Robert David Steele
Phi Beta Iota


FBI Director James Comey is now leading a massive cover-up of all facts related to the Orlando false flag event. He has ordered all state and local agencies to withhold from the public all records relating to this event.

FBI asks agencies who responded to Pulse to deny records requests

This is utterly outrageous. If the Florida Governor had any integrity at all he would immediately nullify this order, countermand this order, and begin an independent investigation starting with the National Guard securing the crime scene and a fresh team video-taping the entire crime scene as it stands today, releasing that to the public immediately. All past photographs and videos of the alleged crime scene should be released to the public immediately.

The integrity of FBI Director James Comey is now totally suspect — from his obligations to the Rothschilds via his well-paid indentured service as a director of the world’s oldest most corrupt bank — the Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation (Holdings) — to his refusal to indict Hillary Clinton, something Wall Street clearly does not want, James Comey has become both the most powerful — and the most compromised — person in the US Government.

See Especially:

HOME PAGE: The Orlando Mass Casualty Event: A False Flag Drama, Atrocity, or Hybrid?

Robert Steele: Open Letter to Mr. James Comey, FBI Director, on Indicting Hillary Clinton and Telling the Truth About Orlando

Leave a Reply

72 thought on “Yoda: FBI Orders All Orlando Records Withheld from Public –Is This An Impeachable Offense for James Comey?”
    1. Puh-leeze, is it not obvious where Comey stands on this whole flap? He’s been a huge champion of surveillance and you don’t get to be head of FBI if you are a choir boy.
      Remember when the initial buildup of Comey commenced? He was called the most impeccable and truthful soul the world has ever seen. He was soooooooo honest, it was a revelation. Imagine, an honest person in DC. Ya gotta be kidding…..
      Comey will do as he is told as he wants to continue with his job. The deck is stacked, folks, we have to keep digging to put things straight. Absolutely boggling what the in crowd will do to get their candidate in the White House. No holds barred.

  1. The build a burger group was garnering too much attention to their secret meeting in Dresden and hillary was having too much scrutiny into her secret server so they staged this as a diversion and to garner support and sympathy towards LBGTQ after all it was LBGTQ awareness month and to strike fear into the public. Fear the ” lone wolf ” terrorist give up more of your rights if we had any in the first place.

    1. There was a Restaurant here years ago where you paid them for a plain burger and you put your Burger together yourself with anything you wanted..

      “The build a burger group ”

      This must be where this group started then took over the world…..

  2. The really disturbing part is that the FBI is not only withholding public records, but they also demand that the name of anyone seeking to obtain these records be turned in to their agency. This is a veiled threat of investigation and cleary an attempt to intimidate.

    1. FBI Federal Bureau of Intimidation

      I try to bring to my mind one, just one, instance in the last 50 years in which the FBI performed honorably, pursued truth and justice doggedly, and brought about the strengthening of our country’s internal intelligence services and therefore the fortification of the rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights. No luck yet.

      Whenever we are tempted to believe in the FBI to be strong and tough and do right, we need to realize that the FBI probably just throws us a bone now and then just to divert our attention and mollify us in order to keep the lid on one or more huge horrible cesspool matters, such is the situation today.

        1. If that is true DL how come none of them are raising hell about the State Department sealing Clinton’s crime record?

  3. A classic sign of a government sponsored false-flag event is the destruction, losing, or blocking access to evidence by Law Enforcement or Govt Agencies. Especially in the big ones. JFK, RFK, 9/11, etc.

    In my opinion this certifies the authenticity of it being a ‘Government Sponsored False-Flag’.

  4. I knew it was staged from the beginning just like San Bernardino and all the others. David Bowdich, FBILA ADIC, was promoted to FBIHQ in DC after pulling off San Bernardino. It was a job well done as the masses believed it. The DOJ appears to be falling apart as DHS/FBI/Infragard gangstalking continues without oversite. The environment is becoming chaotic in the justice department in the wake of fake terror.

        1. I guess the new FF is Hillary walking Free Today…Unbelievable Tyranny “Let them Eat Cake” moment in your Face!

    1. I concur. But when the ‘Feds’ show up, Local and State law enforcement roll over and beg to have their belly’s rubbed. I’m sure there is a monetary explanation for this. Occasionally County Sheriffs stand their ground.

      1. “when the ‘Feds’ show up, Local and State law enforcement roll over and beg to have their belly’s rubbed.”

        That’s a Fact like lap Dogs.

        Peace is right: It’s all about Money Dummy.


  5. The ultimate goal is a one world death and slavery for all.

    Money is just one of control tools.

    Basically it is a bribery, extortion, blackmail grid.

    Each person tries to hold on to their own little niche in the cesspool using what ever power/manipulation tools they have.

    But beyond money and the threat of busting to desperate poverty individuals, cities / counties /states and countries and federations of counries such as the EU, there is the threat of weapons of mass destruction.

    Those at the top are megalomaniacal nihilistic types who will ultimately drop nuclear bombs to bring recalcitrant countries and peoples in line thereby destroying the planet and themselves as well. They have already laid to wasteland Iraq and several other countries.

    I do not agree with Paul Craig Roberts that it is “Washington” or
    America or the United States that wants world hegemony at all costs. He gets much closer to the “who” when he explains how the Trotskyites and the Neocons spread their satanic evil throughout the world and how they are the owners of banks and the governments and the laws and the weapons of mass destruction companies.

    I do not believe preserving your wealth in silver and gold is the answer because we are very close to cops busting down our doors and just confiscating your silver of gold. Plato or plomo! The Columbian drug cartels don’t have a monopoly on that tactic.

    The USA is already well on its way to a totalitarian fascistic police state.

    There is a pecking order within the federal bureaucracy and it also operates withing the same grid to keep all in line. The FBI is not very high up on the food chain. I have a feeling there have been some little earthquakes trying to keep the grid in place of late. The people are just waking up big time.

    All we can do is to stand up for truth and justice in our own little settings and when we look back on our lives, we can have comfort in knowing that we did not just act like lemmings and alcohol-sotted TV, mainstream media, and bread and circus imbibers.

    And be not conformed to this world; but be reformed in the newness of your mind, that you may prove what is the good, and the acceptable, and the perfect will of God.
    Romans 12:2

    1. It’s ironic,nonetheless. A month ago, I wrote my senators in DC and asked some pointed questions, all done with sincerity and civility.They had to do with two notable false flags, 911 and Sandy Hook. Having written them before by a week or two, I expected some sort of answer from both of our stalwarts. Their websites mention how welcoming they are of letters to them, etc etc, and yet, they did not write me the second time.
      These people know the answers to all my questions. Every last one of them. But, despite taking their oaths to protect and defend the rights of their constituents, nothing came of the letters to them.
      It seems to me that one of our great detriments is our inability to penetrate the hard shell of these types. Has anybody ever gone to one of their homecoming meetings they hold from time to time? What happens there?

      Lies happen there. “I brought the bacon home to my state, the fat defense contracts, etc”. They think that defense dollars are the ultimate bribes and they are right. Hit people in their weak spot, their pocket books, and you own ’em. These people know that. They are sooooooo ingratiating, so warm and wonderful as they trade defense dollars for our votes and our silence.

      We have not identified the weak spots that would enable us to penetrate their armor. Sure, we don’t own the press and they fight us every inch of the way, we can’t get published and we can’t get the necessary publicity.

      I feel our inability to showcase our feelings and our truths is our biggest deficiency. We in the Nutmeg state have been drowned out by the Sandy Hook movement. They either ignore us or outshout us. Why can’t we score?

      1. The Zionists have the West Coast bottled up,
        what’s the point of going through your Senators when they are part of the Tribe,
        and Jerry, who went to Israel and brokered a deal with Netanyahu face to face,
        I just can’t get the picture of JB when he did the Berkeley radio show years ago, stumping for the poor and oppressed,and then going to the Apartheid State to meet the man-who woulda’ thunk’

      2. Gil, writing to our senators, U.S. or state, is not only a waste of time, they are the kind of entities that you want to protect yourself and your privacy from.

        My state’s Republican “patriot” candidates for state offices continually threw the patriots under the bus about 9-11. As a Christian carrying about the issue of murder of the unborn, the Republicans have amazingly continually fumbled the ball on that issue even when the Rs were the dominant party.

        I received a snail mail mailing from “my” state senator, a female M.D. She was practically begging for me to contact her regarding any issue or concern I had. I was tempted to write to her about a completely “secular” issue that should be and really was an issue of great concern to all citizens of this state.

        I was an activist years ago in trying to stop the Trans Texas Corridor from putting toll roads, owned by CINTRA, a Spanish conglomerate, all over our state.

