“Extreme Weather Events” and Manufactured Terror

[In early October 2016 Hurricane Matthew bears down on Caribbean island nations and the Southeastern United States. Available information suggests the US has long possessed the technology to cultivate and direct such inclement weather manifestations.


The two articles below were originally published at MHB on July 9 and 16, 2013 as the first two installments of a four-party series by Ohio-based attorney and researcher James R. Hanson. The following hyperlinks will direct the reader to Part III and Part IV. -JFT]


By James R. Hanson*

The following is the first installment of an exclusive four part series on memoryholeblog.com probing the relationship between America’s police state and less-understood weather warfare programs. -JFT

Mother Nature does not engage in terrorism.  Her ravages are integral to the natural world in which mankind must adapt or die.  Insofar as we know, Mother Nature has no motive to induce terror.  That’s where human beings come in.

The following report is about aspects of weather and environmental modification which are not presented in the corporate media but can be found at alternative news and analysis websites offering explanations of weather phenomena caused by human beings. For example, in an introductory note of an article found at Global Research, Prof. Michel Chossudovsky states:

Environmental modification techniques (ENMOD) for military use constitute, in the present context of global warfare, the ultimate weapon of mass destruction.  Rarely acknowledged in the debate on global climate change, the world’s weather can now be modified as part of a new generation of sophisticated electromagnetic weapons.  Both the US and Russia have developed capabilities to manipulate the climate for military use.

…  The US military has developed advanced capabilities that enable it selectively to alter weather patterns.  The technology, which is being perfected under the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP), is an appendage of the Strategic Defense Initiative – “Star Wars”.  From a military standpoint, HAARP is a weapon of mass destruction, operating from the outer atmosphere and capable of destabilizing agricultural and ecological systems around the world.

There is no official statement or major media recognition of the uses that have been made of this capability to bring death and ruin to large numbers of people.  In my report I provide details which I believe illustrate the high probability of implementation of these capabilities including their use in planned debilitation of the people and productive capacity of the United States.

Hurricane Sandy is my first subject because it fit such a use of the power.  Before one dismisses this particular possibility as a fool’s errand they must conclude that it is never used for deleterious effects upon the United States, even if it might seem more than coincidental in its use on nations such as Russia or Iran at critical places and times.

Along these lines, for a conspiracy researcher such as I, Sandy has been an especially suspicious phenomenon. I couldn’t turn away because it was so historically unprecedented and affected the political situation at such a high level.  With terrorist events—such as 9/11—one is left more so to guess at the suspects, and it takes a while to find out because the news media can’t seem to hear those low notes.  While the aftermath of Sandy was still bounding around in the public consciousness there was a smaller event called “Sandy Hook” that understandably got to everyone’s heart and made them want to do something. Further, because it featured  firearms and the slaughter a flock of first graders in their schoolrooms, naturally enough many wanted to ban guns so that such an event would never happen again.

Mother Nature didn’t do that one, of course, nor in my estimation Hurricane Sandy, a form of terrorism unrecognized as such.  “The Sandy Hook massacre” is a new form used to alter public policy.  One can sense the terror that energizes action due to the pain in everyone’s heart for those lovely young children who were mercilessly slaughtered.  I felt it.  But after a calm appraisal of the facts my reaction turned to assessing the named terrorist, Adam Lanza, to be as innocent as the children–a probable victim of terrorists who established his reputation as having performed the single most unfathomably dreadful deed in collective memory.  As one faces the actual facts, he finds the same sort of evil (illegal) force behind Sandy Hook as that responsible for Hurricane Sandy, the result in both cases being debilitation of the American people and their human rights.

The similarity to 9/11 terror was not apparent at first.  Sandy Hook Elementary School was much smaller and it focused on the horror of blood-drenched children who were 100% innocent, while 9/11 destroyed all the buildings in the World Trade Center and some 3,000 100%-innocent adults.  (The thousands who had notice and didn’t come to work that day were not 100% innocent, and survived.)  If you are amazed that intelligent people can still believe that it was attributable to four airplanes flown by amateurs, you will be blown away by the national credibility accorded the “Sandy Hook massacre.”  Blown away.  It is connected by the same old principle of substituted reality, or “false flag,” used for terrorism designed to affect the judgment of target groups of people–e.g. leaders of a fleet, an army, or the people in a republic.  With 9/11, the blame was placed falsely on 19 Muslim hijackers in order to create hatred to permit our leaders to start illegal wars against Middle Eastern countries populated by Muslims.  Most Americans and most media are still buying the “hijacker” explanation as correct in reference to that underworld event.

The enemy selected as the villains of Sandy Hook are not Muslims but gun owners said to be led by the National Rifle Association, known for its history in preserving firearm ownership.  When one examines the detail, one finds that a false image was created at Sandy Hook to stampede citizens for a political end just as was the historic event of 9/11.  The desired effect by managers of the false flag of Sandy Hook is a diminution toward ultimate deletion of Article II of the U.S. Constitution which grants states and their citizens a means to defend themselves against a federal tyrant to replace the one they rejected by use of firearms in 1776.  That tyrannical voice echoes as Englishman Piers Morgan speaks down to those bold enough to stand up for American principles inconsistent with those of the royal tradition, as if dim-witted American loyalists should be taught of their error.

If the Sandy Hook event had been a tornado someone could point to the damage and say “That’s Mother Nature for you!”  The essence of Sandy Hook is that the declared damage is fictional, devised, playing Americans as dull, complacent folks who are confident that the commercial media would analyze the facts before nullifying dissent with their opinions.  Surely, the people behind this would not be a party to the construction of a police state.  This hope is dashed by the way the media has succumbed to a carefully-organized plot for just that.  You will find me critical of the New York Times on this subject because it is not unlike the “hometown paper” for Newtown, Connecticut, and likely knew of the falsehood.
An Election Season Hurricane

Hurricane Sandy was the largest in history for Atlantic hurricanes, rather specially put together as hurricanes go, the most costly since Katrina, and remarkably timed by Mother Nature to “freeze” the presidential campaign by closing airports and roads in east coast states.  She crossed into New York and New Jersey on October 29 just before hurricane season closed on October 31.  The presidential election was held on November 6.  In the society of hurricanes, Sandy was a stranger.  President Obama immediately went out to the disaster area to promise help to everyone when they badly needed reassurance.

In this four-part report that begins with an analysis of Sandy, I want to describe connections between this storm and other apparently natural events.  After hurricanes and aspects of weather control, I’ve included earthquakes, which are like an ancestor of “weather warfare.”  I must refer to Sandy Hook because it is an eminently notable part of deceptive democracy.  You and I are arguably connected to all this by the phenomenon called “chemtrails,” which are connected to the police state that Paul Craig Roberts so eloquently describes in “It Has Happened Here in America: The Police State is Real.”According to Roberts, “9/11 was used to create an open-ended ‘war on terror’ and a police state.  It is extraordinary that so many Americans believe that ‘it can’t happen here’ when it already has.”

New York City had a notable hurricane in 1938. Remarkably the next one of similar notability was Hurricane Irene in 2011–73 years later.  Overnight, Irene had spread out and didn’t flood the subway as feared.  Before Sandy hit, people thought she would be another Irene.  Sandy turned out the lights, the water, all transportation, and future prospects of life near the seacoast.  She flooded the subways like they had never been flooded before and destroyed or made unlivable more than 300,000 homes, of which New York Governor Andrew Cuomo announced that he would buy 10,000 to turn the land into flood-proof parks and beaches.  The state would pay for flood-proofing structures in the hazard areas.  Buildings at sea level would require giant 15-foot pylons.  In March more than 2,000 people were still living in hotels at an average $252 a night, paid for by FEMA, because they could not afford to rent an apartment.


