Do Americans Live In A False Reality Created By Orchestrated Events?

Paul Craig Roberts
paulcraigroberts.org

Most people who are aware and capable of thought have given up on what is called the “mainstream media.” The presstitutes have destroyed their credibility by helping Screen Shot 2016-02-29 at 11.27.39 AMWashington to lie—“Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction,” “Iranian nukes,” “Assad’s use of chemical weapons,” “Russian invasion of Ukraine,” and so forth. The “mainstream media” has also destroyed its credibility by its complete acceptance of whatever government authorities say about alleged “terrorist events,” such as 9/11 and Boston Marathon Bombing, or alleged mass shootings such as Sandy Hook and San Bernardino. Despite glaring inconsistencies, contradictions, and security failures that seem too unlikely to be believable, the “mainstream media” never asks questions or investigates. It merely reports as fact whatever authorities say.

The sign of a totalitarian or authoritarian state is a media that feels no responsibility to investigate and to find the truth, accepting the role of propagandist instead. The entire Western media has been in the propaganda mode for a long time. In the US the transformation of journalists into propagandists was completed with the concentration of a diverse and independent media in six mega-corporations that are no longer run by journalists.

As a consequence, thoughtful and aware people increasingly rely on alternative media that does question, marshall facts, and offers analysis in place of an unbelievable official story line.

The prime example is 9/11. Large numbers of experts have destroyed the official story that has no factual evidence in its behalf. However, even without the hard evidence that 9/11 truthers have provided, the official story gives itself away. We are supposed to believe that a few Saudi Arabians with no technology beyond box cutters and no support from any government’s intelligence service were able to outwit the massive surveillance technology created by DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) and NSA (National Security Agency) and deal the most humiliating blow to a superpower ever delivered in human history. Moreover, they were able to do this without the President of the United States, the US Congress, and the “mainstream media” demanding accountability for such a total failure of the high-tech national security state. Instead of a White House led investigation of such a massive security failure, the White House resisted for more than one year any investigation whatsoever until finally giving in to demands from 9/11 families that could not be bought off and agreeing to a 9/11 Commission.

The Commission did not investigate but merely sat and wrote down the story told to it by the government. Afterwards, the Commission’s chairman, co-chairman, and legal counsel wrote books in which they said that information was withheld from the Commission, that the Commission was lied to by officials of the government, and that the Commission “was set up to fail.” Despite all of this, the presstitutes still repeat the official propaganda, and there remain enough gullible Americans to prevent accountability.

Competent historians know that false flag events are used to bring to fruition agendas that cannot otherwise be achieved. 9/11 gave the neoconservatives, who controlled the George W. Bush administration, the New Pearl Harbor that they said was necessary in order to launch their hegemonic military invasions of Muslim countries. The Boston Marathon Bombing permitted a trial run of the American Police State, complete with shutting down a large American city, putting 10,000 armed troops and SWAT teams on the streets where the troops conducted house to house searches forcing the residents out of their homes at gunpoint. This unprecedented operation was justified as necessary in order to locate one wounded 19 year old man, who clearly was a patsy.

There are so many anomalies in the Sandy Hook story that it has generated a cottage industry of skeptics. I agree that there are anomalies, but I don’t have the time to study the issue and come to my own conclusion. What I have noticed is that we are not given many good explanations of the anomalies. For example, in this video made from the TV news coverage, the video’s creator makes a case that the person who is the grieving father who lost his son is the same person outfitted in SWAT clothes at Sandy Hook following the shooting. 

The person is identified as a known actor. Now, it seems to me that this is easy to test. The grieving father is known, the actor is known, and the authorities have to know who the SWAT team member is. If these three people, who can pass for one another, can be assembled in one room at the same time, we can dismiss the expose claimed in this one video. However, if three separate people cannot be produced together, then we must ask why this deception, which raises questions about the entire story. You can watch the entire video or just skip to the 9:30 mark and observe what appears to be the same person in two different roles.

The “mainstream media” has the ability to make these simple investigations, but does not. Instead, the “mainstream media” calls skeptics “conspiracy theorists.”

There is a book by Professor Jim Fetzer and Mike Palecek that says Sandy Hook was a FEMA drill to promote gun control and that no one died at Sandy Hook. The book was available on amazon.com but was suddenly banned. Why ban a book?

Here is a free download of the book: http://rense.com/general96/nobodydied.html I have not read the book and have no opinion. I do know, however, that the police state that America is becoming certainly has a powerful interest in disarming the public. I also heard today a news report that people said to be parents of the dead children are bringing a lawsuit against the gun manufacturer, which is consistent with Fetzer’s claim.

Here is a Buzzsaw interview with Jim Fetzer:

If the information Fetzer provides is correct, clearly the US government has an authoritarian agenda and is using orchestrated events to create a false reality for Americans in order to achieve the agenda.

It seems to me that Fetzer’s facts can be easily checked. If his facts check out, then a real investigation is required. If his facts do not check out, the official story gains credibility as Fetzer is one of the most energetic skeptics.

Fetzer cannot be dismissed as a kook. He graduated magna cum laude from Princeton University, has a Ph.D. from Indiana University and was Distinguished McKnight University Professor at the University of Minnesota until his retirement in 2006. He has had a National Science Foundation fellowship, and he has published more than 100 articles and 20 books on philosophy of science and philosophy of cognitive science. He is an expert in artificial intelligence and computer science and founded the international journal Minds and Machines. In the late 1990s, Fetzer was asked to organize a symposium on philosophy of mind.

For an intelligent person, the official stories of President Kennedy’s assassination and 9/11 are simply not believable, because the official stories are not consistent with the evidence and what we know. Fetzer’s frustration with less capable and less observant people increasingly shows, and this works to his disadvantage.

It seems to me that if the authorities behind the official Sandy Hook story are secure with the official story, they would jump on the opportunity to confront and disprove Fetzer’s facts. Moreover, somewhere there must be photographs of the dead children, but, like the alleged large number of recordings by security cameras of an airliner hitting the Pentagon, no one has ever seen them. At least not that I know of.

What disturbs me is that no one in authority or in the mainstream media has any interest in checking the facts. Instead, those who raise awkward matters are dismissed as conspiracy theorists.

Why this is damning is puzzling. The government’s story of 9/11 is a story of a conspiracy as is the government’s story of the Boston Marathon Bombing. These things happen because of conspiracies. What is at issue is: whose conspiracy? We know from Operation Gladio and Operation Northwoods that governments do engage in murderous conspiracies against their own citizens. Therefore, it is a mistake to conclude that governments do not engage in conspiracies.

One often hears the objection that if 9/11 was a false flag attack, someone would have talked.

Why would they have talked? Only those who organized the conspiracy would know. Why would they undermine their own conspiracy?

Recall William Binney. He developed the surveillance system used by NSA. When he saw that it was being used against the American people, he talked. But he had taken no documents with which to prove his claims, which saved him from successful prosecution but gave him no evidence for his claims. This is why Edward Snowden took the documents and released them. Nevertheless, many see Snowden as a spy who stole national security secrets, not as a whistleblower warning us that the Constitution that protects us is being overthrown.

High level government officials have contradicted parts of the 9/11 official story and the official story that links the invasion of Iraq to 9/11 and to weapons of mass destruction. Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta contradicted Vice President Cheney and the official 9/11 story timeline. Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill has said that overthrowing Saddam Hussein was the subject of the first cabinet meeting in the George W. Bush administration long before 9/11. He wrote it in a book and told it on CBS News’ 60 Minutes. CNN and other news stations reported it. But it had no effect.

Whistleblowers pay a high price. Many of them are in prison. Obama has prosecuted and imprisoned a record number. Once they are thrown in prison, the question becomes: “Who would believe a criminal?”

As for 9/11 all sorts of people have talked. Over 100 police, firemen and first responders have reported hearing and experiencing a large number of explosions in the Twin Towers. Maintanence personnel report experiencing massive explosions in the sub-basements prior to the building being hit by an airplane. None of this testimony has had any effect on the authorities behind the official story or on the presstitutes.

There are 2,300 architects and engineers who have written to Congress requesting a real investigation. Instead of the request being treated with the respect that 2,300 professionals deserve, the professionals are dismissed as “conspiracy theorists.”

An international panel of scientists have reported the presence of reacted and unreacted nanothermite in the dust of the World Trade Centers. They have offered their samples to government agencies and to scientists for confirmation. No one will touch it. The reason is clear. Today science funding is heavily dependent on the federal government and on private companies that have federal contracts. Scientists understand that speaking out about 9/11 means the termination of their career.

The government has us where it wants us—powerless and disinformed. Most Americans are too uneducated to be able to tell the difference between a building falling down from asymetrical damage and one blowing up. Mainstream journalists cannot question and investigate and keep their jobs. Scientists cannot speak out and continue to be funded.

Truth telling has been shoved off into the alternative Internet media where I would wager the government runs sites that proclaim wild conspiracies, the purpose of which is to discredit all skeptics.


Paul Craig Roberts is one of the most respected columnists in the alternative media. His syndicated articles can be seen on many leading alternative news websites including Lew Rockwell, Infowars, Counterpunch, InformationClearingHouse and countless others. Roberts scores huge points in the credibility department having been the former head of policy at the Department of Treasury under Reagan, and the editor of the Wall Street Journal — among a long list of other accolades. His research is impeccable and his vision of how the world really operates is second to none. He knows why and when the global chess pieces are moving, and has the incredible talent to communicate difficult concepts to the general public. He has written several books including The Tyranny of Good Intentions and How the Economy was Lost. His many interviews can be seen on Russia Today and Prison Planet TV. Roberts is also a recent contributor to Gerald Celente’s esteemed Trends Journal. There is no one better at reporting the reality of geo-political events and the workings of the Treasury and the Federal Reserve.

0

Leave a Reply

124 thoughts on “Do Americans Live In A False Reality Created By Orchestrated Events?”

  1. The 9/11 Commission was a redux of the Warren Commission which validated the actions of a rogue MIL/INTEL coup of the American government.

    There was a real rise in mass shootings starting in the early 1980’s. Many of the economic and sociological aspects of workplace violence were investigated in books and films like Murder By Proxy: How America Went Postal (2010).

    That being said, a mobbing culture in the U.S., including community mobbing and gang stalking, brought about Columbine and other real tragedies that grew exponentially over the past generation.

    The answer of the U.S. government to this real problem was not to solve it, but rather, to use it for a gun control agenda. This agenda is necessary to maintain the tyranny over a population required by all police states. This is a purely reactionary response, in the vein of Problem Reaction/Solution. 9/11 used the same modus operandi directed outward to the world writ large.

    Sandy Hook, the Charleston Church shooting, and the Umpqua Community College shooting are some of the most farcical events in the government’s militarized Kabuki Theater. It is clear that there was a real rise in mobbing activities in workplaces, colleges, and communities across the U.S. that led to a real increase in episodes of mass violence. It is just as clear that the repeal of the Schmidt-Mundt Act, and, the government’s third-rate macabre theater events are designed for a gun grab prelude to a totalitarian state.These staged events are modeled on real world dynamic events, and, represent a Mafia-style hijacking by the government, using carefully managed and staged reproductions (i.e., bogus false flags) wholly for their own agenda (e.g., Project Longevity). Can a blackmailed Congress do anything about this before it is too late?

    1. There’s really no mystery involved in going postal, at least not to me. Bill Clinton got NAFTA passed, while at the same time pretending to be “on the side of the working man.” Ha! That POS has never worked a day in his life, unless you count trying to diddle every women you set eyes on as “work”.

      Anyway, between all the job losses and the fact that employment law is 99% voluntary compliance, it’s pretty obvious that people who can’t get justice from the system, will take matters into their own hands when they feel there’s nothing left to lose.

      But that doesn’t begin to explain what’s been happening under Obama – people just open fire and kill someone when they have no motive or even
      connection to them? I really don’t think so. That’s not human nature, that’s the way gun-control idiots think – “people go berserk and kill innocent strangers for no other reason than they had a gun – get rid of guns and we’ll all be safe!”

      Such idiocy!

  2. I don’t know. You can say Americans are lost in a false reality, but the truth is, it’s easier to take a stranger off the street and convince him that nobody died at Sandy Hook than to disabuse some of these “awakened ones” of their own superstition.

