New book analyzes Paris AND San Bernadino attacks


Kevin Barrett
Veterans Today

Now available and shipping! Click here to purchase a hard copy.

Or click here to buy it on Kindle – please consider writing a thoughtful review to discourage the usual suspects from trolling the review section without even reading the book!

And as of today, We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo will also be available on Kindle

Dear VT readers,

Why wait for years to read a reasonably scholarly treatment of a major false flag event? (Or, in this case, TWO major false flag events?)

Today, the first anniversary of the Charlie Hebdo attacks, I’ve managed to publish a terrific new book on the latest big false flags…thanks to the help of 26 leading alternative analysts (and our two greatest political artists, David Dees and Anthony Freda).

You may want to purchase this book while you still can; there is no telling when it might be banned, as happened to Nobody Died at Sandy Hook.

Thank you for helping spread the truth!

Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor

PS Here is the product description:

Were the “terrorist attacks” in Paris and San Bernardino false flag operations? Most of this book’s 27 contributors say “yes.” Though the government, academy, and mainstream media are afraid to explore the evidence, these 27 leading public intellectuals – including former high-level government officials, professors, and journalists – fearlessly explain how and why our own governments are slaughtering us in horrific terror events set up to be falsely blamed on “radical Muslim” patsies.

From the Pentagon’s “Operation Gladio,” a US military program which orchestrated almost all of the high-profile “terrorist attacks” during the Cold War, to the post-9/11 era, abundant evidence indicates that most terrorism is created by governments and falsely blamed on their enemies. The motive: Roll back freedom, promote authoritarian leadership, and prepare the public for war.

In this book, former CIA counter-terrorism officers Philip Giraldi and Robert David Steele, leading economic advisor to President Reagan Paul Craig Roberts, and two dozen other top analysts question the official stories of what happened in Paris on 11/13/15 and in San Bernardino on 12/2/15.

ANOTHER French False Flag also explores such issues as:

*How do we know when an event is a false flag?
*What is the “Deep State” and how is it implicated in false flag attacks?
*Who is really behind ISIS?
*How do the shootings in Paris and San Bernardino fit into the history of false flag terrorism, from the Lavon Affair to the Gulf of Tonkin, the USS Liberty attack, Operations Northwoods and Gladio, and the series of “Islamic terror” incidents launched on 9/11/2001?
*Is there a Zionist connection?
*Are these events part of a New World Order agenda?

ANOTHER French False Flag? was published on the first anniversary of the Charlie Hebdo attacks. It follows on the heels of We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo! Free Thinkers Question the French 9/11, which garnered praise from 9/11 scholar David Ray Griffin, international law professor Richard Falk, and former Canadian Defense Minister Paul Hellyer, among other luminaries.

ANOTHER French False Flag, and We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo, have pioneered a new genre: “Open-Source Intelligence” projects that expose big false flags shortly after they happen. Why is this necessary? Normally, false flags are designed so that the Official Story is hammered deep into the public mind in the immediate aftermath of the event, when people are in a state of shock and susceptible to mass hypnosis. If critics wait too long to express a skeptical view, it will fall on deaf ears. So if we want to win the “infowar” by spreading the truth, we need to act as quickly as possible. These books do that.

ANOTHER French False Flag is a monument to free speech in a time of cowardice and censorship (especially self-censorship). Editor Kevin Barrett, who was driven out of the University of Wisconsin by Republican politicians for questioning 9/11, has been attacked indirectly by French President François Hollande in anti-conspiracy-theory tirades, and named as one of the five most dangerous “conspiracy intellectuals” in the world by Hollande’s think tank, the Jean Jaurés Institute. That hasn’t stopped Barrett from repeatedly flying to Paris to give interviews (in French) and participate in conferences in which he tells the French people that it is Hollande’s government and its foreign allies—NOT “radical Muslims”—who have been mass-murdering them in their streets, offices, stadiums, cafés and nightclubs.

As a challenge to the censors, Barrett has chosen to include a very wide range of perspectives in this book. Most readers will find something in it challenging, disagreeable, perhaps even offensive. And that is when free speech matters most. As the spurious Voltaire quote has it, “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”

ANOTHER French False Flag and its predecessor We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo are the most important books the truth movement has produced since the 2002 – 2005 period that gave us the seminal works of Thierry Meyssan, Nafeez Ahmed, David Ray Griffin, and Webster Tarpley. As former Canadian Defense Minister Paul Hellyer says, “Today’s Western governments and mainstream media are not trustworthy. If you want the truth, you need to read books like this.”