An article in the Arts section of the New York Times for November 20 by Michael Kimmelman refers to “no brainers” that aggravated the damage from Sandy, like not having floodgates at subway entrances, not getting transformers and switching stations out of harm’s way, and not getting Congress to order a Corps of Engineers study on the impact of barriers and barrier islands.  “Hurricane Sandy was a toll paid for procrastination.”  Early pledges were made by officialdom to bring things back the way they were.  But that’s the last thing we want to do, says Kimmelman.  “Now the task is to create a whole new ecological infrastructure for the region.”  This seems to make Sandy a blessing, like a timely gift from God.

The Times had synthesized the problem in a November 1 editorial, “Worrying Beyond Hurricane Sandy.” This piece views Sandy as a lesson for both cities and citizens for ignoring the “grimly precise detail by scientists in the latest state and city climate studies.”  The coastal waters are rising as the ocean warms and expands.  The editor quotes Klaus Jacob, research scientist at the Columbia University’s Earth Institute and adviser to the city on climate change as saying the political process hadn’t recognized that we’re playing Russian roulette.  Governor Cuomo wants surge barriers, involving billions of dollars, which the Times editors see as “a bargain if Sandy and Irene are truly harbingers of more frequent disasters eating deeper into the city’s heart.”

The fact that Sandy came ashore eight days before the presidential election gave President Barack Obama time to find his way through the debris in New Jersey for a tearful embrace and endorsement (before the television cameras) of Governor Chris Christie, who had become known for his livid excoriation of Obama in the election season.  With the election less than a week away the President must have said something to the Republican governor that made him very happy.  New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, neither Republican nor Democrat, enthusiastically joined in the endorsement.  Definitely not a Mormon hurricane, Sandy put Mitt Romney’s campaign out of action in the transportation vacuum of critical eastern states where his staff was organized for a strong finish.  No airports, railroads, highways, restaurants, hotels, parking lots, schools, welcoming crowds, or time for paying attention to TV ads even if they had electricity.

A few weeks after Obama’s re-election, using the entire front page of its November 25 Sunday Review for a picture of the Statue of Liberty, the flame of her torch breaking the surface of the water just above her head, the Times asked “Is This the End?”  This headlined a James Atlas op ed with the explanatory subhead “Whether in 50 or 100 years, there’s a good chance that New York City will sink beneath the sea.”  Now this is getting serious.

In the midst of this gnawing uncertainty, a rather small event occurred, compared with Hurricane Sandy.  On December 14 the national attention was yanked from the still-flowing stream of unnerving discoveries of debilitating harm from Sandy, to an event in the track of Sandy: a new nightmare named “Sandy Hook Elementary School,” envisioning a pile of 20 shredded first graders.  It instantly overcame Hurricane Sandy’s rank in national attention, gaining daily with wholehearted engagement of the media as if it were the essence of what news should be.  No need for a huge investigation.  When 20 innocent children are murdered, we don’t need one.  It was obviously a local boy, Adam Lanza, who killed himself, thus no need for a trial.  He was seen as a mental case, with a whole bunch of guns which evidently were his mother’s.  Gun control was now equated with the subject of “Sandy Hook.”

Mother Nature: not guilty

Hurricane Sandy thus far has taken 44 American lives, almost 300 total.  Older people were affected in ways that will hasten their demise.  They weren’t tourists in a hot air balloon, or vacationers on a 4,000-passenger cruise ship, they were people simply trying to live day by day wherever they happened to be located and had no choice but to stay, wait, and hope.

If I hear Mother Nature being blamed, I rise to her defense.  Anyone analyzing the current atmosphere of threat to human rights must clearly see the fact that the USA does not have to experience any hurricane it does not prefer to experience.  “We” have long had the capability to prevent hurricanes and tornadoes, and to guide and empower them.  Sandy was not the result of “Russian roulette,” it was more likely the result of targeting with our military assault weapon: weather.

For the states or the Congress to be preparing gun control bills in this light is corrupt in itself, because its motivational reference is presumptively false.  If directed from the White House—to which the event does not appear unimportant, but rather, vital—one must bear in mind that human life and justice, even for Americans, is not considered as important as the need for respect of fabrications vital to secret government objectives.

Would our federal government lie to us?  We hear of nameless agencies equipped with “black budget” money of secret and incredible amounts that even the president and Congress are not permitted to know, and we are required to pay taxes without knowing how the money is spent in addition to wars that have clearly been improper and wasteful.

The Iraq “war clock” is currently approaching $900 billion, the estimated overall damage in trillions   That was enabled by a Bush/Cheney lie.  But Obama?  In order to adequately defend the nation, no one outside the black budget agency can know what it is doing because of the presumed advantage that knowledge would give to the nation’s enemies.  The black budget that has grown and been used continuously since World War II could by itself make it impossible for the United States to survive as the free state we say we admire.

Hurricane Sandy has the fingerprints of a criminal phenomenon, one being shielded by the President, the Vice-President, all federal agencies concerned with the military or the environment, and the major media which are threatened and commercially blackmailed into silence.

Blackmailed?  That is a generalization, but I must assert that for one reason or another the flow of facts has been so restricted that it feels like the atmosphere after 9/11.

Some weeks ago I watched a couple of Weather Channel programs—“Hacking Tornadoes” and “Hacking Hurricanes,” presented as cheery-jokey explanations for schoolchildren, in which the object of each was ways to protect ourselves from them.  “What if we could have pushed a button and prevented Sandy?”  Hurricanes have been getting more numerous in the past decade due to ocean warming.  “We need to reduce insurance claims.”  Or play offense, attack the hurricanes the way they attack us.  Some ideas, nothing practical, need more resources for study and experiment.  Sorry, folks, nothing yet, but silver iodide produced rain in Vietnam a few decades ago.

For comparison I watched my DVD of “Weather Warfare,” from the History Channel, one clearly for adults, telling us about the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) and its 3.6 megawatt ELF wave projection from Alaska.  These waves are Extremely Low Frequency which allows them to penetrate the earth, or bounce off the ionosphere to cause an earthquake or a hurricane, or re-route the jet stream and decide who gets rain and who doesn’t.  Or—affect the human mind.

There is much more information available in books I reference is subsequent installments of this series, but I find that most people don’t see what’s happening to us.  The History Channel DVD came out about four years ago, was shown a few times on TV, then the History Channel refashioned its programming to focus on trivial things such as artifacts in a pawn shop.  The DVD is still available for purchase under the politically correct title, “THAT’S IMPOSSIBLE.”  Yes, I had thought it impossible that several of the best-informed people on this subject would be allowed to do an exposure on television.

Before New York City is re-designed as a subterranean metropolis, why not look to the well-funded and forward-looking scientific community and ask if there isn’t some way to prevent another Sandy, not just sit back and let it happen?  I picture the late Senator Claiborne Pell looking down at all this and shaking his head.  He had seen the future clearly when the Treaty on Environmental Modification (ENMOD) was being discussed in 1976-77.  Its main thrust was to prohibit use against an enemy of “techniques that would have widespread, long-lasting or severe effects through deliberate manipulation of natural processes and cause such phenomena as earthquakes, tidal waves, and changes in climate and weather patterns.”

Pell lost in his challenge to an amendment allowing research and experimentation on these prohibited techniques, correctly picturing any agency permitted to develop them as becoming unable to resist the temptation to use environmental modification as a military weapon.  He may have anticipated their domestic use, but should he have seriously anticipated illegal (criminal) domestic use to distort public opinion and Congressional motivation?  Or long-term, to convert the United States into a police state on par with the Soviet Union or a Nazi Germany?

The U.S. and the U.S.S.R. signed the treaty in 1978, bringing a momentary quiet, but after the U.S.S.R. was dissolved in 1991 it announced that as “Russia” it was no longer bound by the treaty, followed by the U.S. position that neither was the U.S.  The race was on.  Ten years later, Representative Dennis Kucinich could be quoted in “Columbus Alive” for January, 2002:  “The truth is there’s an entire program in the Department of Defense, ‘Vision for 2020,’ that’s developing these weapons.”  Publisher Bob Fitrakis was asking him about the use of “chemtrails,” an operation which the U.S. Air Force denied, and still routinely denies, calling them “a hoax.”  In print, the Air Force had announced its objective to master (“own”) the weather, once seen essentially as an answer to Russia.  There is no reason whatsoever to believe that this objective has been discontinued or reduced.  The more useful it becomes, the heavier the silence surrounding it.

Representative Kucinich has been constant in his attempt to enact legislation to prevent weather control from becoming standard operating procedure, as has Fitrakis in keeping it before readers of the Free Press.  The Ohio Republicans, as of this Congressional term, have thrown the courageous Kucinich off the train by isolating him from his voting support through re-districting.  That’s “dirty trick” democracy.

Gun control is a foremost ingredient to a “police state.”  Guns of sufficient number and size are an obstacle to the growing concretion of such a police state, which following rules of the rapist, gets its way unless someone can effectively say “no.”  It needn’t come to a violent revolution.  Gun ownership gives the people confidence, just as it gives pause to officials who would compress the middle class and enslave all but the wealthy.  It cannot be discussed rationally with everyone weeping over dead children.  It’s too serious for snap judgment, either way, when “the people” are democratically disabled.

When I first heard a talk on the subject of weather control in a water management conference some 25 years ago, chatting with a civil engineer at intermission I found him enthusiastic about the possibilities of growing crops more predictably and economically by reallocating rainfall.  As an attorney I was appalled, picturing the impossible confluence of this human factor in life or death with due process of law, which requires that the taking of property meet standards decided by U.S. Supreme Court interpretations of the U.S. Constitution.  Secret weather control turns the Constitution into a worthless document.

The tough question is not just the taking of property by drought, flood, snow, or wind but the accompanying deprivation of life and health.  Will there be a special court for that?  One who can control the weather has his hand on a switch (perhaps a keyboard) to kill people, a subject still considered by most as improper, and clearly unconstitutional.  Today we talk about use of drones and the thoughtless murder of innocents, including children not unlike those said to have been killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School and considerably more numerous.  This is justified by those who defend it as necessary if the U.S.A. is to be “safe from terrorists.”  We openly deplore it, but it will most likely be the course again on any day somewhere, to our discredit as Americans.

It has become increasingly impressed on all involved that the outstanding aspect of weather as a military force is that it must appear to be the action of Mother Nature.  It thus cannot be successfully attributed to a particular source to attract a reaction, military or political, by the injured party.  In the United States at the present time the façade includes disciplined fabrication by all federal agencies concerning the ability to affect the weather, from chemtrails to floods, droughts, tornadoes, hurricanes, and earthquakes.   This phenomenon of tight secrecy is intended to furnish “plausible deniability,” an overriding objective that is most feasible with a controlled media, as in a police state.  The inherent problem that undercuts virtue, and thus human rights, is that the method requires that the government lie to its citizens, and that the media cooperate–  not just now and then, but by principle, all agencies, always.  It all but makes the country destined to become a police state.

In considering the morality of weather warfare bear in mind that weather kills people, whether you intend it or not, including kindergartners and first graders in much greater numbers than massacres by assassins.  As discussed extensively in the U.S. Congress in the lead-up to approval of ENMOD, hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, droughts, heat waves, extreme cold, and earthquakes amount to lethal weaponry capable of being used secretly by a military force to destroy another nation without its knowing who did it, feigning innocence and tsk-tsking about Mother Nature and global warming.  Masked by “plausible deniability” it starves an enemy, drowns it, tears up its cities, destabilizes its people and its military gradually without their knowing what is happening.  With the same facility, it can spread toxins and hallucinogens from the air, unsuspected, or endured for lack of proof—that is, “plausible deniability.”

With weather warfare used against an avowed enemy, cooperation of citizens would be considered patriotic.  Using it against one’s own citizens would be a crime of the highest order, the withdrawal of human rights, a police-state standard.  In a police state, people who protest would be “disloyal” and subject to penalty as severe as necessary to prevent cracks in the illusion of national greatness.  A letter-writer to the Columbus Dispatch asks “Is the U.S. government tyrannical?  Of course not!”  He asserts that to make such an allegation demonstrates contempt for the democratic principles that make our country great.  “To express disagreement one goes to the voting booth,” says he.

If one has studied Ohio elections as have Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman, one must see this letter-writer as the ideal citizen for a police state, an element of which would be elections decided by those able to prevent media from reporting or acknowledging substitute vote counts, as seen by those of us watching from Ohio.  The newspapers in Ohio, one being the capital city’s Columbus Dispatch, saw no evil in the method that gave Bush/Cheney another term—Ohio being the swing state in 2004.  Bush had been overwhelmed.  Depression ruled in the Bush camp until the next morning after things had been rearranged.  The Republican state chairman, to whom I had earlier written to tell him he was head of a criminal organization, got the last laugh.

That banditry changed elections in more ways than we realized at the time.  It allowed Bush appointee John Roberts to become Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, where he chose the “Citizens United” case for hearing even though the subject upon which the court acted was not the issue on appeal.  It allowed Roberts, with the court majority, to declare that a corporation be treated as a “person” for purposes of political contributions, thus without the limits intended to keep corporate contributions from overpowering those from individuals.  It has had the predicted undemocratic result by shifting the effect of money to those who have the most.  It took us a long step away from a free state where the “common man” still had a voice that could be heard.

In these reports it is my purpose to examine weather control, not detailing how it is done, but to give the reader a circumstantial and statistical basis for seeing it in a different light.  One must start with the reality of the power.  There is no question whether it is possible.  The “chemtrail” factor, for one, is not just possible, but an actual, provable crime that anyone who chooses can witness being committed, yet another manifestation of a permanent police state, enshrouded in official lies.


By James R. Hanson*

Expanding the Stealth Terror Thesis: Hurricane management

The following Atlantic hurricanes, of those exceeding $10 billion in damage, are the costliest to date.  Dollars are approximate, Sandy’s estimates still in flux.  Those in bold occurred after the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) took responsibility for the weather-control program beginning in 2003.

                        Katrina     $108 billion           2005          Bush 43

                        Sandy           72                       2012          Obama

                        Ike                38                       2008          Bush 43

                        Wilma         29                        2005          Bush 43

                        Andrew        27                       1992          Bush 41

                        Ivan              23                      2004          Bush 43

                        Irene             17                       2011          Obama

                        Charley        16                       2004          Bush 43

                        Rita              12                       2005          Bush 43

                        Gilbert         10                       1988          Reagan

Of the next ten in rank (less than $10 billion in damage but more than $5 billion) Bush 43 had five,  thus the majority of the “top 20” hurricanes were during the presidency of George W. Bush. Only one of these, Tropical Storm Allison in 2001, was prior to DARPA’s jurisdiction.  Before Obama’s entry with Irene and Sandy, George W. (Bush 43) could claim 69% of the dollar cost of this list.  Following from this, those hopeful that Obama would not continue the Bush excesses may find little reassurance.

