Unraveling Sandy Hook in 2, 3, 4, and 5 Dimensions

@flyingtigercomics – I know there are suspicions of ‘no deaths’ because of the sealing of all the evidence. But, I wonder, if nobody was killed, all the threats we believe were made would be pointless, wouldn’t they? Because unless someone is seriously afraid they will eventually talk, so I think there were kids killed there.

Maybe they were all grabbed off the streets across the nation and killed somewhere and dumped there. Maybe they were brought in and then killed by the same two shooters who brought Lanza there and killed him. I don’t know. Too many possibilities and not enough information – but I submit that absent real bodies the ‘threats’ won’t hold water. Besides, somebody would be able to find the families and eventually get photos of the kids who are on the ‘dead list’.

“Media are certainly capable of faking and using actors even if there is a tragedy beneath it all- after all, when the Nazis faked the attack on a radio station, they still killed people. But the “mincemeat” recipe was very different to the represented facts.”

I agree this can happen. many of the media reported victims on 911 appear to be faked and photographs reversed/modified to create two personae from one photograph and just because the media presentation was theatre, it would be a serious lapse in judgement to say it was all fake based on that.
sandy hook is whole different scenario though. your claim that there must have been victims is based purely on wild speculation, there is ZERO evidence that there were any victims at all, and plenty of evidence to the contrary. There is more evidence of Joseph Smith’s Golden Plates than there is of actual victims at sandy hook.

It amazes me how many people still hold on to the Jonestown meme of actual victims at Sandy Hook. Even Alex doesn’t believe in actual victims, he makes calculated decisions based on perception and public opinion not by what he thinks is true. Psst.. he also lies about the products he sells whether its a tangible item or a personality he wants to suck up to. That doesn’t mean people should believe it all nor think he is a shill, just don’t take everything at face value.
I’m not trying to be abrasive here, I have no idea whether you listen to alex or not, it’s just something I have observed with his followers that makes me amazed at the volume of lemmings in the truth movement. The comment was meant as a generality not towards you personally.

“This “experiment” would have been planned for months, if not years.”

Did you notice that near the beginning she says that the event took place on the “solstice of solstices”? All the talk about the implications of the end of the age predicted by an ancient messo-american year counting system pointing to December of 2012. Why was it hyped so? Is it just coincidence that Sandy Hook was years in the planning, and they chose the same point in time?

Obviously, this is very speculative, but what Sophia is postulating is that they are using these fake events to craft a very real–if artificially designed–future that will be very different from the one that would come about naturally, if the technocrats were not engineering it. This is beginning to seem a whole lot larger than a sequence of false flag events. Very chilling.

“The piece did not fit” (the collapse of the buildings). I think we need to hold onto those moments where something is “off” and where something in us is telling us what the situation is, something is adding things up and when we get the “receipt” we know it doesn’t tally. It almost seems like an act of will or discipline to hold onto those insights. When the first building fell after pulverizing outward, although I was in shock, I said to myself “the other one will do the same thing.” Why did I think that? Part of me was saying “because I want it to.” George Carlin pointed this out about how the public reacts to disaster. He says “You want it to be big, don’t you, admit it.” He’s right. So the media delivers us disasters from all around the world to exploit that aggression in us. But so do the movies. With the fall of the third building, which few were directed to watch, the final conclusion is that the whole thing was a movie. Or a big Superbowl-style commercial.

By the way one of the women from that crazy story about two friends – one on each plane, going to meet at Disneyland – well, her identity was probably put together based on someone who died already. Her alleged “husband” was an old man who runs a public relations firm (or his successors do – he may be in a nursing home) which probably created those heart-warming stories of airline passengers on 9/11. But there I go again – I look at Sandy Hook and I see the New York world of magazine publishing which lives right in the heart of where it happened.
9/11, Sandy Hook and the Boston bombing are not really Hollywood, not entertaining movies. They are ad campaigns. And we have inklings of what each one has been intended to get us to buy – war and disarming ourselves so we cannot effectively protest war, so we are not threat to power. But the products there are selling are duds and the US isn’t stupid enough to keep up the belief system they require. They have “misunderestimated” us.

Sandy Hook was a ‘production’ meant to confuse, scatter attention and defy analysis. Badly scripted one at that. No movie is perfect; it will often leave mixed messages. After all, art is a human endeavor and even when Hollywood develops a project, it can misfire on several levels. There is no doubt that SH and BM used camera and acting techniques honed to art by the industry. The perps just have to convince the muddled public of its legitamacy; the media is there to assure the message is pounded home until the fiction sticks.

How many people do you know who aren’t buying it? I mean outside of the waking blogosphere. That is why even the most ridiculous of scenarios have traction. The ruling caste is not worried. Hitler’s minister of propaganda studied Walt Disney’s cartoons, used to sell our side of the war, for inspiration on thought control. Ponder that for a moment.