    1. Americans have been groomed to embrace a false reality. The “No Child Left Behind” is farcical considering the deliberate dumbing down of children in our public schools. Many children are home schooled to avoid bullying that is linked to mass shooting events. Home schooled children I have met have an even lower vocabulary and general education than those victims of California’s public schools. Reality T.V. is right out of Roman bread and circus in a time of rapid decline of empire. These badly under-educated victims are being groomed as cattle slaves for the corporate fascist state. They are ready to abandon their guns and constitutional rights. As I understand it, this same attitude of embracing the police state is evinced in students from surveys conducted at Yale and other Ivy League schools. Pathetic:

      http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/12/16/yale-fail-ivy-leaguers-caught-on-video-clamoring-to-kill-first-amendment.html

  3. I’ve been following Dr. Roberts for years and I’m glad to see MHB publishing his work. Not only does Dr. Roberts have impressive credentials, but I find his prose to be exceptionally clear and rational.

  4. Great, straight forward article.

    Everything that’s wrong is due to the fact we have No real Media/Journalist any longer and everyone at every level fears losing their job and pension.

      1. Haven’t done any digging on what he’s let out of the bag because I assume it’s simply part of ‘the reveal’. I’ll take your word on it at this point. Thanks for the holodomor site. I passed it on.

  5. The 9/11 Commission refused to question the key witness, the janitor with the key to all floors, William Rodriquez, who told us at the screening of his documentary that he waited in the corridors and they never called him. Why? Because he pulled burn victims from the sub basement of the WTC after explosions went off and before the planes hit. The grateful people he rescued are on his docu. He also heard weird noises on the empty floors that he later surmised were explosives being set by operatives. He also recalled that bomb sniffing dogs were removed from their patrol months before the event. The commission also was very light questioning Condi Rice, and that infuriated the Jersey Girls and Bob MacIIvaine.

    1. “The 9/11 Commission refused to question the key witness, the janitor with the key to all floors”

      Just like they Never questioned Rick Thorpe, Head janitor of Sandy Hook School and who witnessed the shootings AND was the first to call 911..Hmmmmm

      Maybe it’s a “Janitor” thing or they are all Lying?
      I’ll go with “they” just don’t like Janitors…..

    2. I haven’t seen this evidence-you say the janitor states for the record bombs went off BEFORE the planes hit? I would like a reference if you have one
      thank you

  6. Paul Craig no doubt elaborates on many things that are true, very rarely something I don’t already know beforehand and always blames it on Washington. He carries on as if the shadow government does not exist, all countries are sovereign and the vote counts. It doesn’t.

    His pic behind him is not inspiring as it shows the hidden masonic hand. He is definitely masonic and was part of the Reagan government which tripled the national debt, killed several million Vietnamese and poisoned millions more with dioxin. It also propped up Rios Monte the Israeli general who was responsible for killing 20,000 Mayan indians in Guatemala.

    I don’t disagree with much of what he says, only who he is pointing the finger at. So in the final analysis, I consider him a limited hangout.

    1. Vietnam War over ’75, Reagan took over in ’80. Math major?

      You failed to mention how long he was with the Reagan administration. Conveniently.

      How do you tell he is Masonic? Did he make Reagan’s decisions for him? Should an economist be blamed for wars of imperialism?

      Would you much rather see him lambaste the Khazarians? Was he smart or stupid to omit mention them? What would he have to gain?

      Were I you, I’d write him very soon and tell him you can read his mind, he knows nothing more than you know, and he should have brought in far more extraneous factors.
      Plus, you failed to blame Roberts for the Iran Contra scandal. You are losing your touch.

      He’d probably not call you a limited hangout, he’d likely just call you “limited”.

      Are you reprehensor?

      1. Gil this is not my first rodeo, I will be 71 on march.

        What is ironic is Paul Craig the tool speaking about orchestrated events he in turn is trying to orchestrate. A leopard doesn’t change it’s spots, they just go on to higher level paying jobs after the last one. This time with Paul … a truth teller. He is syndicated but not high level. He is carried by the usual suspects in the media.

        All the world’s a stage,
 And all the men and women merely players;
They have their exits and their entrances, 
And one man in his time plays many parts

        William Shakespeare’

        HELTER SKELTER

        “You will best benefit yourself by keeping an open mind and forgetting most of what you have learned in the past.” Jay Sebring

        1. Name ONE journalist with a better reputation than Paul Craig Roberts. Name a stronger patriot.

          Your implication that you know as much as he does is poppycock. If you expect him to know everything, we need you to hold to that same requirement, also.

          But he’s disinfo…….. is this deliberate disinfo, accidental disinfo, non-intended disinfo?

          How about your disinfo?To what standard do we hold you?

      2. And for your information the “alternative” media knows reagan is a pedophile. His own daughter refused to speak to him for years before he died.

        I won’t try and leave you links but there hundreds concerning rent boys in the white house etc. Reagan was a pedophile and anyone associated with him in my books is suspect. Those associated with it, well they always find them a job somewhere down the road. Paul Craig is one of them.

        Reagan was groomed by his first Jane Wyman, one of the eternal victims. He knew what to say, it was funneled to him. “Let’s pave Vietnam”. He was an actor playing his most important role. But hey if you believe the current crock of political jargon presented to you, more power to you. Don’t expect me to however.

        http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/Franklin/FranklinCoverup/franklin.htm

  7. Interesting concerns, thank you. I’ll warn that the process of disinformation is necessary much wider than described. Just to take the example of 9/11:
    * foreign mass media could properly report on it, especially in areas targeted for U.S.-led military operations;
    * history textbook writers could properly describe 9/11 as the false flag that it is;
    * Muslim potentates and opinion-makers could leverage 9/11 to improve Islam’s image and dampen western enthusiasm for U.S. military operations in strategically valuable Muslim areas.
    * technical organizations could have made 9/11 fall flat in a few weeks by simply informing their members of the self-evident controlled demolitions;
    * not a single TV channel, anywhere in the world, has ever aired an inexpensive and riveting documentary on “the little office fire that could” disintegrate Building 7 in a way so reminiscent of a controlled demolition.