Another means of comparison of all 32 hurricanes costing more than $1 billion is by the percentage of total cost of all 32.  Bush 43 had 62%, Obama had 19%, Clinton 8%, Bush 41 8%, Reagan 3%, Carter a third of 1%

No president saw nearly as many damaging hurricanes during his presidency as the younger Bush following the DARPA takeover in 2003, which has HAARP as a central feature of its work.  The High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program in its final form was the project of BAE (British Aeronautical Enterprises) headquartered in the United Kingdom.  HAARP can be involved in all aspects of weather control.

Hurricane Ike, which took out half of our magnolia tree in Ohio, was heading west in the Gulf early in September, 2008 after beating up on Haiti, Cuba, Florida and the other Gulf states. As I watched and wondered about the target, it was amazing to see how it developed in strength and size, seeming repeatedly to refresh itself in order to continue. Would Ron Paul, much in the news that election year, rank as a target?  Paul was growing in prominence, a Republican in stark contrast, a Populist, a straight arrow without the shaggy histories of John McCain and Sarah Palin.  When Ike turned north toward the Texas shoreline its eye, unusually large, stretched from one side of Paul’s congressional district on the Gulf Coast to the other, like a monster mouth opening to chomp down on his district.  It flooded his primary congressional headquarters at Galveston, flooding and wrecking the office sufficiently to put it out of operation for the rest of the year.  Paul had been growing in interest as a presidential candidate, but when Ike swamped Paul’s office on September 13, McCain had already been selected in the Republican convention in St. Paul, Minnesota ten days earlier.  Ike was Texas’ second hit, a million people already in evacuation after Gustav two weeks earlier in an area of east Texas and Louisiana.  For days after entering Louisiana Gustav pointed straight for Denver, Colorado where Barack Obama had been nominated Democratic candidate on August 27.  Gustav turned to the northeast on September 1 to head away.  (I am told by experts that Mother Nature does not have hurricanes move in a straight line.)

Ike’s damage to Ron Paul was in the debilitation of his district containing the people who voted him into office to represent them, an area today still not back to normal.

Ike had made a quick turn to the north to travel through Ontario and Quebec to the Atlantic Ocean.  Ohio and Indiana each had seven fatalities and with near hurricane-force winds the loss of trees, downed poles and wires causing weeks of electricity loss.  Ike made its impression as far as Iceland, where wind speeds were even higher than in Ohio

When all insurance payments had been counted, it turned out to be the most expensive storm in Ohio’s history–$1.33 billion.

For a hurricane seemingly named after Dwight D. Eisenhower to be sent to chastise a Republican who wasn’t impressed with the party’s leadership seems to be a compelling analysis to remove coincidence as a motive, but it’s pretty thin.  It makes for a guessing game—were the controllers unable to get Gustav enduring enough so that Paul’s district could be hit on September 2, the day John McCain and Sarah Palin were nominated?  The huge punch by Ike was worth more, because the debilitation of Paul’s district was the main point, and “Ike” was too good to pass up.  “Ike” was a listed hurricane when the year began.  Was it planned that far ahead?  Coincidence or code?

Hurricanes are well known in the secret world of weather warfare, exposed in many books and articles for years.  See a January 3, 2013 article at the Free Press and Bob Fitrakis’ 2004 book “Star Wars, Weather Mods, and Full Spectrum Dominance.”  He tells the story precisely and well.

On October 29, 2012 did Mother Nature side with Obama’s re-election, to be delivered nine days later as she laid Sandy, a unique last-of-the season hurricane, against human political markers?  David Cay Johnston in “Everyday Armageddon” in the November/ December Newsweek suggests that the money for repair and renovation should put Governors Andrew Cuomo and Chris Christie in good position for the presidential nomination in 2016 with this “opportunity to do what’s right instead of what’s politically expedient.”  (Just announced: Christie will pay $300 million for storm-damaged homes, to be lived in or leveled.)  Prospects for this scenario may be seen in the enthusiastic 16-page special section in The Times by the Real Estate Board of New York (REBNY) assuring that all will cooperate in the recovery.  The new business area at the World Trade Center will draw occupants.  “If you look downtown,” one REBNY member is quoted, “you are looking at a complete, desirable area that is a magnet for tenants coming into the city.

Was Sandy sent as a gift?  If so, not everyone understood it.  No one publicly asked the question that would be considered irresponsible if published.  When anyone asked “Why did they let this happen?” it was to blame it on the victims as the result of procrastination. To quote Klaus Jacob (July 9 installment): “They “failed to recognize that the authorities were playing Russian roulette.”

These things someone can say.  But they do not have leeway to say that this happened because it was likely set up in the secret chambers somewhere inside the Defense Department or the White House.  If it was not created by someone at a console, and was in fact entirely an act of nature, then ask the question: “Why did they not head it off?”  That is what guiding the jet stream can do.  One way the jet stream can be used, for which Irene’s weakening was typical, is to cut off the cloud mass above the twisting core so that it loses its power.  In Irene’s case it was said to be the fact that instead of the jet stream cutting across her for a route inland, it went beside her guiding northward so that she spread very widely and thus dryly.  This caused a greater area of wind damage, by the time she reached New York she was too moderate to do damage equivalent to Sandy’s.

The hurricane that swamped New York City in 1938 was featured in the 2008 History Channel video: “New York City Hurricane” which was in essence a warning, often repeated, that there was more to come and we’d better get ready for it.  The producers at the History Channel may well have known what was possible by human control.  Many of their programs over the years until 2010 were bolder than you might imagine today, with facts and analyses given by people in a position to know.  One of their JFK investigations several years ago implicated so many prominent people they were required to pull it—no more broadcast, no more video.

When you have an unprecedented, permanent-fact-changing event like Sandy a few days before a presidential election, we coincidence-checkers do a double-take.  It’s a lot like finding out about the early warnings of a plot to crash hijacked airplanes into the World Trade Center that Bush had received, yet somehow his Secretary of Defense couldn’t get the Air National Guard interceptors off the ground to do anything but circle above the rising smoke.  FAA controllers, puzzled, met together and recorded their conversations about the breakdown in communication.  Then their boss destroyed the tape.  If you try to follow the action, as the controllers did, you wonder why the fighter pilots had to sit so long before takeoff, as in the case when Flight 77 was reported to be heading for the Pentagon.

At this point I turn your attention to a Rumsfeld-amended special procedure for handling hijacked airplanes:  Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction J-3 CJCSI 610.01A, as amended in the first week of June, 2001.  Its new instruction would have been most interesting to the befuddled watchers, including fighter pilots with their engines idling, to find the reason they had to endure the long waits that prevented their involvement, thus allowing the disaster they were trained and equipped to prevent.

The change requires that in the case of an aircraft piracy (hijacking) emergency, they must (1) forward the request to the appropriate unified command to determine if suitable aircraft are available and then (2) forward the request to the Secretary of Defense for approval.  (Explained by Peter Tiradera, a physician and former Air Force officer, in “9-11–Coup Against America,” 2006.)  It is unfortunate that Secretary Rumsfeld was so involved with other matters that he could not make these connections promptly, even to protect others in the Pentagon who could have moved away from the west wall with the minute or two they would have had.  This is easily proven.  One can be there to see how it looked in detail in a book by one of the victims, LTC Brian Birdwell, “Refined by Fire” (2004), who casts no blame on his boss.  Evidently to make up for this failure that so fatally involved the Pentagon, Rumsfeld hastened to the impact scene on the far west side of the building to help move the injured to ambulances, seen on television later and acclaimed as heroic.  During that time, Flight 93 was still reported heading toward Washington.

