allowing free speech to exist online. Texas Governor Greg Abbott sat in front of an Israeli flag with a Jewish State Representative and called Gab an “anti-semitic platform.”
This week the American Jewish Congress is attacking Gab and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene with a smear campaign. When I countered their smear campaign with the facts, they played the victim and claimed that I was “attacking” them.