        The legislature sold out the citizens and let that company put in SH 130, a part of the corridor being gradually pieced together. Nobody drives on this highway because the tolls are so very high. The ticketing of drivers on the road and sticking them for huge tolls and fines is done by some totally incompetent company that is working on the state side of the agreement. The drivers of the big rigs that it was hoped would use SH 130 and get the traffic off the old and nun down IH 35/ I do not know the tool for sure, but I think for a truck to ride from San Antonio to and through Austin is over a hundred dollars. The truck drivers do not use the toll road and hardly anybody else either. It is a huge failure.

        The CINTRA subsidiary concessionaire company to collect the tolls at the highway is now bankrupt and CINTRA was given a 430 million dollar loanby our crooked legislators to build the road. The payments become due in 2017. It looks like that loan will not be repaid. I was going to write my senator and ask what the state was going to do to collect on that defaulted loan and get our money back from multi-billion dollar conglomerate. I know I will not get complete and honest answers on that perfectly legitimate governmental issue to ask about.

        The truth is that our state legislators made an under-the-table deal with the CINTRA the toll road private company and it looks very much like some of the arrangers of this public – private partnership loan just got to pocket a large portion of that 430 million.

        That is just one tiny issue that I know I cannot get the truth about from my “representative.”

        They are all crookeder than a dog’s hind leg!

    2. I don’t disagree with you much, but get over it, while there are plenty of very powerful bombs, look up MOAB, there’s no such thing as a “nuclear bomb”. It is a hoax, and a hoax designed to instigate irrational fear in the masses. Irrational fear in the masses leads to irrational decisions. Get it? It is a thought device designed to give “godlike” powers to people who are actually as weak as kittens.

      1. The subject of nuclear weapons and are they a hoax? is very interesting,
        none of us have ever witnessed one, even the ones who claim they did witness it closed their eyes/shielded from initial explosion,
        so what we see we get through pictures, videos, and the more you examine them the more it raises questions, but any information about the subject is as tight as a drum

  6. I just happen to be up at 3:00 am that night, when the “Breaking News Report” of the shooting was Aired. The initial report from CNN was that 4 were killed and 15 injured. By noon of the that day, the numbers had risen to 50 injured/ 52 killed. How did the arriving Police Officers make such an inaccurate report?!? (They didn’t )!! Why were only four names initially released by the Authorities. This incident was supposed to create a shock wave. To create more gun control laws.
    Why haven’t we seen any funerals. Why haven’t we heard from grieving Family or Friends since this event occurred. To many questions! Not enough “Story Line” for me to blindly believe this drama as presented. So.. a “Cover Up” wouldn’t be hard to believe at this time. This “SO CALLED” event had the entire Country waving flags and an calling themselves “We Are Orlando”, when Orlando as “they” presented it, didn’t happen!

    1. They give us rainbow flags, “we are Orlando” pledges and gay discos to replace Old Glory and all we thought it stood for.

      I usually display Old Glory upside down in my yard on Independence Day. Won’t this year as I don’t feel like being picked up as a nonviolent extremist.

      1. That’s a great idea,
        I think I will do that July 4th on the rd to Yosemite,
        this is a powerful protest w/o being in your face,
        people will wonder at first what the meaning is
        DL scores again

      2. Well DL,
        I protested today,
        it was a great feeling,
        didn’t get arrested,
        some honked, one flipped me the bird,
        one asked what it meant,
        but it seemed like most people were just interested in a picnic and fireworks

        1. Glad you did it and glad you are OK.

          Displaying inverted flag is a longstanding signal of distress.

          “The upside down U.S. flag is an official signal of distress. It is not meant to be, and is not officially recognized as any type of disrespect when so displayed for the right reasons. To the contrary, here is the relevant part of the US Code of Laws regarding how to fly the flag when in distress:

          THE FLAG CODE
          Title 36, U.S.C., Chapter 10
          As amended by P.L. 344, 94th Congress
          Approved July 7, 1976
          § 176. Respect for flag: No disrespect should be shown to the flag of the United States of America; the flag should not be dipped to any person or thing. Regimental colors, State flags, and organization or institutional flags are to be dipped as a mark of honor.
              (a) The flag should never be displayed with the union down, except as a signal of dire distress in instances of extreme danger to life or property. 

          Most individuals who have served in the military service of our nation will (or should) recognize this signal. ”


          I bought a T shirt with the symbol and the law wording on it from Infowars years ago.

    2. We were up that night too

      Twitter was bitching at domestic media as all
      info was coming from media outside the USA

      Several hours domestic media was censored

  7. Comey is a full supporter of the LBGTQi agenda (21) There is no question where he stands on The Orange Project. As far as Clinton, who knows but he is right out of the agenda to reduce population and that means destroy the nuclear family. His NWO pedigree is stunningly like all Obama nominees from Columbia to New York and DC stints, Deputy AG and even down to Martha Stewart, who after being jailed came around to promoting same sex marriage. Comey prosecuted her. In the world of these covert agendas, Orange really is the New Black. It’s now a matter of what was covert is nor “IN YOUR FACE”

    Orlando wasn’t gun control or ISIS or anything else but driving the agenda that if you are religiouly an objector to homosexuality, you are a terrorist and criminal. UK is already prosecuting first amendment advocates for this political correctness meme that cloaks the deeper more sinister aspects of our future INGSOC social network tyranny.

  8. I expect that Mateen was being closely monitored by FBI and police intelligence units from the time he made the courthouse terrorist threat that led to the FBI’s failed attempt to entrap him in a terrorist conspiracy. This type of monitoring commonly employs community stalking groups or “gang stalking”. It also means that a great number of “threat assessment professionals” in threat assessment teams (a growing and highly dangerous trend involved in many of the rampant office and school shootings) were observing and reporting on his behavior. He was probably considered low risk, in light of, inter alia, his rejection of the FBI’s attempt to entrap him into a phony terrorist conspiracy. This means that the FBI likely knew that he amassed an arsenal, but, did nothing relying on his passive personality profile. His being told by a Puerto Rican lover, after unprotected sex, that that person was HIV positive was likely a provocation test staged by FBI/police. If Judge Napolitano, and others, stating that the police breach provoked the first gunfire are correct, then it seems that Mateen was indeed not inclined toward the use of violence until the bitter end.

  9. Florida has a “gov’t in the sunshine” law, too. Public records are just that – public. Of course, unless the FBI wants to put them under opaque covers because, ah, well, wait, I’m struggling here, because, um, just “because” they “can,” public’s right to know be damned. Makes perfect sense if you’re trying to hide something.

    On another note and somewhat off-topic, anyone here watch Orange is the New Black? Aside from some good takes on privatized prisons this season(4) which I believe needs to be highlighted as much as possible, the showrunner has zeroed in on “conspiracy nuts” with accent on the “nuts.”

    A female character named Lolly is obviously out of her mind, hears voices, is paranoid. But her paranoia often takes the form of “conspiracy theories” which are as loud as the voices in her head. In one episode this season, which centered on her, she fixed herself a “time machine” in a cupboard she had lined with spare aluminum foil because she wanted to go back in time to “stop Jimmy Carter from forming FEMA.”

    She also constantly (with exaggerated crazy sounding voice) talks of the NSA spying on her and us, and they often throw in every other “conspiracy” they can think of for her spout off crazy stuff, Another male character in the episode’s flashback to where Lolly was to be admitted into some sort of mentally ill half-way house talks (again, reeeeal crazy talk) about too much fluoride in our water.

    I’ll just let this lay here and allow you all to digest as to how anyone who thinks differently (or who has actually researched any one of the “conspiracy” topics that have obviously driven Lolly bat-poop crazy) is treated in something as culturally popular as Orange is the New Black – and how, when I go to sites that talk about the show, people accept her rantings as “crazy conspiracy theories.”

    You see, we’re all simply crazy and need to be locked up. I think that’s the come-away, amirite?

    If you’ve not seen the show or the character of Lolly, played by Lori Petty, do a google search for a photo shot.

  10. This comports nicely with a quote form Aldous Huxley in his book Propaganda in a Democractic Society:

    “In their propaganda today’s dictators rely for the most part on repetition, supression and rationalization – the repetition of catchwords which they wish to be accepted as true, the supression of facts which they wish to be ignored, the arousal and rationalization of passions which may be used in the interests of the Party or the State. As the art and science of manipulation come to be better understood, the dictators of the future will doubtless learn to combine these techniques with the non-stop distractions which, in the West, are now threatening to drown in a sea of irrelevance the rational propaganda essential to the maintenance of individual liberty and the survival of democratic institutions.”