Dr. Judy Wood in her book “Where Did the Towers Go?” (2010) presents evidence of HAARP use of “directed free-energy technology” in the “dustification” of the Twin Towers.  (See “Tesla-Hurricane-Magnetometer Correlation,” Wood p. 431.)  Did you know that September 11 each year is “Hurricane Day” (The New York Times weather page, 9/11/01) because of the statistical frequency of hurricanes on that day?  There was one offshore on 9/11 that had headed straight for New York for several days, then on 9/11 as the towers were struck turned and headed east, not to return.

Hurricane Erin is mentioned routinely on page 6A of the Sarasota Herald-Tribune for that day: “Hurricane Erin kicks up surf along East Coast,” relating that it had “sideswiped Bermuda” over the weekend and “kicked up the surf along the East Coast on Monday.”  It was the first Atlantic hurricane of the season, with top sustained winds of 115 mph.  It was expected to turn to the northeast, away from the U.S., but there were 3 to 5-foot waves in New Jersey with lifeguards keeping a close watch on swimmers.  The Coast Guard posted small-craft advisories along parts of Long Island.  The big story in Sarasota was that President Bush had arrived the day before, to speak at Booker Elementary School on the 11th.  The next day, storms in the Gulf might double back with 15 inches of rain over south Florida, but a reconnaissance plane could not check on the weather because the order from Washington was that all planes were grounded.

(Pausing to look around: After he was notified of the second plane and that “we are at war” Bush continued to listen to the first graders for a few minutes, then stalled until 10:30 for a TV appearance.  His visit well-announced, another “hijacked” plane could have been on the 25-minute route from Miami International Airport to result in a schoolful of dead children, which caused a marine guard to burst in and yell “time to go” and get shushed.  Mothers all over Sarasota were hopping into their cars to bring their children home.  (Sarasota Herald-Tribune)  Cheney then had Bush flown to Omaha apparently so that he would not get in the way.)

The Times mentioned Erin that day with no alarm in the Weather Report on page A22 under “National Forecast,” noting that it will begin to weaken as it interacts with the jet stream.  In its “FOCUS” paragraph, September 11 was “HURRICANE DAY,” saying:

“Hurricane Erin spinning north of Bermuda will add to the reputation of Hurricane Day.  In 9 out of 10 years since 1886, at least one tropical storm or hurricane has raged in the Atlantic on Sept. 11.  No other day has had more storms.  Water temperatures in the Atlantic Ocean peak in early September, providing optimum conditions for tropical storms that draw energy from the warmth of the seas.  At the same time, strong high-level winds that are capable of tearing storms apart are”

Check that last line, shown exactly as it appears on the page, which does not complete the reference to “strong high-level winds.”  That issue was delivered to my door in Ohio on September 11.  It will give you pause if you have seen Dr. Judy Woods’ book “Where Did the Towers Go?” because her theory involves a hurricane and a strong high-level wind from the West.  The hurricane revolves counterclockwise, the wind strikes it at the north edge, clockwise, to create the “directed free energy” to enable the World Trade Center buildings to be turned to dust.  It is a compelling theory, contested by other hard-working and respected 9/11 researchers, but I find it important for consideration without abandoning the engineering analysis which fits the story of former CIA asset Susan Lindauer who tells of three “truck vans” arriving at the WTC at 3 a.m. on “ten to twelve nights” between August 23 and September 3 or 4, leaving by 5 a.m.  (Lindauer, “Extreme Prejudice/ The Terrifying Story of the Patriot Act and the Coverups of 9/11 and Iraq” 2010 p. 29)  Materials were seen moved into parts of the buildings that were closed in the daytime as if for renovation, noted by WTC occupants as peculiar.  Presumably to hold mini nukes or thermite bombs.

The other tie to a hurricane is the NOAA graph showing tropical storm Erin coming in from Africa, heading toward the Gulf of Mexico, a turn north on September 6, northwest a day later when it appears to establish a base from which it takes a bee line toward Cape Cod.  On the fourth day of this unlikely straight line for an Atlantic hurricane, namely September 11, a NASA photo shows the outer bands of Eric reaching within 170 miles of the World Trade Center site pouring dust southward and southwest into the harbor.  Having done her duty, Erin turned 145 degrees to head due east–at a moment when the  HAARP crew could have been informed that both towers were gone–“dustified.”

Dr. Wood admits that this subject requires more explanation.  It is rich with coincidence such as the obvious lack of comment in the Times even though it was a major hurricane and the first Atlantic hurricane of the year.  Had Erin not turned as it did when the Trade Center towers went to dust its eye would have touched Long Island about September 14, conceivably a Sandy-like track.  My suggestion concerning the difference in analysis between the engineers and Dr. Wood is that plotters may well have used both HAARP and the planted explosives, not certain if they could pull off their attempt at formation of a “Tesla coil.”  (These show up in nature during tornadoes, to do things like jabbing a straw through a wooden pole as molecules of the pole and the straw separate, then reform.)

In the case of Sandy, her birthright must be examined because of her unprecedented and atypical formation.  In late October there was no Bermuda high pressure system left to pull the storm around in the Atlantic to the northeast, the usual fate of a tropical storm in the Atlantic.  The climatologists in Europe, with more advanced equipment, were the first to display the correct route toward Atlantic City, while the Americans offered a bouquet of waving varicolored strands that confused a warning.  An unusually large nor’easter met the Atlantic storm from the land side, its several-hundred-mile length and its winds merging with Sandy’s larger mass, still strong with hurricane force because the Atlantic Ocean that year was five degrees warmer than normal.  The eye of Sandy was pulled against the moving mass from the West by a “U” in the jet stream so that thus joined, the masses would comprise an outsized monster more than 1,000 miles across, improbably heavy with water transported by high winds, affecting 24 states.  This includes Ohio for Lake Erie damage, which is scheduled for part of the appropriation of $50.5 billion that finally came through three months (91 days) after Sandy put so many lives on “hold.”

HAARP, from its Alaskan base, is central to the question “whodunit?”  It has had expert discussion for years, including several excellent books not yet banned, an early one being the late Rosalie Bertell’s Planet Earth / The Latest Weapon of War (2000).  Bertell, only recently deceased, was a Canadian member of the Grey Nuns of the Sacred Heart, holder of many awards including five honorary doctorates.  She tells of Nikola Tesla’s discoveries, such as use of electromagnetic force to cause earthquakes prior to 1900.  She tells about ELF waves and Russia’s early involvement with Tesla’s ideas.  At page 131: “The key to geophysical warfare is the identification of environmental instabilities to which the addition of a small amount of energy would release vastly greater amounts of energy.” 

Two books whose authors have mastered this subject are Dr. Nick Begich of Alaska with Angels Don’t Play This HAARP (2002, with co-author Jeane Manning), and the late Jerry E. Smith (died too young on March 13, 2010) of California, with Weather Warfare / The Military’s Plan to Draft Mother Nature (2006).  Begich and Smith star in the History Channel DVD “Weather Warfare.”  Smith wrote an earlier book entitled HAARP / The ultimate weapon of the Conspiracy (1998) which contains patent language, drawings, old news articles including a 9/22/1940 article from the Times headed “Death Ray for Planes,” a Tesla offer to build a dozen plants for $2 million, taking three months to construct, that would melt the motor in airplanes 250 miles away and thus build a Chinese wall around the country.  The article favored the idea, as a small cost for a country in preparation for war.  The “teleforce,” as it was called, would save billions.  Tesla stressed his stipulation that he “would not suffer interference from experts.” (p.56)  They didn’t take him up on it, possibly because FDR was afraid it would work.  You will recall that he moved the aircraft carriers out of Pearl Harbor so they would be intact to fight  following the expected attack.

