Dash-Cam DVDs Deemed Public Records, Officials Pull Out Stops to Keep Docs Private

Tony Mead
Facebook – Sandy Hook Hoax

On February 18, 2016, Wolfgang Halbig appeared in the CT FOIA Commission Hearing to continue his attempt to obtain public records from the Newtown PD and Department of Sandy Hook PanoramaEmergency Services and Public Protection, who are entrusted with the CT State Police report and are the holders of those records.

The Hearing begins and it becomes immediately apparent that Vincent Perpetua is much more rigid than Matthew Streeter (the previous hearing officer). This is a no nonsense, by the book, informed and educated attorney who seems to view Wolfgang and his attorney along with Christine Plourde (Legislative Manager and basically “gatekeeper” of DESPPP records) and her attorney with equally condescending disdain.


Kay Wilson explains to Perpetua that Wolfgang has been getting the “runaround” on his FOIA request for written police reports from both the Newtown PD and the DESPP as each refers him to the other agency. Newtown claims that they are NOT in possession of the records as the State Police were the “investigating agency”. Christine Plourde claims that the records are exempt from public disclosure as they are “signed witness statements”.

They were also seeking unaltered Dash Cam DVDs as they contend that the dash cam videos provided previously had been altered and did not contain embedded date and timestamped information.

I found it surprising that Perpetua did not wish to hear about Wolfgang Halbig’s background information. Wolfgang’s experience as a National Safety consultant grants him a standing in the pursuit of these records as it could aid him professionally in understanding the incident and in making recommendations for future safety considerations. One of the key contentions of the State in denying Ablechild access to Adam Lanza’s mental health records in their FOIA Hearing was that they were not a “stakeholder” and as such, had no legal right to these records. I spoke to Sheila Matthews of Ablechild and she feels that it’s “apples to oranges” as they are a 501C non-profit organization whereas Wolfgang, regardless of his professional background, is simply a member of the Public seeking Public Records.

Steven Barry, attorney for Christine Plourde, opens by stating that Miss Plourde will testify that the “witness statements” given by the Newtown PD, which are a part of the online CT State Police Report, are exempt from FOIA requests and that the “Newtown Police Report”, if there is one, will be in possession of the Town of Newtown”. Wait, What?!?!

That’s right folks, according to the DESPP, the Official CT State Police Report contains NO Newtown PD Officers reports, they are simply “witness statements”. Since when is a trusted servant, performing his duties as an employee of the public, who is a first responder at a mass casualty incident, considered to be a “Witness” ?!? That has to be one of the most ridiculous arguments that I have ever heard!

Mr. Barry then proceeds to explain that the Dash Cam DVDs are considered to be evidence and as such are exempt from FOIA requests. He fails to realize that once a case is closed, such as the Adam Lanza murder case, the “evidence” becomes “property” and is no longer exempt. This argument is also ridiculous as many Dash Cam videos have already been released to the Hartford Courant, Vincent Riccio, and even Sandy Hook Facts. Several of the CT State Police Dash Cam DVDs were released in the CT State Police Report itself. How can those be considered a matter of public record while Halbig has to undergo a tedious legal process to obtain Newtown’s?

Next, Barry goes on to say, “If there is a Newtown Police Report, the State is NOT in possession of it”. This leads us to believe that the “statements” contained in the CT State Police Report do NOT constitute Newtown Police Reports and that perhaps there is no Newtown Police Report even in existence. One of the most deadly mass casualty incidents in history, and the first responding agency has made NO REPORTS ?!?

Even Victor Perpetua is left shaking his head trying to understand this!

Kay Wilson next brings up the fact that the attached police reports given by the Newtown officers are actually redacted in the CT State Police Report. The redaction codes used to justify the redactions are 03 and 10. Redaction Code 03 is defined as “personell/medical/similar files/invasion of personal privacy” while redaction code 10 is defined as “signed statements of witnesses”. So, the contention is affirmed that the submitted reports by the Newtown Officers are considered to be witness statements. We will come back to this later.

Redaction Codes:


As Kay Wilson attempts to outline the case she is continually interrupted by both the hearing officer, who really just wants to get to the point, and the opposing counsel who wants to object to anything and everything for some odd reason. He even objects to allowing the email exchange between Wolfgang and Plourde to be entered in as evidence citing it as “hearsay”. The email exchange shows how Plourde repeatedly kicked his requests to Newtown who then kicked it back to DEPPS. I’m not sure of a better way to substantiate Wolf’s claim, and I think that Perpetua agreed as he allowed it to be entered while noting it as hearsay.

As one observes the blatant attempts by the State to confuse, obfuscate and delay the release of these documents, it becomes apparent to even the least informed that they obviously have something to hide. There is no justification for the continued efforts to delay the inevitable. If the Sandy Hook incident is a genuine mass murder, why not simply provide Wolfgang with the proof and have him move on? It should really be just that simple!

The next significant occurrence in the hearing is the appearance of Newtown Police Officer Lt. Christopher Vanghele. Vanghele is asked what time he arrived at the Sandy Hook School and his response is “I don’t have my report right in front of me, so I don’t know the exact time”. The most important incident that he has ever participated in, and he doesn’t even know what time he arrived? Certainly when an officer is subpoenaed to appear in court, he would be prepared to answer questions. If it were me I would have brought the report with me so that I could refresh my memory if need be.

“So you did write a report?”, asks Kay.

Vanghele quickly corrects his mistake by saying “Uh, no, I gave a statement”

“Did you sign that statement?”, Kay asks.

“I don’t remember signing that statement” is his reply.

Now, without going into a line by line analysis of his testimony, let me summarize that he attests to the fact that he wrote a statement at his office, on his own personal computer at work, which he the loaded onto a “thumb drive” and delivered to DESPP who then may, or may not have edited his statement to be used in the CT State Police Report. What ?!?

Yes, that is correct! Vanghele has now either perjured himself or the CT State Police Report is a blatant lie!!

If you refer to pdf #00002060 in the CT State Police Report, you will find that the statement given by Lt. Vanghele is classified as an “interview” with a location of that interview given as “Newtown Police Dept, LT’s Office, 3 Main St., Newtown CT.”
The date and time of the “interview” is given as 12/18/12 from 8:30 AM- 11:43 AM. That seems pretty specific and since the investigating Officer is listed as Jeremy Combes, one would be led to believe that an actual interview was conducted by the investigating officer of Lt. Vanghele.

The pdf also states that the “Action taken” was that Vanghele “provided a typed statement”. Why it would take over 3 hours for Vanghele to provide a typed statement, which apparently only consisted of him handing them a thumb drive, is beyond my comprehension.