    It also fits nicely with Edward Bernays’ observations in his book Propaganda:

    “The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits an opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country….It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind, who harness old social forces and contrive new ways to bind and guide the world.”


    “It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes. Now, what is still more important, the extent to which our thoughts and habits are modified by authorities.”

    Stay awake and aware……

    1. PeaceFrog,
      Phi Beta Iota, the site you link to, belongs to Robert Steele.


      Check out this About page: http://www.phibetaiota.net/about/ It touches on Steele’s broader ideas for change, like Open Source Everything and True Cost Economics, which are summed up in this quote:

      “We intend to help the public to eliminate information asymmetries and data pathologies, and end the rule of secrecy. We support the Collective Intelligence of the public in such as way as to create a direct democracy, collaborative economics, and a prosperous world at peace.”

  11. I don’t know where to post this, but it sort of fits into the concept of the state hiding records – of where they’ll be sending people and of what becomes of dissidents, etc.:http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/06/11/health/gang-stalking-targeted-individuals.html

    It’s a long article highlighting various individuals claiming to be victims of gangstalking (one of which MHB featured), and probably attributing ‘symptoms’ to them that most don’t have. My stance on gangstalking is agnosticism, but at the very least I know it’s probably rarely a ‘mental disease’ i.e. schizophrenia, so the article’s claims sound spurious.

    Many on here thought I was nuts for predicting there’d be a time when internet groups discussing any verboten topic would be considered ‘mentally ill’ despite psychosis pivoting on idiopathy. Sucks to be right sometimes…

    1. Well this is the answer the Zionists are pushing against Patriots and whistle-blowers, can’t stop them so define them as crazy,
      happening before our eyes-with the help of our Jewish controllers at the JYTs

      1. What’s the JYt’s? Do you believe one Race is behind all this and All the other races are stupid and just gullible pawns? If you are an atheist I can’t explain who these people are and how the blood is much deeper than just the “Juice’ and I ain’t talking Oj..

        1. Sun, with all due Respect. I’m not tying to be a pain or start a controversy.

          I just would just like know your opinion on what I asked.

    2. One of the keys to total control of citizens is labeling them as “mentally off kilter”. This leads to a situation where new laws created out of whole cloth suddenly appear and allow institutionalization aka incarceration of these same citizens. Shades of Dr. Mengele?

    3. ETA Here is the passage in the revised Murphy House bill, that would loosen HIPAA restrictions. Besides being written in an obviously obscure fashion, it’s also linked to in the bill, meaning that you have to actually find an amendment to the bill to actually read this very important change:

      (C) If authorized by an appropriate order of a court of competent jurisdiction granted after application showing good cause therefor, including the need to avert a substantial risk of death or serious bodily harm. In assessing good cause the court shall weigh the public interest and the need for disclosure against the injury to the patient, to the physician-patient relationship, and to the treatment services. Upon the granting of such order, the court, in determining the extent to which any disclosure of all or any part of any record is necessary, shall impose appropriate safeguards against unauthorized disclosure.

      The amendment and revised bill don’t specify as to exactly who might qualify to seek such a court order, which means ANYONE. That would mean ‘caregivers’ who might have contrived without due process to railroad and imprison the citizen, and also even more importantly down the road THE POLICE. All this without one iota of due process to safeguard constitutional rights.

      But that’s not the only menace of the bill. It will force the taxpayers to fund endless internments via Medicare, and Medicaid, among other horrors. Whatever happened to no taxation without representation?

      I exhort all readers to check out the preliminary blue print for the official end of freedom: https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/2646/text

      It’s just the beginning…

      1. More from the Sandy Hook Promise parents, reminding us that when it comes to gun restrictions and ‘mental health,’ there are no “ors” just “ands:”


        I personally emphasize their attack from the ‘mental health’ angle because it’s their more effective tack, even though I fully recognize that it’s an “and” battle not an “or.” By playing both sides against ‘the other,’ they’ll eventually achieve their goal – the end of the Bill of Rights and middle class freedom.

  12. Now look here, we’ve been (((hoaxed, deceived, fooled))) from the very beginning: ; Please read this article in full and find out for yourself:

    The American Revolution, Part II: Who Wrote the Declaration of Independence? | James Perloff

    “he following article raises questions about the American Revolution, which many patriots regard as the foundation of their beliefs. It can be dangerous to shake a good man’s foundation – even if the foundation is flawed – because it might cause him to question his worldview, and weaken his resolve. However, no historical event should be held so sacred as to be immune to examination. Our country is in too much trouble to make truth secondary.

    “Everyone knows” Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence, but not “everyone knew” it in early America. Jefferson was on the drafting committee at the Second Continental Congress. However, he made no claim to authorship until 1821, when he was an old man, and even then did so ambiguously.”

    “For a long time, it has been understood outside the box of orthodox historiography that the Declaration’s real author was Thomas Paine. The case was made, for example, in Junius Unmasked: Or, Thomas Paine, the Author of the Letters of Junius, and the Declaration of Independence, by Joel Moody (1872); in this article published by Walton Williams in 1906; and in Thomas Paine: Author of the Declaration of Independence by Joseph Lewis (1947).

    Paine (1737-1809) was a British author of anonymous pamphlets. In England he met Freemasonic Grand Master-at-large Benjamin Franklin (who served not only as Grand Master of Pennsylvania, but Grand Master of the Nine Sisters Lodge in Paris, as well as attending Britain’s satanic Hellfire Club). When Paine traveled to America, Franklin gave him a letter of introduction. He arrived on November 30, 1774, greeted by Franklin’s physician. This was less than five months before the orchestrated Battle of Lexington, flashpoint of the Revolutionary War.”

    Paine wasted little time fulfilling a mission is his new-found land. In 1775 he wrote the lengthy pamphlet Common Sense, which called for America’s independence from Britain. Widely distributed, it became the single most influential document inspiring the revolution. Inscribed at Paine’s gravesite is John Adams’s famous rhyme: “Without the pen of Paine, the sword of Washington would have been wielded in vain.”

    America was founded on lies and inuendo. You figure it out.


  13. Fear of Freedom and the Lies of the State – Zen Gardner

    “The problem arises when some artificial construct is held up as representing a human collectivity or even as being the human collectivity, although it is not formed and steered freely in the natural way. We are basically talking here about the state, an entity of any size (up to and including the potential existence of a global state) which is claimed by its supporters to enshrine the common interest of the human collectivity it embraces.

    It clearly does nothing of the sort – indeed, its real function is to suppress the organic freedom of the collectivity in favour of structures and strategies reflecting and defending its own interests. And what are its own interests? Even if we accept the idea of a theoretical state completely free of corruption by private agendas (which is in fact impossible, as we will see), the interests of the state are not identical with those of the collectivity.

    By virtue of its very existence, it sets itself, and its role, apart from that of the collectivity. Its recognition of itself as a legitimate representation of that collectivity, and its demand that those under its control also recognise that legitimacy, becomes, itself, its primary raison d’être.

    Taking as its starting-point the assumption that it is itself legitimate (as it must, if it is to exist) and a genuine incarnation of the collectivity, it immediately distances itself from the actual interests of the collectivity. In the eyes of the state, it is the collectivity, therefore the real collectivity, outside of the state, cannot exist!

    Worse than that, the real collectivity, when it manifests itself in some way, is not only unrecognized for what it is by the state, but regarded as an enemy of the state and a threat to its legitimacy. This is obviously true – the re-emergence of the real collectivity does represent a threat to the state. But the problem is that the state does not depict the situation in these terms, convinced as it must be that it itself is the incarnation of the real collectivity.

    Instead, it paints the emergence of the real collectivity in terms of a problem – disorder, subversion, instability and so on. The state’s point of view, and its interests, therefore become still further divorced from those of the genuine collectivity.

    If this point of view was only held by those controlling the state this would hardly matter, but unfortunately it tends to be much more widely shared. The claim that the state is the same as the real collectivity is a lie and as such its intention is to deceive.

    The victims of this deceit will often include people with a strong innate belief in collectivity, in the need for individuals to work together for the common good. Having been tricked into thinking that the state represents that collectivity, they project their commitment to collective well-being on to the state.

    From there onwards, it is a slippery slope. They accept that the state, in the interests of the common good, has to achieve some kind of “balance” with individual freedom (as that freedom can never be expressed through the blocked, above-down structures of a state).

    They accept that the state has a right, or even a duty, to repress manifestations of what is in fact genuine collectivity in order to protect the fake collective good that it purports to incarnate. They accept the state’s conflation of good and bad with legal and illegal, accept its definition of responsibility as obedience to its laws.

    They accept the state’s claim that its role is essential, that the idea of an innate human tendency to free co-operation is absurd and that human society would collapse into murderous chaos without the firm hand of the state in charge.

    The motivation for this acceptance of the state’s claims is essentially well-meaning, arising as it does from a sense of the importance of a collective level of human existence. But hand-in-hand with these good intentions, comes a fatal degree of gullibility. The whole system of democracy behind which the modern state hides itself is designed to retain the allegiance of such gullible individuals.

    The flimsiest and most transparent illusion of power somehow resting in the hands of the population seems to be enough to fool them. Perhaps, in truth, they have to believe that they live in a democracy so that they can continue to believe in the legitimacy of the state. They have to believe in the state because, in their minds, the state represents the collective level of human existence which they know is essential for the common good.

    From their perspective, not only is it irresponsible to fundamentally challenge the existence of the state but even selfish – for they can only see opposition to what they regard as a genuine incarnation of collectivity as stemming from anti-social individualism.

    These people, these victims of the state’s self-justifying deceit, might therefore, on some level, feel obliged to internally censor, to block out, the knowledge that democracy is a sham, as the collapse of their faith in the legitimacy of the state would leave such a void in their understanding of the world.

    (This article is taken from my [Paul Cudenec’s] book Forms of Freedom, published by Winter Oak)”


  14. Cartels of the Mind: a movie that never was « Jon Rappoport’s Blog

    “For several decades, the pseudo-discipline called “social science” had been turning out reams of studies and reports on tribes, societal groupings, and so-called classes of people.

    Deeply embedded in the social sciences were psychological warfare specialists who, after World War 2, emerged with a new academic status and new field of study: mass communications.

    Their objective? The broadcasting of messages that would, in accordance with political goals, provoke hostility or pacified acceptance in the masses.

    Hostility channeled into support of new wars; acceptance of greater domestic government control.

    Nowhere in these formulas was the individual protected. He was considered a wild card, a loose cannon, and he needed to be demeaned, made an outsider, and characterized as a criminal who opposed the needs of the collective.

    Collective=robot minds welded into one mind.

    As the years and decades passed, this notion of the collective and its requirements, in a “humane civilization,” expanded. Never mind that out of view, the rich were getting richer and poor were getting poorer. That fact was downplayed, and the cover story–“share and care”—took center stage.

    On every level of society, people were urged to think of themselves as part of a greater group. The individual and his hopes, his unique dreams, his desires and energies, his determination and will power…all these were portrayed as relics of an unworkable and deluded past.”


  15. Your Genes Programmed by your Ancestors’ Terror

    “What happens to us in life changes the way our genes behave – this is called gene expression. What you do, what you eat, how you exercise, even the music you listen to alters your gene expression.

    There’s no doubt that terrifying experiences also change our gene expression. This is accepted science. The behavior of the genes in our bodies changes with our experiences.

    In technical terms, your inbuilt, inherited genes, called your genotype, are influenced by gene expression to determine your phenotype. Your phenotype is YOU – the way you develop, and behave, your internal biochemistry, the way you think, and what you do with your time each day.

    It’s already well-known that if one family member has a phobia, then the levels of this phobia among first-degree family members will be much higher than average, by a factor of more than x10.

    More recently, scientists have claimed that terrifying experiences do not only affect your phenotype, they actually get built into your genes and can be passed on as an inherited fear to your offspring and generations to come.

    Barry Dias and Kerry Ressler from Emory University School of Medicine exposed mice to fearful experiences (electric shocks) while there was a smell of cherry blossom around.

    We’d normally expect this would alter the mice’s gene expression, affecting their behavior – their phenotype. We would not expect it would fundamentally change their genotype, their basic genetic code that would be passed on to future generations.

    BUT it turns out that the mice’s offspring and the offspring’s offspring were still fearful of the scent, even though they had never smelled it before and had no reason to fear it.

    The brains of the parent mice were found to have been changed by their experiences, and the offspring also showed the same changes to their brains.

    This is evidence that a parent’s experiences can be written into the parent’s genetic code, then passed on to the children and later generations. If an ancestor of yours had a bad experience, you might also fear that experience, even if you have no reason to fear it from your own experiences.”


    1. Apparently,much the same genetic fear transfer happens in bumblebees. My Grandfather had always warned us not to kill them because they would send the next year’s offspring to sting you. Well,it happened to me twice. I learned that it wasn’t just some old country farmer’s tale.

Leave a Reply