The  program advanced during the Bush/Cheney administration, well-known within the U.S. Congress as had been the ENMOD Treaty in 1977, eagerly joined by the US and the USSR, both involved in “environmental  modification”(ENMOD) including earthquakes, which “modify the environment.”  DARPA can move the jet stream to create or divert tornadoes and hurricanes as with British Petroleum’s fatal well site in the Gulf of Mexico, exempted from hurricanes for three years so far.  During the first season it was obvious that Mother Nature would be drafted to protect BP from having to face further damage by hurricane to complicate its status by oil-and detergent-filled storms loading residential and seaside vacation areas on Florida’s gulf coast to make the present damage seem minor.  Having studied BP’s slimy-shady background I wrote that there would be no Gulf hurricanes that would seriously affect them.  I hereby make that bet for year four.

The Critical Role of the “Chemtrail”

This is a “police state” subject.  It refers to the long white trails left by tanker aircraft in the skies over the United States, Europe, and elsewhere.  The subject has more importance than one might realize—an importance communicated by the remarkable intransigence of government agencies to even admit there is such a thing.  If one asks the Air Force, or the Federal Aviation Administration, or any other federal agency, silently followed by all other agencies of state government and the mainstream media, what we “conspiracy theorists” think we see is actually the normal jet exhaust that follows jet aircraft at altitudes of 35,000 feet or higher, containing ice crystals and carbon dioxide.  Not a boa constrictor.  Only a garter snake.

While I have suggested calling the chemtrail a “PSA,” for “Police State Aerosol,” Wikipedia calls it a “Chemical conspiracy theory” with statements such as “the Chemtrail hoax has been investigated and refuted by many established and accredited universities, scientific organizations, and major media publications,” referencing a fact sheet published in 2000 “to dispel the rumors” issued by the Environmental Protection Agency, the FAA, the National Aeronautical and Space Administration, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

How is it that this false cover can continue for fifteen years as earnest sky watchers persist in documenting their existence?  William Thomas’ 2004 book Chemtrails Confirmed fully tells the story, as have many more authors in the continuing decade.

The most recent examinations are by Michael J. Murphy, producing two videos in his attempt to inform, the first one in 2010 that a friend called to my attention: What in the World Are They Spraying?  I had assessed the subject as a minor nuisance—thus giving me a personal understanding of the blank stare of some 98 or 99 percent of the population today who simply haven’t looked.  I simply hadn’t looked.  Having looked, the subject for me has come to play a role like watching a daily reminder that we have been imprisoned below these white, all-consuming bars.  Murphy’s new video, released in August and titled Why in the World Are They Spraying? is highly pertinent for weather forecasters, parents, farmers, and absolutely essential for those who wish to bet on the weather at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange.  It is most instructive for those who would view with their own eyes, from their own property, the day-by-day confirmation of a police state.

I can tell you of the situation in central Ohio from my own records, which begin on February 13, 2011.  In the calendar year 2012 there were 262 days in which I observed chemtrails, none on 34.  All-day thick overcast made viewing impossible on 70 days.  I have been both honest and conservative in this count.  For accuracy in import, I would include those 70 with the 262, for 332 days (roughly 90 %), because I have repeatedly watched, and photographed, chemtrails lain across the sky row after row, the older ones already grown, in two hours swelling and merging into brownish cloud banks to blot out the entire sky—which hides other chemtrails and the sun, and anything else above a few thousand feet.  Even with cirrus clouds or cloud cover, I do not count a chemtrail unless it is clearly unnatural.  In 2011 I saw none on 29 days, with viewing impossible on 96.  One striking difference was a series of five days in October of 2011 with no clouds, no chemtrails or trace thereof, as the sky day by day lost its haze and became a true blue.  This was unique, and although I could not measure or record the scent, to me it smelled like fresh air, the kind Clifford Carnicom lost in 1998.  On October 4,5,6,7 and 8 of 2011 the skies were free morning to night.  The uniqueness of these five days is underlined by my further counts in which I found no four-day or three-day series since I began counting, and only nine sets of two days in two years.  They are also made at night, floating into this area.  Our weather is under constant control.  If a meteorologist contests this conclusion, he should watch Murphy’s DVD.

On an auto trip to D.C. from Columbus in 2011, and on my return a few days later, I saw skies of chemtrails the entire distance both ways.  Add to Ohio: Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Virginia, Maryland, Delaware, and the District of Columbia.

As you read this, if you have visible sky the odds are that you will see these trails being made, or view their elongated clouds as they stretch across the sky and slowly expand into haze.  It takes persistence to keep a complete record.  If I don’t see them as the sun comes up I must keep an eye out until sunset.  It requires dedication to the count.

Tests have shown that chemtrails contain metal sulfates–barium, aluminum, and strontium, recently a report from Europe that they now contain fluoride.  A number of other chemicals for particular purposes are best described by Carnicom.  He explains the concept of “plenum,” which is important in understanding the effect of chemtrails, whether being used for weather control or something else.  The earth’s atmosphere is a plenum because every particle of atmosphere contains the same elements as in his example of the full bathtub containing pure water.  If one puts a drop of red dye in the tub, every drop of water in the tub will contain its percentage of that drop of red dye.  It will not show, but it is there.  As one adds more to the tub, at some point a pinkish cast will appear.  Whatever is included in a chemtrail at 35 or 40,000 feet or so, when its cloud has been made and dispersed so that the sky shows “clear,” the chemical content is becoming part of the world’s atmosphere.  If it is a debilitating element, all people will be affected, as they will if it is an element that only changes natural weather to cause, for instance, more severe drought, which is the predicted result of long-term spraying in the atmosphere.

Carnicom, living in New Mexico in 1998 found the cloudless blue sky there an irreplaceable fixture of that state’s scenic environment.  It was losing its blue, becoming hazy—the generator of haze being long white streams following jets at high altitude as the streams swelled into long white clouds turning the blue sky into grey as they expanded.  Carnicom has since devoted his life to analysis of this subject.  Dr. James F. Tracy, Associate Professor of Communications at Florida Atlantic University, gives an account of Carnicom’s work and experience following a December 10, 2012 conversation with Carnicom on GlobalSkyWatch in which Carnicom emphasized the biological aspect of chemtrails, concluding with his humble statement in answer to a question:  “How do we get this to stop?  How do we get the government to respond to us?”  His answer includes a John F. Kennedy quote: “Ask not what your country can do for you.  Ask what you can do for your country.”

He goes on to answer with the deep seriousness that the subject deserves:

Just skip the patriotic aspect of it and ask yourself what you’re going to do.  The first thing that I would do is extend to every one of us the necessity for involvement and using your talents.  The second thing is that our world has been transformed now.  Normal things don’t work.  Frustration does not eliminate the call for duty that exists upon each of us … This is more a level of consciousness and awareness, of planting a seed, but the level that is going to be required is so different in this world than anything that has been imagined in terms of the right to a healthful and peaceful existence on this planet, it’s going to have to happen at a level that we’re not thinking of right now because the normal processes are not working.  The Million Man March doesn’t cut it.  I wish that I could answer simply what it is going to be.  But it is going to (require) a shift in consciousness and awareness that is so forthright and direct that all of the games and manipulations—and the business of three, four, six companies controlling the media—no longer works and no longer applies.  I don’t want it to be decades in our future.

This response contains a painful recognition, and a sadness, that I share.  With a lawyer’s reaction, I submit that my property, my family, and my cat are being medicated without due process of law.  Whom do I sue?  As a citizen, I must realize that if this clearly obvious spraying is admitted by the government as fact, it will undermine or destroy the “plausible deniability” which permits secret warfare to defend our nation (assuming that is necessary).  For the loyal citizen of course it causes the same conflict as with the costly disaster of Hurricane Sandy, or our grand historic event that occurred on 9/11/01, when the U.S. was placed under police-state procedures which had been prepared for instant application after 9/11 when fear and dismay would create an atmosphere for acceptance.

Chemtrails were in our skies even before that Bush/Cheney event, for weather control along with HAARP, guiding storms by movement of air pressure differentials.  Chemtrails would have been useful for the impact of Hurricane Sandy, or for the cascade of tornadoes ripping up Texas and Oklahoma this year.  We excuse Mother Nature for the death of humans and ruin of our property, because we know rain and wind and snow and ice are inevitable and that Mother Nature follows principles such that she cannot avoid harm when humans get in the way.  But when some high-level controller has Mother’s arms tied behind her back so that he can kill the humans of his choice, it allows a new depth of evil.  Those few who do not shrug are those aware of the permanence of chemtrails and the continuing increase in metal content in the atmosphere that we all must breathe.

Carnicom’s emphasis is on the content of chemtrails.  These are metal sulfate showers sucked into our lungs which have sometimes contained toxins, and could be used for population control today or tomorrow without notice.  They are already believed by many analysts to cause breathing disorders, increase asthma, and to result in pneumonia especially for young children.  Mind control has been a hidden federal activity for many years.  The accepted, ignored, almost daily use of large-volume tanker aircraft could begin this role with no alteration in its appearance.  The tanker pilots would not know, or being foreigners, would say “that’s war for you,” just as they note the cynical disrespect for innocent life in U.S. drone attacks in the Middle East.

*James Hanson is a native of Nebraska and graduate of Oberlin College. His first job was as reporter for the Defiance, Ohio Crescent-News.  Drafted, he was with the Korea Military Advisory Group (KMAG) 1952-1953.  His law degree is from the University of Michigan, where he learned the importance of well-drafted legislation.

For the Ohio Water Commission, born of the 1959 flood, Hanson assisted in creating an intelligent framework for water management.  He was legal advisor to the Director of Natural Resources, then legislative counsel for the Ohio Legislative Service Commission.

In private practice Hanson’s long-term representations were for environmental organizations such as the volunteer Water Management Association of Ohio and the Ohio Water Development Authority, bond-issuing agency for municipal sewer and water facilities.  The Wildlife Legislative Fund and the Wildlife Legislative Fund of America became his major clients, which he created under the direction of James H. Glass as the defenders of sportsmen’s interests in Ohio and wherever wildlife laws came under attack.  Their present successor is the U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance.

Retired, Hanson was writing histories of immigration into Nebraska when he suddenly found himself duty-bound to concentrate on the flood of government falsehoods spilling over especially since 2001.

Leave a Reply

32 thought on “Stealth Terror: Weather Warfare, Hurricanes, and the End of America”
  1. Hello to the author and MHB commentariat:

    The best critique I have read on “ENMOD” is written in Spanish by Josefina Fraile Martin. She has written an open letter to the US military critiquing their 1996 Air Force manifesto “Owning the Weather by 2025,” acknowledging that they are far ahead of schedule.

    Here is the link: http://www.guardacielos.org/users/1/Documentacion/Carta_abierta_a_los_militares_redactores_de_Poseyendo_el_Clima_para_el_2025.pdf

    I have translated this article and am submitting it to MHB for your consideration as a published article. Martin’s research is unparalleled in that she has read every single US “ENMOD” related document back to the 1950’s, and says she has yet to discover a single paragraph in reference to the health effects of such programs on human or any other kind of life, let alone the potential to destroy the planet. No humbug about CO2 in any of it. Rather the business-as-usual pork barrel defense contractor orgy reeks in every word.

    How people fall for the “chemtrails conspiracy” humbug when such verification is so easily obtainable baffles the mind.

  2. Thank you, so much, James Hanson, for your excellent presentation. When I appended my previous comment we had not finished reading your bellwether exposition of weather modification in light of political corruption and the nascent police state. You have done fantastic service to your countrymen and all living beings with your work. You have my utmost respect for your honor, courage and veracity.

  3. Thanks for notice of the weather series. I’m a little too fidgety to read it all now but will definitely save it for later. It’s the usual “pins & needles” waiting to see if all the Hurricane fearmongering on the News all week will turn out to be something or not (for N.E. FLA).

    Politics1.com suspended tweeting until after the Hurricane passes by, saying he’s in S. FLA:

    I had already wondered if this Hurricane was in some way a “whammy on Florida” due to FLA being more pro-Trump than for Hillary.

    Then, about an hour ago Gov. Rick Scott did a press conference (wearing a NAVY baseball cap; was he in the Navy?). One person asked, “Would he EXTEND voter registration due to the Hurricane?” He said, NO. 🙂

    The last big FLA Hurricane Hoopla was 2004 with Hurricanes Charlie, Frances, & then Jeanne, August & September, & the weather/news went non-stop practically the entire two months. It was exhausting.

    That’s the year I learned they were basically full of it, as it was obvious they were “playing” with being able to “steer” the weather when Charlie’s course made a huge “X” across the entire state (X marks the spot?) Even the weathermen were freaking about that. Then there was a big “S” inside the eye of one of those hurricanes (Satan? Prieure’ de Sion?). Then another went off-shore, made the letter “P” out in the Atlantic, & then came back onshore (Plantard?) I can’t remember now which ‘cane did which gymnastic-feat, but the weathermen were freaking about that as well, exclaiming, “WE’VE NEVER SEEN ANYTHING LIKE IT!”

    For those interested in an esoteric take on the freaky hurricanes, referred to as WeatherMancing, here’s the older articles:

    So far, all evacuation up here is “voluntary”; even along the beaches, though they are repeatedly strongly “suggesting” it.

    Charge up the phones; make extra coffee in advance in case the power goes out; hunker down in the smallest room which has the walls closest together – a closet, etc. (In lightning storms they always say stay away from plumbing, so bathrooms aren’t the best as a “bunker.”)

    Hang in there!

    1. I wish you folks would stop HAARP-ing about jury rigged weather, for cryin’ out loud. I see nothing wrong predicting the weather for next February 14 at 4pm in downtown Sheboygan. Nothing to see here, buy extra batteries for your TV, radio, and cell phone, though. Weather you like it or not, meterologists are NOT on CIA payrolls. I’d bet Obama’s legacy on that one fact alone.

      1. “…t is not crazy to assess news events (or posted comments) to see if they’re real or not real, in the United States, as well as overseas, and in fact, it’s kind of crazy not to.” – Former Clinton political consultant Naomi Wolf

        Nat Defense Auhorization Act legalizes use of propaganda on the public. 

        “…means that the last “news” …fabricated to garner a specific response or perception;”

        No US citizen asked for or approved funding to con us, Sign petition to reign in overstepping federal authority at conventionofstates.org

  4. Great article,
    I want to recommend the Corbett Report who recently put out a story on climate change, it answered a lot of questions on this and I am now firmly convinced this is yet another hoax

    1. sunaJAeon, I’ve studied the climate change hoax for the past two years and know it’s a hoax. I recommend two sites to you.
      http://RealClimateScience. It’s kind of a fun site & down at the bottom he often compares past weather for today’s date, which fails to show warming & often dramatically in the cooling direction.

      For straight science you can’t beat http://notrickszone Much is from German scientists translated to English.

      But my final comment is that I think it likely that the chemtrails decreasing sunlight must be speeding up the cooling which is expected from the Grand Solar Minimum which we are in.

