The Boston Marathon Bombing’s Inflated Injury Tallies

Dr. Tracy, thank you. Your analysis shows that the BMB is not intended to be literally true, but rather figuratively and “morally” true. It’s message is that the American warfare state is inclusive. The Costa Rica native in the cowboy hat represents that inclusiveness. His son died fighting fanatical Moslems, and that Group is excluded from this policy of inclusion. Hispanics are in. Moslems of the Islamic type, inclined to “terrorism,” are out.

The Jewish doctors at the hospital also interpreted the event clearly for us. The Israeli Jewish doctors are used to operating on terror victims. So you see, innocent blood unites the U. S. and Israel. The former does not cause any mischief in the 70 odd wars in which it is currently involved, while the latter, thirsting for peace, suffers from the Palestinian addiction to “terror.”

That message is, of course, completely false.

The so-called perpetrators, like Arredondo, have most likely been on the FBI/CIA payroll for years. Strung along until needed. Then, on one fateful day, central casting gave Carlos a hero role, and the two Moslem brothers villain roles. And the controlled media took care of the rest.

Please keep up your courageous work.

The lack of identification of the victims and their injuries is very important to the official story, it stops any independent research from referencing official information regarding injuries or cause of death.

The case of Krystle Campbell highlights this, she is photographed with what looks like severed and/or badly distorted legs in photos from the scene… after that she is miraculously photographed on a stretcher with structurally normal legs… then there are reports from a Dr in the medical tent of, what can only be her, having legs severed at the thigh(1), and another report from a nurse of her left leg “broken and facing the wrong way”(2).

Photos: http://anywho.simplesite.com/201858941

Both reports can be only related to Krystle (I will be happy to be shown otherwise), and can also only be related to one set of photos of her, which prove to be deceptive photos because the images of her on the stretcher show structurally sound legs.

The medical staff in the tent present confusing testimony most likely because the play acting finished as soon as the actors got inside the tent, they can’t exactly report seeing Krystle sitting up, sipping Champagne, and laughing, so they rely on a set of photos from the scene to describe her injuries.

Here is where having 100 plus victims that no details are available on saves the official story, there remains the possibility that there is another unknown victim with two legs severed at the thigh that has not been reported.

They completely stuffed up Krystle’s death with irreconcilable photos and irreconcilable testimony, it will be very interesting to see the autopsy report from Krystle Campbell should it ever be released.

(1) In the New England Journal of Medicine, Dr Sushrut Jangi of the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston writes “At the tent, I stood in a crowd of doctors, awaiting victims, feeling choked by the smoke drifting along Boylston. Through the haze, the stretchers arrived; when I saw the first of the wounded, I was overwhelmed with nausea. An injured woman — I couldn’t tell whether she was conscious — lay on the stretcher, her legs entirely blown off. Blood poured out of the arteries of her torso; I saw shredded arteries, veins, ragged tissue and muscle.”

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1305299

(2) This nurse seems to conflate Krystle with someone else, a common deceptive practice, as Krystle has no abdominal injuries, yet it can only be her he is talking about because he says she died, and blonde and blue eyes rules out Lingzi Lu.

QUOTE: “One of his first patients was a young woman, he thinks maybe 20 or 22 years old, whose abdomen was torn open. Her left leg was broken and facing the wrong way and she wasn’t breathing. He and his colleagues did CPR on her and kept checking for a pulse, but there was none. They stopped when they realized it was futile.

She became the first patient in their makeshift morgue.

Segatore and others checked her pockets for a wallet, an ID, a cell phone, anything that would help them find her parents’ names. There was nothing.

“I still don’t know who she was,” he said. “She had blonde hair, blue eyes, the all-American girl. She was probably a student somewhere in Boston.”

http://edition.cnn.com/2013/04/16/us/boston-bombings-nurses/index.html

The following may or may not apply but hopefully provides parallel insight regarding reporting of injuries.

Researchers were a bit surprised to see in the reporting of civilian deaths and injuries in Afghanistan and Iraq that the numbers appeared in distinct groupings, say, 1, 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 50… In other words, you’d never read about 7, 11, 27, or 32 victims, but you would read about 10 or 30. In other words the count was not accurate, maybe even inflated; its purpose was to give readers a ballpark estimate, not to provide accurate stats that could be tallied by the arm-chair generals state-side.

