Revised on January 4, 2013

As documents relating to the Sandy Hook shooting continue to be assessed and interpreted by independent researchers there is a growing awareness that the media coverage of the massacre of 26 children and adults was intended primarily for public consumption to further larger political ends.

A considerable amount of evidence has been withheld by authorities, who in a telling move have successfully postponed public disclosure of items culled from Nancy and Adam Lanzas’ residence and vehicles for an additional ninety days. [1]

At the same time what has been revealed and captured in press reports suggests how from missing suspects and evidence to unrevealed corpses much is still unknown and mainstream news outlets have been at least complicit in what could conceivably be described as the Sandy Hook massacre’s constructed reality. In this way unseen and largely unaccountable authorities set the agenda of the reportage through a titillating storyline reliant on an unsettling symbolic landscape to further develop and cultivate audience credulity.

The spectacle came complete with its own features specially designed for those with a penchant for pointing to intrigue. Shortly after the shooting prominent Arizona political figure and former gubernatorial aspirant Michael Harris opined that the shooting was carried out by an Israeli paramilitary team. Veterans Today Editor Gordon Duff amplified this speculative assertion through a brief article carried by Iran’s PressTV that went viral, becoming the Iranian news outlet’s most read item ever.[2]

Despite compelling geopolitical and diplomatic conditions the claim cannot be verified because the identities of the two-to-four additional suspected gunmen apprehended by Newtown and Connecticut state police remain undisclosed while almost all identity-specific references to these suspects were scrambled on the audio recording of the emergency dispatch-responders exchange. Were these men possibly playing roles in an emergency drill?

Much can still be gleaned from the press coverage of Sandy Hook. Most importantly, as with the events of 9/11 that ushered in the interminable “war on terror” and police state, the techniques that have emblazoned Sandy Hook in public consciousness require continued scrutiny if only for the fact that they will almost certainly be deployed to create similar disaster scenarios, likely in the near-term.

Was Sandy Hook a Relocated Emergency Drill?

At 9:53AM, no more than ten minutes after the reported shooting ceased, the Associated Press published a story, “Official with Knowledge of Connecticut School Shooting Says 27 Dead, Including 18 Children.”  AP and the Washington Post have since removed the story from their websites in lieu of subsequent reports that took their cue from a press conference scheduled for later that day.

Indeed, aside from internal police accounts of what took place inside Sandy Hook Elementary there is little information available to piece together what may have actually transpired inside the school. No photographic or video footage of the crime scene have been made publicly available and major media have to a large degree based their conclusions on Connecticut Medical Examiner H. Wayne Carver’s verbal account of the postmortem which is at best ambiguous.[3]

Two weeks after the incident an attorney representing the family of one six-year-old Sandy Hook student came forth with a $100 million lawsuit because their child “sustained emotional and psychological trauma and injury” when she, like several other children and staff, heard “‘cursing, screaming, and shooting’ over the school intercom.” The suit has since been withdrawn.[4]

Coverage of the event by the modest local weekly the Newtown Bee is most revealing in its combined discrepancies, vagueness, and brevity. In a December 14 article unidentified school personnel were floridly commended for their courage. Among them were school principal Dawn Hochsprung, who recounted to Bee Editor John Voket[5] how “a masked man entered the school with a rifle and started shooting multiple shots – more than she could count – that went ‘on and on.’”

The problem with the account was that it conflicted with a subsequent storyline where Hochsprung was the first to be killed by the gunmen. Three days later the paper issued a retraction and revised the story further.[6]  No additional explanation was provided concerning what party Volkert spoke to and quoted at the crime scene, suggesting from the onset a partly botched attempt at establishing a well-worn storyline.

Along these lines the same article relates what under the circumstances seems like an odd exchange between law enforcement and the school’s staff. Shortly after the incident

an unidentified woman wearing a Connecticut State Police jacket addressed the group of teachers and staff who were consoling each other in the empty Sandy Hook apparatus bays. She complimented them on their individual and “exemplary” efforts following the procedures they were taught to ensure the protection of as many children and colleagues as possible.[7]

In the immediate aftermath of a bloody massacre where 27 lay dead or dying is this the appropriate time for a “post-game pep talk” and slaps on the back? What this closely resembles is the breakdown of a shooting drill, one that proceeded with violent sound effects broadcast through the school’s intercom system. In fact, on the same day the State of Connecticut Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection in association with the Federal Emergency Management Agency were carrying out a “Planning for the Needs of Children in Disaster” drill in nearby Bridgeport.[8] Was the exercise location changed to Newtown at the last minute?

Close analysis of circumstances surrounding the event including unusual emergency procedures and news outlets’ interactions with alleged victim families following the shooting reveals important recurrent features and figures that further call the official account into question.

A Phantom Evacuation?

Additional facets of coverage and maneuvers suggesting the possibility of an at least partially staged event include the choice of the Sandy Hook Fire and Rescue Company’s headquarters as an evacuation point for the school’s students. This is accompanied by a lack of photographic or video evidence of such a widespread evacuation, bizarre interview footage of idle and wandering families alongside an emotional man who just happens across a half dozen Sandy Hook first graders in his front lawn who apparently witnessed their teacher’s murder.

Newtown Bee Associate Editor Shannon Hicks asserts that she was among the first on the scene at Sandy Hook, driving behind police and “taking photographs immediately through the windshield of her car, with one hand on the steering wheel and one holding her camera.”[9] Strangely, however, at best only two of Hicks’ photos actually emerge from the series—the famous shot of about fifteen students in conga line formation evidently moving across the parking lot en route to the fire station and a second of state police officers appearing in the December 14 Bee report that is later expunged.

Hicks’ ferocity and determination to capture the scene only yields a few published photos at a time when corporate media outlets were very eager for such documentation, while no other photo or video evidence have emerged indicating such a widespread exodus from the school.

Nor is there any rationale provided in reportage on exactly why the fire station is even designated as an evacuation point. The choice is unusual because the school has only one route in and out of the facility—Dickenson Drive—and in the event of an actual emergency children are forced to parade down a street as police cars, fire engines, and ambulances race the other way. Many schools use their adjoining parking lots as a rendezvous point, and Sandy Hook’s is particularly capacious.


“Safety First,” photo Tweeted on October 17, 2012 by Sandy Hook Elementary Principal Dawn Hochsprung.

Despite this dangerous and untenable set of conditions Sandy Hook students rehearsed this very scenario less than two months prior, as revealed in a photo Tweeted on October 17 by Principal Hochsprung. The image depicts a much larger assemblage of students in the lot behind the Sandy Hook fire station.

Itinerant “Crisis Actors”?

Following an evacuation of such magnitude the Sandy Hook fire depot would have been bursting at the seams with over six hundred children and staff, and at least as many family members, in addition to police, fire and medical personnel. Yet apart from a large array of emergency vehicles at the site no aerial footage indicates activity on this scale at any point following the shooting.

Instead, there are numerous strange encounters between broadcast journalists and small, sporadic group of wandering parents and children, some of whom are at best moderately curious and far from grief-stricken or hysterical at the prospect that their child may have been caught in the deadly assault. After such a harrowing event why are select would-be family members and students lingering in the area and repeatedly offering themselves for interviews? A possible reason is that they are trained actors working under the direction of state and federal authorities and in coordination with cable and broadcast network talent to provide tailor-made crisis acting that realistically drives home the event’s tragic features.

One organization providing such services is the Colorado-based Vision Box’s acting troupe Crisis Actors. The entourage’s personnel are “available nationwide for active shooter drills and mall shooting full-scale exercises.” Crisis Actors “develop and portray characters in emergency training scenarios,” Vision Box’s website reads.

The intensity at which they work recreates real life pressures that first responders going through the training must cope with … This special group has sessions with police officers, 911 operators, school administrators, mall security, radio experts, and school safety training professionals. There is an endless amount of scenarios this group can tackle, which range anywhere from weather issues, to a missing child, to an unknown intruder.

According to the Crisis Actors website group members work in association with the Federal Emergency Management Agency and “can play the part of the shooters, mall employees, shoppers in the mall, shoppers who continue to arrive at the mall, media reporters and others rushing to the mall, and persons in motor vehicles around the mall.” They are also trained to “play the role of citizens calling 911 or mall management, or posting comments on social media websites.”

Is it possible that such actors were utilized in Newtown to control the event’s depiction and magnify its effect on public opinion? With the exception of police and government officials, the shocked and grief-stricken students, family members and pedestrians captured in photos from the shooting’s aftermath are almost entirely anonymous. Further, the suggestion of collaborative efforts between journalists and families is evident in many of the interviews with family members, such as this surprisingly aborted exchange between a would-be parent and journalist.

Reporter: Sir, can I talk to you a second here? We’re Channel Two in New York. How did you find out about this, uhm, terrible tragedy?
[Reporter approaches family of three with third grade daughter and apparent Sandy Hook student accompanying them.-JT]
Unidentified Mother: OK. My daughter’s in third grade. We got, uhm, an automated call from, uhm, from the town—
Reporter: Yeah?
Mother: –that there had been a shooting.
Reporter: Sure.
Mother: Uh, nothing about where the shooting was, and that the schools were on lock down.
Reporter: So you were assuming it was probably the high school at first, right?
[Note that the mother has yet to say anything about having a son attending the local high school.]
Mother: Of course, and my son’s at the high school and I text him. He said, “Everything’s fine here.”
Reporter: Yeah.
Unidentified Mother: And then I got another text from, uh, CBS.

With virtually hundreds of students, faculty, staff and their families looking for each other and being reunited around the scene one would think journalists would have a broad range of interviewees from which to choose. Yet the same mother and daughter are again captured the morning of the shooting by an NBC affiliate.

Unidentified Mother: Another friend of mine said that, uhm, there was a man—masked man came in and just started shooting.
Unidentified Daughter:  When we were gone doing morning meeting [sic] like, we heard like, shots and everybody went on the ground and Ms. Martin just closed the door and we went to the corner.

In the same news clip another male child describes in unusual detail how he narrowly escaped the gunman’s hail of bullets.

Unidentified male student:  I heard something like a person was kicking on a door. Then I turned around and I saw smoke and I smelled smoke. Then (pause) Then bullets whizzed by. Then—then a teacher pulled me in to her room.

Here is the same student speaking to another journalist.

Unidentified male student: I saw some of the bullets going past the hall [sic] that I was right next to and then a teacher pulled me into her classroom.
Reporter: You heard sounds?
Male student: Yes.
Reporter: What did it sound like to you?
Male student: It sounded like someone was kicking a door.

The frequent hesitancy with specific words in this children’s deliveries, combined with a parent allowing their child to repeatedly recount such an event and the unemotional, almost identically-worded delivery, suggests how they may have been coached to present memorized lines.

Another child by the name of “Alexis Wasick” also makes at least two appearances and, following the unscripted lead of one journalist, recites similar lines in each interview.

CNN Reporter: Joining me is the Wasick family. We have Alexis who is in third grade. You told me you were sitting in class this morning and you saw a lot of police. Tell me-tell me how you found out what was going on.
“Alexis”: Well, we found that there was all these people and we found that [unintelligible] because we were right near the window in our classroom. And like, we saw like police officers and we heard them [directly addressing camera] on the roof and in our building.
[At this point “Alexis” receives some cues from CNN’s reporter.]
Reporter: Was everybody crying, scared, wanting their parents to get them?
“Alexis”: Yeah, they were.  And some people were even like, they kind of wish that they got a stomach ache [sic].

On the same day “Alexis” gives a somewhat different account with similar verbiage to an entirely different reporter.

Reporter: What happened?
“Alexis”:[Addressing reporter offscreen] Nothing really [unintelligible] We heard like an ambulance and a police officer come and everybody was a little scared crying and I felt actually a little sick, and I felt like I was going to throw up and [glances at camera] did my teacher too [sic]. [The garbled line, “My teacher did too,” suggests a canned delivery.]
Reporter: How did you get out of there?
“Alexis”: We had to [vocal cadence slowing] go—through—the—building (pause) and then we had to just go to the firehouse.

The performance of Sandy Hook resident Gene Rosen suggests how the community members might become intimately enveloped in the unfolding tragedy. Despite the overwhelming federal, state and local police presence blanketing the community on December 14 Rosen explains several days later how while feeding his cat he receives an unexpected visit from six mislaid and forlorn children whose classmates and first grade teacher Victoria Soto were killed in the shooting. “The six who turned up at Rosen’s home apparently ran out of the school past her body,” the New York Post amazingly asserts.[10] Instead of calling the authorities to properly reunite the children with their parents Rosen bizarrely invites them inside his home for 30 minutes to jostle with stuffed animals and describe their ordeal.

In an initial interview Rosen is standing in the driveway of his home and appears overcome with emotion, taking off his glasses while turning away from the camera and wiping eyes. He then proceeds down the driveway toward the front of his house, pointing to where he first spotted the children.

Rosen:  Six children, and they were sitting there. They were sitting there, and I had no idea why they were there. And I went down there.
[Cut to Rosen’s hands clutching reading glasses, then back to Rosen.]
Rosen: There’s a school bus driver and she says, “There’s been an incident. And I said, “Just come in the house.” And that’s how it started and  I—I brought them in the house.
[Cut to stuffed animals inside Rosen’s house, then back to Rosen.]
Rosen: And then over the next thirty minutes they just described what happened, little-by-little. These two boys kept saying, “We can’t go back to school. We can’t go back to school. Our teacher’s dead—Mrs. Soto. We don’t have a teacher.” And I couldn’t believe it. I couldn’t take that in. I had no idea what had happened.  A woman came to my house at twelve o’clock
[Cut to dimly-lit interior of house where Rosen stands before stuffed animals on floor.]
Rosen: Her face—her face looked frozen in-in terror. I’ve never seen a face look like that. She said, “Is my boy here? I heard there were six kids here.” And she said the name of the child. I thought that if she’d been to the Sandy Hook school she thought maybe a miracle from god would have the child in my house.  And I looked at the casualty list at six o’clock.
[Hand to eyes and weeping, then shaking head]
Rosen: His name was on it!

Time and again in the wake of the incident Rosen is brought before network cameras to present his maudlin recounting of the surreal and implausible encounter.

Continued Postmortem Uncertainties

To properly identify each victim would have required weighing, measurement, de-robing, washing, with all identifying features such as scars or birthmarks noted. Such standard postmortem procedures, the public is asked to believe, were accomplished at the school as no more than three were treated at the well-prepared Danbury Hospital.[11] According to Carver’s December 15 press conference remarks the teachers and children were processed by the state coroner and his staff at an onsite mobile facility the night of the shooting.

Yet at least one family was  not even allowed to see the body of their loved one. “They told me, ‘You can’t see (the body),'” Gilles Rousseau remarked to Radio-Canada, the French-language arm of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. “Because most people he shot, it was two or three shots in the face, point-blank.”[12] If this were the case it puts further pressure on the uncertain notion that Lanza was an expert shot who had the opportunity to uninterruptedly fire at almost inanimate subjects.

Further, without explanation Carver postponed examination of Adam Lanza’s body until two days after the shooting. Jean Henry, a processing technician in Carver’s office, was recently placed on leave when she allegedly brought her husband, an unauthorized party, in to the state morgue to view Lanza’s corpse.

They went to the gurney where Lanza lay, then Henry unzipped the bag so her husband could look at him for a moment, and she closed the bag and they left the room, sources familiar with situation told The Courant Wednesday.[13]

The refusal for at least one family to view the body of their loved one and Henry’s informal intervention both contribute to the uncertainty and ambiguity surrounding what appears as a severely compromised postmortem operation, the gross inconsistencies of which major media have presented to the world as established fact.


As transcribed and analyzed in Part I of this analysis, the unusual testimony of Connecticut’s chief coroner H. Wayne Carver II, ostensibly placed in charge of the Sandy Hook school postmortem. Carver’s December 15 behavior and remarks before the press suggests his clear discomfort and demonstration that he knows very little about the shootings or autopsies themselves. In light of the above the physician’s hesitant performance in Sandy Hook’s tragedy is perhaps not so difficult to explain. At one point Carver even indicates his  disapproval of the proceedings by expressing his wish that his staff and “the people of Newtown don’t have it crash on their head later.” Is Carver referring to an embellished event that he has been an unwilling participant in?

As indicated on the Crisis Actors website, performance of this type is now a commonplace feature of widely prevalent “live shooter drills” and may be infused throughout such an event and its aftermath to augment and control a broader narrative intended for public consumption. “The power to make a reportable event,” historian Daniel Boorstin writes, is “the power to make experience.”[14]

Along these lines and despite countervailing facts and inconsistencies the official story of the Sandy Hook shooting is now part of the nation’s collective experience, consciousness and memory. To declare that the shooting “never took place” is cause for intense opprobrium in most polite circles where, in familiar Orwellian fashion, the media-induced trance and dehistoricized will to believe maintain their hold. Similarly, an individual who contends that Timothy McVeigh was an accessory in a much larger operation at Oklahoma City, Osama bin Laden was not responsible for the events of 9/11, or the World Trade Center Towers were brought down by controlled demolition is vigorously condemned for thought crimes against the state. Such are the immense dimensions of mass manipulation where fact and tragedy may be routinely revised and reinforced to fit the motives and designs toward a much larger apparatus of social and geopolitical control.


[1] Michelle Tuccitto Sullo, “Newtown Search Warrants for Adam Lanza’s Home, Vehicles Still Sealed,” New Haven Register, December 29, 2012.

[2] Gordon Duff, “Israeli Death Squads Involved in Sandy Hook Blood Bath,” PressTV, December 18, 2012.

[3] James F. Tracy, “The Sandy Hook School Massacre: Unanswered Questions and Missing Information,” Global Research, December 25, 2012.

[4] Mary Ellen Godin, “Claim Seeks $100 Million for Child Survivor of Connecticut School Shooting,” Reuters/Yahoo News, December 28, 2012. The suit was tentatively withdrawn shortly thereafter.  Michael P. Mayko, “Lawyer Withdraws Sandy Hook Suit, May Refile,” Connecticut Post, December 31, 2012.

[5] John Voket, “Stories of Heroism Emerging From School Tragedy,” Newtown Bee, December 14, 2012.

[6] “Retraction and Apology,” Newtown Bee, December 17, 2012. See Niall Bradley, “Sandy Hook Massacre: Official Story Spins Out of Control,” Veterans Today, December 20, 2012.

[7] Voket, “Stories of Heroism.”

[9] Julie Moos, “How the Newtown Bee is Covering Sandy Hook Elementary School Shooting,”, December 15, 2012.

[10] Reuven Fenton, “Children at Door: Teacher is Dead,” New York Post, December 18, 2012.

[11] Joe Van Brussel, “Danbury Hospital Prepared for School Shooting Massive Casualties, Got Few,” Huffington Post, December 14, 2012.

[12] Lise Millette, “Lauren Rousseau, Teacher killed in Newtown Shooting, Mourned by Canadian Family,” Canadian Press via Huffington Post, December 18, 2012.

[13] Jon Lender and David Altimari, “State Worker Placed on Leave After Showing Husband Adam Lanza’s Body,” Hartford Courant, January 2, 2012.

[14] Daniel J. Boorstin, The Image: A Guide to Pseudo-Events in America, 25th Anniversary Edition. New York: Vintage Books, 1987 [1961], 10.

Leave a Reply

243 thought on “Sandy Hook School Massacre Part II: Continued Ambiguity and Augmented Realities”
  1. Wonderful article on Sandy Hook as fake tragedy. It’s the most plausible account I have read so far, but I have some questions, if you would. Are you saying that no children and teachers were murdered? Are they even missing? If they are missing, kidnapped? To be returned. Are only some of the teachers/parents/media, etc. people in on it, or are they all in on it? Were these invented parents and teachers? Wouldn’t there be some in the community who would recognize the fake parents? Thanks.

    1. Thanks. At this point we don’t know and it continues to be a mystery. I am convinced there is media complicity in constructing the event. Something I did not include in the piece is that of the 28 individuals apparently killed on December 14, 11–about 40 percent–do not have last names listed in the Newtown telephone directory (available at the Newtown Bee website). Perhaps they live out of town or opted to be unlisted, but this still seems like a somewhat high percentage of overall victims.

      1. “this still seems like a somewhat high percentage of overall victims.” <— From what evidence are you drawing the conclusion that a 40% "not listed" rate in the local telephone directory is unusual for a community with the demographics of Newtown, CT? I ask because it seems that what you are saying here is that approximately 40% of the time, you could not find a match for a given victim's surname on a list of surnames for telephony service subscription holders in the same general community. If this is the case, it seems that there could be many legitimate reasons that this could be true and not an unusually high rate.

        You state two possibilities: the family does not live within the geographic boundaries covered by the directory or has opted for an "unlisted number". The general affluence of the community suggests that rate of "unlisted" numbers would be "higher than normal" for a couple of reasons. First, phone service providers generally charge a premium to keep your listing out of their published directories which creates a financial constraint on this benefit. Second, people with more assets are generally more concerned about theft, especially identity theft, and therefore might be more ready to adopt any available measures to limit what information about them is made available to the public.

        But, aside from these scenarios which would make the 40% matching failure between the two lists of names less exceptional, there are at least two others which would further raise the possibility of not getting a match. First, many households are getting their telephony service from what might be considered "historically non-traditional" providers which do not publish subscriber's numbers in public directories. The most significant of such providers would be mobile carriers (or the mobile subsidiaries of traditional service providers). Trailing much further behind would be VoIP only carriers such as Vonage, Ooma, and various smaller companies. The second, and, in my opinion, more significant variable that might have an impact on matching names on the two lists would be the fact that many victims may not share the same surname as the person who is the subscriber to the telephony service in their household. There are lots of reasons this could occur, but in an affluent area like Newtown, I would guess that the primary drivers would be households consisting of families comprised of re-married parents (e.g. the victim was a stepchild of the person subscribing to telephony service in the household and therefore listed in the directory), as well as families consisting of two parents with different surnames for other reasons such as retention of a maiden name by the mother, as is increasingly common among educated, professional-class, women who start families later in life than the historical norm. Children of such households would also have an increased likelihood of having a surname different from that of the household's telephony service subscriber.

        You were raised in a time when a 40% miss in a matching exercise similar to this one would have been much more exceptional (the 1970's). I was too, so I get how the 60% match rate seems intuitively low. However the circumstances I've detailed seem to bring down the likelihood that such intuition is close to the mark without more supporting evidence.

        Further, all of this assumes that the names were correctly spelled by the reporting outlet you used as your source for the list of victims' surnames. I don't know your source, but various and many media outlets have reported erroneous information and, in the context of this forum, I think it's safe to assume that I don't need to go out of my way to convince you of this. "The media" are notoriously bad at spelling names correctly (I've seen "Newtown" misspelled more than once throughout coverage of this event). Whether it's a bad "robo-transcription" or the non-existence of fact checkers, I don't think this variable can be discounted entirely either. Each misspelling that resulted in a mismatch would add another 3.5% to the total match failure rate.

      2. Cell phone numbers are not listed in the phone book, and yes, plenty of people choose to be unlisted. Over a third of US households do not have land-line phones.

        Cell phones plus unlisted numbers combines to make nothing about that 40% number strike me as unusual. Is this the level of evidence you require in student papers?

      3. The teachers who were killed came from surrounding towns. I found this by checking and comparing town names with the obituaries, they match up. I only checked teacher names because children rarely have telephone numbers listed in their names.

        Lauren Rousseau Obit:
        Lauren Rousseau Whitepages Entry:

        Victoria L. Soto Obit:
        Victoria L. Soto Whitepages Entry:

        Rachel D’Avino Obit:
        Rachel D’Avino peoplesmart entry:

        Dawn Hochsprung is an interesting case. As the former principal at Sandy Hook she’s listed on an old Demographic Report.

        I’m inclined to go with Occam’s razor here, these poor people were most likely killed in a school shooting.

    2. I’ve been wondering who reported the story of Ms. Soto hiding her students in a classroom closet. I don’t remember ever hearing the source for that story. I don’t recall any of her students being interviewed. Also, I can’t stop asking myself why she didn’t lock her classroom door if she knew a shooter was coming and had the time and calmness to round up the students into a closet?

        1. Yeah, but there are NO REPORTS whatsoever in the media about him shooting his way through any classroom door. Stop trying to explain away the inconsistencies. They are there. They are evident. We can all see them. If you don’t have any questions, and are plenty satisfied with what the government and the media have reported, then what can we say?

      1. @mart-Actually a door would stop someone. I’ve fired both a Sig Sauer and a Glock (the two handguns the media said he had) and neither are going to knock a door down. They will make holes, certainly, but you would have to fire many, many, rounds until there was a hole big enough to knock the door down. Besides, it is a basic instinct to put up a barrier between yourself and an attacker. Ms. Soto was a victim like the others. I just question the story of HOW she ultimately met her demise. There are different versions of her story too. She hid all of her students in cabinets. She hid all of her students in a closet. She hid some students in a closet. Some escaped and ended up on Gene Rosen’s front lawn (yeah right). What is the truth? All of that is really a side issue though. She and the other staff members and student victims are gone. The hard, important questions we need answered are: Who did the shooting? Is there surveillance footage to prove who did it? Is there surveillance footage at all? Did a mole hack into the security system and shut it down before the attack? Who are the guys arrested outside of the school that day? Why did Wayne Carver act like an ignoramus at the press conference? What information is being kept from us and why?

  2. FYI, Facebook users are allowed, with minimal stipulations, to change their profile name and even their url of their Facebook page. So the page could have already existed and then after the shootings the user could have changed it to an Emilie Parker tribute page.

    1. True, but if the page already existed the timeline and origination date would have remained intact. To my knowledge Facebook provides few accommodations for users who wish to both alter or delete the date they “joined Facebook” and shave 18 months from their timeline short of starting a new account.

      1. So, the origination date remains unchanged. So what? After the shootings, the owner changed its name and after that, even older activity would show the new name with the new profile pic.

        1. I think we are just not seeing this the same way. You see this as evidence of conspiracy being exposed, I do not. I have now seen you do this several times, trying to support your argument with info that is poorly documented, not well researched and/or simply a matter of selective interpretation. I see this item as a person with a Facebook page who has no connection to this at all, until after the tragedy becomes emotionally moved,by learning of the events, to change the name of the page.

        2. Good troll, Ben. By your own admission, as well as Facebook’s criteria, timelines on pages cannot be altered or deleted. Yet the timeline on this page, its date of inception, as well as each item on it are entirely deleted and reset for December 21, 2012. The second photo taken of the page depicts the timeline’s inauguration on March 23, 2011 as well as a post from August 8, 2011 to “RIP Emilie Parker Sandy Hook Massacre Victim.” I find that unusual and sufficient for scrutiny.

          Questioning the interpretive judgment and research skills of an author should be a more ambitious project than half-hearted attempts at dancing around the edges and disingenuously pointing to trivial points of concern.

      2. “Questioning the interpretive judgment and research skills of an author should be a more ambitious project than half-hearted attempts at dancing around the edges and disingenuously pointing to trivial points of concern.”

        Seems like he had a good example.

      3. But that’s the whole point, James, and you seem to be missing it. Anyone wanting to create “evidence” to support the ” staged event” theory wouldn’t want the dates and times lines to change. The whole idea would be to keep the pre 12/14 date and time line, but change the information associated with the timeline. Ruse complete.

  3. I always wonder how much of the weirdness can be attributed to incompetency rather than malice.

    Regardless, it would seem to be really easy to confirm whether any of these people were actors – just ring around the community and see if anybody knows them. I’m willing to make a few phone calls. Anybody else? If we had 10 volunteers, we could ring 50 total fairly easily…

    1. Some of the actors and /or victims were there only since 2010 or later. It was well planned and set up. Some might have really died but we’ve seen no proof of it. Rosen’s wife may have hired Hochsprung and the other teacher’s in her powerful government position. And magically all photos of Marilyn Rosen have been scrubbed from the internet. She may also be an actress who acts and is very involved in a theater in NYC. And they seem, like other actors involved, to have multiple homes around the country in affluent places. All the actors (I’ve noticed) who’ve done interviews are raising money based on their kid’s murder. Well maybe not Lanza, but he knows better and makes perhaps $2,000,000 a year from his 3 employers (DARPA, Ersrt & Young and GE). And he likely gets patent and copyright money in advanced financial and precrime and other predictive programming analysis and software. Still later on when things die down he can cash in on books or movie deals from the notoriety. Even if he wrote a technology book unrelated to the mass shootings it would sell due to this new fame. And that is whether or not he even really exists.

  4. I’ve certainly noticed the pattern(perhaps pretext) of the “Training Exercise”, its prominence in these “shock”/Mass Casualty Producing Events. Aurora, CO was a training exercise at the university, 7/07/05 London was also apparently a training exercise, 9/11/01 was 1 dozen exercises that “went live”(Vigilant Guardian/Vigilant Warrior) – not including manuals depicting almost the VERY scenario of “crashing planes into skyscrapers”. In just about every case, Local/State/Federal Authorities, FEMA, Military were DIRECTLY INVOLVED. With that as the backdrop, it shouldn’t be ANY surprise when a similar scenario plays out at Sandy Hook—where according to this piece & some reports, one was carried out in Bridgeport, CT, as well as Faculty & Students of this very school this “took place” training ahead of time for this VERY event!

    Of course it also shouldn’t be dismissed the possibility of “actors” involved in implementing this “play”, as it should be known the very close relationship btw law Enforcement/Pentagon & Mainstream Media…understanding that in the ’90s, The Pentagon had(has?) a program placing personnel within Media Organizations like CNN.

    1. The purpose of the drill is to draw in the patsies and the players. Patsies are told that they are needed to play a role as a terrorist for a drill. Then the drill goes live with real deaths and acts of terror and the patsies get killed in the process and blamed – study the 7 7 attack in London – there is a great documentary on youtube

    2. Rico perhaps you can explain this:
      If this event was staged and or fake wouldn’t the NRA have some inkling. They have lots of lobbying power… well here, read this press release issued on January 10th 2013:

      Fairfax, Va. – The National Rifle Association of America is made up of over 4 million moms and dads, daughters and sons, who are involved in the national conversation about how to prevent a tragedy like Newtown from ever happening again. We attended today’s White House meeting to discuss how to keep our children safe and were prepared to have a meaningful conversation about school safety, mental health issues, the marketing of violence to our kids and the collapse of federal prosecutions of violent criminals.

      We were disappointed with how little this meeting had to do with keeping our children safe and how much it had to do with an agenda to attack the Second Amendment. While claiming that no policy proposals would be “prejudged,” this Task Force spent most of its time on proposed restrictions on lawful firearms owners – honest, taxpaying, hardworking Americans. It is unfortunate that this Administration continues to insist on pushing failed solutions to our nation’s most pressing problems. We will not allow law-abiding gun owners to be blamed for the acts of criminals and madmen. Instead, we will now take our commitment and meaningful contributions to members of congress of both parties who are interested in having an honest conversation about what works – and what does not

      While they express their frustration working with the White House, how come they can’t see the conspiracy for what it is and why haven’t they tried to expose the plot of the Feds? Why haven’t NRA memebers (aka: contributors to this thread) pled their case – 4 million of ya got to have some pull.

  5. I don’t believe the conspiracy theories, however I do find the media’s incompetance and complicity to be a grave concern. The state police warned all people to stay away from their quarry, the families of the victims with police state rules, when under the law the media does not have to do so but could contact the victim families without sanction. This reminded me of when GW Bush warned the media not to follow his daughters, probably about the same correlation.

    Good point on the drills happening and sometimes being used by the bad guys as cover for their evil deeds. Also the point that those who cry “conspiracy” become pariahs and scorned. I do hope some real facts come out soon.

    1. Thanks (I think). That’s a central problem: If facts are presented from where will they be issued, how will they be used to make better understand an event we still know very little about, and how will they be verified as accurate? In commonsensical thinking and under ideal conditions this is what public servants and authorities are supposed to provide to we the people.

    2. If you do not believe in conspiracy theories then you cannot investigate anything or understand the nature of evil. Every homocide detective must be a conspiracy theorist or he can not investigate and solve and help prosecute any murder.

    3. con·spir·a·cy (kn-spîr-s)
      n. pl. con·spir·a·cies
      1. An agreement to perform together an illegal, wrongful, or subversive act.
      2. A group of conspirators.
      3. Law An agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime or accomplish a legal purpose through illegal action.
      4. A joining or acting together, as if by sinister design: a conspiracy of wind and tide that devastated coastal areas.

      People like you who only think conspiracy “theories” belong in the movies are only fooling themselves. 9/11 was the watershed that ushered in the “War on Terror” and all its attendant personal freedom restictions and our ever increasing surveillanced and monitored society says that we are only a few more incidents away from a total police state.

      The anomalies inherent in this event have been carefully researched by people like Mr. Tracy only to point out that our government controlled media is not revealing the truth of the so-call shooting. When it comes to gun control, people rely on their feelings, not the facts. Regardless of where you stand on it, a disarmed society is a controlled society.

  6. I think you’re forgetting one thing: If I understand right the family pic was on the RIP page dated Mar 23, 2011 & therefore was taken on or before that date– i.e., 1 year 9 mos ago. This is plenty of time for Baby to have outgrown her red dress and be given a white one instead. (Notice her hair is longer). Middle child also would’ve grown & taken Emilie’s dress as a hand-me-down. She looks much more like Emilie in the Obama lap cuz she is now approaching the same age that Emilie was in the original family pic, and her hair also would’ve grown.
    Something else bothers me. Maybe it’s trivial, but they don’t get around to looking into the Honda trunk til after dark, but the pics of it being flatbedded are in daylight. Surely they didn’t leave it there overnight? Also, when reporters were taking pics of trunk being searched why didn’t they comment on “temporary structure” for medical examiner being set up? The exact quote of the ME iis slightly different by the way: Referring to his staff whom he’s just complimented: “I hope uh I hope they & I hope the people of Newtown don’t have it crash on their heads later.” (4min into press conference). I have more, will put it in next comment.

    1. Thanks. I don’t believe the pic on RIP Emilie Fb page had to have been provided on March 23, 2011 when it was started. I am more concerned with why it was started at that time and under what conditions the timeline was deleted. I have looked into the Honda auto less so, and there’s certainly something unusual about not searching it until that night. Thanks also for the full quote from Carver.

      1. Excellent work, James. What I think is needed now is for some dedicated reporters to go to Newtown and talk to the residents about what they think really happened. Surely a whole town cannot be involved in a cover up, can they????

        And what about the actual school kids who, supposedly been moved to another school. Has anyone been able to talk to them and the teachers?

        And there was very little coverage of the funerals. I, for one, wish I could have attended them and secretly popped open a coffin or two to verify the deaths:P

        I also think they wanted the Sandy Hook school building empty and abandoned for their own reasons. It will be interesting to see what the do with the property later.

  7. On one point that Lanza would have had to be an advanced marksman to have such a high kill rate some comments:

    OK, so as a former cop you are very skilled with firearms. How about concealed carry? Principals and others at the top rung are paid extremely well, many over $100K a year plus benefits, pension, etc., so why aren’t these people skilled with guns?

    Second point; how does this kid pull off a near perfect kill rate, especially since there is no evidence the Lanzas spent time doing target practice locally according to the Feds??

    Response: “100 bullets to 26 kills is far from “perfect”, whatever the H that is! And yes, ANY armed response could easily be futile against a high rate of fire weapon. There would be a high probability that any teacher/admin/security guard with a “pea shooter” by comparison would be outgunned and just as dead.”

  8. Okay, so I was listening to an archived show w/Rick Adams and Dr. K (RBN) and learned this interesting piece of info:

    “Adam Lanza was a vegan: He didn’t want to hurt animals” (video at link)

    It was a shared love of live music that sparked a close friendship between Russ Hanoman and Nancy Lanza more than five years ago. Now, in light of the tragedy at Sandy Hook and recent reports suggesting she was a paranoid survivalist, Hanoman is speaking publicly about the woman he knew. As he told PIX 11, “She was a wonderful, beautiful, elegant woman who loved life, and most importantly she loved her son, Adam.”

    Another small detail emerged in the course of the interview, this time about Adam Lanza.

    Lanza was vegan, according to Hanoman, because he “didn’t want to hurt animals.”


    Also, if you watch the video, they again show you that shot of the firehouse, but it has a sign “Welcome to Sandy Hook School” and they seem to be trying to give the impression that that’s actually the school. And, for what it’s worth, somewhere in the audio w/Rick Adams, Dr. K was talking about how he actually called the Newtown Police to talk about the discrepancies in the offical story. He said the guy he spoke (he didn’t give a name) said something about how the discrepancies weren’t coming from them, but were coming from the federal govt, which kind of took over (or something to that effect) (I was kind of surprised that Dr. K apparently called the Newtown Police–I was kind of under the impression that independent “journalists” were supposed to stay away from this)

    Also, here’s a crazy question: how do we actually know Adam Lanza’s body was even found in Sandy Hook Elementary?? Did anyone see him there (I’m pretty sure we were told he was wearing a mask)? And how did he actually get to the school. At first the MSM gave the impression that he drove his mother’s car tehre. But, as it turns out, the car we were told was Lanza’s was actually registered to Chris Rodia, a drug dealer from Norwalk. So, are we to assume that Adam Lanza, who has no history of violence or criminal behavior also stole a car? Were the keys to Chris Rodia’s car found on Adam Lanza’s body? Has it even been verified that Adam Lanza knew how to drive and earned at CT driver’s license?

    1. Thanks for the additional info. Interesting to also note that the Sandy Hook Fire House is not designated as such on Google Maps, suggesting that it is part of the school’s campus. As with the Aurora Colorado shooting we have no witness that saw the assailant. We also don’t have info on any of the bodies, including Lanza’s. To my knowledge there is at best limited information on the autopsies and the state medical examiner appears to know very little about their condition.

      1. How do we know the story of Victoria Soto hiding her students in a closet took place? Who reported that story? I don’t recall any of the interviews with any of the children being interviews with her students. I’ve been wondering about that. I also can’t stop asking myself why Ms. Soto did not lock her classroom door if she had the calmness and presence of mind (and time) to round up her students into a closet? (She obviously was not paralyzed with fear so why would she not lock the door first and THEN proceed to hide her students? I’m not criticizing her without empathy. I’m just asking these questions like a detective examining the scene of the crime would presumably do. Thoughts?

      2. We know two people peaked in that body bag. Jean Henry, a very long-tenured state employee with an active lawsuit (unrelated to this situation) going against the gov and others, was apparently concerned enough about what she was seeing to show it to her husband. It’s not rational to think a long-term employee would risk her job by doing this for the fun of it. I wonder what they saw in that bag? I wouldn’t be surprised if they have a car accident in the near future…

    2. In fact, it was a discussion with a reporter at the Hartford Courant where this information was derived. It was he who said that the discrepancies and preemtive infromation arose not from them, that is the Newtown Police and State Police, but instead from:

      Washington, D.C. and
      The Justice (or injustice) Department

      He made it highly clear that the locals were NOT responsible for the early l eaks about Ryan Lanza or even the original claims regarding the deaths of the children, as shown, here by Mr. Tracy. Nor did the first reports of Adam Lanza as either the culprit or his death come from the locals.

      All the fraud that has been perpetrated was orchestrated from these sources. The role of media black-ops organized for a hidden agenda against Ameica’s guns is clearly evident , the anti-gun momentum being clearly organized by likes of Bloomberg, Feinstein, Schumer, Sugarman, et al.

      1. Grazie for my complimentary copy of your excellent work- “Wrongly Blamed” which I won from Rick Adams. Please stay on this case.
        Does your “et al” happen to include a certain Senator from Connecticut, or did you leave him out on purpose?

    3. Maybe the fire house knew the children were coming ahead of time, and some incompentent person ( not understanding that this was suppose to be real) put the welcome on the sign prior to the emergency exercise? Understand what I am saying?

  9. five hundred children and staff, and at least as many family members, in addition to police, fire and medical personnel

    I’m a retired career firefighter and am somewhat familiar with the layout of fire stations. How they planned to get 500+ people into a typical fire station is unknown.

    Shortly after the FALSE FLAG/INSIDE JOB of 9/11, Fire Administration was thinking about opening up fire stations to the general public in case of some type of large, city-wide emergency.
    At a staff meeting, this subject came up and I asked “Are you going to provide fire stations with arms?

    There was a look of shock around the table and the Deputy Chief asked, “Why would fire stations needs weapons?”
    I told her that when a station became full and could take no more people, someone with a gun would show up and demand that he/she and their family be let in, so at that point, what were us firefighters supposed to do?”

    My question was never answered, but Fire Administration never approved of turning stations into mass evacuation points.

  10. Another reason why middle-child-grown-older might look so much like Emilie: She IS. If original family pic contained only 2 kids, a younger Emilie & Baby & later an older Emilie is added. . . . Thus the missing child in the Obama pics is the middle child, whose grown into Emilie as we know her.
    Bear in mind that we KNOW there is a time lapse between the pics cuz baby’s hair has grown.

    I continue to be surprised there is so little comment on what is heard on the police scanner– altho if one assumes the whole thing is a scam that wd make sense.
    Bits quoted from :

    3:35 Reports that a teacher saw 2 shadows running past the gyn which wd be the rear– rear shooting.
    3:46 Yeah we have ’em. They’re coming at ME, down _____Way.
    4:06 (stressed) Come up the driveway. Walk slowly.
    (other calmer voice, different location?) This is it.
    5:52 Got him proned out
    6:44 1 Charlie Echo Julie4. 1CEJ4 [anybody know what this plate turned out to be?–Penelope]
    9:04 Party in custody
    20:00 ________muliple weapons including 1 rifle and a shotgun [Can somebody tell us what he says just before this?
    [There is much, much more but my hearing isn’t good enough–Pen]
    Sometimes the site won’t come up by clicking on it. If so, it’s put up by radiomantv911
    Like you, James, I actually think the whoe event is phoney. Paid for by govt faction as a psyop, perhaps engaging a pre-existing group, like a congregation maybe, plus a few imported actors. An invesigator cd find out if these children were born in area hospitals 6 years ago or just imported recently. Ownership of the homes wd yield info too & is public info. Need exact address of Gene Rosen & the parents tho. Finally, was school privately owned or public? (Are the satanic handsigns real or an internet hoax?) Thanks so much for all your work on this. Hope others will continue it.

    1. OMG! That is true! You can clearly see that, when you click on the “ANDREAS BEHRING BREIVIK.We hate him) link, it goes STRAIGHT to the RIP Emilie Parker page! That is mind boggling! How did you find that out, Richard?

      1. If you will look carefully at the photo, the 2 girls are sitting next to each other on his lap. Even if they were both straddling him, SOMEONE’s legs would be seen in the photo. This photo has been carefully examined by competent researchers and found to be doctored. Better rethink what physical world you live in:))

  11. “I continue to be surprised there is so little comment on what is heard on the police scanner– altho if one assumes the whole thing is a scam that wd make sense.”

    The Greenwich police say they unscrambled the feed from that day, I wish they would post the results online…..

  12. I just listened to this quick post from John Friend and this Brian Stavley guy mentioned something about how an Emilie Parker Facebook fund was set up before they even knew she was dead (like on the day of the event, while the school was in lockdown).

    This is talked about here:

    Here’s what they said:

    Why is “Emilie Parker Fund” FB started BEFORE the creator(s) knew she was dead???

    The very FIRST post on the page (after the cover photo was updated):

    “Alan Prothero and I have set up an account at America First Credit Union to help Robbie Parker and his family with their immediate needs due to their loss of their beautiful girl in the shooting this morning in Conn. You can put funds in the account or give them directly to me or Alan. Please contribute what you can and spread the word: Emilie Parker Memorial Account at America First Credit Union. Account #9056862.”

    … and the SEVERAL posts later…

    “We’ve had an update. The school is still on lock down, I assume pending investigations. Robbie and Alissa have very limited information. They haven’t been able to see Emilie, and they do not know if she is still in the school or if she was one of the ones rushed to the hospital. We apologize for the misinformation that we gave you earlier. But we know still that sweet Emilie was a victim. We just don’t know any detail about what exactly happened to her.”

    But WHY would anyone create a memorial account fund, if they – at the time they created the fucking thing – had no idea of the person’s situation????

    Check it out for yourselves:

    Okay, maybe others can look into this. I’m not that familiar w/facebook and when I went to the page, I couldn’t find the above post about the school being in lockdown.

    Also, what happened to the RIP Emilie Parker Facebook page created Sept. 23 2011 that was posted here a few days ago? Has it been taken down?

    1. The mechanics of Facebook are such that Fb pages with fewer than 200 “likes” can have their titles changed by their owners, which is likely what took place with the RIP Emilie Parker page and may have been the case with the EmilieParkerFund. What is unusual about the RIP Emilie Parker page is that the timeline was also eliminated after the page was retitled. It is unusual that this “Fund” page you reference here would have been started on December 14 in the midst of the crisis. I have revised this post accordingly.

      1. Feel free to delete my above post if it sounds too “conspiracy-ish” for your site. I also posted that information over on the CT shooting thread at anti-zionist forum, where a bunch of independent citizen researchers are posting what they uncover on the CT shooting). Someone who has more experience w/Facebook just checked the info about the Emilie Parker fund page and the school still being in lockdown and verified that the posts are still there. So, comment #218 at the infounderground thread says: “I just checked. It’s there: on the bottom of the page on the left hand side.”

  13. I am in agreement that there are many strange discrepancies between the “official story” and the facts we are able to gleen from the media. But checking up on some of the facts presented here, I was able to see that the two teachers that the 3rd Grade girl referred to in the two TV interviews, are among the Names of Teachers listed on the Sandy Hook Elementary website. Both are 3rd Grade: Courtney Martin and Robin Walker.

  14. The most obvious things seems to be the lack of an evacuation crowd, so either 1. the students were still in the school, or 2. they were at home, or 3. the media intentionally avoided filming them.

    It seems that the first two possibilities would be very easy to verify unless the 600 student’s and their families could somehow be all silenced which seems impossible to me.

    The third possibility would only require the press to cooperate, which is totally feasible. So the question is why? The video below seems to make sense to me, they are creating discrepancies to make a red herring. Kind of a logical mind bender, but could be very effective if later the discrepancies are resolved discrediting sources exposing 9/11 and other much bigger false flags.

  15. Let me clarify some things…there are NOT 600 students in this school more around 400 range.
    I live in a nearby town and personally know someone who is related to parents of 3 children who attended SHE’S. THIS WAS REAL….VERY REAL!
    Now let’s get to the Media…It is EMBARRASSING on how wrong they were just to get the news story first. To my disgust…watching Fox news they were literally interviewing someone from the Newtown Patch. I don’t know if you are familiar with “patch” online news in towns all over the country. Basically glorified BLOGS. Second, not to totally trash the Newtown Bee…once again we are talking small town newspapers. Not “real” journalist.

    So this is what I know…incident really happened.
    because of the press so many questions….car registered to whom? Guns registered to whom? Did Adam have aspergers? Was he mentally ill? Was there another shooter? Chris Rodia-was he involved?

    Finally I have elementary and middle school aged children and they have been having lockdown drills in the past 5 years. They are quite comprehensive and occur quite often. So it is not strange that Newtown had a drill so recently.

    1. Thanks much for reading and posting. My main argument is not whether or not the event was real for residents such as yourself who experienced it, but more so how it was presented to the rest of the world (in a compromised way) by major media. On the drill, I simply find it unusual that it was held at the fire station. I have children as well and understand that they go through such drills. Can’t get a correct figure on student pop, and have seen how it ranges from 400-600. The late principal Dawn Hochsprung says the student pop is close to 700 in the letter where she announces the school’s new security system, I believe. (See below. JT @ 4:05PM EST 1-6-13)

      At the start of the 2012-13 academic year Sandy Hook Elementary School Principal Dawn Hochsprung announces in a public letter to families the Newtown School District’s new security system installed “in all elementary schools.” Under the newly-announced security regimen, “exterior doors will be locked during the day. Every visitor will be required to ring the doorbell at the front entrance and the office staff will use a visual monitoring system to allow entry. Visitors will still be required to report directly to the office and sign in. If our office staff does not recognize you, you will be required to show identification with a picture id. Please understand that with nearly 700 students and over 1,000 parents representing 500 SHS families, most parents will be asked to show identification. Doors will be locked at approximately 9:30 a.m.” “Principal Outlined New Security Procedures at Sandy Hook Elementary,” Hartford Courant, December 14, 2012, 8:25PM EST.

      1. Media incompetence here in Conn-etiquette/Corrupticut is very bad and I usually expect better from the NY Times….So we are left with the blogs which do have good info., but also misinfo. and twaddlers whose minds are mush and incapable of discerning truth from untruth. People who feed on junk culture, and junk food daily are the perfect stooges for events like this.

      2. James, I heard you state something to the effect that there is no reason to doubt the presence of video footage of Adam Lanza and the shooting, given the school’s new security system. Do you have proof that the visual monitoring system was a digital video recording system? There are plenty of visual monitoring systems – like baby monitors and apartment complex monitors to name just two – that don’t have video recording capabilities. That’s why they are called visual monitoring systems, not video surveillance systems. It seems strange to me that you would jump to that conclusion, if you weren’t trying to use it to justify a preexisting assumption.

  16. The Newtown event reminds me of what Rove (most likely) famously said to Suskind: “We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors…and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.” Newtown could be just the kind of reality creation Rove alluded to in his famous quote. Are we meant to be studying it in the way you and other researchers are doing, deconstructing the interstices of the “official story” of these new realities to determine what really happened? Talk about practical post-modernism, a theory wonderfully suited to perception management technologists. Now that the deep state is taking overt power it’s getting more comfortable performing these mass media misdirections — they’ve come a long ways since the painfully awkward and blatant attempt at perception management since the Jessica Lynch affair.
    I’m reminded of Lt. Kijé, the Russian folktale satirizing bureaucracy about a nonexistent soldier who is promoted to a colonel and becomes a hero. The Emperor, of learning of this hero, wants to meet him. Unfortunately Lt. Kijé dies before the meeting: “What a pity,” the emperor says, “he was a good officer.” Newtown is the dark, flip side of this tale, with society grieving over what really may be a nonexistent event. What was a prank against bureaucracy may now be the deep state’s black prank against society.
    Of course there’s the gun control aspect, where the event is used as an excuse to increase the power of the police state. As Kevin Carson sums it up: “what strict gun laws will do is take the level of police statism, lawlessness and general social pathology up a notch in the same way Prohibition and the Drug War have done… I’d expect it to lead to further erosion of Fourth Amendment protections against search and seizure, further militarization of local police via SWAT teams, and further expansion of the squalid empire of civil forfeiture, perjured jailhouse snitch testimony, entrapment, planted evidence, and plea deal blackmail.”
    But I think this goes even deeper than that. Given the way the deep state works — the web of connections between weapon makers, the government, and the media (the military-industrial-media-financial complex) — it’s not farfetched to draw the conclusion that instead of, or even in addition to, the idea that such an event can be used to pass gun control laws to bolster the police state, it may have also been designed to drive gun sales up. Indeed gun sales have reached historic highs after this event, haven’t they? (As they do anytime an event like this happens. And remember how quickly sales of duct tape spiked after the Dept of Homeland Security mentioned, in one of their first actions, that people duct tape their doors to protect themselves? Is that Pavlov laughing in the background?) Perhaps Newtown serves a double purpose: increase profits while providing yet another excuse to increase the police state “for our own security”. Is a new criminal black market being created to both boost profits and clamp down on civil rights? The drug war, after all, has served both goals exceedingly well.
    But wait, there’s more. Let’s see, we have the recent passage of the NDAA. We have the CT state police telling us the feds are investigating “misinformation” about the event on social media with an eye towards indictments. We have whistleblowers and even government critics now being involuntarily committed for psychiatric reasons. Facebook is suspending or cancelling accounts that don’t toe the line. It feels like a trap is being sprung. Given the CT police warning about social media, perhaps this event can also serve to finally gain restrictions to internet freedom that the PTB have been hungering for; maybe the Facebook user terminations is a canary in the mine.
    An event like this — killing white suburban kids in the heart of an upper-middle-class white-picket-fence America — hits the amygdala hard, the part of the brain where emotion is processed, and shuts off higher thinking. The very first news reports were rife with internal contradictions and paradoxes that could be easily parsed — if one were not emotionally catatonic when learning about the event. Such an event easily falls within Peter Dale Scott calls a deep event wherein there’s “an ongoing and perhaps irresoluble controversy as to what happened.”
    The Newtown shooting was definitely a perception management operation, regardless of the actual events that occurred for which there is no stable consensus. It feels to me more like an experiment to test the sociological waters of how it’s received more than a black psyop to be used for social control policy, like passing gun control laws. I have a feeling, as I believe you intimated in a previous post, that if this one experiment proves successful, which it appears it is, there will be more, and harsher ones to come. If this was indeed a fabricated event meant to be consumed as truth – with the mass media magically misdirecting our attention so as to elicit fear instead of wonder, the better to plant the seeds for political events to come — then questioning its veracity makes one a heretic, doesn’t it? And we know what’s happened to heretics in the past, don’t we?
    I’m really glad that you’re exploring this event, James, and sticking with it. Keep up the great work!

    1. Lohmann-

      The Sandy Hook incident also reminded me of what Rove said about “creating realities.” This 1995 essay on “Information Warfare” by Professor George J. Stein is also interesting to think about, especially the part where he mentions “capabilities of already well-known Hollywood technologies to simulate reality”:

      Information warfare, in its largest sense, is simply the use of information to achieve our national objectives. Like diplomacy, economic competition, or the use of military force, information in itself is a key aspect of national power and, more importantly, is becoming an increasingly vital national resource that supports diplomacy, economic competition, and the effective employment of military forces. Information warfare in this sense can be seen as societal-level or nation-to-nation conflict waged, in part, through the worldwide internetted and interconnected means of information and communication. […]

      Information warfare, in its essence, is about ideas and epistemology- big words meaning that information warfare is about the way humans think and, more important, the way humans make decisions. And although information warfare would be waged largely, but not entirely, through the communication nets of a society or its military, it is fundamentally not about satellites, wires, and computers. It is about influencing human beings and the decisions they make. […]

      A major new factor in information war is the worldwide infosphere of television and broadcast news. Information warfare at the strategic level is the “battle off the battlefield” to shape the political context of the conflict. It will define the new “battlespace.” We face an “integrated battlefield,” not in the usual sense of having a global positioning system (GPS) receiver in every tank or cockpit but in the Clausewitzian sense that war is being integrated into the political almost simultaneously with the battle. Many people suspect that the national command authorities (NCA) are in danger of becoming increasingly “reactive” to a “fictive” universe created by CNN, its various international competitors, or even a terrorist with a video camera. This media-created universe we live in is fictive rather than “fictional” because although what we see on CNN is “true,” it is just not the whole, relevant, or contextual truth. Nevertheless, this fictive universe becomes the politically relevant universe in which the government or the armed forces are supposed to “do something.” […]

      Fictive or fictional operational environments, then, whether mass-targeted or niche-targeted, can be generated, transmitted, distributed, or broadcast by governments or all sorts of players through increasingly diversified networks. […]

      Let us take just one example of how current technologies could be used for strategic-level information warfare. If, say, the capabilities of already well-known Hollywood technologies to simulate reality were added to our arsenal, a genuinely revolutionary new form of warfare would become possible. Today, the techniques of combining live actors with computer-generated video graphics can easily create a “virtual” news conference, summit meeting, or perhaps even a battle that would exist in “effect” though not in physical fact. Stored video images can be recombined or “morphed” endlessly to produce any effect chosen. This moves well beyond traditional military deception, and now, perhaps, “pictures” will be worth a thousand tanks. […]

      (excerpts from Stein essay originally posted on

      1. Thanks, Amanda — a truly fascinating read! Baudrillard’s simulacra in the intentional service of nefarious political ends… That’s where we are now, isn’t it?

      2. Lohmann and Amanda –

        The quote by Rove also brought to my mind the essay by Michael
        Aquino on psychological warfare and the works of Michael A. Hoffman on Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare. Here where I live the main gun dealer where I live is a Freemason, and I also suspect that this event was intended to run up gun sales for those in the loop, so to say.

        Honest gun dealers I knew were run out of business long ago, but that is another story. Organized crime rackets always try to squeeze out the competition, and that is essentially what certain religions are — organized criminal rackets masquerading as pious philanthropic organizations, and what a “friend” we have in Freemasonry!

        To the elite Freemasons, the mass mind is something to be manipulated like electricity, and it is considered a blind, dumb, and very predictable force or energy, which can be manipulated at will with the right tools and knowledge, much like electrical energy through logic gates on a computer chip. “Doubt it not”, as Pike said in Morals and Dogma, from whence I source this fact. Masonry is a “spiritual technology” known as Kabbalah which is the science of bringing controlled order out of chaos. The dark night is indeed rising, just as the predictive programming and twilight language seemed to suggest.
        The masses seem to think they have a mind of their own, however,
        contrary to the claim of aforementioned Freemason, Albert Pike.

        Confusion is the chaos of the mind. So, rightly said that epistemology is where the rubber hits the road. It is all about mind models, modes of thought, unconscious and unspoken assumptions that guide behavior, cognitive dissonance adroitly induced and and directed towards a desired dogma, the double-mind infused like the poison of a snake to stupefy the victims before moving in for the kill, the play of polarities, so to say.

  17. Here’s someone w/a background in the entertainment field who is questioning the Sandy Hook event as well. He compares this to the moon landing hoax and suggests what we are being show is “media magic.”

    Beautiful Rant By Adam Curry About How Fake the Sandy Hook Shooting Is, The No Agenda Show

    I highly recommend the video below–the guy talking clearly has background/experience w/the military/weapons, as well as police procedures. He opens w/an interesting quote from CT Gov. Malloy saying something to the effect of “We were spoken to and told to prepare for something like this happening in our state.”

    Now, he also mentions the issue w/the black honda supposedly being registered to Chris Rodia and NOT Nancy Lanza. But, as discussed here , it seems as though a mistake was made by the person recording the police transmissions (it would be helpful if this issue could be completely resolved by having someone w/access check the plates w/DMV).

    He also pointed out the problems around the issue of witnesses seeing one of the suspects seated in the front of the police car (apparently police procedure is for suspects to be in the back). This guy also does a very good job going into the problem surrounding the timing of the information released about Nancy Lanza being dead (since she was found dead at her home, it seems as though that information would not have been known until much later in the day)

    Investigating the Sandy Hook Narrative and Asking the Hard Questions

    In addition to having parents who appear to be acting (e.g. Robbie Parker), we also have a photo of a supposedly dead child, who is, in fact, very much alive:

    PROOF SANDY HOOK IS FAKE Woman’s Daughter’s Photo used for Sandy Hook Shooting Victim

    Description of video: Sandy Hook Shooting Victim Allison Wyatt does not exist. Her photo was stolen from her mother Cathy Gaubert’s Flickr page. The girl’s name is Lily Gaubert and she is alive and well.

    This next video seems to suggest that AP tweeted about the Sandy Hook shooting at 7:30 am EST (someone familiar w/the workings of twitter will have to look into this and verify what the woman making the video is saying)

    Why did the AP Tweet Sandy Hook at 7:25AM HAPPENED AT 8:30-40AM!!!

      1. I saw the United Way story earlier today. A spokeswoman stated that it was a “Google glitch” that gave incorrect date and time. But I don’t think she even mentioned Facebook!

      2. Were you aware that the Newtown Bee’s initial report on the shooting was crawled by the spider on December 13, 2012? Details here. The cached page was removed from the server sometime between the 9th and 10 of January. The text of the cached page is here.

  18. Thanks for writing this post. I find it all very unsettling. And any time I mention that there’s something odd about this whole thing, the response is “[Shame on you!] Have some respect for the families!” I mean no disrespect to the families, but there are just too many discrepancies in this story that rub me the wrong way.

    Also, as to what Lohmann said in a previous comment, my thoughts exactly: “I have a feeling, as I believe you intimated in a previous post, that if this one experiment proves successful, which it appears it is, there will be more, and harsher ones to come.”


    Amanda: That YouTube video about Allison Wyatt’s photo was chilling.

  19. But I do (respectfully) have this question for people who think this incident was fabricated with actors, etc.: If any part of this event were fake or staged, how would they convince the whole town to go along with the sham? Wouldn’t somebody step forward and say, “Wait – we don’t know these families (victims)”? Or if they’re covering up a different or larger version of this story, how would they keep all those kids and teachers quiet? Wouldn’t somebody come forward and say, “Wait, this is how it REALLY went down”?

    1. I wonder about this myself. They need not convince the whole town to go along — just a handful of intimates involved in the event, who may not know the story themselves of what occurred. Besides, who needs to be convinced about what? Ok, maybe you get a some families comparing notes, and reach certain conclusions. Now what? Where do you go?

      When I explore the matter as someone from the town who has firsthand knowledge of facts being fabricated, I ask myself “who can I go to to set the record straight”? Exploring the various scenarios I wonder if I would be able to break through the fortress of access to mass media when giving information that contradicts the official story. Just as with 911, there are many stories from witnesses and first responders that contradict the official story who were never given access to any mainstream media venue. Just like the tree in the woods, if no one hears the firsthand story of a witness that contradicts the intended narrative, then such a witness does not exist.

      Having been denied access to mainstream organs, they might try going to local authorities, or to the feds. If not actively ignored, such witnesses may be threatened, or even killed. (One need only look at the impossibly coincidental deaths of witnesses (“one hundred thousand trillion to one”) at the Kennedy assassination. Examples abound.)

      Without gaining access to any way to counter the official narrative, witnesses may end up going to the only place in which their voices will be heard — social networks and alternative media sites amenable to their stories; but such organs and their audiences are easily marginalized and dismissed by mainstream audiences.

      All propaganda experts, from Bernays to Goebbels to Ellul, know that for a lie to be believed it must meet several requirements, the primary one being that it must be repeated ad nauseum. Finding the truth requires the desire to find it combined with critical thinking skills, neither of which America audiences have in abundance.

      1. Quoting myself: “Without gaining access to any way to counter the official narrative, witnesses may end up going to the only place in which their voices will be heard — social networks and alternative media sites amenable to their stories; but such organs and their audiences are easily marginalized and dismissed by mainstream audiences.”

        Oh, and not just marginalized and dismissed, but, as we’ve learned from the CT State Police, those countering the official narrative — even firsthand witnesses — may find that they’ve become felons, or perhaps involuntarily committed to some psychiatric hospital…

      2. Lohmann, I think your whole premise, that the shooting was staged, is absurd. Just stop for a minute and really think about what that would entail. Based on your scenario, there would have to have been hundreds of actors, ranging from children and parents, school teachers and administrators, police officials, to local news coverage. They would have had to practice the event numerous times to make sure it went off without a hitch. And of course doing this without anyone in the small town of Newtown ever noticing. And who is hiring the actors? The so-called government -media-industrial complex that you describe? And for what purpose? To set forth anti-gun legislation? If that is the case, then why would the Adam Lanza “actor” be using/carrying two pistols? The gun control measures focus on assault weapons. Why wouldn’t the ” script” be more precise in delivering it’s intended result? Okay, sure, I’ll play along. There were glitches in the script and the event didnt go down exactly as planned. Okay. And yet, still, nobody seems to notice the actors? But wait, there’s more. The actors had to have planned for all the funerals, which would involve some local and not so local churches. Hmmm….maybe the churches are complicit. And still, no one seems to notice?

        I have friends who live in Newtown. They are actively involved in the community at various levels and in various fields. Some have known the “players” involved for quite awhile. None of my friends, or for that matter, none of the Newtown residents have raised any red flags pertaining to the legitimacy of their friends and fellow residents. Does it mean anything to you that NOBODY directly ot indirectly involved with the tragedy has questioned the authenticity of the tragedy? In a small town such as Newtown, everyone ends up knowing everyone else’s business. To say that the actors would only have to involve a “handful of intimates” in order to pull the wool over the eyes of an entire town is just absurd.

        And lastly, to assume that any Newtown resident with serious questions would have nowhere to go is ignorant of the facts. For starters, they could post on this website, or contact James. They could post on their own website. These two options alone would bring significant attention to their questions. And why wouldn’t they if they seriously thought that their whole town had been duped. If they didn’t want the attention that a website such as this would generate, they could just go to their local town hall or police force and voice their concerns. Oh, but wait…they’d be silenced wouldn’t they. Because their local government and police force are complicit as well…
        Are you beginning to see how many hundreds, if not thousands, of people would have to be involved in your tangled conspiracy web you are weaving, without anyone catching on??

        1. I have little doubt that you have friends in Newtown, “Pete Lie,” since your IP address indicates that you live just north of Stamford. Your argument contesting the idea that such an event was staged is also coherent. Since you’ve brought up Newtown residents, I have found it interesting that almost none have made their voices heard to silence such speculation. I would certainly be motivated in this regard if self-anointed “journalistic mavericks” were attempting to speak for me. Nor have they voiced any concern over how, for example, CT medical examiner H. Wayne Carver II could not professionally respond to exactly how the deaths of 26 Newtown residents occurred. Try this exchange on for size: “Reporter: How close were the injuries? Carver: Uh, all the ones (pause). I believe say, yes [sic].” Now I can anticipate your response. “He was having a rough day and isn’t used to doing autopsies on children.” But isn’t that his job? I can honestly say that if I were a parent of one of the children and saw a public servant performing like Bozo the Clown when discussing my child’s postmortem no words would adequately describe my rage. One could go on to cite additional glaring inconsistencies without much difficulty.

  20. Emily Parkers Facebook account was set up five hours after the shootings. With bank account already set up to receive charitable donations. Before her parents even knew she was DEAD! No media will report this. This is not a negative comment about the deaths of innocent people, but a question of how this could be possible. Questions about this will be removed from the page by the 24/7 monitor, will be removed from twitter, ect. Where is the freedom of speech. Where is the Media.

    1. Why does a well-to-do family need charitable donations for their slain child? Donations to help with a dead loved one are usually to help with burial expenses, or to help the family get along when a breadwinner has died, or to help with medical bills. What are the donations for?

      1. Courtesy of your friendly Connecticut Department of Homeland Insecurity:
        If you can get past the rant, this latest from Kirwan is worth a look. (Check links at bottom)
        Maybe a few more of these will help to “drill it home”

  21. There are too many inconsistencies in this event for one to believe that the official “State Media” version is what really happened. The emperor has no clothes. Thanks professor for having the guts to stand out in this.

  22. I must agree that something is amiss about the Sandy Hook narrative. Much. Is missing.
    Good research so far. There are also repororts that one of the teachers killed was/is an actress, and one of those anonymous photos was that teacher, posing as a concerned family member , phone to ear, trying to get word about a family member inside the school. Another claim is that a child listed among the dead was photographed with President Obama.
    I’ve wondered how the gunman used the rifle to kill kids when the rifle was found in the back seat of the car.
    Most puzzling is the link to Sandy Hook in the movie “the Dark Knight Rises”.
    Very odd indeed, and speaking of off, what is wrong with the medical examiner of Newtown?
    Good job so far. The truth is out there.

    1. Good research? He hasn’t even been to Newtown! I’m from Newtown and this did happen, any assertion to the contrary is idiotic and those of you that believe this drivel deserve a swift kick in the gonads.

      1. Hey StormsNYC…then answer the inconsistencies and I will leave it be…until then it is like WTC 7…yeah it just fell flat down cause it got hit with something…do you think the american people are that stupid? baaaaahh

      2. Have you considered the possibility that it DID happen (Prof. Tracey doesn’t say it didn’t happen, he’s just saying it appears that it didn’t happen the way the MSM depicted it) but that things are not as you have been told? Are you aware of all the issues with the official narrative? If 20 little boys and girls were killed in your town, don’t you want to know who did it and why? Even if no one in Newtown cares about this, the blowback is affecting the entire nation and we WILL continue to ask questions until officials explain themselves.

  23. I think you’re nuts. But I also note you don’t let any posts go onto this blog unless they are congratulating you for a job well done, or tossing you an easy question. Good luck regaining your sanity, you are going to need it my friend!

  24. James, I just read an article on Drudge Report regarding this website and about yourself.

    I think it’s great that you have gone on a limb to say that the shooting may not have occurred at all, or at least not as the media may have portrayed it. I believe that it is very important to not take things presented to us at face value. We should always be questioning claims given to the masses. And you did just that with this article.

    Thanks for the intellectual piece of writing and keeping us on our heels!

  25. I believe that Adam is completely innocent but was abused as a patsy:

    He obviously was very intelligent and socially rather unskilled because he spent his time pursuing intellectual interests versus gaining people skills.
    Furthermore, he made traumatizing experiences when both his brother and his dad kicked him out of their lives. Presumably these two career minded men were embarrassed by Adam’s seeming social ineptitude.

    So Adam might have felt very flattered if he got feed back from other players if he played online games. He reportedly was an IT wizzard. If one of these individuals remained predictably stable over time it is very likely that Adam would have been happy to meet this guy in person.

    I believe that his mum, Nancy, was shot by an intruder who broke into the house with locksmith’s skills. She probably wore house clothes and fled into her bedroom to search for a weapon to defend herself.
    Her trained killer was faster and shot her in the head. She fell on the bed – comments that she was sleeping in her pyjama also serve to make her look lazy.

    The killer stole her weapons and destroyed the computers – lest traces of a minder befriending Adam could be found.
    Then he drove away in the Lanza’s car.

    Adam’s fate was sealed after he left with his minder.. It would be easy to tell him that they have to drive be the school to pick up some stuff waiting in the basement.

    It is impossible for Adam to have performed this kind of shooting. Maybe there were 2 shooters for the kids and one to guard the floor. The latter one shot the staff who came running.
    The shooting was done in very few minutes. That gave the team time to get away before the police arrived.
    The shooting on the parking lot was probably done during the retreat, while the police had not arrived.

    Maybe the school was on lock down in the belief that there was a simulated emergency – just like on 9-11 there were simulated emergencies that simulated kidnapped passenger planes. Hence the flight control personnel did not believe that it was for real. All reactions were too late and the planes had crashed already. – or were flown via remote control as this technology was available at that time already..

    The aim is probably gun control:
    The US will be bankrupt as soon as the Federal Reserve ceases Quantative Easing, printing money that is not backed by anything but increases inflation and recession. The Feds cannot continue to do this forever as Obama requests when he demands another raising of the debt ceiling. Then what? The prospect of armed individuals alone or in groups demanding their money from banks or looting grocery stores due to the US’ s bankruptcy has to be controlled.

    Just like we were asked to believe that Mohammad Atta’s passport kindly survived the collapse of the twin towers, or that the alleged London 7-7 criminals caught their tubes in London on time after it was shown that their departure train in Luton was cancelled – it seems to be equally foolish to believe that Adam styled himself as a shooter and managed to accomplish this feat.

    It is a veritable illusion of confusion.

  26. I have to ask for clarification, I could be wrong and don’t want to go back to your original post to find this (sorry it is late)….. but I could swear that there was a mention of Lanza not shooting too many shots at close range and that most shots were taken with the .223 at a distance (apparently he was an “expert” marksman) But then the coroner and the Canadian man contradict this story by stating that he cannot see the body because most victims were shot point-blank in the face multiple times.

    I could be wrong, and if I am, you can just delete my comment, but I swear the shooting distance has been reported differently, as we’re the weapons used.

  27. Thank you for all of this info. Thank you for being willing to put it out there for the everyday american to see. Most will not take this seriously, but some will see this article published today and realize that what you are saying is true. You will have many enemies now. I hope I am wrong. I wish more people in high positions would step forward with this info. Most people are asleep and some (sadly) wont be awaken no matter what. But many will. so, Thanks again.

  28. Given that most victims were small children it is perhaps not so
    surprising that there were few wounded relative to the number of dead.

    That ratio is worth paying attention to, however as there have been other probable false flag incidents where implausible skill/accuracy has been attributed to a supposed lone wacko gunman. Most notably the Port Arthur, Australia massacre that led to the Australian gun ban:

  29. You want to actually be taken seriously as an investigator and writer, and cannot even spell check your work? The correct spelling is “ambiguity”. Although you have some interesting points, you are making the same wild accusation others made about September 11th, the moon landing, and so on. How many times have you visited the town and families?

    In my opinion, it was a tragedy set in motion by the evil alien race orbiting the earth.

  30. GREAT Information on This Globalist, (Bank$ter-run) Operation. There Can Be NO Doubt, The Sandy Hook Elementary School Shooting(s) In Newtown Connecticut, Were (ARE) a ‘False Flag’ Event, To Be Used As A ‘Psy-ops’ As Well As The Primary Tool, To Be Utilized Against The Second Amendment Right of Americans To “Keep & Bear Arms.” — PERIOD!
    Please Visit The Following Links, For Answers To What (and Who’s) Responsible For, … Well, Everything That’s Wrong In The World:

    (BTW Professor; You Spelled ‘Ambiguity’ Incorrectly In The Headline of Your Post. … LOL, Just Sayin’ … Again, Great Research. THANKS!)

  31. One of the important responsibilities of scholastic research is follow-through. Anybody can conjure up theories, but truly dedicated scholars will complete the research process. I see a lot of rhetorical discussion without direct data collection. Utilizing news sources are useful however, it is an indirect method. You have your hypothesis, now go up to Connecticut and collect your data. Publish your conclusions. Be true to your profession and provide a substantial, unbiased study of the matter.

    1. The town is on super-ultra lock down. You may already know that, but it needs to be said just in case anyone has the fool idea that they are going to breeze on out there and get out of their car within 150 yards of a victim, witness or authority without being confronted by extreme professionalism.

      As I recall, within hours of the shooting specially assigned police protection teams were posted at “every” parent’s home to ensure the media wouldn’t upset or overwhelm them.

      1. How close can people get to the school site at this time? Any possibility of independent researchers getting close enough to take photos of the front door that little Rambo allegedly shot his way through?

  32. I don’t understand. So if none of this actually happened, then how did the children who are dead die? I mean, there are parents who actually lost their children that day. How do you explain that?

    1. I won’t speculate as to whether the killings did or didn’t happen. But, I just wanted to broaden the discussion by pointing out you’ve posed a question that is essentially a trap based on a logical fallacy.

      You state as fact that parents lost their children that day (presumably by being killed), which doesn’t allow any theory based on the event being staged completely. Since the investigation is ongoing, it’s not unreasonable to consider the possibility that no children died. If we avoid making assumptions of any kind, that is.

  33. […] Sandy Hook School Massacre Part II: Continued Ambiguity and Augmented Realities!  by Prof. James Tracy,  Revised on January 4, 2013 As documents relating to the Sandy Hook shooting continue to be assessed and interpreted by independent researchers there is a growing awareness that the media coverage of the massacre of 26 children and adults was intended primarily for public consumption to further larger political ends. – A considerable amount of evidence has been withheld by authorities, who in a telling move have successfully postponed public disclosure of items culled from Nancy and Adam Lanzas’ residence and vehicles for an additional ninety days. [1] – At the same time what has been revealed and captured in press reports suggests how from missing suspects and evidence to unrevealed corpses much is still unknown and mainstream news outlets have been at least complicit in what could conceivably be described as the Sandy Hook massacre’s constructed reality. In this way unseen and largely unaccountable authorities set the agenda of the reportage through a titillating storyline reliant on an unsettling symbolic landscape to further develop and cultivate audience credulity. ….. …. the identities of the two-to-four additional suspected gunmen apprehended by Newtown and Connecticut state police remain undisclosed while almost all identity-specific references to these suspects were scrambled on the audio recording of the emergency dispatch-responders exchange. Were these men possibly playing roles in an emergency drill? – Much can still be gleaned from the press coverage of Sandy Hook. Most importantly, as with the events of 9/11 that ushered in the interminable “war on terror” and police state, the techniques that have emblazoned Sandy Hook in public consciousness require continued scrutiny if only for the fact that they will almost certainly be deployed to create similar disaster scenarios, likely in the near-term. – Was Sandy Hook a Relocated Emergency Drill? At 9:53AM, no more than ten minutes after the reported shooting ceased, the Associated Press published a story, “Official with Knowledge of Connecticut School Shooting Says 27 Dead, Including 18 Children.”  AP and the Washington Post have since removed the story from their websites in lieu of subsequent reports that took their cue from a press conference scheduled for later that day. – Indeed, aside from internal police accounts of what took place inside Sandy Hook Elementary there is little information available to piece together what may have actually transpired inside the school. No photographic or video footage of the crime scene have been made publicly available and major media have to a large degree based their conclusions on Connecticut Medical Examiner H. Wayne Carver’s verbal account of the postmortem which is at best ambiguous.[3] – Two weeks after the incident an attorney representing the family of one six-year-old Sandy Hook student came forth with a $100 million lawsuit because their child “sustained emotional and psychological trauma and injury” when she, like several other children and staff, heard “‘cursing, screaming, and shooting’ over the school intercom.” The suit has since been withdrawn.[4] – Coverage of the event by the modest local weekly the Newtown Bee is most revealing in its combined discrepancies, vagueness, and brevity. In a December 14 article unidentified school personnel were floridly commended for their courage. Among them were school principal Dawn Hochsprung, who recounted to Bee Editor John Voket[5] how “a masked man entered the school with a rifle and started shooting multiple shots – more than she could count – that went ‘on and on.’” – The problem with the account was that it conflicted with a subsequent storyline where Hochsprung was the first to be killed by the gunmen. Three days later the paper issued a retraction and revised the story further.[6]  No additional explanation was provided concerning what party Volkert spoke to and quoted at the crime scene, suggesting from the onset a partly botched attempt at establishing a well-worn storyline. – Along these lines the same article relates what under the circumstances seems like an odd exchange between law enforcement and the school’s staff. Shortly after the incident – an unidentified woman wearing a Connecticut State Police jacket addressed the group of teachers and staff who were consoling each other in the empty Sandy Hook apparatus bays. She complimented them on their individual and “exemplary” efforts following the procedures they were taught to ensure the protection of as many children and colleagues as possible.[7] – In the immediate aftermath of a bloody massacre where 27 lay dead or dying is this the appropriate time for a “post-game pep talk” and slaps on the back? What this closely resembles is the breakdown of a shooting drill, one that proceeded with violent sound effects broadcast through the school’s intercom system. In fact, on the same day the State of Connecticut Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection in association with the Federal Emergency Management Agency were carrying out a “Planning for the Needs of Children in Disaster” drill in nearby Bridgeport.[8] Was the exercise location changed to Newtown at the last minute? – Close analysis of circumstances surrounding the event including unusual emergency procedures and news outlets’ interactions with alleged victim families following the shooting reveals important recurrent features and figures that further call the official account into question.A Phantom Evacuation? – read more! […]

  34. People often mention that Sandy Hook is “affluent” but don’t say why it’s affluent. There is a high percentage of high-paid government employees and contractors many of whom are undercover spooks who work for the alphabet agencies including FEMA and DHS, the very agencies responsible for staging these drills.

    In other words, Sandy Hook is not a typical American town. But it ‘s perfect for a false flag terror drill because most of the key players will maintain silence (omerta) and pledge allegiance to the federally mandated narrative no matter how debased and inconsistent.

    I also read that Gene Rosen is an actor and that many of the “parents” and residents of Sandy Hook are fairly recent arrivals of only a year or two. Perhaps they were sent to Sandy Hook on assignment and will quietly disappear (possibly with new identities) after enough time has passed. We need to find out more about and other acting agencies and perhaps set up an online catalogue of all the actors.

    Thank you for your courage and honesty. I think many people will want to take your class. I know I would.

    1. It makes perfect sense now……each of the “parents” could have been moved in within the past few years and allowed to fit into the norm…all the while on a mission to bring this event to fruition……Obama has been in long enough to craft a plan like this and try to make it happen so gun control can be accomplished. I as many I know are not fooled one bit by all of this……Down in Dixy we just sit back and say bring it on….click

    2. Great point..I say this since Plum Island which is protected around the clock by DHS. People from Connecticut work there. Remember that Lyme disease was named after the town in Connecticut. Ventura did a doc. on the conspiracy.

  35. I remain of the opinion that you overestimate the professionalism of everybody involved. Especially the medical examiner who is in an appointed position answering to political appointees.

    You also discount or ignore possible individualized motivations for being less than forthcoming or for coaching the witnesses. The Medical Examiner’s office has a strong vested interest in making sure it doesn’t appear foolish on television. Especially in the internet age where videos never die. Perhaps his flustered news conference is a result on some coaching given to him by the political appointees he answers to about how to make sure the department is presented in the best possible light (ie they Know everything) and his basic inability to maintain that cognitive dissonance in a press environment which overwhelms anything he has encountered before. Couldn’t that explain his repeated falling back in his choice of language unto an environment he’s more familiar/experienced with: the courtroom? Or maybe he was flustered from having to examine the bodies of school children. Or maybe he was a plant. But I seriously doubt the last one.

    Another of your points deserves greater scrutiny: I suspect strongly that the paucity of children is a reflection of the diverse beliefs of parents in raising their children with the majority restricting access to the press and a small minority allowing access. Given the small number of children I do not doubt that several in the press-core coached the children prior to taping in order to give their coverage greater credibility. Just as there is no universal example of Liberalism or Conservatism there is no universal example of parenting despite what the press leads us to believe. Laziness/unethical behavoir on the part of the press, for sure. “Bad” parenting too. Evidence of a vast and well-covered up conspiracy designed to influence the public debate… well… I’m just going to need some more evidence.

    Also, before you continue in this line of thought I encourage you, strongly, to put it off for a few months. Let this issue subside. Let the next distraction take its place in the media-consciousness and then go visit Newtown anonymously. It should be easy, at that point, to prove your theories.

    As long as you are making judgments from Florida based on news-coverage you’re doing yourself & your theories a serious disservice by allowing the news-media-establishment to cast you as an extremist- Conspiracy-Theorist. (which is actually how I found your blog)

    (PS I truly enjoyed your piece in Global Research in the Politics of Imagined Opinion & think the ideas therein and the basic theory you’re striking at needs to find a wider audience. I know that wiser folks than myself insist that bad press is better than no press; I think in this instance the ultimate result will be less airing of your views and theories and a marginalization of folks who share that opinion by association with you “the Newtown Denier”)

  36. Some more seriously odd and unexplainable evidence about the fakeness of Emilie Parker’s family story. First, this video clearly showing the photoshopped image of Emilie Parker into the family picture. Here: Now, look at this picture which is clearly of Emilie, though with a totally different set of parents, here: Also, see how her so-called aunt “mistakenly” said how great an example she was to her BIG sisters (when she was supposedly the oldest of the three!), here, at 2:22 into this video:

    1. King’s Bride, this is in response to the image you linked of “Emilie…with a totally different set of parents,”

      It could be that the “father” in the pic is a slightly younger “Robby Parker”–same hair and hair line, same basic face shape and coloring.

      But the “mother” in the pic is not “Mrs. Parker.” She looks like “Lauren Rosseau” one of the teachers that was supposedly killed. Same smile, same hair and basic face shape.

      1. Thank you, King’s Bride. That’s an amazing find, that the actress playing Emilie has clearly different parents than the actor playing “Robbie”. But — cornspiracy too– don’t you think the mother in that photo bears a striking resemblance not to Lauren Rousseau but rather to “Kaitlyn Roig,” the actress playing a teacher who ‘survived’ – (esp. 4:41) and who sheds only fake tears in this poorly acted interview?

        1. Yeah, now we’re talking! I can see that, especially the nose, and right at the moment in the video you pointed out, even the mouth, the cheeks and the hairline and parting… I think you’re definitely onto something. If only there was a way we could find more info on that picture…

      2. A younger version of Robbie Parker, hm, I don’t know, maybe, but then Emilie would have been much younger too … As for the woman, if that were Lauren Russeau, she would have to have gained an awful lot of weight in a short time, as well as aged. I really can’t tell if the possibilities you raised are viable, but I’d say i don’t think so. That the girl is definitely Emilie, though, I believe there can be no doubt.

      3. I’m glad I’m not the only one! The first moment I saw her I knew she was a fraud, even maybe an actress I’ve seen elsewhere before… And I agree- where did you find the photo, King’s Bride? Can you please relink to the video where her Aunt apparently forgets which niece is older (it was the wrong link above). Thank you.

    2. reply to Kings’s Bride: It’s Robbie Parker’s younger brother, he’s Emilie’s real Dad & they borrowed Emilie for the Sandy Hook scam. I read somewhere on the net that the Parker family had been in Sandy Hook only 7 months. (There was no source for the info given). I also remember that within 10 days of the incident they visited another state that they had lived in before. Another memory– so faint that maybe I’m wrong. Robbie quoted as saying he was returning Emilie to where she came from (i.e., burying her in her hometown.) I’m not sure about this last at all, in fact everything here is supposition.

      I have a graphics background also & agree w you about the 4-person family plus Emilie patched in. I thought she might have been patched in to the later Parker family photo.

  37. Tell my friend, who was a grandfather of one of the six year olds, that this event was “staged”. You are one sick individual. What possible positive outcome are you expecting from this nonsense? Why don’t you try to contribute to society rather than add to the multitude of extremists trying to drag it down because of their warped view? Go to Newtown and meet with those affected. After that, tell us again how this didn’t happen. I dare you.

    1. I wonder then, with all due respect to your “friend” if he’d be willing to be interviewed or provide account of the “tragedy” at Newtown? Perhaps you should ask him, if 4 nothing else 2 put an end to these “conspiracy theories”. Another thing: there’s nothing wrong with questioning an “official narrative” when inconsistencies within that narrative are present….that’s usually referred to as “INVESTIGATION”.

        1. I saw that…it still doesn’t negate my point & question I addressed to that specific comment. Media choose who to interview, & who they can interview…depending on how the issue is covered, revelations or concealment of the actual story can occur. Also, there still are gaping anomalies & inconsistencies regarding the official story, and SCIENCE. For example, no one’ll dispute that people were killed on 9/11/01….what is disputed is the “Official Conspiracy Theory”, mostly on Scientific Grounds – & as I’ve said earlier: there’s nothing wrong with scrutinizing what we’ve been told. After all, the purpose of “cross examination” in a courtroom is to see whether the Prosecutor’s “theory” can withstand scrutiny.

      1. It is amazing how many people (aka trolls) there are on the internet trolling and responding to truthers that they know someone who died in Newtown. But they never name the person they know. They never provide any better details of events or help clarify the ‘facts the media have put out’. For those trolls out there, add something valuable to the discussion or troll somewhere else.

      1. @Victoria Krueger
        I have close friends there too so now you can make your troll like remarks to me. Your world is easy for you, you’re right, and what doesn’t work for you is wrong. Black and white, tha’st the easy way out (I imagine white is more your color). Come to Newtown , we”ll show you around. Connecticut and Newtown are real places, and our whole state isn’t filled with actors. For those of us who live here and are much closer to this, it’s very real.

  38. Where is the CCTV for the Sandy Hook School for Dec. 14, 2012. Where is the surveilence videos from Nancy Lanza’s house Dec. 14, 2012??? No ones talking.. everything is conjecture untill they show those videos. The Helicopters where up in the air… 600 children leaving a school after a massacare??? and there are tons of poilice and fire fighters milling around walking back and forth like a movie set eating donuts and where are the 600 children?? Also all emergency vehicles blocked by double parked cars and deliberate blocking? this put the full town of Newtown in danger this day . No Tirage set up in parking lot of the Sandy Hook School??? They were all blocked in and milling around at firehouse.. No one was a witness to anything being down there. What is going on here. People need to demand answers to serious questions. We should not stop till we get proof of this. Why is the only photos by the “Newtown Bee”? we can write a book on all questions that need to be answered.

  39. Perhaps one day someone you dearly love will be murdered violently for inexplicable reasons. Then when arrogant strangers pester you about how it “feels” to lose a child (or other loved one) and then eventually insinuate that you’re over-reacting, malingering, dragging out the “pity party” for too long, or maybe they completely invalidate your pain by suggesting you just made up a story about a child’s death to elicit sympathy or for some political reason, maybe then you’ll begin to grasp the utter depravity of your words here. I happen to live in Connecticut, and i happen to have met one family whose child was murdered in Newtown’s Sandy Hook school. We are all real people who live in the real world and we waste no effort creating fantasies as you spend so much time doing here. When those of us who participate in the real world recognize humans who lack humanity or empathy, we call them by a name: psychopath. You are a psychopath with a small talent for compiling words in a pretense of having intellect, rather like a trained chimp. You are a small, mean bag of meat, that is the best that can be said of you. As I read here some of the incredibly bizarre and paranoid “theories” from others of your ilk I am amazed that folk such as yourselves manage to maneuver your small, timid, fearful lives in the midst of such overwhelming self-created conspiracies and paranoia. Such pathetic little lives you stumble through!

    1. Ohhh, your comment is definitely deserving of a response.

      First, I freely admit that I suspect you are being intentionally deceptive likely in someone’s employ. I suspect so, mainly because your argument is very well thought out and clearly written by someone well-versed in rhetoric and logical argument.

      Yet, you oddly appear to argue like someone who can’t see why the theorists and this author are justified in their persistent watchfulness and suspicion of this event.

      Claiming that this man’s very limited sharing of information already well in the public sphere is akin to “pestering” is a stretch.

      You state the cause of your disagreement coming at least in part through “…reading here some of the…” “…theories from others of your ilk…”, the opinions of which is then distilled into a targeted defamation of the author.

      The disconnect may be in how quick you seem to be “and others of your ilk” in judging and then insulting people, ironically labeling them psychopaths. Your extremely harsh attack is directed at someone who hasn’t even risen to your claim of “pestering.” What this author likely is endeavoring to combat is murder, killing.

      Do you understand why I disrespect attacking the “Pesterer”, ignorant of the fact he’s making an effort to prevent “Murder?” Will you now equate the pestering to be just as horrible as murder?

    2. Again, the trolls never provide any real information other than they know someone who died that day in Newtown. Enough said. Troll alert.

  40. After reading through this blog and others I was curious to know more about Mossad death squads. A few articles from 2009 and beyond stuck me as oddly coincidental. I am prior military with extensive experience and expert marksmenship with the M4/AR-15 rifle. The lethality of these killings struck me as odd. The coronor stating everyone was shot 3-11 times. There have been a few interviews with prior members of these death squads. “The ex-soldier, a trained sharpshooter, says he fired 11 bullets into the head of the militant whose death had been ordered by his superiors.” (huffingtonpost, 2009).
    And from a prior publication in 2003.
    “Agents of the Israeli secret service Mossad have been given free rein to kill those deemed to be a threat to the Jewish state – wherever they are hiding. They said the policy raised the potential for killings in countries with close ties to Israel, including the US, Britain and Australia.” (, 2003).

    After reading through some of these brutal encounters with the MDS, hearing these words send a chill down my spine. I just cannot figure out the methodology behind Adam’s shooting. So choatic yet so methodical. It doesn’t make sense.

  41. I can only hope and pray that the opinions posted herein are not reflective of the average citizen of the USA. God help us all if it is. As somebody viewing the events from outside the US I find it hard to believe that an educated society can generate these ridiculous theories. I have to assume most of the above commentators also subscribe to the 911, moon landing and Obama conspiracies.

    1. Interesting take on the American psyche. I should point you to another group of “conspiracy theorists” (besides every prosecutor on the planet): Architects & Engineers for 9/11 truth. They apparently don’t agree with the official narrative either. Or, are you suggesting Architects & Engineers wouldn’t know a thing or 2 about….ARCHITECTURE & Engineering? A truly sick population is one that trusts the official story too much.

    2. Well then, I am very sorry for the likes of you, “Rhodes” because you have obviously not been researching the details of December 14th fully and you are the one misinformed. It sounds like you are the ideal Sheeple citizen that the Government loves…question nothing, believe everything. Happy trolling.

  42. Is it correct that many medical personnel were at the scene very quickly? Is it correct that no medical personnel were allowed into the school to render any possible aid to the “victims” ? How long would it take skilled emergency medical persons to thouroughly examine 27 injured “victims” to see if any vital signs could be found or regained? Who did this? If 20 innocent children were shot wouldn’t any possible means, regardless of how futile they might seem, be used to see if one life could be saved and, considering the scene was immediately safe, wouldn’t all available medical people be sent into the school ASAP? Any pics of anyone with blood? (How could the assholes forget such an obvious thing?)
    With all of the reports that Lanza wore a mask (?) how did so many see his face or look into his eyes? Who is the other ” nurse” (not the inconsistent Sally Cox) that was interviewed on camera? Regardless of what any ignorant media whore may say (they seem to have been given a talking point on what horrible, destructive wounds an AR-15 makes) any entrance wound from a relatively small caliber .223Rem/5.56NATO bullet will be a small hole. How then that the alleged father of alleged victim Ms Rosseau was not allowed to see her body? (Cremated before the funeral of course) Is it true that her car which was shot has already been returned to him and taken to Canada (just a rumour I’ve heard) Do some of the Soto family members seem to be trying to keep from laughing? Etc,etc,etc,etc,etc etcc
    Keep it up, ignore the attacks from the mob.

  43. I find it a bit odd that “Alexis” Kept say they they they she never said we or I it was always they as if she were just standing around watching everyone and she was completely unaffected…. strange

    1. Great find Kate. I wonder if the homes were bought in advance by the Feds (under Newtown’s name) so that they could rent to the actors. Afterall, it is difficult to buy a home these days let alone if you are not a real person, who has no social security number (because you are are fake) and thus no credit history! I would be interested to find out who the renters were at the addresses of homes purchased on Chritmas Day 2009. I noticed before I even read it online that it seemed the parents interviewed were new to the area. The Parkers came to Newtown from Utah so that Robbie could be a nurse? Newtown is expensive to live in first of all. But do hospitals and doctors relocate (pay for moving expenses) for nurses to move? Doubtful.

  44. Check out photo shopping of pictures. The one with the nun infront of a fire truck holding hands with a parent. It looks like something is wrong above her head. Just. Look or maybe Im seeing things. Also check out the parents and john holmes attorney wtf

  45. I was watching CNN when the news broke. I have an police scanner app on my phone and I turned in on and found the local area where the school was. The audio was scrambled. Also I was the k9 tracking something in a wooded area on tv. I heard them say the shooters mother was dead and at the school. A government cover up

  46. I understand the futility of arguing here, but none the less will state this.
    Emilie Parker’s father is her father. The idea that our entire community and state is in on a federal hoax is insane, and insulting. One of my best friends was a TA there last year (let go for budget cuts, thank God) and knew all of the administration and teachers personally. My cousin’s son just left and went into the middle school this year, and she worked in the school’s kitchen 2 years ago and knew the administration and some of the teachers personally as well. I have a student who was best friend’s with Emilie, who was pulled out of Sandy Hook to be homeschooled this year, because her parents wanted to focus more on growth in critical thinking. Have you had to hug a 7-year-old because her best friend died? Why do you all think everyone in this state is a goverment cronie who’s helping to perpetuate a sick and twisted lie such as this? Do you really think that a group of people would spend years in a set-up for this?
    If you want to say this kind of trash about a grieving father, buy a plane ticket, or a bus ticket, or a train ticket, or a couple of tanks of gas and drive up here and say it to their face. Talk to the kids who witnessed horrors. Go to the families that lost people. Put your body where your mouth is. If you want to say these things, then make the trip.
    I am not saying that I think the MSM did a great job of reporting, that there aren’t things we don’t know, that the motive for it is not questionable. Because I do think it- there are questions that are not answered. But if it’s real and if these people were real and actually died, that the people doing interviews are actually family members is not one of those questions, because as a member of this community, I know better.

    1. If Robbie Parker is her real father and she did die, as you assert, then he must be a psychopath because no father would be clowning around 2 days after his daughter just got slaughtered as she did, and we all have seen him do it, it’s on You Tube. Are you going to deny this footage is real? Are you a parent? Do you know in your heart of hearts that NO PARENT in the world would be smiling AT ALL in a situation like this? Then please give me a plausible explanation for this behavior that has been caught on camera, apparently unbeknownst to him. I would REALLY love to know your answer to this, since you claim to know so many of these people up close. Why do they act like actors and not like real people then?

      1. Because human beings grieve in different ways and there is no book for how a person is “supposed” to act.
        Why don’t you do what I suggested and get off of your chair, turn off the computer, come to CT and do some volunteer work with the survivors or the families of the victims?

        1. I guess you are right… maybe psychopaths do grieve their daughter’s murder by smiling and joking around, looking like they have not a care in this world, and then just before they think the camera is going to start rolling, they take 10 seconds to do their breathing exercises and put on a grieving face. Not to mention the whole family “say cheese” faces during their photo-op with dear leader, again, 2 days after the murder of their beloved child.

      2. I cried more for 2 weeks after my dog died (who I only had for 3 years and she died of old age) than these parents did. I cried if anyone came up to me and said they were sorry about my loss. One of the supposed parents of the kids was smiling as she discussed her daughter’s white casket. Yes, happy memories. Is she nuts? I would have lost it at that moment (and I have a 4-year old child). And by the way, not one parent shed one tear on camera. Odd? Yes.

        1. Yup, odd indeed. More like impossible, really. It is impossible for a real parent to react that way, and we all know it. But some would rather believe the theater and play along with dear leader…

      3. Elizabeth, your troll post resembles so many other posts I’ve seen on other truth seeker websites. Why don’t you go troll on Fox News or CNN’s website where you can read about all the misinformation to your hearts content if that makes you feel better about yourself. Don’t criticize people who are asking questions.

  47. Yes, let’s lead with the Jews being behind this. Everyone knows Passover is just around the corner, and the fresh blood of these Sandyhook children will make the matzo so tasty.

  48. James, please watch your back. We should all be praying for your safety and that of your family, as we are seeing the ravenous wolves come viciously after you. May God protect and deliver you from bloodthirsty and vile men!

  49. Okay, just want to note that it’s kind of interesting that this whole Sandy Hook thing is happening at the same time the trial for the Batman shooting is going on—it’s impossible to follow both, though from a quick glance at things, it seems like some interesting info is coming out about the Batman shooting (if anyone is interested, there are lots of interesting videos on both the Sandy Hook incident and the Batman/Aurora shooting indicent at this channel: you just have to scroll through a bit…there’s even a video on witnesses to Aurora shooting being afraid to talk b/c they suspect there may be imposters w/in the DA’s office??)

    Anyway, back to the Sandy Hook incident…

    I honestly don’t know anything about gun/permits, but this seems to suggest that gun permits are public record and that there are no records of the guns we were told that Nancy Lanza owned??

    No Gun Permit Under Nancy Lanza’s Name In Public Records, Says TIME Magazine

    video description: Published on Jan 11, 2013 -So gun permit records are public knowledge, and major news outlets are unable to find any for Nancy Lanza. Not even for the AR-15 rifle? The police are saying that those guns were registered to her and she had permits for them, but apparently the public records themselves are not supporting their theories.

    1. Markus, excelentjob on your post! You have made a thorough exposition of the overwhelming oddities found in the official Sandy Hook story. Keep up the great work, James Tracy, Markus Allen, and by God, do watch your backs!

  50. Wow!

    Lucky for me, the years of research (countless sleepless nights) that I have put into the study of 9-11 Truth will help me get to sleep tonight (I hope).

    We can not expect the Corporate/CIA controled mainstream media to ask/answer the really impotant questions for us anymore, but I have no doubt that “we the people” can & will.

    I have read evey comment & watched every vid posted here, & the truth about Sandy Hook will not remain a mystery for long.

    Thank you James.
    Thank you everyone!

  51. Anyone who believes the Sandy Hook shooting was staged is an ignorant ghoul and should be ashamed of themselves. I can only conclude that anyone who buys into this beyond ridiculous conspiracy theory has no shame nor any capacity for critical thinking and the assessment of evidence or even knows what, exactly, counts as evidence. Conspiracy theorists and gun nuts – no surprise that there is plenty of overlap in these two groups.

    Sickening and pathetic.

    1. Have you at least attempted to inform yourself about the events that took place? From sources aside from the media? Did you spend more than 2 minutes on Google? Are you 100% sure that what happened at Sandy Hook is true? I’m assuming, no. I wasn’t there and I’m assuming you weren’t either. I know, it seems like an insurmountable theory, but it’s the 2000’s now. Anything you can imagine we can make happen. Remember, that this world is more than just a physical one. And keep in mind the government isn’t ALWAYS trying to help us.

      I mean no disrespect, but if you’re american you must wake up immediately.

    2. PulseTeresa, you are the typical troll. Nothing meaningful to add to the discussion other than calling us truth seekers names. You are the pathetic one my dear. Pull the wool back over your eyes like the government likes its sheeple. Happy trolling.

      1. Yes, ‘YouCan’tHandleTheTruth’ (YCHTT), that’s right, you’re not a troll…
        So, do you believe Sandy Hook was staged and a government coverup too?
        Are you implying that people from CT who have family and friends there that we’re lying? What’s our motivation to lie? What do we have to gain? You have what right to demand, anything!? Yes, I would you give you information on this blog with their names, why, so they can be harasses by low lifes like you – Gene Rosen getting harassment calls – what sick fucks you are. To satisfy what, you’re paranoia.? Would you like me to escort you to Newtown? Would you talk face to face with someone who went to funerals, yes plural. Would you like to the Newtown police depatment and chat it up with them? Let me know, I can help you make the trip if you’re interested.

        1. So they had a new camera security system set up before this happened…….so why not release the tapes to show what really happened? Don’t want to see kids being shot but you show the tapes……we all see it was real and then the conspiracy talk dissipates….Until then…it was a set up for gun control…..

        2. It’s typical to not hear much after the initial event while they conduct the investigation. That happens with every major event. Maybe they will show the video, but you want them to show you the video because you say so?
          And in America I believe in innocent till proven guilty but because you read “Before It’s News” and watch YouTube videos, your analysis of the crime scene is complete and you’ve ruled it a hoax. Nice, how American are you? Just enough to be paranoid about losing your guns. Why don’t you poke your head out of your bunker – you may be sad to know the Feds aren’t waiting to seize you and your guns. That is the only reason you “truthers” are weaving this story because you’re afraid of losing your guns. I’d rather be sitting here talking to you and other gun owners about how can we protect the rights of everyone. I don’t want shot while I’m at the mall, or in church. I can’t undo that my daughters think and talk about what they would do if a shooter came into their school.
          If it’s all an act ten the government screwed up big time! They staged this supposedly long ago and you mean to tell me they planted crappy actors? Wow, they sure didn’t get their money’s worth! Oh and the people I know they’re actors too because the whole the town is set up by the feds to get your gun. And a close family friend, Al B, we’ve known his family from the late 80’s and he’s an actor too. So is the son he bore who got married, had children of their own, moved to Newtown to be part of the government plot to take your gun. So, if you want me to introduce to a few folks there you let me know.

        3. In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot…….Mark twain said it right… question me as to how american am I sounds like the reds after they took over russia and instituted the full blunt force of Communism……..

        4. Ok, then explain the hard evidence you have that what you watch on YouTube is proven. Really, think about how it sounds that the trusted source of information is YouTube and Before It’s News. I live here, I offered to pay someone to come here and I’ll give them the tour and meet whoever I can get. Interested? That’s all I have to offer is to go to that extreme because all of you simply refuse to accept that people from CT are here because we know at the very least that it happened. What makes you the authority!! Come here.

        5. All you have to do is answer the questions that many in the country are asking. With answers to those questions then it goes away. Can you explain them? It really is common sense without much effort.

        6. Oh yeah, Manny, that hero, no, saint really, Gene Rosen, his story is so believable! I am a bus driver who am driving some kids who just came out of a school massacre, having had their teacher and friends shot to death, and because I don’t know where the kids live, I drive right by the Fire Department and decide I will then drop them off at a stranger’s house who, by the way, is not even outside waiting for them. I’m kind of disturbed myself, so I don’t have the presence of mind to ring the bell, make sure there’s someone home, and talk to this stranger and ask, “Sir, can I leave these children here with you, since I’ve got no brain and it didn’t occur to me to drop them off at the Fire Station I’ve just passed?” No! Instead, I just drop them off there and go my way.
          Do you REALLY, REALLY believe this bucket of tripe? Ok, I admit you might, some people believe the weirdest things, but WE DON’T!!! GOT IT?

  52. Odd…
    According to CNN’s December 14, 2012 Timeline, the first mention of a “Bushmaster” (rifle) was 6:51PM (Dec 14), approximately 7 1/2 hours after accurately ID’ing and recovering two handguns from the suspect inside the school building.

    And coincidently… the investigators had reportedly secured the suspect’s mother’s home (Nancy Lanza) 4 hours and 31 minutes PRIOR to even mentioning the discovery of the Ms. Lanza’s “Bushmaster” rifle. How convenient…

    [Updated at 11:34 a.m. ET] The shooter is dead, a source with knowledge of the investigation, tells CNN’s Susan Candiotti.

    Police have recovered two weapons from him, the source added.

    It’s not known whether police killed the alleged shooter or he took his own life. The source says one weapon recovered is a Glock and the other is a Sig Sauer.
    [Updated at 2:20 p.m. ET] We are now hearing from CNN’s Mary Snow, who is reporting from outside the suspect’s home, that dozens of law enforcement officials are on the scene.

    Neighbors are “shaken,” Snow said.
    [Updated at 6:51 p.m. ET] A law enforcement official familiar with the investigation says the three guns found at the shooting site were legally purchased by Nancy Lanza, the mother of the suspect in the shooting.

    According to the law enforcement official, the Glock and Sig Sauer handguns were found inside the school with the deceased gunman. The Bushmaster was found in a car outside the school. The official did not know if the car was registered to the gunman, to his mother or to someone else.

    The official echoed what other law enforcement officials have told CNN: That Adam Lanza was the suspected gunman, and that he died at the scene of an apparent self-inflicted gunshot.

  53. My error… I rechecked and the Bushmaster was apparently discovered at 3:54pm (NOT 6:51pm as I previously suggested). my apologies for the error.

    [Updated at 3:54 p.m. ET] Three guns were found at the scene, CNN’s Susan Candiotti reports. According to a law enforcement source, the third weapon found on the scene was a .223 Bushmaster. The other weapons, previously reported, are a Glock, and a Sig-Sauer. No word on the models of Glock or Sig-Sauer.

    1. The News some times reports errors. I listen to local police action on my scanner and the local news at the same time. Police will get a gunman and be driving him to jail while the news reports that he is still outstanding. I have even heard miss communication between state and local police as they work together on the same crime, as they don’t use the same radio channel, which they have but never seem to use. (LERN) While I still think there is something to this cover up, it would not be the first time cops and the government covered up. Remember the cops that shot people on the bridge during Katrina storm? Any update on the guy found in the woods? Why did the police not find the people in the first aid closet? They said they were in there for four hours. Every inch of that school should have been swept room by room and a All Clear called. Bottom line… if we could take every firearm and drop them to the bottom of the sea, people would still kill on a scale of sandyhook.

  54. Edited and APPROVED! Time for this to be transformed to a White House petition:

    Moderate PSYOP Projects with Oversight and Provide Judicial Process to Address Myriad of Damages Claims in Connection with the Unconstitutional Practice of Using Human Guinea Pigs to Study Reaction to Crisis and Trauma Bond

    (people DID start turning in their guns in buy back projects)


    Lets do this!


    > _

    Okay, let’s face it. NO ONE has the courage to do this. Not even blustery civil rights attorneys. We’re fxckxd!

  55. The story of the medical examiner’s “processing technician” put on leave is used to create versimilitude and certainty about “the shooter”. Such a tale is especially necessary if the medical authorities don’t have the body of Adam Lanza.

      1. Interesting point, and very valid indeed, Susan and YouCantHandleTheTruth! Anything to make the whole farce more credible and buyable by the trools and sheeple!

  56. So many of you assume that Gene Rosen is just awkward on camera. That can happen, but considering that he has had maybe dozens of interviews at this point over the span of weeks, and this “retired psychologist” can’t get his shit together? He bumbles through his horrible story the same exact way everytime. Plus I find it hard to believe he was such an educated man and failed to remind us of that fact 500 times like all “smart” people seem to like to do.

  57. This means they have lied to us about a lot of things. What are going to be the ramifications of knowing the truth? Will we mysteriously start dying or disappear maybe? Or maybe the whole Cassandra Complex thing, where the majority is never going to believe it. How do I get passed the fact of betrayal that some news organizations I previously trusted are debunking this? Yet, not one person has yet to prove this really happened. I keep asking people all over the internet for just ONE pic or video of someone crying over their dead child in this suppossed shooting. Here is another fact that I caught on that no one else talks about but there are no single parents or maybe even a grand parent? Just two perfectly coifed parents who, save the one, have just one perfectly lovely child. Every child is adorable, none are ugly. The teacher Ms Soto. Could you ask for a younger, prettier teacher if you tried. This whole thing is a slap in the face and I am angry to be thought of with such low regard by my own government. This means even the president of the US has, is and will continue to lie to us so he must have a really awful agenda. I am afraid they will get me for my views. I am dead!!!

    1. Victoria, I agree 100% with everything you said here. And good point about no ugly children, no single parents, everything too perfect, almost like a tale from Stepford . And lo, I was just reading on the Stepford Wives story, and it is set, of all places, in Connecticut!

  58. James, have you seen the helicopter footage that both CNN and CT12 aired on live TV reporting the breaking news of this school shooting? Showed cops running at high speed into the school. Problem is, this wasn’t footage of Sandy Hook Elem, it was footage from St. Whatever, the Catholic school about a mile away. Where apparently eight victims and their families attended church, as well. You can find that on you tube, it’s all over the place.

  59. interesting theory and connections here:
    – and I also noticed the above mentioned bit about the date of Adam Lanza’s Death – searched the sites myself and found same as this:
    and also this is just another piece of news media making us think we are looking at live events, when it isn’t always the case:
    Regardless of the fact that it wasn’t Sandy Hook that CNN showed, I wonder why the Police were charging into the St. Rose of Lima School, and when.
    Thank you for all of the wonderful information here!!

    1. As soon as I saw all the confusing reports about the details and timing of the purported events, I did a shadow analysis.

      First, it should be understood that I did an analysis not included here of an overhead still frame depicting the parking lot to the north-east of the school. The shadows, in that shot were as expected for a roughly 10:30am time-frame.

      Then, I did the same to a still from the helicopter chase footage. The following sequence are the relevant images, showing where the shadows were and where they should be for 10:30am in that location on that morning. The final frames show how the shadows indicate a time of 12:30pm or later…

      While I’m at it, you might appreciate the brief analysis of the chase footage that still frame is taken from…

  60. It is interesting to watch what is going on in the background while the reporters are interviewing the actors. The Obama bumper stickers, what looks like military stickers on the front windows, one guy in black (is it or is it not a uniform?) with a red scarf walks casually by with a rifle behind the family being interviewed . Notice that the bald guy keep looking inside the car they are interviewing next to – and he must see something in there that they don’t want the camera to see and texts another guy who, right before the end of the video is smack up against the window of that car looking in to see if the camera can see whatever it is. Check out all the other on-the-scene interviews and watch the background for inconsistencies to the narrative and you’ll see them. Notice the messages, writing and emblems on people’s shirts. And the license plates on the cars.