    Accordingly, analysts who wish to fix and save the world ought to focus less on the particulars of one category of obfuscators (like the U.S. mass media), more on estimating the size of the disinformation process, and especially on determining whether it encompasses the vast majority of opinion-makers, worldwide, permanently, and in all disciplines. Such a finding would give Plato’s cave a new and very down-to-Earth meaning. It may even lead to some resolution. But this is another story.

    Love,

    1. Our friend on Greenwich St which is above the park facing 7 saw an entire row of windows light up with flashes – explosives going off. Then she saw the building collapse in its own footprint. So the office fire story is nonsense.

  8. Reblogged this on THE ONENESS of HUMANITY and commented:

    What are the odds that the “awkward matters” articulated in this hard-hitting article by Mr. Paul Craig Roberts become included in reports forthcoming from the corporate media? An even more, perhaps the most important, question the article raises: “Will any of the candidates running for President of the United States 2016, or any elected representative in the United States Congress, comment in any manner whatsoever – either affirming or denying the serious allegations put forth – on these extremely disturbing points of contention?”

    1. I suspect what Paul Roberts doesn’t know is dwarfed by what Dublinsmick doesn’t know. It’s a favored trick of Mick to repeatedly omit the vast number of positives to one such as Paul Roberts and accentuate negatives that are most likely in the far smaller fraction of the two categories. I know some 4th grade dropouts who insist college graduates are totally stupid and can’t tie their shoes. The dropouts can, indeed, tie their shoes but nothing else…..
      Mick, ever hear of a balanced presentation when qualifying/quantifying an individual’s total cerebral horsepower? You sound so much like an unwashed rube at times.

  9. Paul Craig Roberts is, or has been, a popular fellow over at OpEdNews.

    This article of his actually appeared there, albeit along with the notification that the author did not wish to allow comments on it.

    I used to be a commenter at OpEdNews before getting booted. I actually lasted a couple of years there!

    OpEdNews is a notoriously cheesy (ie., phoney) ‘alternative’ site that I rejected immediately (as cheesy and precipitously phoney) when I first viewed it.

    Only after getting booted from a number of other ‘alternative’ sites, did I start my commenting career there.

    Though I insist it was better when I was there, due to the number of people who dwelled there and were somewhat aware or slightly aware of my subtle tinkerings while I performed my work as ‘commenter’, it is and was and always will be, of course, a very cheesy and phoney site.

    If Paul Craig Robersts leaves the company of the OpEdNews team, then we will perhaps know, he is at least, started to get warm.

    He is, in my opinion, a kind of Jim Fetzer lite. He is no Miles Mathis, quite obviously.

    Ned Lud

    1. http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2013/08/rob-kall-petty-tyrant-of-opednews.html

      Tuesday, August 6, 2013
      Rob Kall: The Petty Tyrant of OpEdNews

      by Jim Fetzer

      Something seriously not right about OpEd News. Dr. Fetzer fell out with them some time ago.

      Lefty’s generally do not like too much false event truth. Same for extreme Right wing.

      I like to read Dr. Roberts for his outlook on world – geopolitical matters.

      He never has had it right about 9-11.

      He sticks to the original diversionary 9-11 truthers –

      explosive nanothermite

      Real planes hit the towers.

      = Destruction observed

      Does not make a lick of sense.

      I notice Dr. Roberts avoids all but the most superficial comments about Sandy Hook saying he did not study it at all. Yet, at least, for the first time, a major alternative commentator dares to comment at all about Sandy Hook.

  10. I discovered an unbelievably elaborate false reality when I was researching Kevin Scott King and came across the “rediscovered” Trivium Education “syllabus” – the very first thing I thought was “trivia is my life, and it simply isn’t possible that I never heard of this, I’m 53 YO.

    So I looked at it harder, and the first few websites I visited were Borat caliber parody – a lot of people would see it as a genuine effort by ignorant christian fundamentalists to recreate the “superior” education method of the Dark Ages. (The obvious joke being that the period represents a retardation of educational method, ho ho, ha ha.)

    So I tried to figure out who could possibly do such a thing, and remembered there was a George Mason professor who had his students prank wiki. I don’t if he’s really behind it, but go read the reviews for “sister Miriam Joseph’s” The Trivium: The Liberal Arts Of Logic, Grammar And Rhetoric at Amazon.

    It’s all tongue in cheek, very dry humor. But it’s as phony as a $9 bill.

    1. What drivel. Read Regine Pernoud’s Those Terrible Middle Ages! (http://www.amazon.com/Those-Terrible-Middle-Ages-Debunking/dp/0898707811), and you will find out that everything you think you know about that period is false. It was probably the best time/place in history.

      Education, since the Prussian system was adopted, has systematically made us stupider. The average person has been successfully groomed to be an idiot. I’m afraid, Robert, you are an exemplar.

  11. Oh…..it is actually worse than what PCR reports. ( tool )

    The game has always been about keeping your eyes trained on their ‘balls’….those proverbial balls that Pavlov’s dogs enjoyed chasing once the ringing in their ears stopped.

    I know that what I am about to present will cause some a bout of consternation and intense denial. Vitriol will no doubt ensue. There is a history of this on MHB, but, I like James Tracy and believe that he deserves an uncommon view.

    This is what we should be talking about…..training our eyes on:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFgkhPCAOjg

    I wish everyone ‘Illumination’……

    1. Ever heard of sun-dogs? They are supposed to be fairly uncommon but one winter day I was walking west at sundown and saw a display where there were two flanking the sun on either side. Sun-dogs arise when there are ice crystals in the atmosphere. If you are in a fascist society like Taiwan sometimes seems, your overlords might want you to think they are supernatural or to direct your attention away from some atmospheric thing they are doing. I don’t understand Chinese so I cannot say what the announcer was calling it, but since one is a pale reflection of the sun, I am going with a sun-dog phenomenon.

    2. You know I am one of many chasing this “Nibiru” story, but every time I check out a reference like this I get a video/picture of sunlight through clouds, with distortion-you don’t have to be an expert in optics to understand these kind of pictures demonstrate just about zero,
      if I have to be a psychic to “see it” then it is a fail-sorry,
      like Scully, I want to believe!

      1. Nibiru is pretty much our planetary history. There are a virtual army on the net trying at all costs to keep discussion of this at a minimum. Ancient Greece referred to it as the winged globe, Titan vs God wars.

        China the Red Dragon and it is their national symbol. The Dragon comes through our solar system on an elliptical pass rearranging the solar system. It is what dragon holding the crystal trinkets are all about the Chinese sell.

        Native Americans call it the planet of the crossing, the Cheyenne symbol is a circle with a balanced cross. It is what native Americans are referring to when they discuss the Red star Kachina.

        It is the Japanese Red Sun also. This planetary history is well documented in the clay tablets of the Berlin museum. Unfortunately the west is least informed on our planetary history and more focused on dancing with the stars. You won’t see much discussion of this on the evening news.

        It is also the sky dragon of the Kolbrin bible king long shanks wanted destroyed.

        Dogon tribal beliefs are similar.

        In Sagan’s Dark Sister it is referred to as our binary companion.

        It is also documented extensively in the Mahabharata which took 600 years to write and is 2300 years old. The Atrahasis is very similar.

        Gary Zeitlin of the Berkeley, Open SETI program has some interesting discussion on it.

        https://dublinsmick.wordpress.com/2012/05/10/who-are-the-nefilim-where-did-they-go-will-they-return/

        1. Well Ric,
          when I saw the list of foreign Israeli spies working in all the echelons of power light bulbs came on,
          this country is occupied,
          taking the red pill is like starting jogging when you are 50 lbs overweight, really a drag:)

        2. The whole Dual Citizenship started I think in 1968 when a Israeli who has and was an American Citizen left for like 10 years, came back, and wanted his US citizenship back.( Duel was NOT allowed)

          He won, then Anyone could be in Govt., Congress, Head of DHS, FBI. Then it advanced to almost any facet of Govt. you could be a duel Citizen and have access to all our Govt. Records with impunity.

          And here we are now…….Diverse, PC Correct

  12. Has anyone ever figured out what the deal is with some comments appearing instantly, others later, and a few never?

    Anyway, I don’t mean to offend anyone, but I’m about 98% convinced
    that the “Trivium syllabus” or home school education thing is a hoax.
    google ‘trivium education” and then read the reviews for “sister Miriam Joseph’s book here:

    http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=dp_byline_sr_book_2?ie=UTF8&field-author=Marguerite+McGlinn&search-alias=books&text=Marguerite+McGlinn&sort=relevancerank

    327 out of 331 people found the top comment helpful? I really don’t think so.

    1. Wow, Robert, you really are a troll.

      What happened to that whole secret bombshell story you couldn’t talk about? did you drop that for this silly “home school education is a hoax” strategy for which you hope to be attacked?

      I hope no one feeds this troll.

      1. I did think it quite odd Robert throws in an entirely off-topic item.

        However, sucker that I am, I read some of the Amazon reviews of that book on the Trivium and came across one that I think is worth reading some time.

        http://www.amazon.com/The-Trivium-Liberal-Grammar-Rhetoric/product-reviews/0967967503/ref=cm_cr_dp_qt_hist_one?ie=UTF8&filterByStar=one_star&showViewpoints=0

        1.0 out of 5 starsSheep are meant to be herded, fleeced, and slaughtered; not taught logic.
        ByLaura B.on November 13, 2014
        Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase
        By Laura B.

        “Logic, therefore, as the science of thought, or the science of the process of pure reason, should be capable of being constructed a priori.”
        -Arthur Schopenhauer, The Art of Controversy

        “Education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their school masters would have wished.”
        -Bertrand Russell, quoting Johann Fichte, inventor of The Prussian School System ( used throughout The West today to educate the masses) …” SNIP

      2. Me? A troll? I’m trying to figure out if this is some sort of honey-pot, because I’ve noticed a whole list of things that don’t make any sense here, starting with the fact that Kevin Scott King seems to have gone missing instead of merely giving me a yes or no answer.

        Do you have your own blog that you could post my story on? If not, what business is it of yours when or even if I ever post my story here?

        And how is my comment off topic? The post is about artificial realities, and I think that Trivium thing is a hoax because there is no method, it’s sophistry. Just like telling people to turn off their TV to avoid being “influenced”. I hear Ostriches stick their head in the sand to avoid undue influence too.

      1. Ah, it’s PCA – there are all sorts of things you “can’t imagine”, but what does that prove? Nothing, except a lack of imagination. And I didn’t say home schooling was a hoax. I said the “trivium method” is a hoax, and it is a hoax. There is no method. If you read the content at various trivium websites, it can’t even really be described as circular reasoning, it’s just bargain basement sophistry:

        “The Trivium is a intellectual method of reaching statistical certainty that you is right about something…”

        I don’t know how much time I spent reading the sort of drivel quoted above, but it was MORE than enough to see that “trivium” is a mockery of home schooling.

        Now we’ve got that nonsense out of the way, are there any other non issues you’d like to quibble about?

        1. I was being polite. I am fully capable of imagining the conclusions ignoramuses are capable of drawing. Stupid people, after all, are all around us. People incapable of comprehending the trivium, for instance, or being able to see the value in Sr. Joseph’s book. People who think homeschooling is a “hoax.”

          Also, people who skim a few web sites that are not the best examples of these things, and then eagerly conclude that it’s all worthless. People like that.

          My imagination indeed stretches that far. Which is better, to lie in the cause of courtesy, taking the chance that you can’t see the nuance, or to come right out and call you a nincompoop?

        2. It really is obvious that you couldn’t care less about the truth, and don’t patronize me with your “just trying to be polite” nonsense – the fact that you resort to name calling is proof that you have no valid argument.

          And again, I NEVER SAID HOMESCHOOLING IS A HOAX. You did, twice.

          Have you ever bothered to read even one sentence of Miriam Joseph’s Trivium? I doubt it, because it’s quite clear that her book was intended for college freshman, it was never meant to be the curriculum for every grade from kindergarten through high school senior. Nor does Miriam Joseph endlessly spew this nonsense:

          “The Trivium method: (pertains to mind) – the elementary three.