The military and the press came into an agreement about HOW to report the casualty numbers, and they were to appear in such “buckets” of numbers. They diverged away from trying to be 100% accurate, and the buckets of numbers provided sufficient shock value to give a reader a general understanding of the extent of the destruction.

The above may be true for the reporting of the BMB victims.

I recall some of the same fudging with Aurora and certainly with 9/11. With regards to 9/11, I think they were trying to reach the casualty levels of Pearl Harbor [3000] in order to justify war. However, I think [just MHO] that some level of simVictim hood existed in the 9/11 tallies to help inflate the numbers and to give inroads to simFamilies (actors) of certain 9/11 simVictims who could be controlled to give EMOTIONAL speeches invoking the memory of their simFamilyMember while speaking on some agenda item helpful to the govt.

Also, some validity exists to the rumor about the towers (a) not being fully occupied and (b) not being fully COMPLETED or FINISHED. Let’s see, the Rockefellers retained almost 30 years of bragging rights of having two of the tallest office buildings without having to flesh-out and complete all 220 floors [which itself could have devastated the NY office space rental market]. They accomplish the same thing on the cheap by having some finished floors up top and bottom and inbetween, but NOT EVERY FLOOR. Think Seattle spire but with the illusion that floors in between were FINISHED and occupied.

I know nothing for sure. Just tossing it out there for thought that there are reasons why the numbers get inflated.

//

Can someone help me comprehend the in-hospital patients featured in their beds (YouTube vids) such as Marc Fucarile displaying his shrapnel injuries and discussing the BMB and his subsequent care . Are we witnessing legitimate injuries (BMB or otherwise) or continued drill acting with family and friends. There are three different Fucarile videos ( i.e. May 10, 2013 post).

Shouldn’t these pathetic sickos be put in jail for taking money for false injuries?????

There is a thread at Let’s Roll that’s attempting to correlate all the medical testimony.

http://letsrollforums.com/alleged-medical-witnesses-t29615.html

These are some of the issues that seem to be outstanding:

*Exaggeration.*
Almost everyone interviewed describes more bodies, blood, amputees, screaming, general carnage than there really was. There are basically two scenarios. The one we see in the photos and vids and the one being described by most of the “medical personnel” present.

Many of them describe unnamed amputees, all dramatically pumping blood from their severed arteries in ways conspicuously absent from Bauman and other photographed amputees.

*Contradictions.*
Medics describing the same victims as having different injuries. Sometimes to the extent of the same nurse/doctor changing his own story.

*The Role of the Medical Tent.*
The tent seems to be identified as a possible weak point in the narrative, because a lot of effort has been spent on “explaining” or obfuscating its role. Some narratives claim it was being used as a “makeshift ICU” for the severe trauma patients, others claim the same severe trauma patients were not treated in the tent at all but wheeled straight through it to the ambulance waiting on the far side.

Some narratives even seem to claim both at the same time.

I suspect the second claim is damage limitation for the first.

I think whoever wrote this scenario was obviously a person or persons with no medial knowledge and only limited common sense and intelligence. They constructed a wonderful melodrama about the first aid tent being turned into an emergency room, complete with taglines about “war zones” and fantastic tales of bravery and improvised treatment, and it was only after it went live that the sheer insanity of this story began to hit home.

Any person who has worked in medicine, or any person with sense would take one look at this narrative and go “why the hell were you setting up the tent as an ICU when there were hospitals with real ICUs five minutes away? Why are you playing out a scenario as if you are in the middle of a desert? This is Boston? All you’re doing with this crap is risking people’s lives”

I think we can bet that people have been questioning this, even if not much of it gets into the media.

Hence, I suspect, the contradictory stories about the severely injured not being treated in the tent after all, but wheeled straight through too the ambulances.

But that doesn’t really fix anything for them, as it only makes other parts of the story seem more bizarre. It raises the obvious question – if you were putting the severely injured straight into ambulances then why didn’t you move those ambulances closer to the scene? Why did you insist on all these severely injured/dying people being wheelchaired up the street and through the damn medical tent before they could even get to an emergency vehicle?

They can’t answer that plausibly – because there is no plausible answer other than the victims were fake, and the tent was being used to hide this fact from the world.

A real tornado just hit. Real schools hit, real amputations probably. No terrorists, just Mother Nature. This doesn’t look like Fantasyland to me. Chinese and Haitian earthquakes, Japanese tsunamis. This is a real world of pain. To honor these true victims, we expose the fake ones.