Lt Vanghele’s statement is slightly redacted, but I highly recommend that everyone read it. He is the officer who handed his badge to Kaitlyn Roig to identify himself as an officer. He also refers to the bookcase that she used to hide the door as a “cabinet” and refers to the bathroom as a closet. You would think that 4 days after the event he would have heard the story and known that it was a bathroom. He also refers to the shooter as having “long blonde, wispy hair”. That is unlike any of the pictures of Adam Lanza that I have seen.

Most importantly, the last line of the statement (or summary of the statement) says:
“The typed statement was signed by Lt. Vanghele, witnessed by Detective Lukienchuk #573 and I notarized the statement.”

So here we have it. Either Lt Vanghlele has seen fit to lie under oath, or the CT State Police Report has been fabricated to fit a narrative. I am inclined to believe the latter.


Next Kay Wilson asks Vanghele whether Chief Kehoe has ever asked him to provide him with a copy of the statement. Monte Frank immediately objects as to relevance (which is ridiculous as Kehoe is the custodian of records for Newtown PD and as such should have responded to Wolf’s FOIA by asking for the statements), and is put in his place by Perpetua who recognizes that Monte has no standing in this hearing and is not even on the record. His objection is overruled, but Vanghele never answers the question.

The question is asked “Mr. Vanghele, how long have you been a police officer”, to which there is another objection. The whole process becomes noticeably frustrating for Kay Wilson as she is continually interrupted and forced to explain herself.

The objection is overruled and Vanghele is asked whether, in his 22 years of experience, he has ever NOT given a police report after responding to an incident. Another objection is raised asking whether this is relevant as the FOIA request at hand involves the State and the records that they have, and not the records that Newtown keeps. It’s another attempt to confuse the issue and it proves to be effective. Kay becomes flustered and is forced to move on. It reminds me of the magician who hides the ball under one of three cups and each time we guess which cup contains the ball, we are re-directed.

The testimony of Vanghele concludes with Steven Barry trying to create the possibility that somehow Vanghele did “sign” his statement, but Vanghele fails to take the bait and contends that he “doesn’t remember” signing. Even given the opportunity to say that he “signed electronically”, Vanghele states that he did not. He also states that after submitting his statement, the State may have altered it and that after that he did not receive it back again for him to sign. It becomes apparent that no “signed and notarized statement” from Vanghele actually exists.

Next we have Christine Plourde testify that the Dash Cam DVDs and the Witness Statements requested by Halbig are being held by the State as “evidence” and are not subject to FOIA requests. Perpetua refers to a pending case (Hartfor Courant vs State of CT) in which it has yet to be decided whether seized evidence is subject to FOIA request once the case is closed. It has actually been ruled that indeed, once a case is closed, the items become “property” and not evidence, but that ruling has been appealed by the State and remains pending. I personally contacted David Altamari of the Hartford Courant 2 weeks ago, who told me that there is still no court date scheduled to hear the appeal.

Perpetua goes on to say that he will rule, as the Commission has previously ruled, that despite being used as evidence, the Dash Cam DVDs will be considered as public records which are subject to FOIA requests.

That is a big win for Wolfgang Halbig, who has informed me today that he will immediately FOIA request all of the Dash Cam video from every single CT State Police Officer that responded to the scene. I have, in fact, already received a copy of that FOIA Request.

Christine Plourde goes on to contend that the State is not in possession of any Official Newtown Police Department report. Indeed, it has become apparent by this point, that there is no Newtown Police Report, which sort of blows my mind.

She claims that the Officer Statements are “signed witness statements”, which are defined in their own redaction codes as exempt from FOIA. The problem here, as we saw from the testimony of Lt Vanghele, is that the Officer statements do not fall into that category. First of all, they are NOT signed. It is my belief that case law history will also reveal that Police Officers, while acting in their course of duty, cannot be considered as “witnesses”.

Like Lt Vanghele, Christine Plourde has also perjured herself by stating that “signed witness statements” were included in the Ct State Police Report. If they were submitted electronically, via thumb drives, it would be impossible for them to be signed, witnessed and notarized.

In summary, this was a big win for Wolfgang and Co. on many levels!! Perpetua intends to rule that the Dash Cam DVDs are indeed public record. They will be ordered to release those records. Police statements being viewed as witness statements requires further review. He gave the parties two weeks to research case law to determine the legality of those assertions, and already Wolfgang has found supporting documents that affirm the belief that police statements are a matter of public record and are indeed in a separate classification than witness statements.

It also becomes apparent by the testimony of the witnesses, the obfuscation by the State, and even the demeanor of the participants, that the State of CT does NOT want the details of the Sandy Hook incident revealed to the public. We can assume that if indeed Perpetua rules that the Officers Statements be released to Halbig, that the State will once again appeal that decision as they did with the Hartford Courant case.

It is important to note that the FOIA Laws and the FOIA Commission are an integral part of an open democracy. The people have a right to know about the behaviors and possible misconduct of public employees. These are the people work for US!!

I commend Wolfgang for continuing his quest and hope that he is encouraged by the most recent findings. We will await the Commission Hearing Officer’s ruling with optimism despite the most likely reaction of an appeal by the State. They continue to try to keep the lid on any factual evidence. It is our responsibility to continue to ask WHY?

Leave a Reply

88 thought on “Wolfgang Halbig Notches Win in Sandy Hook FOIA Fight”
  1. Kudus to Tony for this article. It is an excellent, concise summary of a very important case. Again it’s interesting to find Monte Frank, the head of the Connecticut State Bar Association, in his lawyer role at a lowly FOIA hearing. It is rather amazing that he finds it necessary to try to obstruct the release of what should be public records. It smacks of corruption and makes people think they have something BIG to hide. And the fact that the Newtown Police Dept. did not even file a report should make every citizen of the town question what those officers actually did that day.

    Their township was recently rocked to find that police Dispatcher Jason Chickos and Sgt. Steven Santucci were involved in a wide-spread Connecticut drug trafficking ring that pulled off some of its purchases and exchanges right at the police department. The Newtown Patch even named Santucci as the head of this drug ring. Of course the police chief and other Newtown officers condemn Santucci actions and deny knowing anything, but then if that’s true, then one would have to question the competency of Kehoe and the entire department. As an onlooker, I must say that if anything similar happened in my city, people would demanding answers and likely resignations.

    An interesting side note is that there was no response listed for the Sandy Hook fire station that day, either, even though one of their fire trucks responded to the school parking lot where they set up a triage area. and volunteers were videotaped on scene at the triage area and firehouse for the entire day. http://imgur.com/F00oZxR

    Between the police and fire recording, and reluctance to release any information, even that which should not have any effect on the families psyche, one might get the idea that that nothing that really happened that day.

    1. NO Connecticut attorneys willing to take Wolf under their pro bono wing? Attorneys, just like journalism professors, are apparently NOT entitled to freedom of speech.

    2. Were Chickos and Santucci momentarily pulled aside and named as drug distributors as a means to get them out of the cauldron momentarily? Are they hot for other reasons? Have they been formally charged, or are they being used as distractions for this SH event?

      1. Good insight, Gil Favor. Your idea seems quite plausible to me. That is exactly how people are used in these hoaxes. It is just a big game of distraction and diversion. Same goes for these lawsuits against the firearms manufacturers. There is quite a bit of buzz in the news at first but then it fades into oblivion and we never find out how the matter played out.

        I would say that in this particular case, we are supposed to get the message that the Ct. state and local law enforcement apparatus is objectively carrying out law and order procedures most objectively and are not at all influenced by the Sandy Hook event and its aftermath. Business as usual – all fair and honest and open and balanced as ever.

  2. The Ct. Dept. of Public Safety was described on a recent Real Deal show as sort of the main “big brother” agency of all Ct. state agencies.

    All of this reminds me of the reports that filed instead of legal autopsy reports in connection with the Sandy Hook victims.

    The Ct. state obfuscators do a similar shell game regarding forms, names and dates of different forms and who signed the official reports regarding autopsies.

    See my comment…


    dachsielady says:
    February 6, 2016 at 1:44 PM


    By the way, I understand the penalty for “tampering with a government document” is a felony punishable by up to 20 years in prison and $10,000 in fines.
    Just for the record, Wayne the Liar’s main lie was…

    Carver: I only did 7 of the autopsies. ”
    http://www.whatthefolly.com/2012/12/23/transcript-press-briefing-remarks-by-connecticuts-chief-medical-examiner-on-the-newtown-shooting-victims/ )
    There were no “autopsies.”
    According to Louis G. Rinaldi, a Connecticut Medical Agency government official quoted (39:47 on video) in a report by Allen Powell in
    The Real Deal Episode 149
    The Connecticut Department of Public Safety report ( 43:10 on video )
    that falsely stated
    “received 26 autopsies”
    The Real Deal Ep # 149 Wayne Carver / Attacks on Sandy Hook Research
    MBC Official Backup Channel ,
    there were only
    “External Post-Mortem Medical Examination” reports

  3. “Wolfgang’s experience as a National Safety consultant grants him a standing in the pursuit of these records as it could aid him professionally in understanding the incident and in making recommendations for future safety considerations.”

    Of course, the whole point o the obfuscation is that TPTB do not want a “lone wolf” poking holes in the patently absurd tale that is the Sandy Hook Massacre.

  4. “Evidence” , like Bldg 7, must be removed before execution. I think this says that the case is not closed. As Jade Helm Masters of the Human Domain show us day after day, the information is bogus and evidence witness sequestration. I would not be surprised that they are still tweaking the ‘official documents’ and that this is a breathing operation as of this date.

    It may be the efforts of Wolf and Kay that are assisting them in actually creating and tweaking the official documents. Kay should not be surprised to see lawyer games and we all really know that the whole feudal legal system is a sham. The 911, 28 pages is another fabricated piece of disclosure that I believe to be a red herring. Now Apple/FBI and Scalia are being run through the gauntlet.

    Do you think the FBI wanting to get the evidence off the iPhone is for discovery? I suggest it is for National Security of the Criminal Mafia we call Government.

    1. Ted, Connecticut is nothing but up to their necks in this mega-morass called Sandy Hook. This state knows through and through that they are going to be tested severely by some very persistent people. Sandy Hook is one of the very strong linch pins that this crooked government slime factory does not want unraveled, they will do anything to keep that disclosure from happening.
      Indeed, the opponents of disclosure are watching Kay and Wolf and adjusting their strategy thereof, this is no surprise. Of course, a decision in favor of disclosure will be met with still another higher court appeal that could take considerable time to bring to docket. Higher stakes, bigger lawyers, promise of financial payoffs will bring out some heavy hitters against our Kay Wilson. They can outspend Wolf pretty easily and promise fat bonuses for “meritorious service” to their legal eagles. If so, this has to be brought to the court of the people, public media, inclusively. If Wolf can convince some media of the merits of his case, who knows?, some Conn. media might hop aboard the Wolf Express. The Journal Advertiser and their chief editor, Chris Powell, could jump aboard and help greatly on this issue. Chris knows the ropes and he knows his neck could be stretched by said ropes, so he’s tried to keep a profile as low as possible without totally giving up the chase on many issues of the day.
      Complicit Connecticut has very, very dirty paws on this matter. We need to support Dr. Tracy and Wolf and try to keep this nation from going bottoms-up. It’s literally our second Revolutionary War and we cannot, we must not, allow this nation to be swallowed up by tyranny.

      Time to buck up, one and all…..

  5. Reblogged this on COALITION OF THE OBVIOUS and commented:

    “Evidence” , like Bldg 7, must be removed before execution. I think this says that the case is not closed. As Jade Helm Masters of the Human Domain show us day after day, the information is bogus and evidence witness sequestration. I would not be surprised that they are still tweaking the ‘official documents’ and that this is a breathing operation as of this date.

    It may be the efforts of Wolf and Kay that are assisting them in actually creating and tweaking the official documents. Kay should not be surprised to see lawyer games and we all really know that the whole feudal legal system is a sham. The 911, 28 pages is another fabricated piece of disclosure that I believe to be a red herring. Now Apple/FBI and Scalia are being run through the gauntlet.

    Do you think the FBI wanting to get the evidence off the iPhone is for discovery? I suggest it is for National Security of the Criminal Mafia we call Government.

  6. How much power does Vincent Perpetua have? I see he is an attorney but referred to as “your honor”. If the state was really trying to cover something up, why would they not put the same person in the hearing? (like Streeter?) Does this type of hearing have to follow same protocol as a real courtroom?

    1. FOIA or “open records reqiests” hearings are part of “administrative law” and there are “administrative law judges” (ALJ) who work within each of the major state agencies that conduct these hearings. The Connecticut Administrative Code is probably where you will find the rules and regulations of Ct. Administrative “laws”.

      When a citizen has some kind of issue with a state agency, they have to first go through one of these administrative “courts” or hearings and then, if they are not satisfied, they can file a lawsuit against the agency in I think state District Court.

      My experience is that these hearings are pretty much a joke. Often agencies will have a room that looks a lot like a real court room and the ALJ will reside in a seat and podium that is above the rest of the people in the room. The ALJs are totally under the rule of the head of the agency, the “front office” and if the agency head happens to be a statewide elected position and is heavily dependent on keeping moneyed corporate interests and campaign donors happy, the ALJ will be told how to rule in the case. For most of the cases, it is some poor ignorant person who could not afford an attorney to carry their complaint through the whole process and the person just shows up and is summarily ruled against. He probably spent close to his last dime just catching public transportation to travel to the hearing. The ALJ does not have to get orders on how to rule on these majority kinds of cases. In other kinds of instances if a big money case is under consideration, the ALJ can rule for the complainant, or whatever you call them, as a payback for a big “favor” the complainant has given to the agency head or who promises to give in the near future to the agency head, or conversely, the ALJ can rule against the complainant as payback, to get back at, the complainant for displeasing the powerful politico agency head. (The books are kept and the chits are counted.)

      Because the subject of Halbig’s case is so extremely important to the top levels of Ct. and federal government, they will send in their top honcho legal clowns to deal with this ostensibly low-level administrative law case.

      Whatever we see and witness in coverage of these Halbig / Sandy Hook hearings, be assured that we are witnessing a major travesty of injustice to the citizens.

    2. “if the state was really trying to cover something up”?. Shirley you jest. The state of Connecticut has tried to cover Sandy Hook up since before the event! They have no desire to litigate in good faith, it’s painfully clear. They are dirty from top to bottom.
      I’m sure the state would be more than ecstatic to provide you with the answer why Matthew Streeter is not administering his frontier justice during this last hearing.

  7. Thank you Tony for this excellent summary, to Wolfgang Halbig for his stamina and to Kay Wilson for her diligence.

    pixxistix46 comments:
    “Between the police and fire recording, and reluctance to release any information, even that which should not have any effect on the families psyche, one might get the idea that that nothing that really happened that day.”

    That’s right, no murders happened on that day in Newtown where Sandy Hook is located. Not on that day and not during all of 2012.


    The link shows murders in Newtown from 2000 through 2012. Only one murder is listed in that time span – in 2010. However, the murder did not take place in 2010. It just so happens that in 2010 the remains of a murder victim 26 years prior were discovered. So they do keep records.


    “Twenty-six years later, on April 14, 2010, a doctor and his son were renovating an apartment in a barn that Heath used to own on Poverty Hollow Road in Newtown. The doctor’s son pulled some bedding and a bone out of a cistern in the floor. His father noticed that the bone looked like a small, human femur, the warrant states. They called police.”

    Fortunately for former Newtown police chief Michael Kehoe who retired last month, he can start his consulting business a safe distance away from courtrooms and consult his clients in the art of obfuscation.

  8. A glimpse into one of Victor R. Perpetua’s past FOIA hearings. Hopefully this won’t matter, but Perpetua is a democrat.


    “The grievance is public, the evidence is public, but bizarrely the end result is not,” Victor R. Perpetua, the commission’s lawyer, told the justices during oral arguments. His remarks echoed a complaint the faculty union made to UConn’s senior administration.

  9. Thanks for a detailed account of a hearing that was difficult to follow due to all of the obfuscation and contradiction by the Connecticut team. Wolf & Wilson deserve applause and thanks – and donations, too.

    1. I couldn’t hear them well.. But always arguing precedent is the course to take; IOWs, on camera the so-called judge would find it difficult to disavow state precedent, [if he knew what it was.] And if he had tried. She should’ve/ could have requested the case number and date when it formally changed. It is always rather obvious that lawyers really do not know how to substantiate sound cases for ‘justice’. (Apparently Mr. Barry found it all amusing. Which is quite telling.)

      1. Our state or just ruled, dash-cams are NOT in the public domain. I find much of this due to not comprehending what this technology has done to us, just arguing over dash-cams is absurd! [to where we are!] Also this level of collusion would be impossible if computers had not normalized an transformed — legal procedures and signed statements by cops. But they really aren’t public servants anymore, are they?(Bogus copy-wright “infringements” is another tactic this technology is perfect for, and the most egregious.)

        1. Damn like button. What is copy-wright anyways Mrs. Graduate? Are you trying to evoke Orville somehow? Or does sociology not require English 1a at Kaplan anymore?

  10. Very nicely done. It may be true that there are no Newtown reports. Drills don’t require them.

    If it gets that far, what might prove interesting is what the State’s attorney will have to say about that “report”. It has already been established that the dash cam videos from the cruisers don’t follow the written narrative.

    I’m thinking of the long-awaited report and the mishmash of redacted junk, complete with timelines of what officers were where. Now we are basically being told that Newtown didn’t file any reports, even as the alleged “first responders”, and that their contribution amounted to “witness statements”.

    My prediction is that it will end in an appeal that will be dragged out until my clothes go out of style. Unless I miss my bet, it will never end up in a court that has justice in mind.

    I am happy that these things prove embarrassing for them. As you say, if these events happened as described, why not simply supply the proof?

    As you well know, one has to be careful when requesting documents. Obviously, if they do not exist, they don’t have to supply them. Even if, logically, they should. So, as an example, when they asked for the signed (accepted) maintenance records and they said that they didn’t have any, they may not have been lying.

    I’m frankly surprised by his ruling on the videos. That was a better objection (that there was a case pending…), than the issue of “witness statements”. That one sounds like the State’s attorney got out his “Weasel Dictionary” and decided to get creative.

    I enjoyed the summary. It’s fun to imagine Monte in his Teletubby outfit jumping up and down.

      1. The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012 legalizing propaganda, I think, protects the media from lawsuits, criminal prosecutions, etc. but I wonder if it applies to these CT politicos? The Gov., this atty, State Police, etc.?

        1. Marv, I’m afraid we’ll never find out. In theory, yes, lying to us is not illegal. Now, collecting funds under false pretenses, falsifying public records, (need I go on?), may be another matter.

          Once you think you have “the matter”, finding someone to prosecute or an honest venue for a hearing may be difficult. Look at who’s involved here.

          As to the “evidence”, the one thing it won’t stand is scrutiny. Therefore, the less of it there is to scrutinize, the less explaining someone has to do.

          They may be “CT politicos”, but they danced to a federal jig. They will never admit any of this, nor will any MSM publication publicize it. None of the players have anything to gain by the exposure.

    1. Lophatt, I would like to see Monte in that ridiculous get-up too! I can’t explain it exactly, but the first time I laid eyes on a photo of him – and it was in that outfit – I got the distinct impression I was looking at a closet girly-man and maybe even worse…like a closet pedo. In fact, I’ve gotten that impression about a lot of the people involved in this sordid affair. My senses have long told me there is a secret group/society or cult of some kind at work here.

      1. I agree totally. He reminded me of a deranged “Jiminy Cricket”, with an attitude developed by years of finding himself duct-taped to trees by those who became annoyed with him.

        I too think there are cults at work here. They probably dress him up in a devil costume for their shindigs and he runs around with playing “odds and ends” with a little pitchfork.

    2. I’ve had this recurring nightmare that Obama will pardon those Sandy Hook participants who aided these deceptions if the pressure and truth gets too dangerous for him to handle and the American public are demanding the truth. The Liar in Chief will rightly earn his legacy then, that of being the worst liar in our history.
      I want to see those traitors squirm when the headlock of truth is applied to their scrawny necks. I’m tired of those liars who make a mockery of the nation. This business of missing reports is a constant thread shared by what appears to be all those complicit in this major crime of deception. Remember the building superintendent who never made reports to get jobs done or reports summarizing what was done to the shabby building called Sandy Hook school? There are no reports because this scam is clearly a diaphanous attack on democracy and truth. The first book written on this subject of SH justice should be called Perjury Aplenty: Lies from the Nutmeg State. Those who live in Connecticut rightfully deserve justice and there’s a lot of mighty dirty folks who took part in this scam of scams. Indeed, “this house will fall”.

    1. Hey, how’s this working for you, dachsielady?

      If it’s not working, it might not be wordpress, but it might be your email settings. Do you think the emails are still going to junk?

      What email application do you use? I would check junk mail rules and “block sender” rules, both usually under the Tools menu. Make sure you have no rules set up.

      1. Everything is working correctly now and I am receiving email notifications. The problem was because of hacking and my overtrusting nature at times. It had to be ultimately fixed, not by my following the WordPress forum’s many suggestions which I did, but by someone just doing what I asked them to do — to just go into my account and fix it.

        Thanks for asking, Toni.

  11. What a coincidence – the same day our city was supposed to have a “tornado drill” (I can’t recall if we ever had one before), we have a tornado watch in progress! How bloody convenient! I bet those selfies that they requested everyone take of themselves “sheltering” will be really dramatic now! Not that I’m paranoid or anything… 🙂

  12. Attorney L. Kay Wilson, and Professional School Safety Consultant Wolfgang Halbig are certainly facing a goliath. Fortunately, they have a huge advantage on their side, and that is truth. The tapestry of lies created prior to, during, and after the events of 12/14/12 have been completely unraveled by the tenacious efforts of so many who refuse to let this stand.

    I am sending these amazing FOIA courtroom tapes to be viewed by my daughter, because Attorney Wilson is the role model I want her to follow. Wolf was wonderfully self-restrained yet a vital presence in the courtroom. He has the facts and evidence down cold. What a team! These two give me faith and hope in a dreary world of deception and apathy.

    In the end, I think the true events will come to light, as so many participants will relish the opportunity to come forward once it is mandated to do so by further actions and depositions. Wolf is building a powerful case in a public setting, and as he has stated, “This house will fall.”

    1. Kay and Wolf may well have the truth, but truth can only bring us so far. Look at the “truth” relating to the Hillary Clinton campaign. She’s up against the wall dead to rights yet we all fear the AG will not press charges due to Obama’s meddling. Imagine, here we have massive reams of truth yet it certainly appears that all this grandstanding will net us no fish….so much for the truth when the cabal is involved.

      1. Gil, if we focus on the forest, rather than the trees, we see that Ms. Clinton is being bested in her quest for the presidency by an elderly eccentric Jew. Although she went into this campaign with big money and big Washington propelling her towards the Whitehouse, it is doubtful that anything can save her now.

        Charges or no, the diligent efforts by the Congressional Benghazi Investigation, headed by Trey Gowdy, have brought out several shocking collateral truths. Even before the release of what will surely be a very damning report, her constituency is disgusted that she took over $600,000 for three speeches to the big banks, and claimed to be beyond their influence. She’s done – thank God.

        1. Don’t get yer hopes up too high. Yeah, I’m hopeful that the Witch gets her just desserts hard and fast, too, but I retain memories of a story about having to drive a wooden stake through a certain leathery heart. Why does slime run for president, anyway?

  13. Reblogged this on Fellowship of the Minds and commented:

    Outstanding description by Tony Mead of what transpired at Wolfgang Halbig’s Connecticut FOI Commission hearing on Feb. 18. Here’s the takeaway summary: “As one observes the blatant attempts by the State to confuse, obfuscate and delay the release of these documents, it becomes apparent to even the least informed that they obviously have something to hide. There is no justification for the continued efforts to delay the inevitable. If the Sandy Hook incident is a genuine mass murder, why not simply provide Wolfgang with the proof and have him move on? It should really be just that simple!”

  14. I wonder if the Sandy Hook fraud has anyone culpable? The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012 makes propaganda perfectly legal. After all, no one was hurt or killed, and if the atty’s are careful no one commits perjury. The whole episode was to lobby for gun control – an innocent political stunt!! With the noble motivation to save lives on the streets of America’s cities. Collecting all the money is fraud? or is it? Perhaps the dollars were political contributions to the life saving cause? And, we tolerate lying as a matter of course, now. It’s done before Congress and no one blinks. Oath? What was that? Quaint concept from another age!

    1. The Smith-Mundt modernization Act was passed as part of the National Defense Authorization Act [NDAA 2013] HR 4310, and signed by Obama on 12/29/2012, just two weeks after Sandy Hook. The Act makes clear that it would not go into effect until 180 days after it was enacted, and it also states that it does not protect material produced prior to its enactment.

      Therefore, the Sandy Hook event was staged prior to the legalization of domestic propaganda.


      1. Your point is well taken, Sandy, but I do not think it is the Smith-Mundt act that applies to Sandy Hook event even it had gone into immediate effect.

        I have wanted to research exactly what law it is that prohibits the US GOVERNMENT from using propaganda on the U S public. I have not done the research yet but as far as what applies at Sandy Hook, there are STATE whistle blower laws that could allow the MEDIA to use propaganda on the public, but this has nothing to do with the GOVERNMENT using the propaganda.

        See the article posted by

        “stlonginus says:
        February 17, 2016 at 10:07 AM
        These young people are on the edge but haven’t yet fully comprehended that the media’s true purpose is to propagandize the public. Not too many years ago, even the 9 in the Saturnalia robes (aka the Supremes) rendered a decision (aka ‘the reveal’) stating the media doesn’t have to tell the truth. Need we know anything more?

        I still suspect there are other federal laws that allow government lies to the public but I have a feeling it would be a tedious search involving several different laws.

        We have several government officials, including Dr. Wayne Carver, clearly lying on the record. He said in a press conference briefing on December 15, 2012…

        Carver: I only did 7 of the autopsies.

        We need to see the regular, usual and customary, official written reports of those autopsies. We do not have them and searches for verification that autopsies were actually performed by Dr. Carver as he claimed, on the record, are nowhere to be found. As far as I know there have been no official records requests on this matter such as those done by Wolfgang Halbig.

        We have to prove that Dr. Carver was lying and I think it would be fun to have a FOIA inquiry on this and see the retired medical examiner tap dance along with the other dissemblers at the Connecticut Department of Public Safety. They would have to say why the forms, the actual medical descriptions and signatures of the M.D. of the autiopsy, legally cannot be provided or that will have to falsify an autopsy report. It would be helpful to know what the usual, before Sandy Hook, official autopsy report looked like in Connecticut.

        Also we have to realize that legally, propaganda and “lying” may have different defintiions.

        In any event the media is a dead dog — period. And good luck with suing the U.S. Government for lying.

    2. I think Marvin has hit the nail on the head here. IF government is cornered and the evidence is overwhelming, there is still vulnerability that can be tagged onto the government and fraud in infinite variety is clearly a viable attack point. Where are laws that allow for infinite redaction, for refusal to follow government’s own laws like FOIA courts? Obviously, the sheer volume of lies and distortions would take vast amounts of time to clarify and by then, the US will be gun-less. I always felt the the citizenry was the key linchpin in this case and still, few people have any desire to study, learn, and make analytical judgment related to this mobbed-up case.
      The court of the common man is plenty powerful if utilized well and correctly. Just takes money and the bully pulpit, it’s always that way.
      We’ve already seen massive attacks on Trump, obviously by propaganda divisions of both parties and other agencies throughout the world. Trump is dangerous but in massive amounts of danger. He faces the syndicates and that is anything but easy. So, what do we expect, then, from presentation of the truth? Truth can only bring us so far, the rest is some nasty bull work. If we fail, America fails.

    3. I doubt that propaganda and lies are exact synonyms. If propaganda is legal, are propagandistic lies also legal? I have to doubt that. Are lies ever sanctioned and protected?

    4. It almost appears that the people on the culpability side of the equation feel they are somehow protected from prosecutorial reach. Malloy and Carver show this by their relatively cavalier attitudes toward potential prosecution, they seem to feel they have been granted protected status.

  15. It did not post it under my other comment..? Our state just ruled dash-cams are NOT in the public domain. I find this absurd arguing over dash-cams. This technology has brought this new brand of collusion on. Legal procedures and cops signed statements on computers is quite dubious to say the least. AND these bogus copy-wright “infringements” are a result of this technology, and probably the most egregious in the long run. (The courts have always been corrupt.) White people are just figuring it out now. I know how this reads, very terse and flat. But I am qualified to say that as a post graduate-level sociology teacher.

  16. I find this all rather trite, but it was legal information and sociologically relevant.. but no surprise! (If I retype it it apparently won’t appear.)

    1. Thanks to “Cinderella” for finding the link below – a true gem. The former Roberts Avenue School in Danbury, CT appears to be a good prospect of current excellent education for well to do tykes.

      Chuckle of the day, courtesy of: Encyclopedia of USA Schools. Find Schools in USA, School ranking, review, football and Fees.


      “The inspection of ROBERTS AVENUE SCHOOL was carried. The inspection for ROBERTS AVENUE SCHOOL ofsted report was carried out by one of Her Majesty’s Inspectors and one additional inspector. Overall Effectiveness Ofsted Report Card of ROBERTS AVENUE SCHOOL is 1”

      Sir Michael Wilshaw, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education


      1. http://www.stuartfoundation.org/Files/UKInspections-RELEASED.pdf

        Elbridge A. Stuart, founder of the Carnation Company (since bought by Nestle), established the Elbridge Stuart Foundation in 1937.

        What does all this mean? I smell Common Core through and through. Common Core being the global education goal of the ubermeisters at UN. They use different avenues such as foundations to get footholds in the classroom doors. The road to 2030 Agenda is being paved with change agents educated from pre-kindergarten. Reading all the pages in the Stuart Foundation link confirms that officials here are working hand in hand with their counterparts in UK. We are being “Ofsteded” with blessings and orders from UN and the Crown.

        Excerpt from the Stuart Foundation link:
        School Quality Reviews
        In 2006, New York City contracted with the British based company Cambridge Education to design and conduct onsite School Quality Reviews as a component of the district’s accountability system. The reviews rely on multi-day site visits that resemble Ofsted-style inspections in certain ways, and the first round was conducted by former British headmasters the company brought to the United States. However, rather than judging a school’s “overall effectiveness” as does Ofsted, New York City focuses much more narrowly on whether schools are implementing a recommended school improvement process. The major areas of the grading rubric reflect that orientation (“gather and analyze data,” “plan and set goals,” “align capacity building,” “monitor and revise”) as do the grades given to schools (“well developed,” “proficient,” “developing,” “underdeveloped”). In 2009, Charlotte-Mecklenburg School District in North Carolina also enlisted Cambridge Education to help design and conduct school quality reviews. Those reviews bore a closer resemblance to English inspections, but the district stopped them last year amid budget cuts.

        1. Yes! Common Core is international (see Bill Gates’ Cooperation Agreement with the UN). No doubt about it.

          I’ve got loads of documentation on my computer (which is currently on the fritz). Anyone interested in this should check out InvisibleSerfsCollar.com blog. Robin Eubanks has got the goods on Common Core like no other.

        2. Yes, Robin Eubanks has done immense work exposing the Common Core agenda. Charlotte Iserbyt is right behind her.

          The funny thing about Roberts Avenue School in Danbury, built in 1953 and torn down in 2009, is that it’s being promoted by Chinese sources as an excellent choice for educating little spoiled, international soon to be trust fund recipients. Even given a 1 by Her Majesty’s inspectors.

          The school that replaced Roberts Avenue School has lofty international goals, but is not in the trust fund league – Western Connecticut Academy for International Studies K-12.

  17. Once again – Halbig sticks out to me as colluding with the state.

    Why? Because his entire FOIA presentation has resulted in one conclusion: NPD Lt. Vanghele’s report was not signed, and therefore is not valid.

    Why does this matter? Because Vanghele’s report is one of the most damning. It contradicts the state’s official story on many, many points. It raises damning questions about Champan. It raises damning questions about the state police allowing the road to be blocked. It raises damning questions about the absence of ambulances, and about police on scene demanding ambulances–even though the official story would claim none were needed.

    It raises damning questions as to how bleeding children were transported from the scene.

    As a whole, Vanghele’s report is one, big damn.

    But wait – Halbig has made sure everyone now knows this particular report is total junk.

    Shaking my damn head, once again.

    You’re good Sed, I’ll give you that. But check out the story of Dovey J. Roundtree as an example of why you won’t win, in the end.

    1. Very interesting insight, Zephr.

      The end result of Halbig’s efforts is that the one record that would substantiate suspicions of a big lie event has to be thrown out.

      It reminds me of my suspicions of “The Jersey Girls”, Kristin Breitweiser and three other women who campaigned widely and publicly to have there be a 9-11 Commission. These women claimed to have lost their husbands in the Twin Towers on 9-11 and they wanted their legitimate questions answered as to what really happened. Then these courageous women after much stuggle succeeded in getting a 9-11 Commission. So the end result was a total farce fake “full investigation” to settle once and for all what actually happened on 9-11, courtesy of dual citizen Phillip Zelikow et al. That Commission apparently perfectly satisfied and answered all these brave women’s questions and almost nothing was heard from any of them in the media after that act of the play.

      I recall that there was some group of people who approached Dr. Tracy and wanted to become somehow involved with or “help” Dr. Tracy on his MHB endeavors. Dr. Tracy had reason not to trust this group of people and rejected their offer but the MHB article said that Wolfgang Halbig did accept the offer of help from the exact same group of people and apparently that group of people has money power that would seemingly translate to control of Halbig’s efforts. I never have much luck in using the search engine on MHB but the info I have just conveyed was in an article or the preface to the article and it was written by Dr. Tracy. It was not in the comments section.

      I really would like to maintain a high opinion of Wolfgang Halbig and still do. However, what Zephr states is just the kind of insight that we must be truthful enough to state and explore.

      The FOIA hearings have been valuable because we see how the government liars attempt to lie and dance around questions and Kay Wilson is giving a good show of at least appearing to be asking some real hardball questions.

      It all is a better searching for and exposure of truth.

      1. My problem with Wolf is his “expert” background.

        He did put on a few anti-bullying seminars, and (if I remember right)) the funding for those was federal (think Common Core). In our schools here, those same anti-bullying campaigns were led by rank amateurs. I could find nothing in Wolf’s background to qualify him as an expert in anything.

        I think of Wolf as a less-slick Richard Grove (of Tragedy & Hope Communications). I think that both are self-promoting charlatans.

        Just my opinion.

        1. Right now, I am moving to the position that WH started out sincere but may have along the way become affiliated with people who came around and said they wanted to help him with his mission, especially by providing him financial backing. I could be still off base and he may have been a purchased project from the beginning but right now I want to give him the benefit of the doubt. If what I am thinking may have happened to him is true, he was obligated to quit and not choose to continue playing the role of their puppet.

          I always hated it when someone would introduce all of WH’s specialized background experience and they would say he had been a school principal. That would be something I would have to see concretely verified. If there is no proof for that, that info ought to be dropped – probably should be dropped anyway. It’s just too hard to swallow.

          Then may be these helper people came to control the policy and direction of WH’s program or project because they were the money men who kept the project afloat. And WH just was the front man, the personality to be interviewed but someone else was controlling.

          You will notice that WH has has made few appeals for donations for at least the last six months. Oh, he still has a donation button on his site and he may, sometimes, briefly make an appeal on a radio interview but he has basically stopped doing that, and yet he is able to keep having one or more attorneys and to make frequent plane trips to Ct.

          I wish someone could find the words of Dr. Tracy I referred to in my previous posting. I have searched but no luck so far. I believe it was in the first 6 months of 2015 that it was the intro to a new article posted. I know Dr. Tracy wrote the into but not sure if he authored the actual article.

          I know that for many years the pattern has been that people who are doing their own little truth seeking projects and the project gains some traction with the public that some people will contact them, sort of from out of the blue, and want to “help” in various ways such as doing volunteer work or offering some fund raising help – whatever. At first it seems so kind and friendly and benign, so that let the person or persons closer in to the inner workings of their project and then something bad happens to cause serious injury to the project or the project just fizzles out or, in recent cases related to these many false events, the project will kept going for years and be well funded continually from unknown sources.

        2. I know exactly what you’re talking about, Dach, but FINDING the article in question is another thing…I don’t have much luck searching, either. But I’ll help you look.

          A while back (2013, maybe?) the comment section went crazy with people either defending or tearing Wolfgang to shreds; I didn’t think then–nor do I think now–that either position was justified by available evidence. The little bit that I know of him doesn’t prove he’s a crook, it only proves that he has been up-selling himself. That up-selling is what makes him a charlatan in my mind, but it doesn’t necessarily make him a fraud (or worse).

          That said, the scenario you posit is a good one (and based on evidence we DO know for a fact): Halbig, who fancies himself something of an expert in the field, speaks up to the only community who will listen to him (Truthers) about flaws he sees in Sandy Hook. At some point, a couple of seemingly-well-meaning people offer him their organizational/social media/legal assistance in his fight to uncover the truth, when, in fact, their motives weren’t so pure. Now, Wolfgang is acting as their pawn? With or without his knowledge, do you suppose?

          Your other observations are good ones: Wolf’s business(es) all went down the crapper when his partner quit on him, and he couldn’t have possibly garnered enough donations to cover all his attorneys’ fees and travel expenses, let alone living expenses. So where’s the money coming from?

          Anyway, I’ll help you look.

        1. “Marzi says:
          February 26, 2016 at 6:44 PM

          The Jersey Girls and Bob MacIlvaine were all furious at the phony 9/11 Commission. What planet are you on? ”

          Just because you choose to believe what the Jersey Girls and Bob MacIlvaine say is no reason to be insulting.

          I am on the same planet I think you are on and I have concrete reasons for believing otherwise.

        2. You’re defaming people you’ve never met and are not characterizing what they’ve said with any evidence. You can believe what you want but that doesn’t mean it’s true.

        1. BINGO!!!

          Thank you, Reprehensor. (long time, no see you)

          Here is the article…


          March 19, 2014
          Wolfgang’s Bad Company 381
          by MHB Administrator • Home • Tags: censorship, government conspiracy, Sandy Hook Elementary

          By James F. Tracy

          Relevant excerpt…
          “In early 2013 major and alternative news media alike were beating a path to my door. Reporters quite literally chased me around my place of employment, hoping to obtain the scoop on the “wacko” academic who might recant on his observation that the incident in Newtown was likely a big fraud. Even Anderson Cooper fussed on national television that such an individual was employed at a “taxpayer-funded” institution.

