UN admits ‘refugees’ are ‘replacement migration’ for Europe and other low-fertility countries

Dr. Eowyn
FellowshipoftheMinds
(April 20, 2018)

For those of us who’ve long suspected there’s a hidden agenda behind the invasion of “refugees” and “migrants” in Europe, here’s the smoking gun.

In 2000, the United Nations’ Department of Economic and Social Affairs issued a report, Replacement Migration: Is It a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?, which proposes “replacement migration” for countries with an aging and declining population.

Below is the UN’s press release on the report, dated March 17, 2000 — that’s how long ago the “refugee” and “migrant” plan was hatched.

Press Release
DEV/2234
POP/735

NEW REPORT ON REPLACEMENT MIGRATION ISSUED BY UN POPULATION DIVISION

NEW YORK, 17 March (DESA) — The Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) has released a new report titled “Replacement Migration: Is it a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?”. Replacement migration refers to the international migration that a country would need to prevent population decline and population ageing resulting from low fertility and mortality rates.

United Nations projections indicate that between 1995 and 2050, the population of Japan and virtually all countries of Europe will most likely decline. In a number of cases, including Estonia, Bulgaria and Italy, countries would lose between one quarter and one third of their population. Population ageing will be pervasive, bringing the median age of population to historically unprecedented high levels. For instance, in Italy, the median age will rise from 41 years in 2000 to 53 years in 2050. The potential support ratio — i.e., the number of persons of working age (15-64 years) per older person — will often be halved, from 4 or 5 to 2.

Focusing on these two striking and critical trends, the report examines in detail the case of eight low-fertility countries (France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, United Kingdom and United States) and two regions (Europe and the European Union). In each case, alternative scenarios for the period 1995-2050 are considered, highlighting the impact that various levels of immigration would have on population size and population ageing.

Major findings of this report include:

— In the next 50 years, the populations of most developed countries are projected to become smaller and older as a result of low fertility and increased longevity. In contrast, the population of the United States is projected to increase by almost a quarter. Among the countries studied in the report, Italy is projected to register the largest population decline in relative terms, losing 28 per cent of its population between 1995 and 2050, according to the United Nations medium variant projections. The population of the European Union, which in 1995 was larger than that of the United States by 105 million, in 2050, will become smaller by 18 million.

— Population decline is inevitable in the absence of replacement migration. Fertility may rebound in the coming decades, but few believe that it will recover sufficiently in most countries to reach replacement level in the foreseeable future.

Some immigration is needed to prevent population decline in all countries and regions examined in the report. However, the level of immigration in relation to past experience varies greatly. For the European Union, a continuation of the immigration levels observed in the 1990s would roughly suffice to prevent total population from declining, while for Europe as a whole, immigration would need to double. The Republic of Korea would need a relatively modest net inflow of migrants — a major change, however, for a country which has been a net sender until now. Italy and Japan would need to register notable increases in net immigration. In contrast, France, the United Kingdom and the United States would be able to maintain their total population with fewer immigrants than observed in recent years.

— The numbers of immigrants needed to prevent the decline of the total population are considerably larger than those envisioned by the United Nations projections. The only exception is the United States.

— The numbers of immigrants needed to prevent declines in the working-age population are larger than those needed to prevent declines in total population. In some cases, such as the Republic of Korea, France, the United Kingdom or the United States, they are several times larger. If such flows were to occur, post-1995 immigrants and their descendants would represent a strikingly large share of the total population in 2050 — between 30 and 39 per cent in the case of Japan, Germany and Italy.

— Relative to their population size, Italy and Germany would need the largest number of migrants to maintain the size of their working-age populations. Italy would require 6,500 migrants per million inhabitants annually and Germany, 6,000. The United States would require the smallest number — 1,300 migrants per million inhabitants per year.

— The levels of migration needed to prevent population ageing are many times larger than the migration streams needed to prevent population decline. Maintaining potential support ratios would in all cases entail volumes of immigration entirely out of line with both past experience and reasonable expectations.

— In the absence of immigration, the potential support ratios could be maintained at current levels by increasing the upper limit of the working-age population to roughly 75 years of age.

— The new challenges of declining and ageing populations will require a comprehensive reassessment of many established policies and programmes, with a long-term perspective. Critical issues that need to be addressed include: (a) the appropriate ages for retirement; (b) the levels, types and nature of retirement and health care benefits for the elderly; (c) labour force participation; (d) the assessed amounts of contributions from workers and employers to support retirement and health care benefits for the elderly population; and (e) policies and programmes relating to international migration, in particular, replacement migration and the integration of large numbers of recent migrants and their descendants.

Note that, unlike Europe and other developed countries, the United States is a lone exception. Instead of population decline and ageing, our population is projected to increase by a quarter in the next 50 years.

That means America does not need to open our doors to immigrants, migrants and refugees. In fact, the UN report concludes that we only need to bring in 1,300 migrants per million inhabitants per year.

The U.S. population in 2018 is 327.16 million. That means that, at most, we need to bring in less than half a million (425,000) migrants a year — if even that.

0

Leave a Reply

One thought on “UN admits ‘refugees’ are ‘replacement migration’ for Europe and other low-fertility countries”

  1. Cowering European males have been gelded by political correctness weapons of mass cultural destruction from a feminized leadership. They have had their backbones surgically removed. They simply are unable, unwilling and impotent to stop the invasion of Muslims. Only in Poland, Hungary and Slovakia do they have any balls left to stop the destruction. The UN is the enemy of the United States. NATO didn’t lift a finger to stop the unarmed invasion of Europe. What are they good for then? Trump should get us out of both and kick the UN out into rowboats on the Hudson. Part of the World’s financial elite DNA is the indelible beliefs that Earth’s population is too big and needs to be radically reduced. Just read the Georgia Guidstones and look at the UN’s Agenda 21 Map of a depopulated America. It spells out the depopulation agenda in vivid technicolor. You can especially see that from smarmy Bill Gates and the arch-hypocrite Ted Turner. Ted had five kids and tells us there’s too many people using too much stuff. Gates comes straight out that his vaccine program is aimed at population control. Another sacred belief of Earth’s oligarchy is that we are too feeble minded to comprehend the severity of the problem and too timid to do what’s necessary. It follows that part of their blood rite of kings to cull the heard of human cattle by any and all means: Abortion on demand, stealth sterilization, one child policy, forced abortions, endless wars, starvation, death trails in the sky and the invention of new deadly diseases. And to profit every step of the way. The Catholic Doctors of Kenya found a spontaneous abortion inducing hormone in vaccines. I’m sure it was accidental. In south America, a lay-person of the clergy mission noticed that only women were being given a tetanus shot as a preventive cure. Wouldn’t men be twice as likely to get the disease working construction, he asked? They found the same hormone as the Catholic Doctors of Kenya. In the seminal Viet Nam War movie Apocalypse Now, Colonel Kurtz told a story of the Viet Cong lopping off all the arms of inoculated children by the American forces. No explanation was given for the barbarous act. It was just a small warning from Francis Coppola to the rest of us that vaccines might not be given to improve your health. And the Viet Cong knew what they were all about. So they needed to send a message to the rest of the population: get a shot, lose an arm. Kurtz marveled at the savage will of the Viet Cong.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *