Sandy Hook Parent Lenny Pozner: A Deep State ‘Cyberpuppet’?

Editor’s Note: This concise and well-documented overview of the lawsuit brought by Lenny Pozner against Wolfgang Halbig (2016-2018) is especially significant as it highlights the legal abuse of process and overall harassment methods used by certain parties and/or “deep state” intelligence operatives against citizen journalists whose efforts have revealed unpleasant facts and observations on the 2012 Sandy Hook event.

By Alison Maynard

It is time the world knew what happened when Leonard Pozner sued Wolfgang Halbig, since the proceedings support the conclusion that Lenny may not even be a real person, at all, but is somebody’s cyberpuppet.  In a nutshell, Pozner never appeared for a single hearing in the case, not even for his deposition when–after numerous delays–the court ordered him to submit to it.  Pozner dismissed the case right before that deposition was to take place.

The suit was filed by Pozner in county court in Lake County, Florida, case 15 CA 001693.  Lenny pled that he was the father of Noah Pozner, a child who had been killed at the Sandy Hook shooting on Dec. 14, 2012.  His complaint was that Wolf had “intercepted” and published on his website correspondence between Lenny and the Florida Attorney General, Pam Bondi, which contained Lenny’s address and other personal information.

Wolfgang Halbig accompanied by counsel at a PoznervHalbig hearing in early 2018.

Lenny said he had suffered impairment of reputation and standing in the community, personal humiliation, and mental anguish as a result of the publication.  He sought attorney’s fees, costs, and an injunction.

Wolf showed the court more than once not only that he had obtained Lenny’s correspondence from Bondi through Florida’s Open Records Act (see Doc. 39), but that Lenny’s address was stated in Lenny’s own suit against gun manufacturers in Connecticut, which is also online.

Pozner’s suit against Wolf did not even state a cognizable claim for relief, such as defamation.  It appears to have been a mechanism to conduct a fishing expedition, since Lenny used it to demand production of all correspondence and “emails, instant messages, text messages, voicemails,” and more, relating in any way to the “Dec. 14, 2012, Sandy Hook shooting,” proving that Noah Pozner did not die, there was no investigation or the investigation was corrupt, the death certificate was forged, and the like (see Doc. 16).  In other words, he wanted to see what Wolf had.  He also wanted to know about Wolf’s prior testimony as an expert witness in school safety.

Wolf, by that time representing himself, in error did not respond to the discovery requests, so the plaintiff filed a motion to compel.  Wolf did file a motion to dismiss.  The plaintiff filed a motion to strike the motion to dismiss (Doc. 21) which stated in the body of the motion that it, along with the plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery responses, was “Special Set” for hearing on Nov. 9, 2016.  Wolf (luckily) saw this hearing notice for the motion to compel buried in this other motion that had nothing to do with it, and appeared in court on Nov. 9, 2016, but neither the plaintiff nor his lawyer did, so Lenny’s motion to compel was denied (Doc. 28).

Lenny’s attorney argued later (Doc. 29) that the Nov. 9 hearing was set without notice to him, accusing Wolf of “underhanded maneuvering” and arguing with the judge about whether his motion could have been denied, since he had had no notice of the hearing–when Lenny’s attorney had set it, himself!  It appears this man even grieved the judge over this (Doc. 96).

Wolf served requests for production, asking for documents identifying Lenny, such as birth certificate, naturalization record, driver’s license, business licenses, and asking whether he was acting as an agent for any governmental entity and, if so, who he worked for and what his duties were.  Wolf also asked for all documentary evidence related to the claims in Lenny’s complaint.  Interestingly, he asked nothing about Noah!

Lenny’s attorney, Alan Marcus, asked for an extension the day the responses were due (Doc. 36), saying he had been unable to confer with his client.  He then responded with a pile of objections, signing that document himself. Wolf had also served requests for admissions–and the answers were, again, signed by Alan Marcus.  Both the rules governing requests for admission as well as production say the answers are supposed to be made by the party.  My interpretation of that requirement has always been that an attorney’s signature does not suffice.  In April 2017 Marcus moved for an extension to respond to Wolf’s interrogatories, saying again that he was unable to confer with his client (Doc 64).

