Blackout on Manufactured Discontent

Billionaire Soros Behind ‘Chaos’ Again?

Via Underground World News

[Editor’s Note: Below is an important September 22 CNN interview with a Charlotte North Carolina police official concerning the ‘rioting’ in that area this week. Significantly, the police spokesman remarks that “probably 70%” of those arrested on September 21 “had out of state IDs”. In other words, most of the alleged “protesters” are in fact carpet bagger types, probably sponsored by George Soros Open Society foundations like Campaign Zero, as the commentaries below suggest.

If Soros or other financial elites wish to fund non-profits that in turn hire mercenary rioters to incite racial discontent that’s one thing. But the fact that news media present the event as spontaneous and indigenous to the area is quite another. How is their editorial decision-making different in this instance from how they “reported” Sandy Hook, Boston, San Bernardino, Orlando, and so many other opaque events throughout Obama’s second term? Perhaps Soros and/or similar coordinated interests are subsidizing “journalists” as well-JFT]

Confirming what many had suspected when viewing the sudden and intense collapse into anrchy that occurred in Charlotte this week, Todd Walther, spokesman for the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Fraternal Order of Police told CNN’s Erin Burnett:

“This is not Charlotte that’s out here. These are outside entities that are coming in and causing these problems. These are not protestors, these are criminals.”

“Police and protesters carry a seriously wounded protester into the parking area of the the Omni Hotel during a march to protest the death of Keith Scott September 21, 2016 in Carolina.” – USA Today (Photo: Brian Blanco, Getty Images)

“We’ve got the instigators that are coming in from the outside. They were coming in on buses from out of state. If you go back and look at some of the arrests that were made last night. I can about say probably 70% of those had out-of-state IDs. They’re not coming from Charlotte.”

So who is footing the bill for all this? The same man that has time and time again before it. If you see BLM In town , this is all on George Soros Money!

Zero Hedge similarly observes:

18 months ago, as the riots flared in Ferguson, there was one man pulling the strings of this ‘domestic false flag’… George Soros. In an apparent effort to “keep the media’s attention on the city and to widen the scope of the incident to focus on interrelated causes — not just the overpolicing and racial discrimination narratives that were highlighted by the news media in August,” liberal billionaire George Soros donated $33million to social justice organizations which helped turn events in Ferguson from a local protest into a national flashpoint.

As The Washington Times explains,

There’s a solitary man at the financial center of the Ferguson protest movement. No, it’s not victim Michael Brown or Officer Darren Wilson. It’s not even the Rev. Al Sharpton, despite his ubiquitous campaign on TV and the streets.

Rather, it’s liberal billionaire George Soros, who has built a business empire that dominates across the ocean in Europe while forging a political machine powered by nonprofit foundations that impacts American politics and policy, not unlike what he did with

Mr. Soros spurred the Ferguson protest movement through years of funding and mobilizing groups across the U.S., according to interviews with key players and financial records reviewed by The Washington Times.

Still not buying it? As The New American recently reported, Ken Zimmerman, the director of U.S. programs at Soros’s Open Society Foundations (OSF), denied last year that Soros had funded BLM, saying it was just a rumor.

That was before hackers with published OSF documents showing that the Soros group had already given at least $650,000 directly to BLM.

Those same documents reveal the reason for OSF bankrolling BLM: the “dismantling” of America so that it can be recast according to the vision of Soros and his leftist cohorts.

The communist-on-its-face nature of these and other demands of the organizations under the BLM umbrella are a clear indicator of the real intent of BLM. The deep-pocketed funding by the likes of Soros, the Center for American Progress, the Ford Foundation, and Borealis Philanthropy show that BLM is the means, not the end.

BLM is little more than a tool of social revolutionaries hell-bent on destroying America so they can build their long awaited dystopia which they attempt to pass off as a utopia.

Leave a Reply

19 thought on “Charlotte Police Say Most Arrested Protesters From Out of State”
  1. Soros is a pawn in a much larger scheme:

    “Today there’s a continuing crisis in the overlap of federal and state law, particularly in the areas previously covered only by state law,” James Strazzella, professor of law at Temple University, told the panel. “With the growth of federal law demonstratively covering more and more traditionally state-crime areas, a mounting and duplicating patchwork of crimes has grown up in the last few decades.”

    Within a generation federal law will preempt state law whenever there exists dual jurisdiction. Local authorities will be little more than peace officers attending to tickets, infractions, and other minor crimes. The major downside will be a complete lack of transparency and oversight. Try getting an external oversight board to review FBI activities.

    1. The CIA FBI NSA and all these alphabet agencies should be under Congress and not the executive branch. Nowhere in the Constitution is this even allowed.

      All these agencies need to be restructured from the top to the bottom and clean out the cockroaches.

      The states need to fiercely oppose the federal governmenta encroachment on states rights.

      Unfortunately, it’s the Democratic governors who allow this especially when a Democrat is the president.

      That would be a start it would slow the police state down ran by the federal government.

  2. Lots of weird stuff going on with these two latest incidents.

    The Tulsa shooting seems to feature the two opposing sides, both having lots of ambiguity in their actions. Terrence Crutcher (sp?) refused to obey a simple order (I assume he was told to not walk back to his car and keep his hands up which a video proves he did not do). Drug test results have not been publicized yet; the cops claim to have found PCP in his car.

    What would cause someone who wasn’t trying to suicide by cop/get in a shootout with one refuse to obey simple orders with a bunch of guns and tasers pointed at him? Why would he wander back to his car and then make a motion right by the window to try to get into it? Why would Betty Shelby, the female cop, shoot with a gun when she’s surrounded by other cops with guns trained on the suspect?

    If he wasn’t on drugs, then I’m calling this whole incident a possible fake. Is it a coincidence that just this week, days after the Tulsa shooting, Daniel Holtzclaw’s attorneys revealed critical new DNA evidence that further exonerates him and indicts Oklahoma City’s prosecutors for framing a (half asian) ‘white’ cop for sexually assaulting black female felons?

    1. I should add that Officer Shelby was surrounded by officers with both guns and tasers trained on the ‘suspect.’ The officer next to her supposedly shot his taser at the same time Shelby shot her gun. Her excessive force makes no more sense than his excessive lack of cooperation.

    2. I agree with most topics on mhb. Shes. 9/11. OKC. I live in OKC. But to suggest that some deserves to be shot in street and not get treatment for 45 minutes because they walked to car with hands up is too far. Have you ever had police draw down and scream instructions at you? Adrenaline can make the situation tricky. Maybe he was a little high. Weed? Pcp? Lcd? Who cares? His general body language was complicit.
      If we argue that lack of video on shootings is shady, I agree. But what is the argument when it is caught on video. Lack of audio?? Maybe he didn’t hear the instructions. What if he was deaf? What if he was having medical troubles/ disoriented? What if he was injured? What if he was on vacation and didn’t speak English?

      1. Where do I ‘suggest someone deserves to be shot in street because they walked to car with hand up?’

        I never suggested Crutcher should have been shot, but I also don’t see his actions as so purely obedient or ‘innocent,’ either. He parked the car in the middle of oncoming traffic lane, he was probably walking away from the cops when they’d probably told him to stop and allow himself to be handcuffed or frisked, etc., and he absolutely did lower his arm right near the car window.

        None of those actions in my view warrant being shot with a bullet, however, especially considering officers had a taser and that he appeared to be high, and could be stopped from accessing any weapon he might have had in the car too easily.

        I just noted the entire Thelma and Louise like treatment of the incident is odd (helicopters, numerous cops who don’t do much but point guns) and that both actors’ actions defy common sense.

        Could be fake.

  3. George Soros knows it is His money that funds these thugs who are bused in solely to burn,loot and destroy the target city.
    If after the Ferguson riots he stopped supporting BLM because of what happened with his money I’d give him a break.

    But he keeps giving after about 6 cities have been destroyed by the BLM movement busing in “mercenaries” to pillage, plunder and destroy.

    IMO, That makes him Complicit to the Crimes they commit. The local business and Homeowners could successfully win a law suit against him and I feel if we had a real DOJ he could be charged with a barrage of crimes.

  4. Obama Vetoes 911 Bill

    But the timing of the president’s veto is designed to erode congressional support for the bill and put off a politically damaging override vote until after the November elections.

    Obama waited until the very end of the 10-day period he had to issue a veto, hoping to buy time to lobby members of Congress against the measure.

    White House officials also hope congressional leaders will leave Washington to hit the campaign trail before trying for an override, kicking a vote to the lame-duck session after the election.

    But Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has said the upper chamber will remain in session until the veto override vote is done.

    This will be interesting in Monday’s Debate for Hillary said she was for the Bill (but really wasn’t”) and Obama’s Veto gave her cover.

    We will see……

    1. If this were to pass it would open up a pandora’s box for all the criminals in DC that are shaking in their boots trying to contain this information from a public that is waking up to the fact that 9/11/War on Terror is State Sponsored Terrorism

  5. “Dismantling…so it can be recast.” Hmmm… Sounds an awful lot like that Fabian social window. Where is it: the London School of Economics? I wanna say it’s called the Beatrice Webb window. Smashing the world to bits so that it can be reformed (or recast). This is, of course, the same window (stained glass) with imagery of a wolf in sheepskin (“sheep’s clothing”) and a tortoise to represent the gradualism of Fabian socialism. I can never go to Barnes & Noble and see that big goofy painting of G.B Shaw without thinking of these rather sinister Fabians. –Paul

  6. Good find re the police official saying most Charlotte protesters were from out of town.

    So, hmm, does “” have these protesters on retainer? I mean, if the shootings are truly spontaneous, how is it hordes of out-of-town protesters can show up so fast to start riots?

    Or, are the shootings themselves contrived in order to “provide the reason” for the riots (for visual fear-mongering effect on the country’s still-too-many-TV-watchers) with mercenary protesters already prepped & standing ready at the waiting for the signal to enter in & do their portion of the psy op?

    To my last question I have to say the dead man’s wife in this video does NOT sound like she is acting nor faking it, but you never know:

    9/23/16: “‘Keith, don’t do it.’ Wife of Keith Lamont Scott Releases Her Cell Phone Video of Shooting”:

    Also at the same blog, another article says the female Mayor will be joining the protesters tonight. SMH.

    And in other hot news: Four shot dead at a Washington State shopping mall by a Hispanic. It never ends. What REALLY are they up to? What is the End Game & How Much Longer Until they consider it has been reached? Is it really ONLY “gun confiscation” they are after?

  7. I saw the interview live with Todd Walther. The next morning on CNN a guest countered Walthers 70% out of state arrest percentage by claiming that the motivation of those who were bused in was that they “cared deeply” about the injustice which had occurred.

    This is the patent nonsense and blatant ass covering CNN and other MSN outlets routinely engage in.

    There is something bigger going on here with Tulsa and Charlotte.

    If you think of these events (including all, like Sandy Hook, Boston, Orlando, etc.,) in terms of the alphabet, we have (A) The event reported that yet another unarmed black male has been gunned down. We are then forced to skip over the details of (B-Y), and are fast tracked to (Z) where we hear that there are enraged rioters taking to the streets, protesting another innocent death at the hands of a trigger happy cop thirsty for black blood.

    If journalistic due diligence had been observed, we would all be clear as to why Tulsa police and Terrence Crutcher came together in the first place. Why in the world would a police helicopter be filming what allegedly transpired in Tulsa between police and Crutcher? Was Crutcher on the FBI’s 10 most wanted list, and I missed it?

    Charlotte police were alleged to have been present to serve an arrest warrant. They just happen to encounter Scott in his vehicle, and approach him instead? Why? There WAS an address on the arrest warrant, no? But instead they approach a vehicle with a black male inside? Did the arrest warrant have a VIN number instead of an address?

    And the cell phone videos. This is where, it seems to me, the vast majority (even some here on MHB) have completely lost the ability to think rationally. The daughter AND the wife, shocked at what is taking place, begin filming the events instead of directly engaging those who appear to be threatening their father, their husband? The argument I assume would be that they wanted to document what transpired in the event tragedy might occur.

    Well, is this where we are? Take pictures first and worry about the potential loss of life later?

    None of this registers with me as being organic in any way. I sincerely doubt that ANY of these alleged police shootings are real in any sense. Again, there is a race from (A) to (Z) which in my mind is purposeful, with the goal of conditioning the masses to just accept, as a default position, that reported events are actual in nature.

    The Conductors don’t want the masses engaging in detailed analysis.

    They don’t want them to wonder why police came into contact with Crutcher and Scott in the first place. They don’t want them wondering how, in Minnesota, a woman begins filming the death of her boyfriend with their child in the back seat.

    They don’t want them wondering how it came to be that in Baton Rouge, Tulsa, Charlotte and others convenient video footage of a “bad
    cop shooting” seems to be a given.

    And the masses NEVER wondered why a state of the art security system did not have record capability in a now demolished Newtown elementary school.

    Just BELIEVE that another unarmed black man is dead because the system is unjust, and CNN, MSNBC and other “news” agencies will direct your thoughts from there.

Leave a Reply