By Diane Jakopovic
Editor’s Note: The author of the article below, Diane Jakopovic, is an experienced respiratory therapist who has done considerable research on the Sandy Hook School mass shooting event. Please see her 2015 study, Medical Aspects of the Shooting at Sandy Hook School. Although many of the links from that piece to video documents on YouTube and government sites have been assiduously removed by site owners since the article’s publication, it still presents numerous professional observations of apparent on-the-ground medical activity and the contradictory capture of such activity in the official record.
Recent revelations concerning FBI administrators’ sentiment toward the US political process and public opinion generally suggests how politicized the nation’s top law enforcement agency has indeed become. This is most recently evidenced in their routine attempts to undermine the 2016 presidential election results and July 12, 2018 congressional testimony of FBI Deputy Assistant Director for Counterintelligence Peter Strzok.
Author’s note:This article is a portion of some of the research I and others have done; I’ve also compiled a larger packet of some of my research that I will include a link to, at the end of this article. The packet contains the information in this article, but is more detailed, with report numbers, links to articles and videos, etc. It also contains some other examples of other oddities, and even blatant lies, from the CSP report. All I ask in return is that you please forward this article to every politician, author, televison host, journalist, and news media outlet (both mainstream media and also alternate media) that you can think of. If we’re ever going to force this issue to the forefront, now is the time… actually, it is way beyond time to blow Sandy Hook wide open.
I don’t claim to know what happened at Sandy Hook School that day. I don’t know if people were killed or not. But I do now know, and will prove, that many people in authority knew about this event ahead of time, planned for it, and may have participated in it.
How can one not notice a big elephant in a small room? It happens.
But sooner, or later…..
Even though I have the entire CSP report downloaded and spent years reading through it over and over, I have always felt there was more. Some astounding proof, via FOIA, persistence, and good detective work, has been uncovered by Wolfgang Halbig, offering undeniable proof (official documents) proving that the Chalk Hill School was in the possession of the Newtown School District months beforethe shooting, not days after, and that Sandy Hook students were already attending Chalk Hill School before the shooting occurred (see photos at end of this article). Wolfgang and many other dedicated researchers have also uncovered vast numbers of other lies that the public has been told.
Because so many of the articles and videos we post are immediately removed, and accounts often closed, there has always been high suspicion that very powerful forces were working behind the scene to bury whatever we dug up. Not many can influence the media, or have the authority to force social media sites and Youtube to remove what they don’t want people to know. It is hard to imagine a group of people with enough money, time and employees devoted only to shutting down the many ‘truthers’. There is really only one ‘group’ that I can think of that has that kind of power; that group is our own government. And now as we watch the corruption and criminal activity of the heads of the DOJ, the FBI, and other government agencies being peeled back like an onion, there is no reason not to believe that they may have actually been involved in so much more that has yet to be uncovered.
There are many mass shooting events which are suspicious and deserve further analysis and answers. But the shooting at Sandy Hook School is exceptional to me because in Nov. 2013, the Connecticut States Attorney, Steven Sedensky, released the Connecticut State Police (CSP) investigation report to the public. This gave independent researchers who saw some outlandish flaws in what we were told, something to dig into using official documents, and first reponders, witnesses, and investigators own words.http://cspsandyhookreport.ct.gov/
The CSP report consists of over 7,000 pages, thousands of pictures, audio recordings, and even dash cam videos. It was not seachable until some savvy, enterprising ‘truther’ made it so. Much is redacted, much is not; some is missing. It is confusing, it is contradictory, it is often implausible, and yes, even ridiculously stupid.
The report is not necessarily in sequential order; the grammar and spelling are awful. Most witness statements have been rewritten in the 3rdparty by the officers, and signed months later, with originals redacted. Even most first reponder officer’s did not sign their own statements for months. But there is enough there so that some of us have been able to pick out many anamolies, contradictions and outright lies.
Then in Oct. 2017, nearly 5 years after the event, the FBI finally released it’s investigative report: https://vault.fbi.gov/sandy-hook-elementary-school-shooting
That 1500+ page FBI report was published in three sections. It is so heavily redacted that it is almost useless….ALMOST. They neglected to redact everything. There IS something in there, and when it’s coupled with the CSP report, it paints what could be a very different picture than what we were told. Could it be another possible gun running operation such as Fast & Furious, by the Obama administration, the DOJ, the FBI, and the ATF, which ultimately ended up in a real massacre at an elementary school?
Or more likely, was the ‘massacre’ just a fake, simulated event as part of the same operation, but perhaps with more devious goals? That is merely my theory… I can’t prove what really happened. However, I can now prove that, at a minimum, the FBI, federal prosecutor(s), and Stephen Sedensky were aware of, and possibly involved in this event before it happened.
After the FBI report became available, I immediately downloaded all three 500+ page reports and read through them. Finding nothing of value, I put it away. Every so often, I would skim through it, and still nothing. It’s just crap. It’s so heavily redacted, it’s not searchable, and the pages are not numbered; they run together so its difficult to know where one report ends and the next one starts. I have no reason to believe that both the CSP and the FBI reports were not deliberately written so poorly in order to interfere and frustrate any researcher digging into them.
Being a Christian, I spent many hours pleading and praying for guidance to help me find what I felt I was missing. Finally, in early February, I decided to give the FBI report one more look through. I do believe at that time, the good Lord poked the elephant in the room, and the big old beast woke up and slapped me with his trunk. All this time, I had overlooked that elephant in the room…
Before I get into what I found, I want to touch briefly on two points. The first is the fact that just over two weeks before the massacre, on November 27, 2012, Attorney General Eric Holder visited New Haven, Connecticut to kick off Project Longevity, a joint project of various city, state and federal government agencies, dedicated to reducing gang violence. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tf9_MU4Aqe4
What is rarely mentioned is that there were already three tasks forces in existence in that region, with the goal and with very good track records, of tracking down and arresting gang members. This 2011 FBI article relates the large number of gangs active in in the nation, including Connecticut, and the task forces created to combat them.
Project Longevity, however, was different; it was reportedly formed more as an outreach and intervention group to prevent gang violence, rather than to track and arrest members. It is still an active organization. http://www.project-longevity.org/
Whether or not Project Longevity is in any way related to the massacre, I don’t know. It’s just that the timing of the kick-off being so close to the school shooting, and the fact that the same man who was responsible for gunrunning weapons to the drug cartels (Fast & Furious) was introducing and promoting this project; that is suspicious to me and therefore makes it worth noting.
Secondly, I want to take a second to briefly explain the Federal Grand Jury process. Grand Juries are nearly always convened to consider criminal activity. A Federal Grand Jury consists of a group of 16-23 citizens called to serve as a jury; there is no judge involved or officiating. The jury members are selected twice a year and may be required to serve on any federal case during their 6-month tenure. Prosecutors (not police or the various government agencies) look at the evidence that an investigation has uncovered, and then decide if, and what charges could be filed. The Prosecutor then calls the jury together to examine that evidence and to determine if said evidence is sufficient to file criminal charges against someone.
After the school shooting on Dec. 14, 2012, many agencies, local, regional, state and federal arrived to assist. If one stops and takes an overall look at the total investigation afterwards, though, it seems to be divided between the CSP and the FBI. Of course, their investigations overlapped, but the CSP primarily investigated at the school and dealt with the witnesses on scene; the FBI investigation was, for the most part, about the Lanza family.
There were two FBI agents who assisted at the school in the first days; one agent took pictures of Adam and his weapons to assist the Hoboken FBI in the identification. They both helped at the scene and assisted in processing the victims’ clothing. But for the most part, the FBI did little at the school; the shooting investigation there primarily belonged to the CSP.
At the Lanza home, however, the FBI seemed to be deeply involved, inside the house gathering evidence (along with the CSP and the ATF), interviewing neighbors and those known to have had any possible contact or interaction with either Nancy or Adam, and detailing Adam’s personal and medical history.
There are several baffling incidents in the two investigative reports, dealing with the FBI & ATF’s involvement in the investigation. The first one (the elephant) is from the FBI report. The others are from the CSP report; I will summarize those in order to keep this article from being too long, but if you read the packet, there is more detail. I also included several other examples of blatant lies that came from the CSP report in that packet. I am not including those in this article.
So now let’s look at that big, old elephant in the FBI report.
The FBI Report on Sandy Hook Indicating FBI/ATF Involvement
The FBI and ATF were immediately involved when the news of the shooting went out on the airwaves. They responded to the school, and also to the Lanza home. The FBI remained active in assisting with victims and offering emotional and financial assistance. They were also involved throughout the entire investigation although much of their investigation seemed to concentrate on a personality and/or behavioral analysis of Adam Lanza. However, since so much of their report is heavily or completely redacted, or deleted, it cannot be known what all they actually investigated.
The Elephant (Subpoenas):The shooting at the Lanza home and at the school happened on the morning of Dec. 14, 2012. The Lanza home wasn’t entered until early afternoon by the CSP and the FBI. A search warrant was issued at approximately 5:30pm and the search of the home began at 7:45pm. The ATF did not enter the home until the initial search was completed, so was late in the evening of the 14th. The search by all agencies continued for several days. The investigation continued for weeks or months.
However, Part 1 of the FBI Sandy Hook Report includes photocopies of 27 subpoenas requiring the recipients (redacted) to testify before, or submit documents to, a scheduled Grand Jury (date and time redacted.) Those subpoenas were issued and signed on Dec. 14th, 2012…!!
There were also 26 subpoenas issued and signed on Dec. 15th, and 45 more issued and signed between Dec. 16 – Dec. 21th. Four additional subpoenas were issued and signed between January and March 11, 2013. One subpoena was undated. Parts 2 & 3 of the FBI report include another 25+ subpoenas, some of them signed on 12/14 and 12/15.
So just imagine this!! While the entire country, even the whole world, was focused on the shooting at Sandy Hook School, at that very same time, a federal clerk in a nearby city was busy signing subpoenas to be served, ordering witness to appear at an already scheduled Grand Jury about this shooting!!
There is no possible way that evidence could have been gathered, turned over to the prosecutor, and criminal charges evaluated, all on the same day as the shooting when no investigation had even begun. And since Grand Juries are nearly always convened to consider criminal charges, then criminal charges against who…? The shooter was supposedly dead!! The recipients of the subpoenas HAD to already have been identified and the grand jury hearings HAD to have been scheduled prior to the date of the massacre.
The FBI reports are specifically about the Sandy Hook shooting investigation; that is their title. If the Prosecutor had already convened a grand jury for the purpose of an investigation related to this school shooting, then they HAD to be aware either that something (a mass shooting) was planned to happen, or they had already scheduled a grand jury investigation into an ongoing matter pertaining to something within Sandy Hook, with ties to this event. They had to know!!
The Connecticut State Police Report Indicating FBI/ATF Involvement
The following are summaries of research that I and others have uncovered. It is included in this article because it deals with FBI and/or ATF involvement, in one way or another. For more detailed information, refer to the packet I discussed in the first paragraph.
The Garmin Nuvi GPS(s): A single GPS belonging to Adam was confiscated from the Lanza home, from a trash bag inside his closet. Sometime before Jan. 2, it was handed over to the FBI and was later returned to the CSP. For some reason, the CSP investigative report described it as two completely different models.
When the GPS was seized, it was described only as a Garmin Nuvi. No other identifying information, such as manufacture date, model number, or serial number was recorded. The GPS was physically handled by both FBI and the CSP officers.
The CSP report identified the GPS as both a Garmin Nuvi 550 and a Garmin Nuvi 200; it was given the exhibit number (#58). We know that the differing model numbers was not a typo since each had at least some different data and travel information (the Nuvi 550 was said to have one favorite while the Nuvi 200 had 61 favorites).
There are significant differences in the data reported, although that possibly could have been because the officers who examined and reported the information, may have each been talking about different data (journeys versus destinations versus sequences) while neglecting to mention the other data on the GPS.
Since some data is obviously missing from the GPS (example, two ‘sequences’ ended at the Lanza home, but the next ones began at a different location), it is not a stretch to think that it’s possible that other information is missing, too. Especially when one considers that a 20-year-old male only logged 18 driving trips within an 8-month period, including only four trips in the past five months.
In fairness to the officers, though, it is also possible that Adam may not have powered up the GPS on every trip he made and thus some information was missing because of that. In addition, the GPS was reported to have been previously owned by Peter Lanza, who claims to have given it to Adam in 2010.
There is no report specifying when the GPS was turned over to the FBI, only of it being returned. I was unable to find any reference to a GPS in the FBI report, although considering the redactions, the difficult reading, and the deleted pages, it is not unreasonable to consider that I missed it, or that information was redacted.
However, it is undeniable that this reporting was incorrect since two different models were reported to have been confiscated, and it was confusing because different data from those two models was reported. And the failure to note vital information about this confiscated item, by two major agencies, was either intentional, or was extremely sloppy.
FBI Cell Phone Photos:Two separate reports, (#00230019 and #00025240) relate that FBI Agent Skelly-Byrnes was escorted into the school to take photos of the deceased Adam Lanza’s face to be used for identification purposes and to rule out Ryan Lanza as a suspect. Skelly-Byrnes was also asked to photograph his weapons so the FBI could begin identifying what kind of weapons they were. While the two reports don’t contradict one another, they do give conflicting information.
In one report, an unknown officer whose signature is undecipherable, said that Skelly-Byrnes had the driver’s license photos of both Adam and Ryan Lanza, and so he accompanied her inside the school to compare them with the body; they determined the body was likely that of Adam, took a picture (singular) of the body with her cell phone, and relayed that photo (singular) at about 2:00 pm.
But in his report, CSP Sgt. Covello said that at about 12:00 noon, SA Skelly-Byrnes told him that the FBI in Hoboken, NJ, had “agents on sight with the brother of Adam Lanza” and needed a photo of Adam. They also stated that the FBI specialist in firearms needed a photograph of the weapons used at the school (they would not yet known about the shooting at the Lanza home.) Covello accompanied her into the school and assisted her.
“After donning appropriate PPE, SA Skelly Byrnes and I took several photographs with her cell phone device. SA Skelly Byrnes in turn transmitted the photos to the respective agents requiring them, as well as my government assigned email, Jeffrey.firstname.lastname@example.org, so as a report could be generated by me to account for these photos having been taken and transmitted at the onset of this investigation. After the photos had been transmitted to each respective location, she personally communicated to me that she had permanently erased the photographs from her cell phone device.
The pictures were requested to be sent to the Hoboken FBI for identification purposes, to the FBI firearms specialist, and to Sgt. Covello. Copies of the emails sent to Covello, with photo attachments, are included in report #00025240; the dates and times they were sent were not redacted.
When reviewing the five emails sent by Skelly-Byrnes, it is impossible not to notice that even though report #00025240 says the photo (singular) was relayed at about 2:00pm, the time stamps on the Covello emails says they (plural) were actually sent between 5:17pm – 5:20pm. It is impossible for me to understand why there would be a more than 3-hour time difference between when one report said they were sent and when the photocopies show they were sent. It is especially intriguing in such a high-profile case such as this.
It is possible that Skelly-Byrnes took photos at two separate times, accompanied by two different officers, and did not mail them simultaneously, but at this point, it is impossible to know. But neither report mentions another officer entering the school with them. Reading those reports, it would appear that Skelly-Byrnes only entered the school once for this purpose. It is no stretch of my imagination to say that either these two reports are incomplete, or that they are deliberately misleading.
Identification Photos: While we are on this topic, Skelly-Byrnes took two pictures of Adam’s face. But does anyone realize that these 2 facial photos were the only means used to identify the body of Adam? No one recognized his body, and no family or friends were brought in to identify the body, even at the morgue. A photocopy of his driver’s license was compared to his undoubtedly disfigured face, and from that, he was identified as Adam Lanza. Of course, we shouldn’t be surprised by that since the child victims at the school, many of whom reportedly received massive head wounds, were also identified only by comparing their class photos to the bodies.
Other photos of Adam, and possibly his fingerprints (or maybe not), were taken at autopsy but there is no record of anything ever having been done with them. Adam was later identified as being the son of Nancy from a liver sample taken at his autopsy, but there was nothing in either report that proved that the body in the school was Adam Lanza.
And there is also nothing in the entire 7000+ page report that proved Adam Lanza was the shooter; not witnesses, not photos, not DNA, and not fingerprints. NOTHING!!
The Cardboard Target: Among the hundreds of photos taken inside the Lanza home, were two pictures showing a much-used, large cardboard target resting behind a couch in the basement (Exh. #34). Zooming in on this large target board, the words “FBI Use” can clearly be seen.
How many young men have access to a target marked ‘FBI Use’ in their basements? It’s also intriguing to me because apparently Adam didn’t drive very often and none of his destinations were in areas that he would likely have been able to target practice (according to his GPS). No neighbor ever reported hearing a lot of shooting coming from the Lanza home or yard, and I’m pretty sure people can’t take their own targets to the shooting ranges.
Perhaps it was Nancy’s target, or perhaps Adam didn’t turn on his GPS on every time he drove his car, but that still doesn’t explain the FBI inscription on this target inside their house.
Adam’s Hack Job: In both the CSP and FBI reports, it states that Adam Lanza hacked into the FBI or CIA database back in 2007 or 2008, so Lanza was not unknown to them. Reports 1200704559, Book 7, #00104343 and #00029051 both recount some statements about that, as does the FBI report – Sandy Hook 1 on page 41. One statement says:
“(Redacted) stated that Adam was always troubled, but brilliant. (Redacted) recalls when Adam was in ninth grade; Nancy Lanza told her a story regarding how either the Central Intelligence Agency or Federal Bureau of Investigation came to her residence because Adam “hacked” through two levels of security on one of their computer networks…”
A USA Today articles talks about the hacking that Adam did: https://usat.ly/2iwGmPe
It is probably nothing, just my own personal observation, but reports 1200704559, Book 8, #00003319 and #00003333 included the Nexis Lexis criminal history reports run on both Adam and Ryan Lanza. The reports are, of course, completely redacted but it is interesting to realize that the report on Adam was 17 pages long, and the report on Ryan was 21 pages in length. Obviously there is no way to know how much, if any, information was on each page, but it seems like an excessively lengthy report for two young men who apparently have never been arrested or even suspected of anything nefarious.
ATF Report/Grand Jury Info: Throughout the CSP report, information is given about the guns Nancy Lanza owned, including models, serial numbers, date of purchase, seller, close-up photos, etc., so most is not secret. The ATF sent their report, #00159702, to the CSP, and it includes a letter which says:
“these materials may not be disclosed to any entity (individual or otherwise) outside your agency without prior authorization from ATF. This prohibition on disclosure extends to governmental, non-governmental, and judicial entities. If you receive a request or demand (including a subpoena or judicial order) for production of these materials, please have the requesting party contact ATF immediately…”
That report is 49 pages long, 47 of them from the ATF. 38 of those 47 pages are completely redacted. But on the final page, it says. “Pages 48-102 redacted for the following reasons: Grand Jury Material.” But There are no such pages; page 47 is the last page that the ATF included. The remainder are missing.