          Shortly after this flurry of attention certain parties contacted me and essentially proposed that they become my handlers. The idea was that I would be the public face of a detailed independent investigation into the Sandy Hook episode. For hours they attempted to convince me that the “Sandy Hook actors” were in fact members of the “Greenberg family clan.” They subsequently produced a professional-looking report that I was to tout.

          I became increasingly doubtful of the thesis and how it might prove productive. My suspicion turned to alarm when the parties suggested that vigilante justice be visited upon the alleged Sandy Hook perpetrators. Even worse, a website was developed for the investigation that came dangerously close in name and terminology to mirroring a federal law enforcement agency—calling itself the “US Intelligence Information Center” and using jargon such as “suspects” and “persons of interest.” The individual then proceeded to essentially speak for me, posting the report and my name to social media sites. It was at this time that I sent the following email and discontinued further communication:

          I was unaware that you posted the report on __________ and included my name and institutional affiliation. This was done without my approval, as was the posting of Sandy Hook Massacre Timeline on the website you’ve created. I am going to have to ask that things slow down and that my attorney review any further activity by you in which you use my name in any way. I also ask that you please not use my aforementioned Timeline.
          As for the name of the organization, “US Intelligence Information Center” and website http://www.sandyhookinvestigation.com/ I cannot at this time approve or lend my support. The use of the title “US Intelligence Information Center” and terms such as “Suspects” and “Persons of Interest” are tantamount to impersonating law enforcement and can likely cause a great deal of trouble for all involved.
          James Tracy

          Those in the 9/11 Truth movement are well aware of the “cognitive infiltrators” who are only too happy to harness a loose cannon or two that will sabotage or otherwise hinder the genuine remedy of collective intelligence. I am aware that at least one of the parties who misinformed me is now operating as Wofgang Halbig’s handler.

          This is unfortunate because despite Halbig’s awkwardness, the overall thrust of his inquiry—legally interrogating the officials overseeing the Sandy Hook event—is a logical next step toward better understanding what took place in Newtown fifteen months ago. Yet my previous experiences indicate that such individuals will likely proceed to lead Mr. Halbig down blind or deceiving alleys that in the end will only serve to further undermine a genuine pursuit of truth. ”

        2. Great job, Rep. I looked too, Dachsie, but I only got back to the middle of 2014 before giving up…there’s just too many posts on this blog!

    2. It would seem that IF Wolfgang Halbig is somehow “complicit”, so is Kay Wilson. She dropped out of his defense fearing for her life, then came back in. Maybe I’ve watched too many Perry Mason re-runs, it seems to me that Kay is too meek and not obnoxious enough. Is an attorney in a FOIA proceeding supposed to be cowering to a state magistrate not at the level of a “judge”?
      That said, how would the FOIA commission/coterie treat Cass Sunstein or Alan Dershowitz? With deference, with respect, with fear and trepidation, disdain?
      Thusly, although the pace of this FOIA brouhaha is painfully slow, putting Wolf on Monte Frank’s team seems a bit of a stretch. But, we’ve all been aware that it’s a bit of a worry to not become a bit paranoid, we are sensitized thanks to all the false flags and other travesties and maybe we see boogeymen beyond every foundation shrub.
      Jim Fetzer, Gordon Duff, Jim W. Dean, and many others have been called a wide variety of nefarious things from traitor to liar to showman, I see this as but a sweep in behalf of the “establishment” cabals. Lots of shills have been created over these last 15 years for the express purpose of clouding the water, fogging the air, and euthanizing the truth. Our task is not easy, separating wheat from chaff is clearly not an easy task.

    3. The official story has been sold to the public a long time ago, and I doubt anyone is going to blow this thing wide open based on Vanghele’s contradictory report. If you want to sit and wait – go ahead. Wolfgang brought this FOI challenge before the very same attorney who argued, and won, to have the 911 calls released. Yes, it appears that Perpetua is intelligent and follows the law, even when challenged by the powerful Connecticut States Attorney.

      The state of Connecticut would never encourage or collude with the actions Halbig has taken. For you to criticize this man, an equal in my opinion to the late great Jim Garrison, suggests that you are caught in a mindset of suspicion, and unable to discern genuine heroics.

      It was extremely telling that Vanghele admitted to possessing a report, only to choke and immediately re-characterize it as a ‘witness statement,’ in order to weasel out of the FOI request. His insistence that it was not signed, and even suggested that it may have been altered after he delivered the thumb drive, is clearly to set up an out for himself because it is so damning. His assertion is completely at odds with the official report. Perpetua isn’t stupid. Someone is lying. Let’s see where the briefs from both sides lead before attacking Wolf.

    4. Such angst you have for someone who is trying to get the state to release information.

      You shake your head because now you cant validate your theory with Vanghele’s testimony about not signing a statement. That is just silly. It wasn’t just Vanghele’s statement that was invalidated by his admission….as you found Zeph…it invalidated everyones statement because it looks like nobody has actual signed statments. You missed everything else that happened in this meeting????

      The woman that testified to looking for the documents said she only searched her electronic copy via word search. She also admitted that she never actually got the any signed document even though she makes a statement later that they do have them…somwhere….

      This FOIA meeting proves the state assembled a big nothing burger of a “report” that does not prove anything… How can you possibly read such a conglomeration of crap that was now proven to be treated legally with as much responsibility as traffic citation.. And conclude all Halbig did was ruin your theory?

  18. Thank you Wolfgang! I know you have gone through immense hardships while trying to investigate this staged event.

    It is mind-boggling…standing, stakeholders…yes. It would be nice if some more lawyers and and business people got into this fracas. Your careers and pay checks are worthless in a society which allows a high-school-drama-quality production to stand as fact and influence public policy.

    Do yourselves a favor and watch a film like Kanał. What would the Polish resistance against the Nazis have been without guns? The gun control push and its associated events are sheer insanity. Terrorism is a meaningless concept of the authors of the Sandy Hook event are not held accountable for terrorizing the American public.


  19. I have written extensively on a hoax in Marysville Washington that involved a school, crazed gunman, and headshot.

    I always start out with the media. In every shooting hoax I have looked into they always post the event before it happened. The minister of Grove church in Marysville proudly boasts they are second only to Sandy Hook. Second biggest school shooting hoax.

    I’m convinced the media isn’t an extension of the United States government but the other way around.

Leave a Reply