I live in California.

There is a connection between Sandy Hook and the Boston Marathon. At the finish line, in front of the Boston Public Library, bleachers were provided for “Sandy Hook families” and the purpose of the Marathon was split there, to be a memorial. The winners passed through, the normal crowd at the Marathon (including many African supporters of probable champs, at the finish line), a very deep crowd which really would have had hundreds of injuries in a blast – dispersed. I was going out for a walk long after the helicopters had stopped circling Heartbreak Hill near where I live, and at least an hour after the winners were crowned in all events. My husband checked his cell. He said – wow – a bomb just went off at the Marathon. My first thought, as the shadows were lengthening (it was after 3, I think) – was that it must have been something random in a garbage can, because who would be around, who would be the target? I’ve attended so many marathons. Yes, there might be a few friends to cheer the stragglers, some who wanted to support them. But not a deep heavy crowd. This is not a major sporting event where you stay to the end.

So my first inkling of deceit was that the numbers for injuries were inflated. The impossible story that you would only see amputee injuries to the legs because the bombs exploded low is another whopper. Is that how an explosion goes? All horizontal? No pieces in the eye? Not a single ear ripped off? No pockmarks of shrapnel? It didn’t add up. But what did is the power of the media to hold you with a fake reality, through constant repetition and bald-faced lying, the newsreaders doing “rinse and repeat” – oh, and please contribute to the Boston One Fund. Yes, that’s the multimillion dollar scam.

There is no good lie here. They will say it is. They will say it is for a good cause. They will say it is the lesser of the evils. But they don’t know what they do.

Initially, the money poured in. Then the homeless shelters and other charities noticed a drop in what they were getting. The big sucking sound was the fund, managed by the 9/11 fund crowd. The usual suspects.

Personally, I think the over-reaching has been to tie Sandy Hook to the Marathon. If one falls, the other must. They are intertwined. I do see mobsters involved with the money. Or their consigliere. But I don’t so much care about that aspect. I care about how the public has accepted it uncritically. That is what alarms me. Garbage in, garbage out.

Suzanne’s IP address indicates that she are in Milford, CT, which is 24 miles from Newtown.

None of these thoroughly maudlin remarks come close to seriously addressing Smallstorm’s important observations that major media and authorities have overlooked or consciously covered up.

Why have local and state law enforcement been paid $2.5 million by the Obama Justice Department? That’s no small sum for work that should be considered routine.

Probably the only way this event can be adequately addressed is through an independent prosecutor–which is the role independent researchers such as Smallstorm have been attempting to fulfill in the absence of any such leadership at the state or federal level.

Suzanne. Why was your friend at the school so early in the morning to make gingerbread houses? According to reports from other parents (Neil Heslin is quoted stating this time), the gingerbread house activity was scheduled for 2:30pm that day.
http://nypost.com/2012/12/15/fathers-anguish-after-losing-his-son-in-connecticut-shooting/

“She saw one girl leave the building completely covered in blood and human flesh, she was the sole survivor from one of the classrooms…She also saw a policeman carrying out another small girl, blood from her head, ”

Fascinating.

Why, Suzanne, is there no video of anything remotely similar to this scenario?

Carver, the medical examiner, was quite clear. In fact the whole set of officials was entirely clear: the dead kids were kept in the building until the early hours of the morning, and removed under cover of darkness, Dr. Frankenstein-style.

Not only is there no video evidence of a single drop of blood on any child, much less human flesh, there is no video evidence of police entering or exiting the building. Not one cop.

You hoaxers are barking up the wrong tree when you come here. We won’t buy what you are selling.

Suzanne,

“She also saw a policeman carrying out another small girl, blood from her head, and whose long brown hair made Sue think for a minute it was her daughter Summer…she said she had to look hard and squint to make sure it wasnt her….”

You say your friend Sue, whose daughter Summer was in the school, was in the school parking lot when she saw this policeman carrying out a small girl who thought was her daughter. Now, according to your story, this same girl’s head was covered with blood.

Would you kindly explain how any parent of a small child who thought for ONE SECOND that that was her child would do nothing but “squint to make sure it wasn’t her…”? I defy you to explain how a MOTHER of a child she thought was hers in a situation such as this wouldn’t run as fast as possible to the child? You did say Sue had “to think for a minute” that this blood covered child was Summer. What mother would even think for more than a second without what would be an absolutely instinctive reaction to run to the child’s immediate aid if she thought that her child might be the person she was looking at?

I really would love to hear your answer to these questions, but for some reason have the feeling I won’t be hearing anything more from you… a shame… perhaps you could teach us all something about the extremely odd and bizarre behavior of these Sandy Hook parents.

“… she said four of the girls were missing the next dance class after the shooting, ” Adding irrelevant detail is a clear sign of lie. Go away, what you are doing is evil!