          General Grammar, Aristotelian Logic, and Classical Rhetoric comprise the first three rules-based subjects of the 7 Liberal Arts and Sciences. As these disciplines are learned and practiced together, they form the overarching, symbiotic system for establishing clarity and consistency of personal thought called the Trivium.

          [1] General Grammar

          [2] Formal Logic

          [3] Classical Rhetoric

          Answers the question of the Who, What, Where, and the When of a subject. Answers the Why of a subject. Provides the How of a subject.
          Discovering and ordering facts of reality comprises basic, systematic knowledge. Developing the faculty of reason in establishing valid [i.e., non-contradictory] relationships among facts is systematic understanding. Applying knowledge and understanding expressively comprises wisdom or, in other words, it is systematically useable knowledge and understanding.”

          The Trivium that most of these homeschooling charlatans are babbling about isn’t based on Miriam Joseph’s book at all, but rather an essay written by Dorothy Sayers in 1948:

          “My views about child psychology are, I admit, neither orthodox nor enlightened. Looking back upon myself (since I am the child I know best and the only child I can pretend to know from inside) I recognize three states of development. These, in a rough-and- ready fashion, I will call the Poll-Parrot, the Pert, and the Poetic–the latter coinciding, approximately, with the onset of puberty.”

          As you can see, Ms. Sayers fully admits that she doesn’t know a damn thing about childhood development, so the Trivium method is premised on pure BS, but it’s not a hoax? Okay, it’s not entirely a hoax, just the part about it being the best, or natural, or classical method of teaching children, because children did not attend medieval universities.

          BTW, I don’t call people names anymore, I stopped right around the time dad took the training wheels off my bike, 40 something years ago. Why are you still doing it? Does it make you feel young, or is that just something “smart” people do?

        3. Patrick, I’m sure you’re probably aware of this.

          Robert said, “…I’m about 98% convinced that the “Trivium syllabus” or home school education thing is a hoax.”

          Now he’s backpedaling and saying only the Trivium is a hoax, when in several posts in this very thread he equated the two. He’s just being contrary with no thought for consistency; its the mark of the troll.

          He’s looking for a disturbance, not a real discussion. People here endorse these educational methods, so he attacks them. Then he’s trolling for Holocaust hoax comments. Then he’s says several times that Tracy, devious mastermind that he is, is running a long-con “honeypot” here.

          Look how he flits from talking point to talking point; he’s got everyone down. Check out this aside, meant especially for me:
          “(The trivium is sophistry) just like telling people to turn off their TV to avoid being “influenced”.”

          This guy’s really creepy, keeping track of everyone at MHB. And what’s with “researching” Kevin, and then coming here and complaining that he won’t respond? That’s not stalking?

          I hope everyone is convinced beyond a doubt that Bobert is a troll.

          You know what they say about feeding them.

        4. It is a vary strange conversation.

          You said this:

          “Anyway, I don’t mean to offend anyone, but I’m about 98% convinced
          that the “Trivium syllabus” or home school education thing is a hoax.
          google ‘trivium education” and then read the reviews for “sister Miriam Joseph’s book here:”

          You are 98% convinced that the “Trivium syllabus”

          OR

          “home school education thing”

          is a hoax.

          Neither, of course, are “hoaxes.” It is very difficult to not call this an idiotic statement, and by extension, you yourself an idiot for making it. I tried, though, phrasing it in as polite way as I could think of. But you would have none of it, digging yourself deeper into the hole you seem quite content to be in.

          In fact, you made fun of me for making the effort! And accuse me of name-calling! And speculate that I do that routinely, to make myself feel young!

          But you don’t lower yourself to “name-calling.” That’s precious.

  13. Glad to see this article posted on memoryholeblog. I’ve also seen it on Zerohedge and the Unz Review. The more people that see it the better.

  14. It’s not a coincidence that Spotlight, an incredibly overall boring film even with its star studded cast, won Best Picture. It features a jewish newspaper head directing complicit irish catholic journalists of a Boston paper to actually report the truth of Church orchestration of pedophilia.

    I don’t know if it’s largely true or just partially (or at all), but it’s absolutely not spontaneous. And I highly respect most of the stars of it, but the truth is it really was very boring.

    It posits jews as saviors and reformers of lowly whites through their media.

    What a topsy turvy world we’re living in. And I’m no defender of pedophile priests, either, or the Catholic Church that fosters them.

    1. I always thought the hero of the story was Roderick MacLeish, grand-nephew of poet Archibald MacLeish and the son of a journalist from Pennsylvania. He seems at first to have felt his own role in bringing lawsuits against pedophile priests in the 1990’s was downplayed or made to seem sinister in the film. He has now supposedly “softened” his stance.

      I think there is some merit in what you are saying about need to portray members of a certain ethnic group as bold outsiders who save us from ourselves. The Hollywood angle on a script needed to portray this guy as a pioneer, when he really wasn’t so original. Certain facts had already been established by these legal cases, which were not secret when MacLeish was involved, articles about them appearing in the Globe at the time.

      I think MacLeish’s original gut response was that these guys were trying to claim all the credit. Yet Hollywood seems to need a tight little package that will run for two hours.

      The early intimations that there was something rotten in Boston clergy first occurred to me with a client back in the early 1980’s along with evasions and obstructions by Catholic Charities over the probably abused child – they were pointing their fingers in what was probably a false direction.

      I wonder how many children were snatched from their families because they were disturbed by what happened to them while in parochial schools.

      In Somerville, where my client’s child came from, there were 15 pedophile priests who circulated through three parishes there. Without the power of a strong lawyer like MacLeish none of this would have come to light, because the ability of the Boston archdiocese to close ranks was so powerful that some pro bono legal aid office could never pry their doors open. He is owed a debt of gratitude, not a smear (if that is what the movie, which I have not seen, does to him).

      But putting the media over the law’s sifting of facts is what’s happening now, isn’t it? Not to say that in this case they made it up – I am sure they did not – but facts are something they can play fast and loose with when not operating under the pains and penalties of perjury or attorney malfeasance. You can say anything in a newspaper these days, and win the Pulitzer prize. The broken clock is right twice a day.

        1. Also, see Eric MacLeish’s Facebook page which explains the relationship of his law team to the exposure of the Catholic hierarchy in the cover-up of clergy sex abuse. He also explains that the film is superficial and does not do justice to the ground-breaking work of his own team, which ironically was covered fulsomely in the Globe pretty much as it was happening.

        2. The name is Roderick (Eric) MacLeish, Jr.

          He has also done wrongful termination of faculty cases, how successfully I do not know.

      1. It’s also the general theme that seemed to have influenced the voters (ever wonder if there’s voter fraud for the Oscars?) The jewish media is portrayed as the truthtelling check on abusive power, when reality reveals the opposite. I just think there’s a timeliness to the pick given how bad the film really was, and how urgent the message is – for the jews, and for the media. My sense of the jews is that they like to expose corruption and abuse in ‘white’ or european institutions when it suits them, but not when it doesn’t.

        I can’t totally articulate how I sensed you were a Catholic, other than that I did somehow. I think it was what seems to me to be your indulgence of the jews. It has a catholic tint to it, somehow, but that may depend on regional differences (in terms of how irish catholics perceive things like the false Holocaust) and not just catholic versus protestant ones.

        1. Well one thing about being in a group which has itself experienced persecution, you want to protect others so they do not have to go through it either. Plus if you know enough people from some group, you see how different they are from each other. I don’t know what false Holocaust you are talking about. Perhaps you can explain what you mean.

        2. My role was not in Catholic Charities (God forbid!) but in a secular law firm offering legal aid to the poor with a mix of people of religious origins, most of them atheist or agnostic. My father was an atheist from a Methodist family, my mother was a Catholic with a fervor I never had. Right now, she refuses to associate with the church, having long ago dropped out. It was simply her cultural background. Nobody in my family was seriously antisemitic. My father was born in Brooklyn to a mix of old-line Americans and German Protestants. His favorite uncle, Dave, married to a kind aunt, was Jew. When Dave died, he left his signet ring to my Dad because he had no children of his own.

          If that is being hoodwinked by Jews, then you have a very low threshold for thinking people are. I am no fool. I can see the games that people play, particularly ones who see the world in terms of their own versus the Other (in which we are inappropriately cast as Cossacks and hysteria is used like some gypsy pickpocket trick). But those are just some people, not all of them.

          I ask you – what kind of “false Holocaust” are you talking about? If you were taken from your home to some “FEMA camp” and starved there and succumbed to a mix of cholera and typhus, which bone thin, what would you call that? Murder. Not just being a POW because you would have been taken from your own home, not as a combatant. But the deportations characterized people as enemy aliens. It was not right when it was done here, but at least we did not envision it as the final solution.

    1. I think pretender is unwarranted, I see Webster Tarpley refers to the “Anglo-American Clique” so it is widespread that various writers who use some innocuous phrase to refer to the international bankers,
      and Washington IS the seat of power of the Rothschild-Zionist clique (one of them anyways)

      1. I love Tarpley! He wrote the best book on 9/11 (9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA). When I say “pretenders”, I mean among other economists. Paul Craig Roberts’ worldview seems very much shaped by his background in economics. I only lament that others of his profession have not joined the fight against the spectacle. I refer to the condition Guy Debord described in 1967: “In a world that has really been turned on its head, truth is a moment of falsehood.” [translation by Donald Nicholson-Smith]

        –Paul

  15. I forgot to mention that I’m not watching any videos, and if you can’t at least explain what I’m going to see when I get there, don’t expect me to waste my time with links to cherry-picked disinfo websites.

  16. I have some questions . I woke up early to this when I saw the laughing sad video ! What a hoax. Anyway , here goes:
    1) In the video above ,where the dad is a swat team guy .. do any military/ gun owners know if he is holding the guns properly? It doesn’t look it to me.
    2) Has anyone done any statically analysis on the age and marital status of the parents . Seems to me they were all older an married ? That would be very unusual for a whole class not to have a mix of young parents / divorced etc
    3) Have the parents ever addressed that they are actors by profession ?
    4) If this was an affluent area, which I believe has been reported , why did they let their kids go to a school in obvious disarray ?

    Thanks

    1. Every single one of your points have been covered in detail extensively via several videos and articles, at least to the extent that is possible by those of us out here who are mainly “amateur” researchers.

      That video of that person who was simultaneously a parent and a SWAT team member related to the same false event is one of the absolute major indictments of this hoax. Maybe that “bombshell” video of the impetus for ” PCR producing this article. He never spoke about these “false flag” events of recent origin on U S soil before so plainly in the past and never at all to my knowledge about Sandy Hook. Here he comes out fully behind Dr. Fetzer and his research efforts. That was a quantum leap for PCR who basically has been in the “mainstream” of the so called alternative media.

      My observations are cursory, but certain data points just stood out to me even from my distant perspective. Your point about age of parents and divorces etc. is brought to my mind about Veronique Pozner. Veronique does not compute. As the story goes, Lenny was her second husband. She had two children by her first husband and Noah and a twin sister from second marriage to Lenny. Second marriage ended in divorce. Then we look at the record of Veronique’s employment. She started out as a nurse in the USA and then Ms. Veronique Haller metamorphosed to where she is said to be today — an attorney and Swiss diplomat working in D.C. in the Embassy of Switzerland, all the while bearing and rearing four children and looking rather on the young side in photos to me.

      https://sandehook.wordpress.com/2014/12/05/a-tale-of-two-veroniques/

    2. To answer your question on the firearm-
      he looks like someone who has never handled firearms,
      pretty plane to see, you don’t carry a loaded weapon around other officers and people with a gun so casually, whether it is loaded or empty,
      to old gunners it is as obvious as watching an actor smoke (who clearly is not a smoker)

    3. Kate Slate does an excellent job with the age of the Sandy Hook mothers. Below is a must watch video she titled “Sandy Hook’s Elderly Parents. They are WAY off the demographic. Recent stats just upped the average age for first births in the US to 26.The Sandy Hook dads are even older than the mothers, and I hope she will do a similar study on them someday.

      https://youtu.be/G2kPfo27Jl4

  17. The Kennedy assassination does not belong with the others because all the factual conclusions are compatible and clearly derived from available evidence. A conspiracy would be a vastly more difficult explanation than the simplest, a crazy man went out and shot somebody. Nobody gained or lost politically because of the assassination. It was done in the days when you could order a gun by mail and Kennedy was lax about security. Oswald was shot by someone as crazy as he was. Both wanted to be the star of everything.

      1. No. The simple explanation of a single gunner makes sense. With Sandy Hook, the simple explanation given doesn’t fit.

    1. Hmm, where to begin?
      How much did they pay you to try to suggest that Oswald was the lone gunman, and Ruby was not a Jewish organized crime figure with direct ties to an international Israeli arms smuggling ring? Wait, didn’t somebody try that lone killer herring with Timothy McVeigh, even though they pulled two military grade unexploded bombs out of the OKC rubble by the bomb squad, and the highest ranking bomb expert in government said a fertilizer bomb could not possibly cause this much damage to the building?
      You need to give that money back!

  18. A false reality?…

    If the best description of your life is a mix of The Matrix, Truman Show, and The Prisoner TV series then yes I live in a False Reality.

    But I must admit it is interesting…, I can’t say I’ve ever had a stage light every hit me, but I can’t go anywhere without seeing multiple AT&T trucks.

    AT&T has been in the ‘spy’ business a long long time.

    1. I think the Matrix serves as a very real and appropriate allegory for our times,
      people live in a created existence that is pleasant, all too real to the victim, who unbeknown to them they are enslaved while their life forces are drained in the form of a battery….

      1. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCO9WdbHKyS9UXsmxtK9IdIQ

        I am sorry the address I gave would not work. I wanted to get some people to listen to it but I guess I am not sure how to do that. I do know it is not necessary to sign up or anything like that.

        To listen after the show is over but not yet permanently posted in archives, I guess there is no way to listen to the replay until it posts by tomorrow morning.

        I do not know if going to the main channel site is the URL for anyone who wants to tune in while show is in progress but I guess that is what is needed.

        I thought that URL would work but guess you have to go to main channel first while show has already started to get access.

        The show will be posted that same address above by tomorrow morning and maybe that original URL gave will work too tomorrow.

        The live show starts streaming at 7 pm Central Mon Wed Fri by just going to the channel address above in this posting at the appointed time.

  19. Here is last night’s Real Deal Show, the one that spent Hour 1 of 2 going through in detail the Paul Craig Roberts article.

    Media Broadcasting Center Official Channel uploaded a video 13 minutes ago
    1:59:13
    635925535838220728
    by Media Broadcasting Center Official Channel

    13 minutes ago16 views 
    

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uf6W8QRA13I

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uf6W8QRA13I

    Dr. Fetzer also participates in the Wednesday Show Hour 2 which is the JFK show. He said he had some information about 9-11 to convey in that show but I have not yet listened to Hour 2 of this video and do not know what that information is.

    I see as we go along in our story that we have new linkages among the false events of the last half century. We observe common characteristics of how these sophisticated deceptions are carried off.

    After looking at the “crisis actor” aspects of Sandy Hook and Boston, I am able to see much more “crisis actor” involvement in 9-11. I also have a now much broader definition of “crisis actor.”

  20. Just curious as to why my comments on Paul Craig and his hidden hand were deleted. If my comments are not welcome be sure there will be no more. I try an contribute here but if the message is not welcome, then I am gone. And by the way Craig is a shill.

    1. I’ve been wondering why anyone interested in communicating with others on a forum would tolerate this strange, seemingly random hit-or-miss comment posting problem that seems to be common to wordpress blogs. If I owned the blog or site, and I wasn’t the one deleting certain comments or ever letting them post at all, I’d suspect that for whatever reason, someone at wordpress was manipulating my blog.

      I know a lot of the people behind the internet like webmasters and coders are activists and are seriously manipulating public opinion because they are not at all what they pretend to be. I found a social security forum one time and asked the owner if I could post a warning on her site that SSA has a covert regulation denying social security recipients the right to know whether or not their minor children are receiving social security payments from their SS account. She got all weird and kept saying she didn’t want to “confuse” anyone.

      I tried about five different ways to assure her that all I wanted people to know is what the official social security regulations say they have a right to know – social security lied to me for years and cost me about $12,000 in child support I never should’ve had to pay – and I can only assume she was a sellout or “she” was actually someone from SSA who ran the site.

      I’m not accusing anyone of anything, just saying that there seems to be a lot of misunderstandings. I’ve been a member of a site called edhat.com for 4 or 5 years – it’s a forum for locals in Santa Barbara and it is run like a cult – the posted forum rules and policies are meaningless – I never attack anyone or use profanity or break any other rules, and about half my stuff never appears on the site.

  21. http://www.startribune.com/richfield-gun-seizure-raises-the-question-of-mental-illness-and-second-amendment-rights/371135581/

    This is a ‘false reality,’ in that this man either doesn’t exist or is being fabricated about by cops and a psychiatrist. For one, anyone having a systemic psychosis would be ‘diagnosed’ with schizophrenia. When the real and genetic manic depression was changed to the ever-changing ‘bipolar,’ the episodic nature of it was retained. For another, a true schizophrenic would never be specific in his or her paranoia; inability to address concretes in their delusions is a defining hallmark of the disease. They simply cannot focus as a function of the psychosis. Collecting license plates and targeting specific individuals as supposed persecutors would not be part of their delusions.

    Note that the cops and a psychiatrist are the only witnesses. This is an attempt to derail Cornyn’s crusade to defend due process against the Murphy bills.

    1. And here’s another false reality: http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/europe/77592128/chilling-final-email-from-germanwings-killer-copilot-andreas-lubitz

      I’ve never concluded whether or not the entire incident was faked, but certainly most parts of its narrative were especially as they pertained to Lubitz. Patrick was right when he said that the controlled op strategy Deanna Spingola was working was the ‘meds made him do it so he should have been interned.’

  22. The world’s people need and deserve to know the immeasurably consequential truth of 2011 and NATO’s destruction of Libya, and precisely why, in the eyes of certain people, Gaddafi had to die. Listen carefully to the following 57-minute interview of James and Joanne Moriarty discussing their knowledge of Libya, then share the interview link with as many others as humanly possible. The implications are global, historic, unprecedented and impossible to understate.

    http://prn.fm/progressive-commentary-hour-03-15-16/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *