The Conspiracy Theorist: What Happened to James Tracy Could Happen to You – Promo 2

Independent Media Solidarity

Independent Media Solidarity presents the second preview of our new feature-length film, The Conspiracy Theorist: What Happened to James Tracy Could Happen to You. Nationally recognized school safety expert Wolfgang Halbig gives one of his best interviews for the project. This preview features great clips from that interview.

Tracy was a distinguished tenured faculty member in Florida Atlantic University’s School of Communications and Multimedia Studies, where he researched and taught courses in journalism history, communication theory, and the media’s coverage of conspiracy theories.

Tracy received awards for his work, regularly earned excellent reviews, and was a former president of the FAU faculty union.
Despite Tracy’s outstanding academic record, FAU fired Tracy in retaliation for controversial posts he made on his personal blog questioning the press coverage of the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre.

In January 2016, FAU terminated Tracy’s tenured professorship, falsely claiming he had been “insubordinate” for failing to disclose his blogging activity under its conflict of interest outside activity Policy.

There are exciting developments in this ongoing saga. In the continuing civil rights action James Tracy brought against FAU, Tracy has filed a reply brief in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. The brief is authored by attorneys at the nationally-recognized Carlton Fields law firm, who recognize the constitutional significance of the case as it relates to the First Amendment and pride themselves on being both lawyers and citizens. The reply stands out as sound and powerful in comparison to the backtracking and, frankly weak response brief filed by Appellee, Florida Atlantic University.

Please share this new video promo with your social media network. You can also provide more direct support by donating to James Tracy’s legal fund, providing other professional services or by broadcasting this documentary film.

View Promo 2 on alternative platforms here.


View the The Conspiracy Theorist Promo #1

See also:

TracyvFAU: A Very Dangerous Precedent 

Federal Appeal Filed Challenging FAU’s Unconstitutional Outside Activities Policy

Palm Beach Post ‘Spins’ TracyvFAU Appeal

0

Scientists Sound Alarm on New Guidelines For Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Radiation

Concern Voiced in Wake of National 5G Microwave Rollout

Editor’s Note: As the preliminary rollout of 5G technology takes place in numerous US municipalities, over 200 scientists from around the world are voicing their opposition to the telecom industry-friendly International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection’s guidelines for human exposure. The scientists argue that the proposed “protections” offer no more safety to the public than the antiquated FCC’s guidelines from the 1990s still in effect today.

Such guidelines “only protect against acute thermal effects from very short and intense exposure,” the scientists contend.

The guidelines do not protect against harmful effects from low-intensity and long-term exposure, such as cancer, reproductive harm, or effects on the nervous system, although these effects are convincingly shown to appear from chronic exposure at intensities below ICNIRP limits.

Their observations are detailed in the post below.


The EMF Call

Call for Truly Protective Limits for Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz)

ICNIRP’s opinion and guidelines are unscientific and protect industry, not public health


In order to protect the public and the environment from the known harmful effects from electromagnetic fields (EMF) we ask the United Nations, the World Health Organization and all governments not to accept the ICNIRP guidelines. They are not protective, rather they pose a serious risk to human health and the environment since they allow harmful exposure to the world population, including the most vulnerable, under the unscientific pretext that they are “protective”.

Background

The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) issued draft Guidelines on 11th July 2018 for limiting exposure to electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz).1 These guidelines are unscientific, obsolete and do not represent an objective evaluation of the available science on effects from this form of radiation. They ignore the vast amount of scientific findings that clearly and convincingly show harmful effects at intensities well below ICNIRP guidelines.2 The guidelines are inadequate to protect humans and the environment.

Continue reading Scientists Sound Alarm on New Guidelines For Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Radiation

0