Because this report was created by the ATF, we can logically conclude that the Grand Juries that were already convened dealt with Adam and Nancy Lanza’s guns. The question is how did the guns they owned, which were all purchased legally, become involved in a Grand Jury investigatiion that was already scheduled before the shooting? Of course, that is presuming that the information we are given about the guns they owned is factual and complete. How would we know?
But clearly, from that report alone, we can logically conclude that the Grand Jury that was already scheduled as early as Dec. 14, did involve Nancy and Adam Lanza’s guns.
Adam’s Hard Drive: One of the hard drives of the space shuttle Columbia was blown up in a fiery explosion, burned, crashed to earth, and lay in a dry creek bed for 6 months before being found. And yet, nearly all of the information was still able to be recovered from it.
Media reports concentrated on the fact that Adam Lanza destroyed his computer hard drive, a Seagate Barracuda 500gb (in fact, there were four hard drives, a laptop computer, seized from the Lanza home and turned over to the FBI). Adam Lanza purportedly removed the Barracuda hard drive from his desktop computer and damaged it with a screwdriver.
According to report #00193569, this hard drive was turned over to the FBI on 12/15/2012, and yet no information was reported to have been recovered from it. I could find no report in either file about the actual recovery effort, or the results (or lack of.)
It would appear that the public reports about data not being able to be recovered from the Barracuda hard drive, all came from media reporting, not from the CSP report. In these articles, a ‘law enforcement source’ told them that the hard drive was smashed with either a screwdriver or a hammer, and would have to be put back together. That is obviously not correct. The hard drive was photographed with a screwdriver lying beside it (there was a dumbbell, but no hammer) and with deep scratch marks on the surface, but it appears to be intact.
Most electronic information that was able to be retrieved was found on the Transcend external hard drive that was found on a shelf in Adam’s bedroom closet, or on Nancy Lanza’s laptop computer.
Summarization: The above article by no means contains all of the nonsensical information contained in the CSP report, but is a summary of some of the FBI involvement.
I want to add a blurb here about who we ‘truthers ‘are. We are many. We are unified but are individuals; only a few of us know each other personally yet we converse and share information often. We’re not a paid group, we’re not ghouls who want to dig up graves, we’re not anarchists… most of us are people who recognize that something is seriously wrong and who also understand that there are powers that are working against our country, and some of those powers are in our own government. Many of us are professional people, specialized in certain areas, who look at an event such as this and quickly realize
- that responders were completely inept and lies were created to cover up their incompetence, or that
- that this was an intentional act of violence, with lives sacrificed for a specific purpose, or
- that this event was nothing more than a false flag, a hoax, carried out to trick people into believing it was real, in order to accomplish a specific goal…. or more likely, a combination of goals.
Most of us work on solving these events because we love our country and worry about the future for our children; others just like a good mystery. There are many of us; we are tied together with a common goal of figuring out what happened. We have been censored, villianized, victimized, sued, threatened, lost our jobs, and even arrested. Articles have been written about how evil we are. We are often infiltrated by people who deliberately say and do things that will reflect badly on the rest of us. We may have some bad or unbalanced people among us but generally they are not researchers, but people with strong opinions who should not reflect on the rest of us, or the research we have done.
What do we want? I think most of us want a new investigation by people who weren’t involved and who don’t benefit financially. I speak only for myself, but I personally want either a congressional or a grand jury investigation into not only the shooting event itself, but also into the response and subsequent investigation by the local Newtown Police, the Connecticut State Police, the FBI and other federal agencies who may have taken part, and also into the formulation of the final CSP report by Stephen Sedensky. Something is very, very wrong, and the truth needs to be pursued, no matter how far up the ladder it goes.
I want to share my entire packet of research with you; it is by no means all of my research. I only ask in return that you share this article with everyone that you can think of, especially politicians, journalists, authors, the media, investigative researchers, other researchers, etc. If they are inundated with many people demanding they look into what really happened, perhaps we can finally get someone to investigate the investigators.
The entire packet is available here:
Feel free to download it or copy it. I would like to add that anyone is welcome to use any, or all, of my research in their own articles.
Addendum: Below are screen prints of documents that Wolfgang Halbig has uncovered, proving that Chalk Hill school was in the possession of the Newtown School District months before the shooting, and that those students were already attending Chalk Hill, not Sandy Hook, when the event happened.
Since my own research focuses only on the official reports, I cannot comment on Wolf’s findings, but I do urge you to follow him on Twitter and Facebook, or contact him personally if you have information to share with him, or if you are interested in a media interview. I’d also like to thank Tony Mead, Eric Pearson and so many other researchers for their relentless pursuit of the truth and the constant inspiration they give to me.
See also by Diane Jakopovic: A Medical Practitioner Analyzes the Sandy Hook Shooting’s Official Report’s Errors and Anomalies
Diane Jakopovic is a retired respiratory therapist residing in Nebraska. She has certification in respiratory pediatric and neonatal care and is a registered polysomnography technician.
27 thought on “How Deeply Was the FBI Involved in the Sandy Hook Massacre?”
The newest edition of Penn Magazine is now available.
“Mr. President, Tell The Truth About 9/11”
Also here in flip-page format:
Penn Magazine is named in honor of Penn Jones, Jr., one of the first honest researchers into the John F. Kennedy murder.
Thank you very much, Ms. Jakopovic, for your continued efforts to uncover the truth about what happened at Sandy Hook. I commend you for your soldiering on despite all the redactions and other efforts to muddy the waters in the official documents.
Thank you Diane Jakopovic for an intelligent analysis, exposing even more lies and corruption by our lying corrupt government with the massive Sandy Hook School Shooting Hoax on America, and thanks to Professor James Tracy, Ph.D. for having the guts and chutzpah to publish it. This event allegedly happened December 14, 2012. This December 14, 2018 will be the 6th anniversary of this event. Should we celebrate? Every day that passes the perpetrators of this massive con win another round against truth. Why do they hold all the cards in this? The answer lies in one single evil word: SECRECY. The United States Government today is the same as yesterday or a century ago or two centuries ago in name only. It has changed and evolved over the years. The Constitution under which it ostensibly operates, by the “rule” of law, if you can call it that, is and was designed by the Founders to be difficult to change. But well defined ways for legally changing it do exist. They were used in about 1919, for example, to prohibit intoxicating liquors throughout the land. A Constitutional Amendment was passed to prohibit them. After about 14 years of seeking to prevent folks from using intoxicating liquors it became obvious it was not working so another Amendment was passed revoking the first one, legalizing and regulating intoxicating liquors again. It was all done out in the open according to the rules.
Following the attack on the towers in New York on September 11, 2001, Congress decided they needed to change the Constitution. But they didn’t want to go to all the trouble to do it legally. Most of them are lawyers so they know the rules even better than you or I. Instead of following the rules for changing the Constitution, they sought to make an end run around the rules and passed illegal laws allegedly changing it. Some of these laws have already been declared unconstitutional. However many still remain on the books in the form of the insulting name they gave to his illegal law the so called “Patriot Act” when their gross misconduct in passing it was the most Unpatriotic thing they could have done. I believe only one of them voted no in the first round. They used vague “reasons” for their actions, such as “national security” and surrounded everything with the word “secrecy” enforced and protected by the full military armed force of the United States Government against its citizens. Numerous vital protections of our Constitution were gang raped by the despicable whores in Congress, many of whom are dual citizens with the outlaw country Israel which did the attack on 9/11/01 which fomented all this commotion in our government. Obviously they had conflicts of interest and more working to move them to such an evil action in passing such an illegal and evil and unconstitutional set of draconian laws against every principle our original Constitutional stood for and has been defended for with the blood of many U.,S. soldiers for over two centuries. The United States of America is no longer the United States of America today. Only the name is the same. It has been turned into a virtual military dictatorship, where anyone can be arrested and jailed just like any old garden variety totalitarian state it had ostensibly replaced! America has been stolen from us lowly citizens by corrupt lying thugs in Congress, Supreme Court and President, mostly directed by the thousands of lying lawyers who control our totally corrupt government today. Secrecy is the enemy of the truth. It will take much more than the ballot box to reverse this hijacking of our government from us. Who knows what the real evil purpose of the Sandy Hook Shooting was? While the immediate one was to promote gun control, it is clear from your good article and many others, there was a deeper more underlying purpose as well or even plural purposes. Who knows.? These evil crooks who operate in secret, protected by the full military armed force of government could have been running some sort of psychological scam to see how far they could go in fooling our duped population? It is all speculation because they can hide behind the veil of secrecy and we have no practical way to force the truth from their sealed lips do we? America is gone folks. Wake up to it and deal with it.
Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., Physics
Here is a summary of an interesting court case which involved both secrecy and academic freedom, the issues Professor James Tracy has faced and still faces in U.S. Federal Courts today. These events happened in the State of Georgia, about 38 years ago, as a result of improper treatment of a female assistant professor in the College of Education at the University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia. Maija Blaubergs was an assistant professor based in the College of Education. In 1979 she was denied tenure for the third time. She sued the University of Georgia for sexual discrimination in May, 1979.
A University review committee voted secretly against her 6-3. All professors who voted were required to disclose their secret votes and justify them to the late U.S. District Judge Wilbur D. Owens, Jr., who died in 2010 at age 80. Judge Owens was one of a tiny handful of federal judges with absolute honor and integrity.
One of these professors on the committee who voted against her, an education professor, the late James A. Dinnan, refused the order saying, “If academic freedom is not the right to judge one’s peers free from outside pressure and intimidation, then what is it?” Judge Owens needed this information to evaluate whether Blaubergs had been treated fairly by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Judge Owens then promptly fined professor Dinnan $100 per day (which lasted 30 days) followed by 90 days in jail for contempt of court. “Dinnan entered the jail at Florida’s Elgin Air Force Base ( other articles stated he entered at Macon, Georgia) adorned in full academic robes.” He remained there three months from July through September, 1980.
“In August, 1980, Blaubergs responded to media coverage in the Athens Observer, “I am not going to be intimidated by the amount of sympathy he has gotten. Dr. Dinnan volunteered to go to jail. He is not being punished for his stand. He is being coerced to obey the law. I think he should have gone to jail earlier.” The lawsuit dragged on for some six years. She lost but earned a degree in law while waiting and left for greener pastures. TIME, Oct., 6, 1980.
This is another shameful episode of gross violations of the rules and responsibilities of academic freedom. This is what happens when there is no supervision of secret activities behind closed doors at virtual houses of ill repute called universities. We learned nothing from former Nazi, Germany and Soviet Union other than to copy their examples of tyranny to others. Shameful is far too polite an adjective to describe all the above obscenity by the University of Georgia in Athens. These activities demonstrate how they earned their bad reputation for so many years, even long after the Civil Rights Laws were passed in 1964, and even when non blacks are involved. Ref. “The University and the State” by Daniel P. Moynihan, Oct. 1, 1980. Dinnan died in 2012 and was a former U.S. Marine.
Secrecy is the enemy of the truth. The Court of Appeals sustained Judge Owens and the Supreme Court refused to consider it. Therefore it made legal history. Otherwise why not wear a hood over one’s head in these secret committee promotion hearings and not be identified at all? If one’s position cannot be justified honestly and openly, then how is it not simply arbitrary and capricious? The same point holds true for the corrupt way most work is evaluated for scholarly journals, in secret, with no identification or accountability of reviewers while the identity of the author(s) is known. Many articles criticizing this archaic procedure have been written but ignored so far.
There is no due process if one cannot challenge one’s accuser; if the accuser is protected by anonymity and is secret, they cannot be held accountable for their actions. Therefore they are acting arbitrarily and capriciously in patent violation of the rules of academic freedom and the law and the Constitution of the United States. This procedure differs little from an inquisition.
Every member of any university promotion committee, at any level, should be required to write a detailed explanation and justification for their decision based on evidence and facts. This must be signed by them, under the penalties of perjury, that bias, prejudice, and personal feelings and politics have not entered their decision in any way, shape or form. A copy of this document should then be provided to the candidate for promotion. These documents, then, could provide the basis for due process and challenge of any decision, for a rejected candidate. This would be the intelligent and proper way of treating scholars in the academy fairly for a change.
The above article was part of a longer invited presentation entitled,
“UNETHICAL TO CRIMINAL CONDUCT Some Failures of Self-regulation from UGA to MIT”, Conference on Academic Freedom sponsored by Professor Dr. James H. Fetzer, Ph.D. and Stephen Francis, held at the University of Illinois, Urbana, April 26, 2014. Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., Physics, formerly faculty member with lifetime tenure, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 1966-1978, voluntarily resigned mainly due to lying and cheating by two deans and three department heads to the tenured faculty for over 5 years.
That is so interesting, and you are exactly correct. Thank you.
I think everyone must keep these points in mind: First, there are millions of adult Americans who own millions of guns of all sorts. Are they shooting up schools with them? Obviously not and there is no evidence any responsible citizen is engaged in these scams. Second, if the Sandy Hook scam was a real shooting event, where real kids were killed, the ambulance chasing lawyers would be begging the parents to sue the school for failing to protect their kids wouldn’t they? But instead, in this case the parents are in bed with the school and the scam! The last thing they want is to have this case appear in a courtroom because lying to the court in public is much more difficult there than in the media. So those who concocted this con of scamming others through Go Fund Me instead to pay the money instead of the public school via the taxpayers. This killed two birds with one stone; it got them some easy money but avoided the truth coming out in a public courtroom. For example, suppose this had ended up in a public courtroom like that of the late Judge Owens described in my post about the professor who sued the University of Georgia. Suppose the school authorities clammed up about the many strange events at Sandy Hook School that day Dec. 14, 2012, like professor Dinnan clammed up about his reasons for voting against the professor at UGA, and suppose the Judge then sentenced all the school officials to jail indefinitely until they got “loose lips” and finally told us and the court the truth about what happened? This is why my post is quite relevant to the Sandy Hook Hoax and any sympathy scam. The sympathy scam is the most powerful of all cons because sympathy for the victims diverts attention of the brain from its natural defenses against being swindled. That is exactly why it was planned and used this way by those evil folks, in or out of government who obviously did plan this massive con on the duped public. All the redactions in these reports are a total joke. Who knows if anything was written under the redactions in the first place anyway? Why redact them if the intention was to aid the public in understanding such a horrible and implausible event? Everyone involved in this con should be placed at a table in public, and forced to answer any and all questions from the duped public about every aspect of this con and if they refuse to answer, they should be jailed until they get loose lips. This is very simple. Obviously our so called government, which is supposed to look out for us and work for the public, is not working for the public at all is it? We need to use these fake shootings to have laws changed to provide that citizens have the authority to impanel grand juries, not lying cheating lawyers, and ordinary citizens can ask the questions, not lying lawyers who can and do stack the deck in secret behind closed doors. Look at how Wolfgang Halbig and his lawyer were obstructed from being provided simple information by the School Board and local government. All those folks should have been jailed for obstruction of justice. Since the government has obviously not been forthcoming in their presentation of lies, everything they say must be rejected as lies. Nothing they say can be believed. It is and would be a very simple act for them to simply tell the truth for a change wouldn’t it? It is quite obvious they are lying and getting away with it too with impunity. America is broken, very seriously broken and people must not accept their blatant lies about fake events like Sandy Hook.
Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., Physics
Abbe, you always file these long screeds that have no relevance to the central article.
As for my point: while it does seem implausible that all these subpoenas could’ve issued on Dec. 14th, 2012, Ms. Jakopovic’s understanding of how grand juries work is not correct. Grand juries are “standing” bodies, appointed for varying terms depending on the jurisdiction, and meeting a few days each month. They are at that time presented with all the business the prosecutor wants them to work on. See this site, dealing with the federal grand juries in North Carolina: http://www.nced.uscourts.gov/jurors/faq.aspx?faq=3
Thus, the grand jury would not have been convened specifically to hear about Sandy Hook–it was already scheduled to meet. Moreover, it is highly possible that all the subpoenas bearing the court clerk’s name were Xerox copies: the court permits pro se parties to use such forms, so that the clerk does not, in fact, have to review each one, and the party does not need to make a separate trip back to the court just to get the clerk’s signature.
About Winfield Abbe.
I guess that Mr. Abbe is doing his best to sublimate his rage. Writing these enormous screeds may be a way for him to vent the pressure from an enormous sense of betrayal. I understand that, the betrayal is deep and real, but Mr. Abbe doesn’t seem to know how to make distinctions in deference to others who are innocent but nevertheless get caught up in the categories that he has decided are always bad. Secrecy is one such category and Mr. Abbe hasn’t taken the time to think of the good uses of secrecy such as when we find ourselves in the way of a dragnet that by it’s nature does not discriminate, but tends to conflate all who are ascribed to some named group that is proscribed for some reason without regard to the fact that some who carry the signs of that group do not do the proscribed behavior. Here the members of this persecuted group who are innocent of the proscribed behavior may find safety in a secret code of conduct that warns others of the approaching threat. No one will trust you if you can’t keep a secret. But of course this is not the kind of secrecy he is referring to. So why not be more careful about what you mean and practice the humility that says we’re not in Dummyville anymore.
I’m only addressing what I suspect is a clever well researched distraction from the work that is being done here.
Thank you for your response. I was always naive about what was happening, and pretty much believed everything I saw or heard from the media. When I was working, I had no time to even consider that what I was hearing may not be the truth. Like most people, I would come home from work, turn on the television to get the news, watch the weather, and relax, and then I’d get on with life because there’s always so much day-to-day stuff to do. As far as what was happening in the world, I trusted the media to tell me, not even realizing that they were, in fact, guiding me.
It wasn’t until I was retired and the shooting at Sandy Hook happened. As I watched, I was horrified, but even then, questions were forming in my mind… where are the kids? Why are ambulances blocked in, and why are their doors wide open in the winter? But I chalked it all up to small town with a poor response to a big tragedy.
It wasn’t until the official report came out and I joined a Facebook group where both legitimate and some not so legitimate questions came up, that the doubt seriously formed in my mind..
Once the report was published, and I saw the pictures of the filthy school, and I read the outrageous, discombobulated reports from first responders who claimed to have seen or touched the injured kids, that I could prove to myself that we weren’t being told the truth. But proving it to myself isn’t enough; it has to be proven to the people who can do something about it.
Maybe because I have a medical background, I’m reluctant to believe anything without proof. And yes, you’re right, it is difficult to find truth when it’s our own government, with all their power, who is hiding so much information.
But I have learned that not everyone who works in the government are as bright as they like to think they are, They count on people being fooled by the media and not having the time to dig and research, and so they can afford to be sloppy. And for the few who do dig and research, then have the power to just shut them down.
I think we now have enough proof to prove that we were lied to… maybe not enough to prove what happened or that it’s likely that no one died… but enough to prove that the FBI, and several police departments were in on a false flag, and that the media were willing participants. But now, it’s a matter of forcing those who can get the missing information and who can do something about it, interested. I fear that may be our biggest obstacle of all.
Kudos. I’m always impressed by other’s findings when they are new to me. I studied the official and media reports of SH extensively. But as you point out, the reports are so discombobulated it doesn’t surprise me that I missed some things.
The possibility that the FBI were more integrally involved isn’t something I’ve concluded myself. My research into their culture and activities over the past 20 years only supports such a possibility though.
Questions I have after reading your article:
1.) Was the “shooting” somehow the product of FBI operations in the months prior? Perhaps involving informants?
2.) Should the Garmin redactions and discrepancies be viewed as further evidence that Adam didn’t exist at the time or something else.
Remember when the employee of the medical examiner’s office allowed her husband to see the “body” of Adam Lanza? That incident always smelled fishy to me and may point to Adam not being the “shooter” or there being no body at all.
Further along these lines, look into the work of Cinderella’s Broom. She and others have uncovered bizarre information when looking into the handling of Adam Lanza’s body. Again, more reason to wonder whether Adam was the perp or if there was even a body at all.
Thanks!! I do read Cinderella’s Broom every so often. I love the writing on that site.
As far as your questions, of course I can only speculate. #1 is the most puzzling of all… we can know the FBI was somehow involved because they already had the grand jury scheduled when the ‘shooting’ happened. I could easily believe that maybe some gang of thugs got caught and the shooting was real, in retaliation, and so rather than allow the public to think that they didn’t protect the citizens, the FBI made a cover story about some confused kid shooting up the school. But not only does it not make much sense, it that doesn’t explain the poor first responder / medical response and sloppy investigation afterwards. And it certainly doesn’t fit in with the fact that Chalk Hill school was already in use by Sandy Hook students (as I had long suspected.) Finding proof of that, coupled with these subpoenas, proves foreknowledge and planning… it just cannot be denied.
As to the motive, of course the past government leaders (not President Trump) were desperate for gun control for the average citizen. They need us to be defenseless so they can ‘protect’ us from the bad guys.
But I often wonder just how much that some in our government are actually involved in gun and drug-running, and yes, human trafficking, on an everyday level, keeping the gangs well supplied. Like any big, profitable business…
I also suspect perhaps they need events like mass shootings because it provides not only a way to horrify the general public and hopefully make them consider giving up their guns and want, even beg for, those same things which were once considered government intrusion, but it’s an easy way to pay those participants…. simply reimburse them through GoFundme accounts. It’s a fantastic way to launder money. I’m not for one second implying that GFM s involved, I’m merely saying that site is there, and is the absolute most perfect pay to pay someone for illegal activities.
#2 As far as the Lanza’s, I really don’t know. I suspect they exist (and probably still do) but I doubt that they lived in Sandy Hook at that time. Reading through the FBI reports, nobody knew them, nobody saw them, at least recently.
My theory (and it’s only a vague theory) is that they did live there at one time but had moved away, possibly using the home as a summer home. I tend to think that the house was semi-furnished but vacant, and so a lot of the stuff that was in there that wasn’t needed, was crammed into drawers or under steps, and then it was staged with some of the stuff they wanted us to see.
But since I’ve seen the subpoenas and know that the Lanza’s guns were somehow part of the (already scheduled) grand jury investigation, I am beginning to wonder if that home was part of what I theorize might be a gun-running operation… where guns were being delivered and then dispersed. It’s quiet, remote, and offers living quarters for those involved. I have no proof of that, of course, but have no reason to believe I’m wrong, either.
I do think the house was stocked with additional Goodwill-type stuff to make the scene more confusing to look at. I can’t help but notice, there are no things like tools or lawn tools, or paint cans in any of the photographs, or even spray paint, and yet Nancy supposedly restored and repaired bicycles to give to poor kids. These are things which one would expect to see in a house with someone living in it for a long time, even if it’s a divorced woman with one child. But there’s lots of stuff one would expect to see in a staged setting.
And if I am correct, then they likely found a Garmin Nuvi inside but may have turned a different one in for examination by agents who are unaware of what’s going on. I don’t know… like everything else, nothing makes much sense. It can never make sense until we have more documents. But right now, we KNOW they are covering up something.
Excellent article! You might want to add the official press release for Project Longevity, dated 17 days before the Sandy Hook event:
IMO, the dozen or so media-driven spectacle cases of mass shootings over the past decade, representing a small faction of mass shootings in this country, are staged for gun control purposes. There is an real problem with gun violence that is sociological and unique to the U.S. and Canada (as opposed to countries like Switzerland where per capita gun ownership is higher without the prevalence of the mass shooting phenomenon). That being said, I believe that the NRA and pro Second Amendment Republicans know all this. In my opinion, there will not be any comprehensive gun control, in large part, because the phony false flag drills are known in pro-gun ownership circles, and, this can easily be used to blackmail any attempts to undermine the Second Amendment. In fact, the NRA ran a commercial of a “good guy with an AK 47” who helped stop the Sutherland Springs “massacre”.
I maintain a blog related to mobbing and its nexus to mass violence. This is a phenomenon well known to dozens of tenured academics. Many have written peer-reviewed journal articles and books about it. I believe that the cozy relationship between the government and criminal elements, as expressed in the Project Longevity press release, has helped to foster vigilante, criminal harassment networks that act as extra-judicial goon squads that attack people who are persona non grata to various government actors. There have been three self-identified “targets” of gang stalking associated with mass shooting events: Aaron Alexis, Myron May and Gavin Long. These cases have some irregularities that make them suspect to a degree, however, not to the degree of Sandy Hook. In any event, here are some links to my site that you may find interesting:
Thank you…. that is also very interesting. I will read the articles you posted this evening, as I have plans for today.
It’s funny that I had never thought of the extent to which our government may be involved in criminal activity. So much is happening in the world these days that is exposing more and more.
[…] Go to it here: How Deeply Was the FBI Involved in the Sandy Hook Massacre? by Diane Jakopovic […]
The only reason for government imposed secrecy, protected by the full military armed force which our government possesses, is to protect government lies from exposure to the public. Even after supposedly releasing secrets after a number of years as they claim to have done, how does one know they released all words of a document without selectively redacting parts of it? Our governments today are pathological liars because this is how to control the duped population. Read some history books. This is how totalitarian governments operate. Our government in the U.S. today is a totalitarian government. Congress, President and the Supreme Court all know who did 9/11/01 and why but have done nothing to arrest, charge and prosecute the perps in Israel or wherever they may be. This September will be 17 years and counting. Israel did 9/11//01 but sought to blame it on Muslims. Our government is a corrupt cesspool. Read the “Patriot Act” and see how our Congress gang raped you out of your Constitutional Rights with almost zero dissent either! Watch the video of former U.S. Marine Ken O’Keefe at LAX.
• “Larry Silverstein – is a Jewish American businessman from New York. Silverstein obtained a 99 year lease on the entire world trade center complex on 24 July, 2001.  The towers were in fact close to worthless, being filled with asbestos,  yet Silverstein “felt a compelling urge to own them”. Silverstein had breakfast in “Windows on the World” restaurant (located in North Tower 107th Floor) every morning.  but broke this routine on the morning of 11 September 2001. Silverstein’s two children, who also worked in the WTC, were also absent from work that day. Larry Silverstein was paid a little over $4.5 Billion in insurance money as a result of the destruction of the WTC complex.  Silverstein was on personal friendship terms with Zionist media-magnate Rupert Murdoch, former Israeli president Ariel Sharon, as well as Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu. Silverstein was such good friends with Netanyahu that, according to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz he would speak with him on the phone every sunday. 
• Video – Where was Larry Silverstein on 9/11?”
Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., Physics
For the sake of argument, if I assume that everything Winfield presents as fact is true, that still leaves me with the underlying message which is “America is gone folks. Wake up to it and deal with it.” The rhetorical Tokyo Rose couldn’t have said it better.
I think it would be appropriate at this time to reintroduce the article by Diane Jakopovic. Though, as Alison Maynard pointed out above, we have a Grand Jury that is scheduled to convene and not specific to Sandy Hook, there is still the problem of subpoenas or the beginning of the process of serving subpoenas being dated on the same day as the event. Apparently the subpoena process was started by the District Court. It’s as if someone at the courthouse looked at the days events and said before any confirmed factuality existed, “there will be subpoenas, we had better get crackin”.
I would disagree that the subpoenas may not be about the Sandy Hook shooting.
The entire FBI report is specific to the Sandy Hook investigation; even the name of the reports are “Sandy Hook Elementary School Shooting Investigation, Part xx of 03” Logic tells me that the subpoenas issued are about the event that they are categorized under.
Thanks for mentioning my comment, Dalin, because otherwise I would not know for sure that I had posted it. A link to my blog has been substituted for a link to my comment, in the sidebar, and it appears my comment was scrubbed.
Please note that no one has “scrubbed” links to your blog in your comment. This is part of the site’s theme and was not intended.
Allison, I went to your blog and found this gem there: “By the way, Sandy Hook Volunteer Fire and Rescue does not even show that it received any calls on Dec. 14, 2012.” I followed the link and sure enough they only received 1 call in the whole month of Dec. which was for a house fire. Much other valuable research on your site. Will return. Thanks.
I would also like to add that I find Winfreind Abbe’s comment fascinating and informative. Criticizing what he has written makes no sense to me… if you don’t like them, if you think they’re too long, then don’t read them, but he certainly has the right to state his opinion for those of us who do appreciate what he has to say.
Diane, please try reading my comments as if from someone you know to be a friend. No-one here, as of now, has said that the subpoenas were not about the putative SHES shooting. What Alison brought up was that the Grand Jury was not predisposed or called to convene because of the putative shooting event of Dec. 14, 2012. It was the District Court that got the ball rolling on the day of the putative shooting and according to one lawyer, here in forum, Alison Maynard, the courthouse clerk only needs to date and sign the subpoena requisition form once for any number of subsequent requisitions. Quoting from her comment field above, Alison said, “… it is highly possible that all the subpoenas bearing the court clerk’s name were Xerox copies: the court permits pro se parties to use such forms, so that the clerk does not, in fact, have to review each one, and the party does not need to make a separate trip back to the court just to get the clerk’s signature.” If that is the case, then each, some, or many of the separate subpoenas would bare the same clerk signing date. Can that be shown in your files?
It remains to be appreciated, that if what we have as evidence in this particular issue is what amounts to a blank check for subpoena orders, dated on the same day as the alleged event, is both hugely implausible and highly suspicious. A slip of premeditation perhaps as you have alluded to.
You might have to cut & paste the link This is the sole entry for calls in December 2012 at Sandy Hook Volunteer Fire & Rescue. Similar to the FBI crime data showing no murders in Newtown for 2012
My assumption was that people who read the article would actually visit the websites I linked to in order to verify what I said is true. It is difficult, and makes articles too long, to write out every single little point. Providing a link where people could see for themselves seemed much more appropriate. However, I will explain what I didn’t feel I had to include in my article.
On page 4 of FBI Report #1, it gives a synopsis of what happened at Sandy Hook School and at the Lanza home on 12/14/2012. Near the beginning of page 4, it labels the Sandy Hook case ID number as 4-NH-2619946. Thus, any documents that include this case number can be presumed to be related to the Sandy Hook event.
In many reports, the case number is included, hand-written near the bottom of the page, coupled with a serial number (example: 4-NH-2619946 Serial 1, 4-NH-2619946 Serial 2, 4-NH-2619946 Serial 22, etc.) The serial numbers seem to be sequential.
As I said in my article, the FBI pages are not numbered and often run together, although some do say page 1 of 3, page 2 of 3, etc.) and we can only hope that those numbered pages really do fit together, one after another.
The photocopied subpoenas are not numbered and are usually (not always) followed by two pages, one being a ‘Proof of Service’ which I understand is basically the recipient saying they have received the subpoena, and the other page bearing the signature (always redacted) of the FBI agent who served the subpoena and when they did it. In some cases, those two documents seem to be combined (example is on page 25).
But at any rate, on many of those documents that said the subpoenas were served, when it was written on its own form and not combined with the ‘Proof of Service’ document, the case number can almost be seen typed in at the bottom of the page (example is on page 16). When the served report is not on its own form, the case ID number is hand-written in, in most cases.
I bear no responsibility for the sloppiness of these reports… I am merely reporting what I see.
A girl in the UK put up a video, about a US Propaganda law, that was passed, just before Sandy hook happened. Allowing the government to lie, on every level and then put that info in the historic record as though it was fact. People doing research can back up their info on mega.nz 50 gigs for free. I have started backing up things on youtube. I actually starting backing up things long ago, finding that original videos, were being edited and then, being replace, in that the actual original one never came up in a search. The videos were edited by being cut and having info removed. This started many years ago long before sandy hook. Some videos just vanished. It is certainly true we are living in orwells 1984 on many levels, on many subjects