Anti-White Male Professors Gone Wild
Fake News Media Push ‘Radical Scholars” Buttons
Warning: Extreme Profanity
The bizarre and unfounded allegations of Palo Alto University Professor Christine Blasey Ford concerning Supreme Court nominee Brent Kavanaugh is causing an acute outbreak of Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS), a particular type of behavioral disorder caused by the nationalistic, politically incorrect, and often irreverent US presidential incumbent.
This specific manifestation of TDS is evidenced as outrage over Kavanaugh’s alleged 36-year-old high school exploits, in contrast to his outstanding academic qualifications and professional achievements. Despite the profuse number of holes in Blasey Ford’s testimony and her deep state pedigree, even the very highly-educated Left embrace her without reservation.
Why? Simply because she’s a woman and Kavanaugh is a white male, a Trump SCOTUS nominee, and is thus guilty until proven innocent. In contrast to the marked attention toward his debauched high school years, Kavanaugh’s involvement in the George W. Bush administration and questionable record on civil liberties is barely mentioned.
Nowhere is Blasey Ford-aggravated TDS more apparent to this author than when he logs on to his own Facebook account. There he sees so many of his former academic freedom-loving leftist colleagues vent their vociferous, even profanity-laden discontent over the much-dreaded Kavanuagh nomination.
Mind you, these emotional political diatribes are posted by tenured professors at US universities right alongside their professional credentials, in full view of and often receiving affirmation by their academic peers and friends via Facebook “Likes”–a sort of groupthink masquerading as “peer reviewed” political dissent if you will.
Some of these individuals are even college administrators with the power to hire like-minded colleagues, while devising ways to make life miserable for (or simply terminate) those with whom they disagree.
Your family, dear reader, pays to have your children and grandchildren “educated” by those who have similar if not identical political views which are considered par for the course on US college campuses. They instill in their students similar values and assumptions camouflaged as “academic research.”
Blinded by their own credentials and salaried positions, they cannot objectively assess the SCOTUS nomination apart from their own fanaticism that is fueled by the fake news media–the New York Times, Washington Post, Newsweek, and so on–as evidenced in the propaganda they share and comment on.
What will please the academic left? Let’s keep in mind that these highly politicized and disgruntled individuals largely control the hiring process, have the most flexible schedules, guaranteed lifetime employment and among the greatest autonomy over their professions of any salaried workers. Underpaid and often overqualified instructors perform the bulk of classroom teaching while the tenured minority produce their research.
On top of this four decades of affirmative action in higher education apparently hasn’t been enough to break break the white male curse. Many academics today, especially those in the humanities and social sciences, are more concerned with asserting a certain political agenda than with objectively approaching objects of study and instructional activities. Nowhere is this more evident than in their blind and collective revulsion of Trump and his most recent SCOTUS nominee.