  5. During the 11pm Local TV-News Hurricane updates (for N.E. FLA): The weatherman actually said,

    “This is NOT Fearmongering. This is a Forecast!”

    Haha, I couldn’t believe he said that. They must know what people are thinking, probably from readings tweets, etc.

    A few old photos I dug up… Hurricane Isabel from Sept. 2003 supposedly had a “pentagram” in the Eye. Someone may have etched it in:


  6. PS: Besides misspelling Charlie further above, which should be Charley, I found this USGS report entitled…

    Google search page: “X Marks The Spot: Florida, the 2004 Hurricane Target”

    Title on actual PDF: “X Marks the Spot: Florida, the 2004 Hurricane Bull’s-Eye”

    by Brian H. Bossak
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Center for Coastal and Watershed Studies St. Petersburg, FL 33701


    In that pdf he has a graphic showing the big “X” which was made by all THREE hurricanes intersecting (Charley, Frances, Jeanne) & not just Charley.

  7. The article contains claims about HAARP emitting ELF and states that ELF penetrates the ground insinuating that HAARP causes earthquakes by sending ELF waves with that effect. That is utter BS. HAARP was an array of HF antenna elements(frequency of 2,4 – 10MHz corresponding to wavelength 125 -30m). The size of the array 327 by 408m made it possible to attain some degree of directivity. That is possible when the outer dimensions are bigger than the wavelength so the diverging angles would be from perhaps ~ 22 to 4 degrees. This enables them to focus HF on the ionosphere.
    There they may induce ELF by producing slowly varying(eg by mixing two nearby frequencies) concentrations of charges over wide areas tens of kilometers in diameter. And that wide area means ELF may be projected allover the earth but not focused. You dont focus anything with a wavelength that size. It goes in all directions but the size of the area enables more of the energy to be transmitted than if HAARP itself had produced it directly. This sky-antenna may be used to send ELF-based telegrams of modest info-content and an application for sending messages to submerged submarines is therefore among the possible uses. That also motivates disinfo about ELF directly causing earthquakes. The submarine named Jimmy Carter is believed to have been used as a platform for suspicious activities related to geoengineering on the seabottom. Thats possibly where to look for explanations regarding artificial earthquakes. All you can do with the abovementioned ELF would be to send orders to the sub…
    HAARP also used higher frequencies.

    1. Thanks Peter ! For providing some real scientific facts on the above article. I’ve read a report about 10 years ago regarding the US Navy using submarine for geoengineering out in the “Tongue of the Ocean” near Andros island, The Bahamas.

      By the way, one of the most top secret US naval facility is located on Andros, and Seal Team 4 has a permanent unit there.

      I’ve heard rumours that the earthquake in Haiti was not really an act of God, but man playing god.

  8. Considering that the first article is more than three years old, an update is needed, not only to move away from archaic technologies like HAARP, and unto the much improved functionally similar NEXRAD network, used in blatant acts of war, on targets of choice, dumping trillions of gallons of water generated as steam from everything that makes steam like the over 56,000 power plants worldwide. See weatherwar101 for a full and uncomplicated explanation.

    But also updates in the When Did Judy Wood Ever Say Haarp Was Used For the Destructions on 9/11 department? I’ve only heard her talk about Hurricane Erin as implicated in a theory of weaponized processes that require no force multiplier but rather a charge field that provides matrix and vehicle to interference trajectories of a tuned electromagnetic nature, all the way to what Hutchison observed in experiment; high weirdness; from levitation, inexplicable heatless fires, demolecularization, metal bending, material fusion, and finally as a long lasting “infection” as seen at effected WTC sites. To paraphrase, that’s why Banker’s Trust at 9/11 site, which was repaired, later had to be demolished and rebuilt from scratch.

    Now as for the Dr. Judy Wood cultist, if I take 75% of her work as truth and speculate that the doubted part is self defensively muddled, can I get a raincheck on the upbraiding, when they’ll probably also take me to task for leaving the doctor off her name. No matter how much truth a cult relies on for it’s credibility, the culting phenomena is well detected, but perhaps to the ruin of the credibility of that same truth.  I put an xA after my name as a mock to all presumptions of knowledge certified by disagreeing experts. xA stands for xArtist which stands for x-termination of one of their favorite control identities. However, Wood ‘sgot some of what we need to unmuddle 9/11 scenario theories. Notwithstanding her denial of having a theory, we nonculty, morally accountable science-minded, assert that she clearly does. I for one, have yet to assert that the WTC destruction videos are anything more than highly skilled digital fakery. I hear a lot of fuffin and lol out there. These are folks who don’t know about Lookout Mountain and the skills they developed as a movie studio expressly for the purpose of editing atomic bomb blasts filmed here and there. Not to say that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were fake but only that film of blasts were edited for effect and fear factor. It doesn’t take leap of fantasy to imagine them cutting and pasting elements of real atomic explosions into the real demolition.

    When it comes to steel columns disolving as we watch, the question is narrowed to only two possibilities. Is it impressive fakery therefore obviating any need to speculate about exoweaponry? Or is it true video evidence of exoweaponry? Steel does not dissolve in freefall by any normal process known in a Newtonian paradigm. Steel will melt into molten steel. But, airborn steel can not possibly dissolve in the heat expected from a presumed collapse. And thermate falls way short of accounting for dissolution of 60 stories of steel columns into the quandary of either bad special effects or weapons formerly only known in science fiction.

    For a visual of that dissolving spire, see fig 17


    Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone

    1. When I said “I have yet to assert that the WTC destruction videos are anything more than highly skilled digital fakery”, I was only thinking of the towers, for WTC7 requires far less speculation about the method of demise. As an obvious controlled demolition, 7 should remain a separate analysis.

    2. It is clear to me that the exact identification of the explosive used to bomb the Twin Towers/Building 7 is a military secret not available to the general public,
      as far as suggesting that 9/11 was a computer generated deception-
      we have many videos of the event
      we have numerous professional and civilian witnesses and testimony at the scene of the crime-asserting that all this taken together is fraudulent would require unquestionable proof otherwise,
      which I have yet to see,
      there are numerous videos and eyewitnesses to numerous squibs detonating during the collapse,
      suggesting a building cannot be demolished simply because it is made of steel is preposterous,
      there was solid evidence of molten steel in the basement for weeks,
      it did not get their because of a nearby volcano, it was a result of the explosive element used in the basement, where eyewitness reported explosions, so obviously this high tech demolition carried out by the best teams in the world had the capability to melt large steel structures-not exactly rocket science

      1. Your comment seems to indicate that you think that I don’t believe there was a real demolition. Composite layering is often used to add to or accentuate the stock material. In that case the content of the true picture will be visable to the degree that obfuscation is diminuated, where digital elements are transparent or not masking over the true picture.
        ….”numerous squibs detonating during the collapse, suggesting a building cannot be demolished simply because it is made of steel is preposterous” Are you talking to me? Where did I say that?

         I don’t think that evidence in general is anything more than the premises on which proof can be based. The proving process is not entirely the responsibility of the bringer of evidence. It’s primarily an activity that can’t be forced and also certain never to manifest where it isn’t wanted.

        There are pictures of the basement taken on the day showing stores but no molten anything. I can’t make you look at them.
        http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=145&Itemid=60  (fig.4-2)

    3. Dalin, how sure are you that the columns dissolved? I heard that explosives had been planted to cut them into neat lengths for carrying away. In that case only the other would’ve been reduced to powder.

      Thanks. I’ll follow up on some of the other things you mention,.

  9. Dr. Tracy, thank you for posting this James Hanson article. Lots of motivating information there. I’m going to get involved with the GlobalSkyWatch.com website mentioned.

Leave a Reply