Featuring essays by Paul Craig Roberts, Alain Soral, Philip Giraldi, Stephen Lendman, Robert David Steele, Gilad Atzmon, Ken O’Keefe, James Petras, A.K. Dewdney, Imran Hosein, Zaid Hamid, Mujahid Kamran, Gearóid O Colmáin, James Tracy, Rasheed al-Hajj, Catherine Shakdam, Patrick Henningsen, Anthony Hall, Ajamu Baraka, Henry Makow, Nick Kollerstrom, Ole Dammegard, Eric Walberg, James Fetzer, Barry Kissin, Brandon Martinez, Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei; edited and introduced by Kevin Barrett, with a cover by renowned political artists David Dees and Anthony Freda

Leave a Reply

14 thought on “ANOTHER French False Flag published on Charlie Hebdo anniversary”
  1. May be interesting, BUT I would have trouble believing a former CIA person, after all I have learned about the CIA! As far as false flags, yes of coarse I believe they are false, and have been orchestrated!

    1. Agreed. There is no such thing as a “former CIA” agent, in my opinion. Paul Craig Roberts has shown his true colors as either a worthless resource for the good guys or nothing but controlled opposition. Kevin Barrett is too brainwashed or too controlled to mention jews and insists it’s all about zionism. And Veterans Today has of course given honest researchers more than a few reasons to not fully trust their material.

      For those who get too ensnared with personalities and so-called alternative news outlets, don’t get your panties in a knot. I of course know both of last year’s Paris attacks and the more recent San Bernardino stories are based on nothing but staged lies. I also see there is a good chance no one died in the Towers on September 11, 2001. When I see Kevin Barrett reinforcing lies about 3,000 killed in a recent RT interview and talking nonsense about Donald Trump being a threat to neo-cons because he might charge the perpetrators (not even those at the top of the pyramid) for the terror attacks, I have to assume there is some BS in the book. And to add “former CIA” to the list doesn’t help the book’s credibility.

      I’m sure it’s a great book in many ways, but when in the f’*k are we going to have more trustworthy, intelligent individuals speading the truth? I can’t help (and think it’s a good idea for us all) to keep in mind that there could be a deeper conspiracy at play. From my experience on this blog I know this posting might not go over well. There are deep thinkers here, but more often than not I see evidence of people stuck in another layer of propaganda. Heck, there are even those so far behind many of us that they still reference Alex Jones as a source! Haha!

      Curious to know what is in the book, but I can’t imagine it won’t contain some deliberate misdirection.

      Listing obvious controlled opposition scum such as David Ray Griffin and other shills as previous gods of truth doesn’t help either. No more making excuses for people who go against the real truth just because they aren’t mainstream and share a lot of good information!

      1. I feel ya Greg. The critical realization for me was coming to a fuller understanding of just how much deception there exists in the world we inhabit. It is similar to trying to wrap your head around just how big the known universe is. We are all deceived and deeply so, even those of us who have come to some level of awakening are still buried in deception. One critical lie is that you’re fully awake, when in reality you’ve barely even cracked an eye open, let alone gotten out of bed.

        I’m 47. Anyone born in the 60’s or younger (TV and radio have become commonplace) has been drenched with propaganda every day of their lives. So we are all stuck in different layers of propaganda. Even here @ MHB I think we’re still more spellbound than awake. That is not a criticism, it is just a reality. I’m painfully cognizant of this fact at a personal level.

        Another reality that happens is those who do speak out, are attacked not only in open, aggressive ways, but also subtle, psychological attacks. They get turned, played, deceived. What kind of person is the most effective liar? The honest, decent, sincere person who themselves has been deceived and repeats and spreads the deception as truth.

        The world is ruled by deception, hence the ‘truth’ is enemy #1. Significant resources will be expended to keep the truth hidden. Any person or group or community trying to discover the truth will be opposed. Misinformation/disinformation is a common tactic, and needs ‘agents(people)’ to spread the word. Therefor the Alt/Truth community is thick with just such agents.

        A very few sources you can trust, some sources you take with a grain of salt, and the others you ignore. I put Barret in the grain of salt category. He does some good work, just have to remember who influences him (Duff an Ex-intelligence asset, I am very wary of all ‘EX’ intelligence personnel), and his personal leanings… Muslim, academic, etc.

        1. What’s wrong with Paul Craig Roberts? Here’s a start into your awakening. I’m not sure I’ve visited the site I’m linking here before, but some good insight into the guy being a shill:

          1) Austrian Economics: the interviewer and PCR go out of their way to put in a plug for Austrian Economics…

          2) The “American Empire” myth: PCR implies that the US government is trying to maintain and expand an American Empire…

          3) The “Washington is doing all this because they’re stupid” lie: PCR attributes the US government’s recent self-defeating and outrageous behavior to simple stupidity/incompetence…

          He is a former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy.

          He is a former editor at the Wall Street Journal.

          He was the “first occupant of the William E. Simon Chair for Economic Policy at the Center for Strategic and International Studies [CSIS], then part of Georgetown University.” It’s worth noting that Georgetown is a Jesuit institution, and the Board of Trustees of CSIS includes Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski, and representatives of Exxon Mobil, Boeing, Coca Cola, AIG, GlaxoSmithKline, and Morgan Stanley (to name a few).

          Looking at the high positions this guy has held in the Washington/Wall Street Establishment, ask yourself this: “Is PCR really going against all of his lifelong associates or is he simply carrying water for them like he always has?” If you put together his background, his gang sign, and the nature of his information, what does common sense tell you?

          Found some more about shill Paul Craig Roberts on the same site:

      2. And Gilad is showing more of his true colors I always felt would come shining through as he seems to suggest that some extremely obvious hoaxes are in fact real. No longer a jew?… My ass! He has his role. And not that I can blame Gilad for this, but Trevor from Austin who was performing with him and whom I had interactions with is in full support of the Sandy Hook official script. Trevor told me after an event that he liked my question to Atzmon regarding the holohoax, but defended the sax player’s skirting around the subject.
        I have seen G.A. in Houston on a couple of occasions and he seemed more real than all other alternative personalities I’ve met over the last decade. Though I was always troubled by his insistence that activism is stupid and not worth the time. Which is odd since almost his entire audience in Houston, at least, was made up of activists.
        I recently wrote Gilad a complaint about the recent, very leftist anti-gun article on his site that pushed Sandy Hook and other fictions as being truth as the author demonized guns instead of shooting hoaxes as the problem. Atzmon was kind enough to reply to me quickly, but said he didn’t have time to mediate and would be happy to forward my e-mail to the author. It’s not as if his site has multiple postings each day that can get passed him. He clearly supported the expressed beliefs of the author of that incredibly ridiculous posting that reinforced multiple lies. And because it’s on his site he is just as guilty of spreading lies as the fool who wrote the piece.
        To include whatever crap Gilad has to say on the topic means this book is looking less and less honest before even turning a page. What a joke… Soooo many problems with just about everyone involved!
        I’m getting a serious ego over here knowing I’m more honest and/or more intelligent than all related to this book. As I’ve stated before, there is probably a lot of good information within, but that doesn’t mean the overall agenda with the publication isn’t to steer feeble minds in the wrong direction.
        I bet I’d never stand a chance as an alternative celebrity of sorts since it seems you have to be less than honest or a total fool tool to be in that realm.
        “Ex”-CIA… Haha… Along with so many other characters who support the official storyline of so many hoaxes… What a joke. A sick joke! I would never buy the book or share it with a newbie since there is plenty of material online for free to prove the events in Paris were staged hoaxes. And I can control what information I forward other than passing along the BS that must be within the book, from all I’ve seen (again I admit I have’t read the book).
        Why not include Obama’s take on it all if you’re going for a fair piece with all points of view? Hahahaha. It seems the shill factory is working overtime.

  2. Correct me if I am wrong, but didn’t France announce on or about Jan 6 of this year that some gun-wielding jihadist in a Metro station or train station had killed someone while shouting “Allah akbar” ? And now all we are hearing about is someone with a knife approaching a police station and being the one who is shot dead. Then, the Parisians are hearing that these “jihadist attacks” are some sort of “new normal”. Oh dear, is Paris normal? Was it ever just lukewarm and normal? I mean maybe under occupation by the Germans, and earlier the Prussians. But do they now submit to a more subtle fascism? Who can tell.

    1. Well, if the authors were independently wealthy, maybe they could publish it for free… but in any case, I personally don’t want to read books that are free.
      Offering me printed material for free, regardless of the topic, reminds me too much of the free propaganda provided by those cult-like religions out there, whose members knock on the door at dinner-time and anxiously try to convert me.
      If it’s well researched and well written, it’s worth paying for.

Leave a Reply