gladioScott Creighton

“Destabilize the public order to stabilize the political order and justify a repressive intervention that would be welcomed with relief by the population. People want to live in peace. They don’t want to walk into a bank or a train and die by a bomb from some unknown killer.”

A reader, Observer, has left a link to a video reminding us what Operation Gladio was.

In light of what I wrote earlier this morning about the targets of the attacks last night, specifically their socialist/leftist inclinations, I thought it might be informative to post a quote about the nature of the people targeted last night alongside that video reminder left to us by Observer. Because when you look at it in this context with the timing involved, it seems pretty obvious what is going on here.

This is the land of hipster socialists. These neighborhoods recently elected a female socialist mayor, as well as a slew of Green Party candidates, even as the rest of the country voted for the more conservative and anti-immigration parties on the Right.

The attackers, whomever they may be and whatever their motives, went after the heart of progressive Paris. They did not attack the more touristy Champs-Elysées or Notre Dame, or the more bourgeois and conservative left bank, where most of the government ministries are located.

And now for a little history of fascism and America. It’s called The Strategy of Tension.

Leave a Reply

23 thought on “Paris Attacks: An Attack on Progressive French Society and Remembering Operation Gladio”
    1. Obama: ISIS Is Not Getting ‘Stronger,’ We Have ‘Contained’ Them

      Friday on ABC’s “Good Morning America,” President Barack Obama seemingly downplayed the threat of ISIS in an interview with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos that aired on Friday’s broadcast of “Good Morning America.”

      Stephanopoulos asked Obama if ISIS was gaining in strength, to which Obama denied they were.

      “I don’t think they’re gaining strength,” Obama responded. “What is true is that from the start, our goal has been first to contain and we have contained them. They have not gained ground in Iraq, and in Syria they’ll come in, they’ll leave, but you don’t see this systemic march by ISIL across the terrain.”

      Just Paris?

      1. Remember the Maine? Remember the Reichstag fire? Remember Pearl Harbor? Remember the Gulf of Tonkin? Yesterday Al-Quaeda, today ISIS, tomorrow …..?
        Obama, ISIS, …it’s all a blip in time. The world is a chess board. The plan is many, many hundreds of years old. To not understand the overarching plan is defeat.

        1. HaHa. I’m getting scared. The leaves are falling off the tree’s and it’s getting colder..

          Maybe they are’s Autumn? You know, Climate Change?


    After WWII, those who were to ‘stay behind’ to continue the WWII agenda.

    Do you really think the war of the bankers was over in 1945?

    You won’t understand today unless you understand yesterday. It is one, behemoth, monstrous plan that only psychotic people can plan and implement over hundreds of years.

  2. Part 2 of the BBC documentary he Power of Fear describes how Middle Eastern intelligence agencies hijacked the Mujahideen’s post-Soviet jihad in the Middle East and North Africa. They infiltrated the groups and drove them to use increasingly overt terror against civilian populations and ultimately each other finally leading to their demise See video at 39 to 41:30:

  3. My guess is that the “hipster socialists” were targeted as a sort of bonus. The main reason for the attack was to gain traction against Russia’s successful exposure of the ISIS farce. While the masses of industrialized nations are psychologically terrorized, the “socialist hipsters” bear the brunt of dying (assuming the general veracity that significant casualties occurred). It wouldn’t surprise me if a few key activists were whacked in the melee.

    Putin should take a lesson from game theory and expose 9/11 as the mother of all false flags (it was). If he exposes this foundational event for the War “on” Terror he will right the geopolitical imbalance which is plaguing the world. As per game theory, the best which Western intelligence agencies could level at him by way of riposte would be to point out his own use of false flag terror in Russia (if such has actually occurred). However, if Putin acts first, then the riposte will have merely the appearance of propaganda and simultaneously incriminate the propagandists.


    1. Excellent comment. That’s the first reasonable explanation for the Paris theater that I’ve read. As far as Putin revealing truth behind 9/11 – I don’t think that would ever happen. If they (russia) were going to expose our lies they would have done so during the moon landings. Or JFK. Instead, I propose they are at least complicit with most if not all efforts to roll out the nwo (I hate that term but that is what it’s called isn’t it?). That goes for every country – the leaders all have to be on board, and from what I can tell, not one separates themselves from the rest. Not china, not India, not even Sweden. I guess this is just the natural evolution of humanity.

    2. Being a false flag by the western elites, they made sure they had something on the russians to cool down their wish to blow the whistle. Both the events surrounding the Kursk catastrophe and whatever hit the Pentagon could be suitable material. If Dmitri Khalezov is right a missile previously stolen from the Kursk hit the Pentagon with the trigger mechanism of the half megaton device switched off. The Janes military zine had an article about that particular ‘ ship wrecker’ missile the day before 9/11. The russian government had previously lied to the public and claimed they destroyed all the 23 missiles on board to hide that they were missing. Khalezov also believes some influential people worldwide were fed with lies about russian mininukes – backpack-nukes so called having been used to bring down the wtc towers. He also claims that the discovery of the missile in Pentagon was used to make some people at the top to order the emergency demolition of the towers since they suspected ‘the airplanes’ to contain nuclear weapons and feared they might explode high above Manhattan. He had encountered info about an existing emergency demolition plan in the 90s

      1. Haven’t read your reference yet, but definitely will. I’m a little confused Peter, is this hypothesis suggesting we were indeed hit with a missile and it wasn’t intended (by the faction suspected most prominently)? If so, then we rigged the towers when they were built for quick demo, however that still means we knew it was going to happen due to the teams setting up in the weeks before. So that means it was a LIHOP with uncertainty whether the mission would go as planned?? Sounds like a jumble of disinfo but I prob misinterpreted what you were saying…

        1. reprehensor
          No doubt about something with the shape of a missile without large wings hit. Dmitris text is long and he explains his hypothesis in detail using several pieces of evidence. He believes the Pentagon recognized the type of missile on the radar through known characteristics, size and speed and immediately brought some high profile figures to safety in accordance with protocol and for the first time closed the nuclear-safe door at the underground command centre. The doomsdayplane began circling above the civilian power centres also only in accordance with protocol only in connection with nuclear war.
          That said Dmitri observes that some individuals in the chain of command were not worried but made sure they would be out of reach seemingly knowing the next in that chain would be the one to press the red button.
          Dmitri believes the earlier attack against wtc was made with a mininuke in a sewer mimicking the effect of the official car bomb and that this led to preparations for the eventuality that a nuclear attack further up would be attempted. He also claims that the original demolition plan from the 60s was using a 150kt fusion bomb at 50m under the lowest level of the building. And one witness claims something of that order was already used back then to cause the big potholes. Dmitri believes those potholes were created on 9/11 while most of us think the towers were brought down with a combination of small nukes and conventional cutter charges. It has emerged that hundreds of decommissioned mininukes (~16tons tnt equivalent) may have been smuggled out of the Us due to negligence of the authorities.

      2. Interesting! I wasn’t aware of this angle with the Kursk. I’m wondering to what extent the Five Eyes et. al. have dirt on Putin regarding his domestic use of false-flag terror to remain in power. Likewise, was Putin set up to bear apparent culpability for a bombing or attack here or there to try and lump him in with the über-terrorists who pulled off 9/11 (certainly a Western intel mishmash of criminals)? To what extent have synthetic “Muslim terrorists” been directed against Russia in an attempt to deteriorate Russian territorial integrity? Of course we all know about the 79-89 usage of this ploy in Afghanistan. –Paul

        1. Daniel Estulin had a screen dump of a soon removed CNN-article about the appartment attacks around 1999. There the CNN made the mistake of asking an expert about the type of bomb. He said 100ton tnt equiv.
          This made the official western version untenable.
          FSB discovered explosives in some appartment and the west distorted it to them being behind the bombing. Dmitri Khalezov has pointed to several cases of mininukes being placed in sewers where the west always points to a modest carbomb completely inadequate to cause the damage. He claims that appart from some 15 cases he attributes to the Cia/Mossad only one was carried out by the Russians against the Cia as payback for the appartment bombings. It was a mininuke in a sewer 200m from a hotel in Iraq where Cia personnel were stationed. They didnt complain and possibly understood the message.
          I dont think there is much dirt to be had about the russians, just strategical concerns. As with the downed russian airliner in Sinai. Now everybody says bomb. But earlier faulty or otherwise damaging software in the autopilot was claimed causing the plane to make selfdestructive manoevers. If true that would cause division between Russia and Europe the last thing the russians need. So bomb suits all parties.

  4. Fits for me. Histroy has a habit of repeating it’s self and the elite have a habit of repeating themselves. We all need to wake up and come together as humans and the 99%. We are all humans not a religion!

Leave a Reply