Zika Vaccine Development Proceeds Alongside Mass Aerial Spraying of Subject Populations

By James F. Tracy 

On August 15, 2016 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) invited “public comment” on an especially disturbing edict that will allow the federal agency alongside the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to quarantine entire geographic areas of the United States, restrict the movement and behavior of inhabitants in these areas, and ultimately require they undergo vaccination–in a voluntary manner of course–or face criminal prosecution. 

Doctor Does Injection Child Vaccination Baby
David Dees, ddees.com

In fact, municipalities need only be given a vague “precommunicable” designation to undergo an overall loss of civil liberties that can include mandatory vaccination. 

This action is being unilaterally undertaken by a bureaucracy that in recent months has proceeded in a thoroughly irresponsible manner to hype the alleged dangers of the Zika virus, even promoting the aerial dispersion of a toxic substance on South Florida populations to control Zika without any scientific evidence such a measure is safe or effective.

Accompanying this, in July the Obama administration sought $1.9 billion from Congress to “fight” the Zika virus. When it failed to secure such lavish funding Obama’s HHS funneled $81 million for Zika “research.” To be sure, Zika’s vague and difficult-to-diagnose symptoms make it an especially apt vehicle for creating widespread hysteria that could without much difficulty provide the basis for at least limited implementation of the CDC’s quarantine and vaccination project. 

The CDC’s summary of its program reads as follows:

Through this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is amending its domestic (interstate) and foreign quarantine regulations to best protect the public health of the United States. These amendments are being proposed to aid public health responses to outbreaks of communicable diseases such as the largest recorded outbreak of Ebola virus disease (Ebola) in history, the recent outbreak of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) in South Korea, and repeated outbreaks and responses to measles in the United States, as well as the ongoing threat of other new or re-emerging communicable diseases. The provisions contained herein provide additional clarity to various safeguards to prevent the importation and spread of communicable diseases affecting human health into the United States and interstate.

The document’s introductory passages point to the Public Health Service Act and Executive Orders by Presidents Bush and Obama, alongside recent encounters with Ebola and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), as the basis of its action.

HHS/CDC has statutory authority (42 U.S.C. 264, 265) to promulgate regulations which protect U.S. public health from communicable diseases, including quarantinable communicable diseases as specified in Executive Order of the President. See Executive Order 13295 (April 4, 2003), as amended by Executive Order 13375 (April 1, 2005) and Executive Order 13674 (July 31, 2014). The need for this proposed rulemaking was reinforced during HHS/CDC’s response to the largest outbreak of Ebola virus disease (Ebola) on record, followed by the recent outbreak of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) in South Korea, both quarantinable communicable diseases, and repeated outbreaks and responses to measles, a non-quarantinable communicable disease of public health concern, in the United States.

While measles is regarded as a “non-quarantinable communicable disease”, it is referenced a total 186 times through the NPRM, and repeatedly alongside Ebola and MERS, which are invoked 330 times and 60 times respectively.

In fact, the document emphasizes that “every case of measles in the United States is considered a public health emergency because of its extremely high transmissibility,” pointing to vaccination as an essential prophylactic.

measles cali
An outbreak of measles beginning in California in 2015 resulted in severe government and media consternation over what was once regarded as an uncomfortable yet normal chapter of childhood.

The passage continues to highlight federal authorities’ “labor intensive” efforts to screen over 4,500 parties for a disease that has resulted in only one US fatality since 2003–a woman in her late twenties whose cause of death was directly attributed to a weakened immune system.

As a result of high vaccination coverage, measles was declared eliminated (defined as interruption of year-round endemic transmission) from the United States in 2000; however, importations from other countries where measles remains endemic continue to occur, which can lead to clusters of measles cases in the United States in pockets of unvaccinated persons. Of note, an unprecedented outbreak that originated in late December 2014 in Orange County, California resulted in 125 cases; measles cases associated with this outbreak were reported in eight U.S. states, Mexico, and Canada. Between 2010 and 2014, HHS/CDC investigated 91 measles exposures on international or interstate flights, which required time-consuming and labor-intensive location and evaluation of more than 4700 individuals, resulting in the identification of 12 cases of onward transmission. 

Global public health authorities have clearly indicated, and evidence has shown, that Ebola, MERS, and measles could spread between countries, and a re-emergence after the current outbreaks are controlled is always a risk. Additionally, although public health responses to measles have become routine over the past decade, the recent unprecedented outbreak in a large U.S. tourist destination with high potential for onward travel by exposed individuals identified greater danger for measles becoming reestablished in the United States in communities with lower rates of immunization. 

The Zika Trigger

Since the CDC repeatedly employs the non-fatal and indeed once commonplace measles virus throughout the document in such a way there is nothing preventing the agency and its partners from plugging in one or more other maladies that are largely the product of government and corporate media hype and disinformation. A case in point is the Zika virus, a phenomenon that has received a deluge of media coverage for a comparatively scant number of cases identified in South Florida.

CDC Director Tom Frieden. Image Credit: CDC

The CDC has clumsily mandated spraying the insecticide Naled to control mosquitoes that can carry Zika, citing dubious research to back its directive. CDC Director Tom Frieden has thus far only cited one source upholding the efficacy of airborne insecticide dispersal to eliminate adult mosquitoes: “Unpublished research by a rookie mosquito control specialist,” the Miami Herald reports.

In a recent article for the influential medical journal JAMA, Frieden wrote that in New Orleans, planes spraying ultra-low volumes of insecticide reduced caged Aedes aegypti mosquitoes in open and sheltered areas by more than 90 percent.

His source for that data: a non-peer-reviewed presentation by a specialist named Brendan Carter at the New Orleans mosquito control board. Some of the presentation’s research was conducted while Carter was still an intern there in 2014, according to his LinkedIn page.

The board hired him that September after his internship. Carter earned his master’s degree in 2014 from the Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, his LinkedIn page shows.

Even so, other experts in mosquito-borne diseases were unconvinced when asked about Carter’s finding as described in Frieden’s commentary for JAMA.

“I know of no published reports that support this figure,” said Durland Fish, a Yale University professor emeritus of microbial diseases as well as a professor of forestry and environmental studies there. Fish worked with public officials in Dominica in 2014 to counter chikungunya virus, another disease spread by the Aedes aegypti mosquito.

“This is a domestic mosquito, meaning they live inside the house — in closets, under the bed, in the sink. Spraying outside won’t be very effective,” he said.

A CDC spokeswoman said the agency carefully reviewed the New Orleans data and was “confident it was a good indicator of efficacy.” Frieden cited it in JAMA because “there is limited published peer-reviewed data on efficacy of ultra-low volume aerial spraying of naled against Aedes aegypti,” according to the agency. [Emphasis added.]

This is what passes for science at the CDC–the mass aerial spraying of a toxic substance on specific populations with almost no evidence of its effectiveness to eradicate a non-fatal virus–one that has been known to exist for decades and whose patent is actually owned by the Rockefeller Foundation.

Rockefeller Screenshot-580

The takeaway from the above is that in the upside-down reality created by the government-corporate media nexus Zika’s symptoms can resemble the effects of the CDC’s method to counteract the virus’ spread.

According to the CDC, Zika virus symptoms are “usually mild with symptoms lasting for several days to a week.” In fact, “[m]any people infected with Zika virus won’t have symptoms, or will only have mild symptoms.” The most typical symptoms include

Joint pain
Conjunctivitis (red eyes)
Muscle pain

The health impacts of naled are far worse and include reproductive harm that could be confused with microcephaly and other fetal abnormalities since the compound can cross the placenta and wreak havoc on the unborn.

In fact, as Jon Rappoport has exhaustively documented, in Brazil the increased incidence of microcephaly (babies born with small heads and brain damage) is likely being caused by the larvicide Pyriproxyfen, placed in drinking water supplies to control mosquitos. Thus the “Zika threat,” Rappoport posits, is a cover story designed to protect the pesticide manufacturers and associated actors, including the Brazilian Ministry of Health. 


Below is an overview of naled’s effects on animal and human physiology from the  Extension Toxicology Network, a collaboration between Cornell University, Michigan State University, Oregon State University and the University of California Davis. 



Naled is moderately to highly toxic by ingestion, inhalation and dermal adsorption. Vapors or fumes of naled are corrosive to the mucous membranes lining the mouth, throat and lungs, and inhalation may cause severe irritation. A sensation of tightness in the chest and coughing are commonly experienced after inhalation. As with all organophosphates, naled is readily absorbed through the skin. Skin which has come in contact with this material should be washed immediately with soap and water and all contaminated clothing should be removed. Persons with respiratory ailments, recent exposure to cholinesterase inhibitors, impaired cholinesterase production, or with liver malfunction may be at increased risk from exposure to naled. High environmental temperatures or exposure of naled to visible or UV light may enhance its toxicity.

The organophosphate insecticides are cholinesterase inhibitors. They are highly toxic by all routes of exposure. When inhaled, the first effects are usually respiratory and may include bloody or runny nose, coughing, chest discomfort, difficult or short breath, and wheezing due to constriction or excess fluid in the bronchial tubes. Skin contact with organophosphates may cause localized sweating and involuntary muscle contractions. Eye contact will cause pain, bleeding, tears, pupil constriction, and blurred vision. Following exposure by any route, other systemic effects may begin within a few minutes or be delayed for up to 12 hours. These may include pallor, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal cramps, headache, dizziness, eye pain, blurred vision, constriction or dilation of the eye pupils, tears, salivation, sweating, and confusion. Severe poisoning will affect the central nervous system, producing incoordination, slurred speech, loss of reflexes, weakness, fatigue, involuntary muscle contractions, twitching, tremors of the tongue or eyelids, and eventually paralysis of the body extremities and the respiratory muscles. In severe cases there may also be involuntary defecation or urination, psychosis, irregular heart beats, unconsciousness, convulsions and coma. Death may be caused by respiratory failure or cardiac arrest.

Some organophosphates may cause delayed symptoms beginning 1 to 4 weeks after an acute exposure which may or may not have produced more immediate symptoms. In such cases, numbness, tingling, weakness and cramping may appear in the lower limbs and progress to incoordination and paralysis. Improvement may occur over months or years, but some residual impairment may remain in some cases.

Naled may cause dermatitis (skin rashes) and skin sensitization (allergies). It is corrosive to the skin and eyes and may cause permanent damage. An aerial applicator developed contact dermatitis after using Dibrom. The exposed area became red and felt burned. Later, water filled blisters formed. They became itchy and dry, then flaked off.

The amount of a chemical that is lethal to one-half (50%) of experimental animals fed the material is referred to as its acute oral lethal dose fifty, or LD50. The oral LD50 for naled in rats is 50 to 281 mg/kg, in mice is 330 to 375 mg/kg, and in chickens is 281 mg/kg. Rats have tolerated a dosage of 28 mg/kg/day for 9 weeks with no visible signs of poisoning and with only moderate inhibition of cholinesterase. The dermal LD50 for naled in rabbits is 1,100 mg/kg, and in rats is 800 mg/kg.

The lethal concentration fifty, or LC50, is that concentration of a chemical in air or water that kills half of the experimental animals exposed to it for a set time period. The inhalation LC50 for naled in rats is 7.7 mg/kg, and 156 mg/kg in mice.


Repeated or prolonged exposure to organophosphates may result in the same effects as acute exposure including the delayed symptoms. Other effects reported in workers repeatedly exposed include impaired memory and concentration, disorientation, severe depressions, irritability, confusion, headache, speech difficulties, delayed reaction times, nightmares, sleepwalking and drowsiness or insomnia. An influenza-like condition with headache, nausea, weakness, loss of appetite, and malaise has also been reported.

Reproductive Effects

Once in the bloodstream, naled may cross the placenta. [Emphases added.]

At present development of a Zika vaccine has moved to human trials. As noted, on August 10 the Obama administration’s HHS sought to bring such a vaccine to fruition by funneling $81 million toward vaccine research, Reuters reports. Less than one week later the CDC set in motion its Control of Communicable Diseases policy by inviting public comment. Keeping in mind the pharmaceutical industry’s formidable ability to manipulate laws and regulation to its benefit, there is a strong possibility that these policies, cover stories, and commodities are being developed and rolled out in tandem.

At this point the concerned citizen has more than enough to question what’s really afoot here. A population so propagandized and ill-informed on the negligible threat posed by Zika could easily mistake Naled’s effects for the mild symptoms characterizing the virus–much as Pyriproxyfen proved cause for a similar frenzy among public health officials in Brazil. This would provide the basis for an ambitious and wide scale federal effort to quarantine one or more areas and introduce related emergency measures now being dictated by the CDC. 


Leave a Reply

30 thought on “CDC Unveils Forced Vaccination and Quarantine Policy”
  1. Reblogged this on The PPJ Gazette and commented:

    There is something in these vaccines that is going to adversely affect the global population. There is something they are trying to do via the vaccines. You cannot look at the current state of medical/science/pharmacology and seriously conclude that our health is the focus. We have never been in more danger from corporate non-scientific, experimental programs than we are at this time. I have concluded…….they really DO what us dead.

      1. I agree Ric….I also think all of these DNA collecting to find out “who you are” is part of it as well. They need to know what is in the general populations DNA to perfect there mission.

        1. The genetic testing kit offered very cheaply by ancestry.com is one way of mining the data. They seem to want to build up a base of people’s genetic code. They only charge $129. I doubt that covers the actual cost. Ancestry.com is a Mormon church initiative. I wouldn’t want my blood type, rH factor, other information out there. What is to stop these fiends from making someone with a rare blood type go missing, while they harvest the organs for their “elite” buddies? What if they use it for something like Obama Care to refuse treatment due to your genetics? I don’t even like the loyalty cards at the grocery store. They track what you buy. “Oh,” says your doctor. “You need medication for your liver, but we can’t write you a prescription because you like to buy beer at Basha’s.”

          This has already led to abuses in the system. Now the cops are combing different geneology sites looking for DNA matches.


          “Although the DNA sample was listed as “protected” in the original Sorenson Molecular Genealogy Foundation database, Ancestry.com handed over the sample to police last year in response to a court order, the New Orleans Advocate reports.

          “Using a technique known as “familial searching,” Idaho Falls, Idaho police were able to hone in on the Usry family DNA as part of their investigation into the 1996 slaying of an 18-year-old woman.

          “Although (Michael) Usry was eventually cleared of the crime, privacy advocates are horrified.”

          It has been noted that there have been false positive matches, like the poor guy in the article who was eventually cleared.

          Notice how they try to cast their kits in the best possible light of “discovering your true roots”. Their website boasts: “Find relatives you never knew you had.

          “Once you’ve taken your test, we’ll search our network of AncestryDNA members and identify your cousins—the people who share your DNA. And if you’re lucky, you might even make a New Ancestor Discovery™.*” and “With more than 2 million people now in our database and the unique ability to connect with Ancestry’s billions of historical records and millions of family trees, AncestryDNA can help deliver the richest family stories—and solve the toughest family mysteries.”

          To me, this is the genetic equivalent of Facebook in getting people to turn over their own information.

        2. 23andme is the test most naturopaths recommend for treating health conditions. It also reveals ancestry.

          This is to add to a post that hopefully will materialize about how these tests are used by the newer breakthroughs in medicine.

        3. In fairness, there are two sides to the issue. Nutrigenomics is the burgeoning field of medicine that looks at the very genes and something called snp’s (pronounced snips, short for single nucleotide somethings…) which are very small mutations to heal people. It takes into account, scientifically in accordance with our genes that these tests identify, environment and other factors (most nutrition) to assess causes of disease and heal. This is science, not quackery or huckstering. Some of the leaders are Dr. Ben Lynch, Dr. Amy Yasko, and many more. Google ‘functional medicine’ or ‘integrative medicine/doctors.’ Those would be MD’s (Yasko is PhD and MD, Lynch is an exceptional naturopath and brilliant biochemist – most naturopaths are not rigorous scientists).

          Even when you can isolate a significant snp (like those for methylation, called MTHFR), the fuller picture of your genetic makeup is necessary to really understand their effects as our body’s systems are interconnected.

          So there is reason beyond just Big Brothering going on. The conundrum is that it will also be used (and is already) by the government towards nefarious ends. On the one hand supporting the anti-Pharma nascent revolution in medicine would help disempower it and the government generally, but doing so puts the citizenry at risk.

          I don’t know what the solution is. Maybe not using your real name if it’s possible? And/or making this true healing medicine more powerful by going to functional medicine doctors (many of whom don’t take insurance as of now)?

      1. Not quite sure how disempowering certain aspects of the anti-Pharma revolution routinely puts citizenry at risk. What about the chemical iatrogenesis that is rampant today? What about the plethora of side effects from taking medicines that necessitate usage of more medicines and more side effects, etc? Large numbers of people die via the iatrogenesis route and few, if any, die from taking natural products. Big Pharma is a vicious racket today and the mechanism whereby doctors are massaged by salespeople to use their products aided by perks and/or monies delivered in plain, brown wrappers is part of the huge problem extant today. Big Pharma is not just big, it’s bloated, overpowerful, and prone to bribery of its subjects. You go to a doctor and you get pills. Doctor uses an algorithm to identify your problem, and next thing you know, you’re on the way to your nearest pharmacy for pills, ointments, lotions, capsules, etc. Better living through chemistry?

    1. The time will come when all monies distributed to academic researchers will demand certain results that are demanded by the sourcing agency. This is already happening, although it has been kept under the carpet. Researchers are under unique types of stress to get money for research and they learn, or fail to learn, that their cooperation can lead to, shall we say?, nicer, fatter grants now and in the future. Go along to get along….Kapos are selected along the way and research projects are funnelled through them for their blessings, and if the submitted proposals meet “standards”, well, guess who gets some money to do work that might never come to fruition without these influences? The gulag of seeking research money is paralleled by subtle coercions that act as control agents. More and more, this is the way things are done.

    2. Well said-
      the news rhetoric is all about how vaccines must be given and how well they work,the reality is it is NEVER acceptable to force people to take medication unless they choose to do so,
      and we must NEVER allow the government to tell us WHAT medication and made by WHOM and administered by ANY DR. except the one we trust and choose

  2. Gov Brown and the Ca legislature has now made all of us Californians criminals, it is detestable that elected leaders have the criminal audacity to suggest they dictate what drugs, by which Dr. and by which Pharma we may choose to use for vaccinations/drugs,
    no sane person will accept this, and we should start impeachment proceedings for all these politicians who think we are the slaves of the State, and we must submit to this BS-enough!

  3. We don’t know if there is a nano-tech technology in these vaccines that are turned on and off by smart meters, RF meters, Wi-FI, smart phone…etc…

    Programming humans wow wouldn’t they love to have that kind of control!

  4. Cure of Viral Diseases with High Dose Vitamin C by Frederick R. Klenner, M.D. (1907-1984); criminally obstructed by the medical orthodoxy of the United States.

    Albert Szent-Gyorgyi from Budapest, Hungary was awarded the 1937 Nobel Prize in Medicine for discovery of Vitamin C documented at the link above.
    Frederick R. Klenner, M.D. (1907-1984) was a top biology student from Pennsylvania. He earned his M.D. degree from Duke University in 1936 the year before Albert Szent-Gyorgyi was awarded the Nobel Prize for discovering this substance. He became fascinated with it and its possibilities for simple, safe and cheap cure and prevention of human and even animal diseases. Klenner cured every childhood viral disease up to and including polio before 1949 long before the polio vaccine was approved. There is no reason to believe it would not also cure the current ones other than the institutional prejudice against even scientifically testing them and you could not believe any “tests” they made because they lie and cheat.
    Here are links to two great articles about this and much more:


    As the above articles show, Vitamin C is much much more than just a vitamin. It is a miracle substance but the totally corrupt members of our FDA, NIH and NCI have obstructed these scientific results. All of them are guilty of scientific misconduct, fraud, medical quackery and crimes against humanity and belong in a jail cell for life. Even snake bites can be easily, simply and inexpensively dealt with by high dose vitamin c by injection. The only trivial dose of vitamin c approved by the corrupt authorities is 60 milligrams per day to prevent scurvy! The first article “The Origin of the 42 year Stonewall of Vitamin C” was first published in 1991. Today, 2016 is about 25 years later. So the stonewall is now 67 years and counting. Below is a Case History Dr. Klenner published in the article at the second link above published in 1971 on curing snake bite with high dose Vitamin C. Warning: No one should attempt to inject vitamin C themselves without professional supervision.

    Quote from above article:

    “Case History: Snake bite Child of 4 years was struck on the lower leg by a large highland moccasin at 7:00 P.M., while at play in the yard of her country home. Seen in the emergency room of the local hospital at 7:30 P.M., the child was vomiting, was crying because of severe pain in her leg, which she held with both hands above the “fang marks”. Fever was 99.0°F. Four grams of ascorbate was given intravenously at 7:35 P.M. with a 20 c.c. syringe. The following 25 minutes were taken to follow a skin test on anti-venom. At this time and before the anti-venom was administered the child had stopped vomiting, she had stopped crying and was sitting on the emergency room table, laughing and drinking a glass of orange juice. She commented: “Come on, Daddy, I’m all right now, let’s go home.” She was allowed to return home with the understanding that her father would give me a report, by phone, each hour during the night. This he did. His report, each time, was that the child was sleeping as usual and that except for moderate swelling to the “calf of the leg”, appeared normal. Seen in the office at 10:00 A.M. the following morning she still demonstrated the small amount of swelling of her leg and had 1/2 degree fever. She was given a second dose of 4 grams of ascorbate intravenously. Seen at 5 P.M. she had no fever but the swelling remained constant. There was no pain. The following day, 38 hours after being bitten, she was completely normal. Since this was our first case of snake bite treated with vitamin C, we elected to give an additional 4 grams of ascorbate on this visit. No other antibiotics were given and none was required. Since she had had a booster injection of tetanus toxoid in recent months, none was given at this time. Compare this to an earlier case of snake bite in a 16 year old girl, struck by a moccasin of about the same size, as gauged from the fang marks, on the hand while pulling tobacco plants, and who was hospitalized for three weeks. She was given 3 doses of anti-venom. The arm was compressed continuously with magnesium sulfate solution. Swelling was four times that of the opposite arm and striae developed over the entire surface. This patient received no vitamin C other than that found in a regular hospital diet. Morphine was required to control pain. (We no longer use anti-venom.)”
    Posted by Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., Physics

    1. I had heard that the experiments carried out by Linus Pauling on vitamin C had never been truly replicated (he used the injection method, those claiming that they were replicating the therapy gave patients vitamin C orally). But I had never heard of the other instances you mention. Many thanks for this information.

      1. A very important contributor to knowledge of Vit C for treatment of heart disease is one Dr Matthias Rath. Rath worked with Pauling on the Vit C effects on heart disease prevention and treatment.
        I will try to submit his name to Dr Tracy and see if Dr Rath can be interviewed regarding his work on Vit C as well as his being threatened by the medical establishment for using improperly substantiated methodologies to treat heart disease. His story is typical of many cases whereby the paranoid medical establishment, altruists extraordinaire, do virtually anything they can to obstruct usage of naturopathic methods to prevent and treat disease entities. It’s a tragic reminder that the NWO wants to kill us off and bring on androids operating drones in place of humans. Mankind will then encompass electrically operated bio-robots instead of humans to serve the elites, a nouveau concept that is revolting and disturbing to the max. Reminds me of Hal, the computer in 2001: A Space Odyssey, that took over the space vehicle and essentially subjugated the ship’s captain played by Keir Dullea.

      2. I did some study on a famous researcher who cured almost 100% of polio victims with high doses of vit c injections, his work was documented, his pts were his best proof, but he was run out of business and ganstalked by the AMA, sorry don’t recall his name, I will look around for it

  5. I remember when the one (Mr. Duncan) died in Dallas during the Ebola scare. My research on that convinced me that there was a good possibility it was a U.S. bioweapon. I’ve heard the same assertion concerning HIV (and I wouldn’t doubt the veracity of that claim).

    Is Zika also a U.S. bioweapon? It’s interesting to consider the way the media framed (literally) Brazil for these Olympics. It seems that the whole “sliming” (maybe HONR was in on it) was planned well in advance. Had “His Excellency” (seriously, Wikipedia…) Mr. Temer not come to power in Brazil, it seems the stage (again literally) was set for Rousseff to be ousted by other means. Green swimming pools, green hair (oops…that was Lochte’s fault), mass robberies of U.S. athletes (oops…Lochte again). It seems the “sliming” was counterslimed. [Russia perhaps?]

    Which brings us back to Zika. Why Florida? Maybe this bioweapon was really allowed to be tested in a “real world exercise” [sic] because Rousseff was already gone. Therefore, the venue was changed to FL.

    By the way…WordPress must be paying particular attention to the comments on MHB (just a guess) as my tech problem was magically fixed tonight by way of some strangely efficient customer service. I guess kvetching has its benefits. But seriously…just wanted to relate my good (genuinely) experience with WP (Automattic) even if it was a bit Orwellian (which brings us back to MHB).

    Wishing all you Florida people good health. I hope Fort Detrick isn’t behind this.


    1. The report of the mass bee die-off after spraying for Zikka is heart rendering, when so many acts of violence happens the destruction to all the other life forms is seemingly brushed aside, I think of all the fish, fowl, birds, ecosystems that have been destroyed with nuclear testing, aerial spraying, etc.
      The effects on the bee population die-off have some frightening worst case scenarios, bees pollinate 80% of plants, and 30% of the food we eat

Leave a Reply