The pièce de résistance is when Wolf noticed Lenny for deposition.  Wolf had unsuccessfully tried to confer about a date, so set it unilaterally (Doc. 58); and Lenny’s attorney moved to strike the notice of deposition and for a protective order, asking that the deponent be allowed to appear by telephone (Docs. 60, 61), and purporting to impose numerous other conditions.

On Aug. 22, 2017, the court ordered Leonard Pozner to appear in person for his deposition, and permitted it to be videotaped (Doc. 86).  It granted Pozner a delay of three months based on “medical evidence” that he was unable to attend until November 15, 2017.  On Nov. 13, 2017, two days before the deposition was supposed to take place Pozner dismissed the lawsuit (Doc. 92).

Wolf then had another attorney for a limited period, who moved for $3,373.73 in costs after the dismissal, which did not even include attorney fees.  The claim was denied (Doc. 100).

Throughout this 2½-year ordeal, both Wolf and his wife were subjected to a shocking barrage of profane and threatening emails from Pozner (Doc. 44) saying such things as “Go fuck yourself,” wishing Wolf a “nice day and a stroke,” calling him a loser and a pedophile, threatening him with harassment charges for communicating with Pozner’s attorney, threatening Wolf’s wife at her place of employment, and more.

Wolf uncovered multiple aliases, phone numbers, and email addresses used by Pozner, in addition to evidence that he is using the Social Security number of a deceased woman named Anna M. McGuire and owns two handguns, including a Glock with a laser sight (registered under one of the aliases).

Leonard Pozner and his former wife Véronique have a pile of judgments against them, too (which, to my mind, is the best evidence that Pozner may exist; however, no marriage license has been discovered).  Wolf further suffered the hijacking of his identity prior to the lawsuit, by means of packages containing noxious and even dangerous items sent to various people using Wolf’s return address.  He has had serious reason to be concerned about this goon–or spook–Pozner, therefore.

It bears mention that Florida Atlantic University’s dismissal of Dr. James Tracy, a tenured professor, also began with Pozner, who complained that Tracy had “harassed” him by sending a letter asking for proof that his son died in the shooting.  Pozner’s frivolous charge led the University to develop its pretext for dismissing this tenured professor:  that he had failed to fill out forms identifying his extracurricular activities. Tracy filed a federal lawsuit against FAU in April 2016. That case is presently before the US Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.


Alison (“Sunny”) Maynard’s understanding of psy ops and false flags grew by leaps and bounds after she found Memory Hole Blog in 2013, on which she commented as “dinophile,” learning from lively dialog with the other participants and James Tracy’s articles, particularly about Sandy Hook.  

Sunny is providing informal assistance to Wolfgang Halbig in the lawsuit several Sandy Hook families have brought against him.  

0

Leave a Reply

20 thoughts on “Sandy Hook Parent Lenny Pozner: A Deep State ‘Cyberpuppet’?”

  1. If Wolfgang has all this evidence against Pozner, why is Wolfgang trying to get the lawsuit dismissed? You’d think he’d be eager to get to court to expose Pozner.

    1. What? It would be helpful if this commenter actually read the post rather than submitting red herring remarks.

      The plaintiff moved to have the case dismissed without prejudice after being summoned by the court to appear for a video deposition. Several months later the plaintiff filed to have the judge recused for no apparent reason. This even left the judge mystified. Aside from the court denying defendant’s request for plaintiff to cover costs that is where things presently stand.

        1. Pozner is not a plaintiff in the current suit.

          Moreover, there is a risk of great liability whenever a person is sued, not to mention the expense of simply defending. It’s not well advised to miss an opportunity to dismiss the suit if that opportunity exists. But if Wolf’s motion to dismiss is denied be assured he will undertake extensive discovery, up to the top of the food chain.

        2. They filed motions to get Corey Slanka taken off the lawsuit and for him to be dismissed… he had nothing to do with it #ProjectTransistor

        1. Alex Jones and his entities have also dumped on Wolf and tried to scapegoat him. They seem not to understand that their clients’ best defense is that Wolf’s statements are TRUE.

    2. So long as Jeff Sessions or his successor don’t run out of bubble gum the Sandy Hook scammers and their enablers roam free.

  2. A very revealing and useful compilation. Thank you! It’s so like the deep state to accuse its targets of the very crimes it has committed. Here we have an investigator who has asked reasonable questions while using public information ; yet he is the one being accused of “underhanded maneuvering” even as his accuser(s) deploy threats, insults, profanity, identity theft and a costly (to Wolf) disappearing act. And what’s this about using a poor dead lady’s social security number?! Ugh. Sounds all too eerily familiar. If we don’t see the pattern emerging in the rug, we need to have our eyes checked.

    1. “…It’s so like the deep state to accuse its targets of the very crimes it has committed. Here we have an investigator who has asked reasonable questions while using public information ; yet he is the one being accused of “underhanded maneuvering” even as his accuser(s) deploy threats, insults, profanity, identity theft…”
      This is the psychological defense mechanism known as projection*. I notice this with all my “left wing” friends and relatives, that is, this knee-jerk retort spouting “conspiracy theory” and just generally words and conduct to cut off any discussion at all about any false event.
      We keep seeking reasonable intelligent discourse about these major false events and we keep getting shut down by the very effective strategies of Saul Alinsky and his Rules for Radicals. Those strategies are designed to put you on the defensive and shut down logical, reasonable discussion. Anybody can pick up on and use these tricks and often have no awareness of Alinsky or Freud ideas at all.
      These tactics are by no means limited to the dialectical playing pieces of “Left” and “Right”, Democrat or Republican, or Liberal or conservative. (These strategies also serve another goal, that of breaking up friendships and family relationships.)

      “Keep the pressure on with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose.”
      “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.”

      https://www.scribd.com/document/24986505/Summary-of-Saul-Alinsky-s-Rules-for-Radicals
      *
      According to Freud, “a defense mechanism [is] where a person “projects” their own unwanted motivations, desires, fears, feelings and opinions onto someone else – if most everyone else feels and acts with the same fears and emotions that I have then there can be nothing wrong with me.”

      https://randomthots.org/2012/05/29/rules-for-radicals-by-saul-alinsky-the-way-ahead/

  3. Three cheers for Wolfgang Halbig! Thanks to his efforts, and to those of James Tracy and others, the Sandy Hook charade is crumbling. May James get his job back (with damages) and may Wolfgang recover his costs and expose this abomination for what it is.

  4. If the perpetrators of Sandy Hoax had wanted people to believe it then they should have hired some better actors.
    Smiling Robbie Parker and Gene Rosens ever changing plot twists started everyone digging.
    Then the digging accelerated when some badge wearing criminal announced that anyone questioning the official narrative just might be punished.
    They should have called the Sandy Hook School shooting “101 Things Not To Do When Creating A Hoax.”

  5. I’m considering writing an article about another malicious action taken by Pozner against Wolfgang. During the presidential race of 2016, Wolfgang began getting email from who he thought was Trump’s daughter’s assistant. This correspondence eventually led to an agreed upon meeting between Wolfgang and D. Trump at Mara Lago in Florida. Wolfgang’s intent was to share information relating to Sandy Hook truth with Trump.

    Wolfgang traveled the 4 hours to Mara Lago only to find out he had been duped. And the person doing the duping, Pozner. Disgusting.

  6. Thanks for that, Peter. I’d forgotten about that. I was relying only on Wolf’s affidavit which he filed with the court.

  7. According to Fetzer, he has sent his evidence to the attorney’s involved. Perhaps the attorney’s know that that evidence won’t stand up in court. it’s easy to convince people on a conspiracy site, quite different to convince a court of law.

    Saying someone is a crisis actor, based on an interview they did, would not work in court. You would need other proof. Halbig tweeting photos of teenagers he says look like the Sandy hook kids grown up is not enough for a court. Fetzer saying Pozner looks like Reuben Vabner is not evidence

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *