myron-mayA few days before the November 20, 2014 Florida State University shooting incident, attorney Myron May video recorded a personal statement of what he claimed to experience as a targeted individual. May also bid farewell to and personally addressed family members and friends. The audio of May’s remarks was presented publicly for the first time on James Tracy’s January 25 Real Politik program.

The videos were found playing on May’s laptop computer by Tallahassee police in the aftermath of the event. They are also among the contents May sent to several individuals before the November 20 incident. The files were released to MHB by Tallahassee police in response to a public records request filed in November 2014.

As of February 1, 2015 the Florida State University administration led by Florida GOP politico John Thrasher has failed to fulfill a public records request concerning the case originally filed on November 21, 2014.


Leave a Reply

22 thought on “Myron May Video: “I Am a Targeted Individual””
    1. Indeed it is, sir.

      As I was watching Myron explain all that he went through, I couldn’t help but think of the similarities between his story and Roger Barbour’s lifelong experiences with the secret society of Freemasonry as an outsider with some insider knowledge. It’s the exact same mentality among the perpetrators. Who says that gangbangers are restricted to street level?

      Roger Barbour describes his “lifelong contest of wills with a very elusive foe.”

      Freemasons above the third level get to be shriners and wear the little hat that says “Arabia” on it. Always wondered why Saudis allegedly did 9/11, yet the US government continues to be BFF with them to this day. Now I know. Saudi Arabia is the seat of Islam. And this was about the creation of the war on terror, which will eventually morph into the more generalized “war on religious extremism”.

      Carolyn Hamlett has this to say about that.

      ” The masses will be led to believe that extremism, especially religious extremism is the enemy to the peoples of the world. Finally, the peoples of the world will agree to exterminate the few for the greater good of the many. My mother called this “a compassionate plan within ‘The Plan’.”

      The Plan: Exterminate “Religious Extremists”

      If Myron’s story can be somehow spun into a case of religious delusion, while ignoring the gang-stalking phenomenon, then he could be used as an example to promote “the plan”. However, the fact that Myron didn’t actually kill anybody severely lessens the desired impact from their point of view.

      1. Freemasonary is JUDAISM!! Judaism, Zionism and Freemasonry
        Judaism Freemasonry

        “Freemasonry is a Jewish establishment, whose history, grades, official appointments, passwords, and explanations are Jewish from beginning to end.”—-Rabbi Isaac Wise
        B’nai B’rith
        Freemasonry and the Jews.
        The B’nai B’rith Finances Russell by Fritz Springmeier
        The Masonic Watchtowers by Fritz Springmeier
        “GENTILE masonry blindly serves as a screen for us and our objects, but the plan of action of our force, even its very abiding-place, remains for the whole people an unknown mystery.” (The Protocols of Zion, 4:2)
        “Masonry, that immense association, the rare initiated of which, that is to say, the real chiefs of which, whom we must be careful not to confound with the nominal chiefs, live in a strict and intricate alliance with the militant members of Judaism, princes and imitators of the high Cabal. For that elite of the order–those real chiefs whom so few of the initiated know, or whom they only know for the most part under a nom de guerre, are employed in the profitable and secret dependence of the cabalistic Israelites. And this phenomenon is accomplished thanks to the habits of rigorous discretion to which they subject themselves by oaths and terrible menaces; thanks also to the majority of Jewish members which the mysterious constitution of Masonry seats in its sovereign counsel.”—Gougenot des Mosseaux in Le Juif, le Judaisme et la Judaisation des Peuples Chretiens, Paris, 1869.
        The Jewish Guardian admitted openly on 12 April 1922: “Freemasonry is born out of Israel

      2. Todd,
        I read your plight and saw the court case and all, if this is the same Todd.
        It was quite impressive being you actually have a lawyer willing to take your case.

        I still can’t take a position here but it looks like you were actually targeted because someone had it out for you. I say that very lightly from what I have read you have been through a lot.

        Good Luck and God Bless.

        1. Not the same Todd.

          If you’re referring to Todd Giffen, then he usually posts here with his full name. This isn’t the first time this happened. Perhaps I should change to posting as Todd W to alleviate the confusion.

  1. Thank you for obtaining and posting May’s last words — the videos need to be spread far and wide. He’s telling the truth about the core of this program.

  2. Worthy of consideration and exploration, IMO:

    Trace Jean Maria Arrigo’s links from the APA’s web site and it will take one to peat-intel dot org:

    EMR Targeting and Moral Responsibility
    Readers Theater
    Jean Maria Arrigo

    Allegations of experimental EMR (electro-magnetic radiation)
    targeting of citizens in the United States, Britain, Russia, Nepal, and
    elsewhere have been widely dismissed as conspiracy theories. I
    approach the issues of plausibility and moral responsibility through the
    testimonies of a navy-contract medical engineer, Elson Byrd (b. 1939);
    a self-reported government witness to EMR targeting, Lt. Commander
    Cecil B. “Scott” Jones (b. 1928); and a self-reported EMR targeting
    victim, Cheryl Welsh, J.D., (b. 1956). As indicated in the references,
    all sources have been archived in the Intelligence Ethics Collection
    at Hoover Institution Archives, Stanford University.

    Part I. Introduction

    MODERATOR: The strong empirical commitment of psychology presents a vulnerability in ethics. Insofar as psychological ethics addresses only substantiated harms, it lags far behind harms concealed by the secrecy, compartmentalization, and strict hierarchical structure of national security settings, or harms disguised through disinformation, manipulation, and deception. The contributions of psychologists to
    the infamous CIA Behavioral Modification Project MK-ULTRA, for instance, were never plumbed, resulting in no lessons learned and no ethical principles established.
    Psychological ethics thus forfeits the opportunity for proactive and educational approaches and has limited relevance where poor practices have already been institutionalized.

    As an exercise in contemporaneous examination of unsubstantiated violations of psychological ethics, we consider experimental electromagnetic radiation (EMR) targeting of unwitting citizens for behavior modification. Allegations of EMR targeting of citizens in the United States, Britain, Russia, Nepal, and elsewhere have been widely dismissed as conspiracy theories (e.g., Weinberger, 2007). Decisive
    evidence for or against illegal EMR targeting may never emerge. We approach the issues of plausibility and moral responsibility through the testimonies of a self-reported EMR weapons developer Elson Byrd (b. 1939); a self-reported government witness to EMR targeting, Cecil B. “Scott” Jones (b. 1928); and a self-reported EMR targeting victim, Cheryl Welsh (b. 1956), who represents a large population with similar beliefs. 1

    These testimonies do not resolve the question of whether governments practice illegal EMR targeting on civilians. However, the testimonies can assist in addressing these questions of psychological ethics :

    Are there plausible institutional mechanisms and personnel roles for the allegedprogram?

    Would psychologists be useful, even essential, in execution of the alleged program?

    Are there proactive or educational measures in psychological ethics that would be appropriate regardless of whether the allegations are valid?

    If the allegations are later determined to be valid, what measures in
    psychological ethics can be taken on an emergency basis?

    Is investigation of alleged, gross violations of psychological ethics a critical component of psychological ethics? Or do the responsibilities of
    psychological ethics begin only when allegations are otherwise
    substantiated? For a point of initial agreement between skeptics and believers in the matter of illegal EMR targeting, let us begin with an announcement of legal EMR weapons experiments on human subjects, from the June 2005 newsletter of Sandia National Laboratories, U.S. Department of Energy.

    Part I: EMR Technology at Sandia National Laboratories

    SANDIA LAB NEWS (Sandia National Laboratories, 2005):
    System Uses Beam of Electromagnetic Energy
    to Heat Human Target 2

  3. In my quest for hard evidence supporting the claims of Targeted Individuals I came across this episode of the Dr. Phil show featuring a targeted individual who claims to have reams of proof of his ordeals.
    I would be most interested in the opinions of some of the great minds on MHB regarding this Dr. Phil episode. For the record, I am not a fan of Dr. Phil. Like most on this blog, I’m seeking truth.

    1. I saw this episode. It was an embarrassment. the TI was convinced that his meth use spurred the gang-stalking, and to “prove” it, he went on a meth binge. Mmmm, reliable.

      Dr. Phil is a whore; I hope you’re not expecting help from him. My son and I watch for kicks…we’ve seen plenty of his “Purpose-Driven(TM)” antics over the years. But even when he’s “exposing” something like gang stalking, he’ll always end up supporting the official narrative.

    2. Government and corporate interests are now in harmony and we the people are not in that club. Note all the announced public-private partnerships and refusal to address fraudulent and unaccountable election systems.

      If the government runs an illegal, extrajudicial, and extraconstitutional program in secret, as Myron claims, then I would expect their buddies in corporate media to help obfuscate that fact. Dr. Phil’s show is **approved** for public viewing.

    3. I saw this episode long ago, I need to watch it again. From what I remember it did a fairly good job at presenting the “organized stalking issue” to the public. I would like to see a follow up show focused on solutions to the problem, and warnings to victims NOT to take the actions that Myron May is reported to have taken… There are many ways to get media attention other than random acts of violence?

  4. This was the most compelling interview on the subject of harassment/stalking, I have heard; Julian McKinney author of “Harassment and Mind Control Experimentation from an Authority in the Field.”, 1991. Her book is in the public domain, intentionally. McKinney is former US military and has some very interesting things to say about who is targeted and why, and by whom. McKinney is a sober and articulate speaker about a subject that is easily dismissed as quakery. Now that I think of it, wasn’t she the one that May called on the phone the day he went off? Listen here:

  5. Myron May speaks of “thousands” of targeted individuals. The real number is much higher, probably several hundred-thousand, in this country alone:

    If the groups and individuals he corresponded with are not government disinformation fronts then why was he not made aware of this???

  6. A productive hardworking citizen to an “unreasonable random shooter” after a Stalking Campaign for only approximately 6 months… Every caring American (world) citizen should be extremely concerned AND angry… Everyone of us must question and cease our various levels of participation in these Stalking Campaigns that we see daily – even if we don’t like the target…

      1. It is difficult to believe how anyone, in particular an individual claiming to be “an advocate for targeted individuals,” would suggest that carrying out such a heinous act “maybe … is the way.”

        1. This is not the way, I agree. At 31 years old, Mr. May had a very long time for advocacy and education on these critical social issues. I can not fathom how violence against innocent people (students were not the stalkers) could be more effective and in alignment with the Word of God…

Leave a Reply