    1. AND check out that link above – see that bald guy’s white sweatshirt behind Alexis and Keith? Look at the reflection in the car window of his arm!!!!! This VIDEO was tampered with!!! You can see clearly in the car window reflection that he has what looks like a police star, and sergeant bars in black on the sweatshirt reflection but NOT on the sweatshirt itself!!!! Aha! More deception, they can’t even get their planned movie set interview right! pathetic! Also, I was hanging out on the Sandy Hook Hoax Facebook and they have this post that the moderator refused to take down of a mutilated, decapitated cat in the GUISE of saying they want to block that web site etc… I posted several rational arguments that it wasn’t on topic, that it was offensive, and the moderator said people need to see stuff like that. I remember that obama had a bunch of Shaman’s drumming on different incident dates – and it seems to me that the occultists and “Satanists” seem to be over-represented in the discussions both for and against Sandy Hook. My theory is that they are part of the constituency creating a series of national deceptions… since it does appear that some of these actors have been involved in multiple incidents in multiple states.

  61. Google actress Zooey Deschanel and compare her to the pictures of Sandy Hook “heroine” teacher Victoria Soto: They look the same to me. I got to wondering, if they were going to hire actresses and actors – wouldn’t they look for people at the Sundance festival? Bingo. She also does an interesting blond – looks totally different with a blond wig – – – I wonder if there are any dead blond teachers?

      Check out the ridges at the bottom of her teeth – then look at the picture of Victoria Soto from the Guardian link above – tell me if you think the bottom of her teeth look blurred like somebody deliberately blurred the bottom of those two front teeth? I’ve zoomed in with my “view” tool and it sure looks deliberately blurred to me – see! you can clearly see the bottom edge of the tooth to the right of the front teeth. Bingo!

    Check out the ridges at the bottom of her teeth – then look at the picture of Victoria Soto from the Guardian link above – tell me if you think the bottom of her teeth look blurred like somebody deliberately blurred the bottom of those two front teeth? I’ve zoomed in with my “view” tool and it sure looks deliberately blurred to me – see! you can clearly see the bottom edge of the tooth to the right of the front teeth. Bingo! Also check out the sister Carlee Soto who ALSO looks a lot like Zooey. It seems they were working these actors and actresses too hard, spreading them too thin with too many role conflicts and ambiguities.

      1. Angela

        I am not a supporter of any of these conspiracy theories but am interested in the arguments put forward so keep an eye on this blog. Whatever credibility other contributors are seeking to gain you are doing a great job in undoing their hard work. There is nothing rational or factual about blurred teeth and nose jobs. As my teenage son would say, “WTF?”

    1. Cmon Angela. Do you really believe that they would get a working A list celeb to use for something like this? I have seen many pics of both of these women. There is a zero percent chance they are one and the same. Why don’t you attempt to add a real argument that would help us? Some people on here are using math and science to calculate time of day with shadows. This is something of substance that can be backed. Complete and utter speculation over an actress is only going to make others shy away from your theories. That is about as crazy as the person who suggested Michael McDonald was playing Peter Lanza. This isn’t a fucking game of “Who’s line is it anyway?”

      1. Aha. You answered. I must have touched a nerve. Thanks. check out the earlier pictures of Zooey before the nose job. There’s only the one picture of her at the scene, the shadows are wrong and the camera person was right there at standard professional photography stance distance and angle to catch her swan song.

        1. Ya you touched a nerve because you make everyone else who questions the official story look crazy too. These women look NOTHING alike. Your a fool to believe such a thing. You have no evidence at all, and your “proof” is nothing more than 2 pictures of brunette women. Reminds me of the other day when at the inaugural event TV journalist George Stephanopoulos mistook Bill Russell for Morgan Freeman. It was funny and a little racist, but stupid regardless. Just as your claim is here. One is not the other. Look somewhere else for your evidence rather than wasting your time with this nonsense. Try and contribute to the conversation or go away.


        The actresses suddenly got distorted and uglier. New Conspiracy: The Uglification of Sandy Hook. Carlee seems to be getting a lot browner, now looking hispanic. The eyes are changing from blue to brown in pictures of both girls AND the that telling hairline with that inverted peak is getting changed in the pictures. These pictures are literally Morphing since I looked at them last night. Look at the original picture of victoria’s left ear (when looking at her its on your right) the ear skin color has several different flesh tones on it and the earlobe seems to have been modified as well as the earring. Check out those pictures of carlee at the funeral – she looks like a white girl and now she’s hispanic. None of this morphing was happening until today…

        If you look at all the different noses Zooeys family has had over the decades, its a wonder they can smell. And now the links aren’t opening up to the pages on the ones with the bigger noses. The pictures of the younger Zooey are buried by a slew of recent ones.…1068.36606.1.37341.…0.0…1c.1.YK7x-AZ14LI&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&bvm=bv.41524429,d.cGE&fp=70fb6c90ad4a13a2&biw=1527&bih=941&

      3. You don’t have any authority or right to tell me where to look for evidence of the conspiracy. I’ve never believed any of these conspiracies before – I couldn’t even fathom that my country would allow anything approaching a widespread public deception. (except I did know about witness protection) For now, I’m playing the “What IF…?” game and just opening my mind up to the possibility that my government has become corrupt enough to allow something like this… because IF they did then this is really mean. I was in a grocery store after all the news coverage and a little boy was telling his mother that he didn’t want the bullet to hit his right hand… If this was a public deception and not a true tragedy, then a whole generation of public school kids has been needlessly traumatized and terrorized. The REAL victims *MIGHT* be the millions of the little kids sitting in classrooms across the USA wondering if they are going to get shot. I never questioned the JFK or the moon landing or the Norway island massacre or 9-11 or the Oklahoma bombing because I’m not into TV or news and even though a lot of details of some of these bugged me, I never looked into it. So now, because the acting was sooo bad with preaching about gun control and superficial shallow details about one-dimensional fake victims and these details were so incredibly not believable, suddenly, I am disillusioned enough to start playing the “WHAT IF…? game. There is a lot riding on these actors and actresses (IF this is staged) being believable and anybody who had the finances and political power and authority to bungle something this BIG…


        It wasn’t my original idea to start focusing on the Teacher, (graduate of Stratford High according to RIP FaceBook) . One of the posts above was observing that the children all seemed to be too perfect, remarking about Victoria Soto… “Could that teacher be any prettier?” But there’s one recent picture that makes her look like Fiona in Shrek when she was an ogre. I think its been tampered with. Many of the pictures have unnecessary blurs, especially around the eyes, nose, teeth and earlobes, and now anterior hairlines too, especially covering that downward protrusion of hair in the V shape on Victoria Soto’s forehead left of her center, on the right when looking at a picture, while other parts of the faces and photos are clear. My computer has a “zoom in” tool where I can zoom in on specific details of the faces in the original pictures presented right after the incident and I can see that physical details that are permanent characteristics of real people are irrationally and illogically changing in these pictures.×471.jpg
        Take this picture for instance. I think she has pencilled in some hairs on the left side of her head – as Carlee – that doesn’t look natural and doesn’t match this picture with the eyes scrunched up.

        in this picture it looks like the nose is slipping on the right nostril because if its the actress that I thought looks similar then she’s had a handful of nose jobs since the original picture when she was much younger and had the big nose. The web site below seems to be asserting that the Jews are the ones behind Sandy Hook. My stereotypical observation of that kind of hypothesis is that it is usually a self-serving arab making that kind of accusation. I don’t know that much about Jewish politics but that seems like something that would need to be researched more. If I were looking at Carlee Soto’s face for evidence, I would say she looks more like an Arab than like a Jew or a Philipino. Ooohh. In the picture at the top of The Criminality of Carlee Soto – her blue eyes are showing through. Victoria’s iris’s are supposed to be blue and Carlee’s are supposed to be brown but I think I can see the blue around the pupil in that picture, the colored contact isn’t covering right.

  63. You mention a Dec. 14 ‘Bee’ article quoting Hochsprung which was quickly recanted. Do you still have access to that original story? I can’t find it on the Bee site. Thanks in advance!

  64. Please see above Prof. Tracy’s comments about Newtown Bee’s associate editor Shannon Hicks and the photographs she took and how at best only 2 photos from the series were published. HOWEVER, the Newtown Bee has a special edition .pdf here: and you’ll see that a few more photos by Hicks were published. [Along with a rare photo of the interior of the firehouse–not by Hicks.]

    The photos are on Page 4. It’s clear from the famous photo on Page 1 that the kids have just had an awful experience. But the additional photos on Page 4 will bring up more questions. One photo is captioned:
    “Two adults and a student were among the first to exit the school building, along with a state trooper, following the shootings”. And another one is captioned “An armed state trooper runs toward Sandy Hook School on Friday, December 14, on a report of multiple shots fired within the elementary school building.”

    Clearly, Hicks WAS there early on. Which means she should have a complete documentary record of the police, the responders, the evacuation of the school and on and on. And it’s not like the police chased her away or the camera battery went dead. Another photo is captioned: “Parents waited anxiously in Sandy Hook School’s parking lot Friday morning, waiting for any word on their children inside.” She was still there long enough afterward to photograph waiting parents who arrived later.

    I guess I would have to correct Prof. Tracy’s statement “Hicks asserts that she was among the first on the scene…” to something like “Hicks assertion that she was among the first on the scene is confirmed by the few photos released.”

    1. I know that my photography professor could take a photograph and look at the information behind it somehow, which would tell him if it had been photoshopped, what kind of camera took the pictures, or if the settings had been changed, like to correct for lighting, etc… I’m not sure if the info contains individual identification for each individual camera or not. I would feel more confident about your correcting the wording on Professor Tracy’s timeline IF Hick’s herself was testifying to exactly which pictures came from her camera, signing them in some verifiable way AND if they were DATED. It seems that a lot of the items that the media are submitting to the public as factual are being shown to have been produced on dates and times other than those that the public might ASSUME they were produced on – specifically at the exact time or within minutes or hours on the exact day of the shooting at that exact location (not at the Firehouse or in the Firehouse parking lot or elsewhere) It seems the squirley questions have to be asked, Hicks asserts she was exactly where and exactly when? Where is her exact location in the “first” helicopter flyover of the scene? (and when was that taken?) Point her out to us.

  65. Have you checked out the two different Photographers mentioned in the first few and last few seconds of the video? “c2012 The Hour Newspapers” (does it exist and did they mis-spell it? & “Photography/ Alex von Kleydorff c2012 All Rights Reserved” I’m going to stop mentioning the anomalies that I mention because it seems they are monitoring this site and changing the anomalies and/or improving their narrative when they are mentioned. Gene’s right nostril seems improbably smaller than the right nostril. I wonder if a person could chart the differences in size and shape between his nose in the different interviews? He’s got quite the round ball on the end in the first part of this. He looks like he has a set of false upper teeth and they seem too wide for his mouth.

  66. It seems to be a cohesive message – this even is SO LOW – You Must Act! (buy guns and bullets?) Gifford’s message… Nobody would have the balls to ask, “Could this really be bad acting too? How can her face have healed so fast? why does it seem unreal and faked? And now, a girl who performed at Obama’s inauguration is said to have been shot dead, too. Dare anybody even doubt that we are dropping like flies?”

  67. There is a difference between affirming a person is alive and has a known work history with established known photos and seeing a preliminary web site with words written on it saying they are building a web site and need time. Is Alex von Kleydorff a known documented human being in the photography world?

    1. I think what really matters is that we can plainly see that Gen Rosen was rehearsing those lines for his interviews the next day. The photographer status does not change what the images and sounds in the video are telling us, do they?

  68. This is an interesting site. It has the full spectrum from angry “believers” to quite advanced researchers. I’d just like to offer a few observations of my own.
    Just like the “9-11 Movie”, some people will not accept the obvious. Mostly it is borne of fear. When faced with incontrovertible evidence they willfully reject it in favor of “belief”.
    This is not the first operation like this. It may be the most “emotional” (on purpose I rather think). Whoever is running the psyop wants it that way.
    In order to analyze this you have to put your emotions on the back burner. The first question is; “did they do this, is it a hoax?” This is followed by “why do I think that?”. Sometime later we get to the “how” of it and the “who” of it.
    There are far to many anomalies to be real. There are too many to be accidental. They are sorting the aware from the unaware. They would like to cause conflict between the two.
    In my mind there is no doubt that this is another “drill gone live” scenario. Bits and pieces of the drill are interwoven into Act II of the drill. Likewise, common sense and physics do not allow the official story to be real. That, of course, leaves the question of what really happened.
    All of the clues above and elsewhere point to a highly organized operation. This is hardly the first and likely not the last operation of this kind. The people who do these things always have more than one motive, always.
    As someone above pointed out, where would you go with this information? It’s happened before and people get committed or “depressed”. They know this. They are not worried.
    The more light you shine on this the better. That’s what it needs, sunshine. Don’t be dissuaded by anger and ridicule. Expect false leads. There are traps set to destroy researcher’s credibility. Don’t worry about it. Use your head and if something starts to look suspicious, you can back up. It’s OK.
    Remember, for most of this, you are not imagining this. If it smells fishy, it probably is.
    After wading through this for weeks now I’m becoming more intrigued with the real estate angle. This is at a point where it needs some serious sleuth work. There have to be records. If these people existed they have records. It is more difficult to find acquaintances, etc., than you might think. This region “Sandy Hook” is but a small slice of the larger town “Newtown”. It is not so far-fetched to imagine a “Potemkin village” there.

  69. There has been a nagging question in my mind for some time about the worker in the medical examiner’s office, Jean Henry, who was let go from her position for allegedly letting her husband see Adam Lanza’s body. Some immediately called it disgusting, and asked how sick someone could be. However, my first reaction was, “That’s exactly what I would do if I saw something questionable. I would call in a trusted set of eyes to witness it with me.” I just followed up on my hunches and found some interesting pieces of information that weren’t ever mentioned in the media reports that I saw. Although the accounts label Mrs. Henry as a ‘processing technician’, making it sound as though she were a low-level worker, Mrs. Henry was described as “well-known worker in the halls of the state Capitol” before she was demoted to the medical examiner’s office. Jean Henry filed a lawsuit against Governor Dannel Malloy and two other legislative officials in the summer of 2011 for wrongfully being dismissed from her job and infringing on her Constitutional rights.
    I’ve not heard any follow-up on her status, but I find the whole instance very interesting indeed.

  70. As I am sure all will agree on THIS–this is some weird shit? So then why be in a limited hangout is what I say. Let us dive in and see where this leads. I have found a MASSIVE taboo. Even trying to open up debate in the psychedelic community about this is met with silence, ridicule, and accusations of ‘conspiracy theory’. What am I talking about. The OCCULT!!! Sharing information about the language these people–that do these JFKs, and 9/11s and Sandy Hooks etc etc etcuse–which is hidden yet in plain sight, but when looked at we can piece together a structure which connects these supposedly unrelated events. In her analysis of Sandy Hook, Sofia Smallstorm talks about the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, and even 6th dimensions to do with understanding Sandy Hook . IE, the 2D is the screen mediarized presentation of THE EVENT, but the 3D is what shows up that’s inconsistencies, the 4th, 5th and 6th is when you look much closer at actions and also what you intend to do when you become aware. This is going deep into the investigation, but even she does not mention about the occult dimension, and that is what this post is about really. For example, she is seeing the Sandy Hook event as some form of experiment that the ones wanting a so-called New World Order are doing to manage perception. HOWEVER, when you look at the occult clues it is more a sacrificial ritual just like 9/11 was etc. If these may seem outlandish to readers reading that, ask yourself just how outlandish is staging such a profoundly traumatic tragedy of little children being massacred and making out it is reality to the world public. IF there is a possibility *that* could be so, then they are capable of *ANYTHING!* Sandy Hook & The Temple of the Feathered Serpent

    1. Well, I think the point at which people will clash when choosing which theory best matches the evidence is where they are simply unaware of what the occult is and its various manifestations.

      However, it is obvious to me where Sofia might not think there’s much to support an occult motive in the case of Sandy Hook. I suspect she is convinced more than ever that there were no killings and I agree that from looking at the core evidence alone does point in that direction. So, an occult connection here begins to seem less likely.

      One thing that I did take into account as soon as I considered your ideas was the phenomenon known as child sacrifice. I’m talking specifically about parents who have in the past murdered their own children. Maybe there isn’t a coincidence that it was the Parker’s eldest daughter that is claimed to have been a victim. She was their “first born.” Just pointing that out, in case someone might find it worth running with.

      My main point though is that, if no actual murders took place is there still a reason to consider an occult motive of some kind? My knowledge is limited in that area.

Leave a Reply