Submitted by Kevin Scott King

Oklahoma City bombing, 9/11, London 7/7 bombings, Madrid train bombings, Osama bin Laden Capture/Death, 2011 Norway Attacks, Charlie Hebdo, Boston bombing, Sandy Hook, JFK, RFK, MLK, Pearl Harbor, Lusitania, USS Maine, Gulf of Tonkin, USS Liberty, Aurora CO shooting, Charleston church shooting, Tuscon (AZ) shooting, Port Arthur, AUS, all very real illusions.

falseflagThe purpose of this article is to break down false flag events into their parts, deconstruct them. In so doing then create a template on how to study an event and determine if it is a false flag. Normally when one thinks or speaks of a false flag event they are referring to the Main Event. This presentation is about the entire operation or plan of which the Main Event is but one part.

Note: What follows is but a brief or summary of a much larger project. I am posting this to the community at large to inspire others to turn this into a full fledged project which could include a website, presentation(video), and book. Further details can be found at the end of this article.

What is a False-Flag?

What exactly is a false flag, why is it called false flag? The term false-flag is a naval term from the age of sail that refers to a ship flying the colors (flag) of a country other than the one the ship belonged. This was done for multiple reasons but a common one was to lure an enemy vessel into gun or boarding range and then at the last moment drop the false flag and run up the true colors before attacking. It was fair sport to use false flags but considered immoral/unethical to attack under one. To the point that it was never done. But that was a different age…

The simplest definition of a false-flag is an event in which the actual perpetrators and the reported or blamed perpetrators are different. The classic use of a false-flag, and hence the military origin of it’s name, goes as follows. Country A’s King wants to conquer and loot Country B’s land to enrich himself. Of course if this is what King A tells his army they may choose not to fight or revolt. Or best case their effort will be lacking. In order to get the most out of their soldiers, the commanders need them to be emotionally involved… anger, hatred, revenge. Now the skilled orator and manipulator might be able to create this mood with just words. But not many have this level of skill. It is much easier to motivate and/or raise an army if one’s country has been attacked, hence you are acting in defense. And this is where the false flag comes in. Country A’s King and its top General(s) conspire to launch an attack against itself, claiming that the attackers were from Country B. The attack needs to be big enough to create real panic and fear, and for maximum affect there needs to be real deaths. The attackers need be convincing in their role as soldiers of Country B, so clothes, uniform, weapons need to match appropriately. The likely hood of success of the attack is high since it would be unexpected or a surprise attack. Even if the attack were to technically fail, the fact alone of an attack might be enough to manipulate a response. King A could use men from within to execute the attack, or it might be better to use mercenaries. Regardless, a successful attack will incense the populace against the ‘evil’ Country B, and therefor justify an invasion.

The above is just one example, or a classic example of a false-flag. However, it is very important to understand that the false-flag event can take on countless forms. I recently read a comment where the commentator stated that because actual people died it was not a false-flag. The defining characteristic of a false-flag is not its specific type or whether or not non-actors died, or even if the event occurred at all, meaning the entire reported event is a fabrication. One defining characteristic is that the real perpetrator is never known or revealed. So the author or director/producer of the ‘production’ is unknown. The audience’s attention is locked on the stage, the villain, clearly identified through the official narrative, is known. But who are behind the curtains? When a staged play is sold as real then the actors become irrelevant, what is important is who are the Producers! Who are the people that wrote, directed, and funded the event? These are the real perpetrators, not the actors on the stage. Cui Bono?… Who Benefits?

The other defining characteristic is that the event is a catalyst for the true objectives. Thus the false-flag uses the classic Hegelian dialectic of Problem-Reaction-Solution. From the example above, the surprise attack is the ‘problem’ (a threat to personal safety), the population’s anger, fear, concern is the desired ‘reaction’, and the ‘solution’ is to invade the offender to eliminate the threat which is enabled by the populations reaction. The false-flag then is a deliberately created illusion whose purpose is create the environment in which the objective or ‘solution’ will be accepted and thus implemented.

Why use False-Flags?

As explained in the previous section the classic false-flag was used to justify an invasion of another country. But there are numerous motivations for using false-flags. Thus the false-flag event has been used throughout history to initiate change. Problem-Reaction-Solution. If the change that the leader(s) want is not going to be wanted or accepted by the population then the false-flag is an excellent tool in order enact said change. So the false-flag is a tool of manipulation(deception) to direct the opinions and actions of the populace. This problem-reaction-solution model of the false-flag is but one tool of the social engineers who are directing the actors on the world stage. While the audience, the 99.9% of the world, much more than just mere spectators, are directly affected by these ‘engineers’ from the moment of their birth until the time of their passing. They (we) are actually unknowing-unwilling participants in the machinations of the .1%.

Göring: Why, of course, the people don’t want war. Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally, the common people don’t want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship.

Gilbert: There is one difference. In a democracy the people have some say in the matter through their elected representatives, and in the United States only Congress can declare wars.

Göring: Oh, that is all well and good, but, voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.

From an interview between Gustave Gilbert, an American psychologist, and Hermann Göring during the Nuremberg Trials. Found in the book; ‘Nuremberg Diary’

Reality-based Community… “The source of the term is a quotation in an October 17, 2004, The New York Times Magazine article by writer Ron Suskind, “Faith, Certainty and the Presidency of George W. Bush,” quoting an unnamed aide to George W. Bush (later attributed to Karl Rove):

“The aide said that guys like me were “in what we call the reality-based community,” which he defined as people who “believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.” … “That’s not the way the world really works anymore,” he continued. “We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors…and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.””

On December 1st of 1942, 80+% of the US population was against getting involved in the war in Europe. FDR wanted the US to join the war, a now well established fact. So how does FDR convince the US population to participate in a war across the ocean that they do not want to be in? The US took 8 steps to incense the Japanese and encourage or force them to attack. The US had broken the diplomatic and military codes of the Japanese in the 30’s. The US knew what they were up to. The Japanese diplomats were to declare war on the morning of Dec 7 before the attack, but this meeting was intentionally delayed. Thus the claim of a ‘surprise’ attack could be maintained, and the surprise, horror, shock of the attack was used to manipulate the population into joining WWII. The Army and Naval commanders (General Walter Short and Admiral Husband Kimmel) at Pearl Harbor, who were blamed for failing to be ready and immediately dismissed, were both exonerated in ’44. Both the Navy Court and the Army Board found Washington guilty. That officials within the US Govt knew the attack was coming but failed to pass this information on to the appropriate personnel.

Proven False-Flags

*Operation Gladio
*Operation Northwoods
*Gulf of Tonkin
*Pearl Harbor

So you’re not convinced false-flags are real. Fair enough, nothing wrong with being skeptical. Let’s then look at events that have been ‘officially’ exposed. One of the most significant is Operation Gladio, for not only was it blown wide open, but it clearly demonstrates state sponsored terrorism. After WWII British MI6 and the CIA created and supported right-wing terrorist groups throughout Europe in which many innocents were killed. The purpose was to blame the terrorism on left-wing groups, using a ‘strategy of tension’, and thus gain support for more government powers. This program went on for many decades, and though officially Gladio may have shut down, it obviously continues unabated.

Iran-Contra, thought technically not a false-flag event, is absolute proof of US Government complicity in international arms sales and regime change. The Iran side involved US illegal arms sales to Iran, using Israel as an intermediary to ship the arms to Iran, in exchange for assistance in freeing of American hostages in Lebanon. Important to note that at this time Iran was considered an ‘enemy’ and officially designated a ‘State Sponsor of Terrorism’, which is deliciously ironic considering what Operation Gladio revealed. In fact the US was assisting Iraq in the ongoing Iran-Iraq War. This was during an embargo of arms sales to Iran. Some of the funds generated from these arms sales were then used to fund the Contras in Nicaragua which had been strictly prohibited by the US Congress.

Failed False-Flags

As with proven false-flags, failed attempts are just as valuable in establishing the reality of these staged events. The Reagan assassination attempt and Ukraine coup are both excellent examples. The Ukraine attempt was a failure as the primary objective was Eastern Ukraine (valuable farmland), including Crimea (where Russia’s largest Naval base is located at Sevastopol). The shoe bomber, and the underwear bomber (in which we have an expert witness, attorney Kurt Haskell, who exposed this fraud) are two other recent examples. This is an area that needs some deeper research. Failed attempts will be more easily forgotten, under reported, or unreported.

Real Terrorism / Real Death

Some terrorism is organic, meaning not state sponsored or created and controlled by the globalist. Some false-flags have real victims. Because some false-flags do not appear to have any real victims, by definition meaning there is no direct verifiable evidence of actual deaths. It is important to investigate those cases of real terrorism, and real deaths to compare to the completely staged false-flag events. Thus providing a base line to compare known verifiable events against suspected staged events. An excellent example is the Beslan School Massacre from 2004 in which Chechnya terrorists took a elementary school hostage with 1000+ hostages, and 300+ deaths. Because this played out over 3 days there is plenty of video and picture evidence as the tragedy unfolded. The short video below is ample evidence of what REAL violence, heroism, blood, anguish, and death look like.

Anatomy of the False-Flag

By breaking down the false-flag into into various components not only can we better understand how they work but why they are used. Also, by doing so it will be proven that the fingerprint(s) of false-flags clearly demonstrate a larger plan. The False-Flag uses a standard plan of action, similar to a business plan or battle plan. The purpose is to fully flesh out in writing all elements of the event. The following is a list of the different elements that make up the plan which will then be followed by a breakdown for each section.

The Event Plan by sections:

*Event Type
*Main Event
*Event Execution
*Back-up plans
*Official Narrative


The false-flag begins with an objective, a purpose, a reason for being. Sometimes the purpose is singular, but many times there are multiple purposes (which is a tell-tale sign of advanced planning, and hence further proof that a particular event is a false flag). The primary objective; eliminate an opponent, further a specific agenda (gun control), or justify war. The more sophisticated events seem to always have multiple objectives, or secondary objectives. The secondary objectives tend to be more psychological, more soft, subtle. These could include creating specific emotional responses, such as fear, anger, apathy. More specifically a public killing might be chosen in order to send a message, a warning. Which was the case in the 60’s with JFK, MLK, and RFK. Another objective of these three 60’s assassinations was the Vietnam war, which is one strong thread that links the three murders together, and the perpetrators. Another sub-objective might be to create an anger response, coupled with some patriotism to manipulate the people into accepting war. The very recent Paris Friday 13th event seems to have at least 5 objectives; justify French participating in the proxy war in Syria, strip privacy/freedom rights of the French peoples, eventual shut-down of all European borders, prevent any potential protests at the Climate Summit in Paris at the end of the month, create anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant sentiment. Long Term Planing. Many of the recent mass shooting events in the USA have at least 2 objectives; further the gun control agenda, and stir up discord among people of different races, and/or religions.


The focus of an event is that which the designers want the audiences attention focused on. This is not necessarily the event itself. It can be the victim, the perpetrator, or other elements.

9/11 the focus of the event was terrorism, hence ‘Osama bin Laden’. He was the villain. He was the reason ‘you’re either with us, or for the terrorist.’ He was the bogey man that had to be found and killed. He is what justified invading Afghanistan, and getting those poppy fields producing again. Which then led to the next bogeyman Saddam Hussein. And the invasion of Iraq. In recent shootings in America it has become painfully obviously that the focus of the events is pushing the gun control agenda.

Another part of the focus is who is the primary or intended audience? In the JFK assassination the primary audience was not the American people per se, it was the politicians and those directly involved in governance. Both at the National and International level. This was a message for the insiders… ‘This is what we’ll do to those who oppose us’. 9/11 the target audience was the American people.

Event Type

The importance of the Event Type cannot be understated. A the simplest level the Event Type determines how the objective is achieved. If it is a killing, then will it be an ‘accident’, suicide(ed), assassination, etc. Another important decision is will the operation piggy back onto a scheduled real event, or will the operation be created from scratch? Another critical decision is determining the ‘level of involvement’ for the Main Event. The level of involvement defines who are the actors and if there will be unknowing participants; victims, persons thrust into the story due to the created circumstances, and bystanders. The level of involvement can be a simple as the perpetrator and the victim, or one actor with the rest unknowing participants, or the entire event being faked. So the level of involvement is on a continuum from minimum (one actor) to maximum (all actors). From having the villain participate (Hinkley, Sirhan Sirhan), to present (Oswald, James Holmes, Tsarnaev’s brothers), to non-existent (Adam Lanza). From the victims being real (actual deaths), to fake deaths (actors), to all fabricated. It is important to avoid the stereotyping that a false-flag only follows a specific format.

A good analogy would be types of movies, which are themselves real illusions. Old school action movie where all stunts are done with real people, in a real environment, with real props. Then we have the now common scenario where it is a mix of real/live action and CG. Then the movie where all special affects and stunts are CG. And finally the fully CG or animation movie. All of these movie types are real. Each of them required real people to work on them, create them, produced them. And all of these movies are illusions. They are works of fiction. They are deliberate creations; produced, planned, directed, and acted to be recorded (filmed) and distributed to be viewed. To entertain and en-train (for movies are powerful tools for social control), and of course to make money. I can’t help but think of the movie “Wag the Dog”.

False-flags are fundamentally the same. Whether there is one actor or many. Whether there are real deaths or fake. Or whether the entire false-flag is but the news report itself (the official narrative). Each type of created illusion is real. They also are absolutely used for social control, in fact this really is their primary purpose. Problem-Reaction-Solution. With the goal being of manipulating the solution upon the greater population, thus controlling the population. Like a movie, the false-flag is a deliberately planned and executed production. It is a real illusion. A better comparison might be the stage play, since the ‘performance’ is done live, on location, with a real audience.

Eventually we come around to the question of “What is ‘real’?” It can be simply a matter of perspective. Look at it from an accident standpoint. The accident can be a mistake or it can ‘deliberate’. A classic and shall we say harmless example is from the iconic ‘Christmas Story’ movie. Where the wife ‘accidentally’ knocks over and breaks the sexy leg lamp. Of course the father suspects it was not an accident. But she feigns innocence. You could witness a deliberate accident, and depending on the circumstances and the skill of the perpetrator would swear it was a mistake. Again, the event really occurred, you were an eye witness. So it was ‘real’, but it was not a mistake, it was a deliberate illusion. And in fact you might have been selected specifically to witness the event as proof that is was a mistake since most people trust your judgment and opinion.

Which leads us the deeper issue of this project. That many of the false-flags are connected. That there is a very deep game of deception that we live within. Perpetrated in large part by the myriad of secret societies vying for power and control in the world. It is this deep game of deception that makes it difficult to analyze false-flags. Confusion, misdirection, misinformation all used to obfuscate what really happened.

Main Event

The focus of this article is on the overall plan of a false-flag event. From objective, to initial planning, on through to the cover-up. But normally when someone refers to a False-Flag they are referring to the Main Event; the hero shot, Act three… the climax. The crux of the planning will be focused on the main event. Regardless of what theory you accept as to how 9/11 was carried out, there is one absolute fact. A tremendous amount of planning was required in order to pull it off, years in advance.

It at this level that ‘The Plan’ coalesces into what exactly the performance will be. This is where the actual ‘script’ is created. The specific location is selected, the actors chosen, the spoken lines created, and the props needed. Time and date are decided. As well as how much financing will be required for a successful performance.

9/11 the main event was the falling of the twin towers. This was the climax. This was the psychological ‘shock and awe’ on the American people, which preceded the physical shock and awe that fell upon the Afghani and Iraqi peoples. It is the image of the falling tower(s) that is still used today to reinforce that fear and anger. JFK, RFK, MLK the main event was the shooting, but the murder was but one objective.


The date and time are both crucial decisions. We know for followers of the occult that dates are VERY important. See Christine Lagarde’s, IMF’s Managing Director, Magic of Number 7 speech for proof of the importance of numerology.

Jump to the :50 mark to here her talk about numerology.

The esoteric and exoteric significance of a date should be closely examined. Another important factor of date and time is how they coincide with the news cycle. Date can also be critical depending on how soon the Main Event is needed or required to take place. The date can be a deciding factor, especially if time is short, on how/where the Main Event is completed. The September 11th, 2001 attack, the date is normally shortened to 9/11 and in the USA emergency services number is 9-1-1. Therefore every time 9-1-1 or 911 is mentioned or seen it recalls 9/11, and the associated trauma. The recent Paris attacks happening on 11/13/15, which just happens to be Friday the 13th. But it appears this was predicted from the January 2015 Economist magazine (Rothschild co-owner) with two arrows with the numbers 11.5 and 11.3, the same exact 6 numbers as the date. These arrows are in front of the picture ‘La belle ferronnière’ by Leonardo da Vinci, which is found at the Louvre Museum in Paris.



Like date/time the location often is a critical part of the event. Signaling on both the esoteric and exoteric levels. The name of the location and/or city as well can also be of significant importance. Locating a shooting in a Gun Free zone, and at schools to maximize the emotional impact. The geographic location in relation to the event to send a signal. Like the Oklahoma City bombing, the center or heart of the nation, signaling the ‘heartland’ is not safe from terror. Other important factors in location is how much control can be exerted at the place, in particular control of movement of non-participants, and ingress/egress to location. It goes without saying that in 9/11 you could consider the location as the event, it certainly was the ‘star’ of the event. Both the Twin Towers and NYC.


Participants can be classified into 4 groups; Knowing-Willing, Knowing-Unwilling, Unknowing-Willing, Unknowing-Unwilling. The knowing-willing are the actors, the knowing participants. The knowing-unwilling are persons who are aware of the event before it takes place and are participating against their will. So they’ve either been tricked, blackmailed, or coerced into it. The unknowing-willing are participants thrust into the main event at the time of it’s execution and decide to fully participate, most likely unaware they are in the midst of a false-flag event. The unknowing-unwilling are participants thrust into the main event who have no idea it is staged and do not want to participate. They may simply be bystanders, they may be victims, or they may actually participate against their will. I think an interesting study of this is Wayne Carver of Sandy Hook fame. My intuition is that he was a knowing-willing participant of what he was told was a crisis training drill. At some point the drill/event went ‘live’ and he was thrust into the middle of it. At that point you could classify him as a unknowing-unwilling participant who then gives his infamous press conference and says the following;

“I hope, uhh, I hope they (referencing his medical team) and I hope uhh the people of Newtown, uhh don’t have it crash on their head later but…”

Jump to the 4:40 mark to here the above sentence.

I suspect there are much more unknowing-unwilling participants who are ‘forced’ into the drama than one would first think. Afraid to speak out, play along to get along, don’t rock the boat all factors in their complicity of silence… but Fear being the strongest motivator.


First is the perpetrator(s) to be known or unknown? If the perpetrator is to be known then he/she becomes the villain of the narrative. The lone crazy gunman or Terrorist! Focus the attention on the targeted patsy. Is the perpetrator to be feared, loathed, or possibly sympathetic? All these are taken into account based on the objective of the operation. If the perpetrator is to be unknown then do they simply not exist (as in the case of suicide by murder), or is the case that it is known there is a perpetrator but the identity is to remain secret? In some cases the psychological affect of the unknown/at large perpetrator is greater than the event(s) themselves. Such as the case with serial killers. As previously mentioned another very important aspect of the overall plan is determining what role the perpetrator (patsy) is to play in the actual main event. Is the perpetrator to play a critical role in the event execution, as in the case of Sirhan Sirhan in RFK’s assassination? Or is the patsy planted there under false pretenses; such as playing a part in a drill, or surveillance work?

Oswald knew he was set-up, and it is an established fact he was involved with intelligence services. What if the planners were hoping he would keep mum? He could claim innocence and not implicate others. But he had multiple undocumented conversations with Dallas Police Cpt Will Fritz, and two FBI agents. (Note: original notes were either destroyed or created after the interviews) So then the perpetrators knew he was going to ‘sing’, hence the need for Ruby. I’m unconvinced that Oswald played no role. Oswald fled the scene, so he knew immediately he was in possible trouble. But if his hands were clean, why flee the scene? Was he a bag man?, the person who delivered the weapon to the site? Or maybe he thought there was only one shooter, and deliberately sabotaged the event to prevent it’s success? In which case he would be very surprised that Kennedy was shot. Or possibly he was instructed to leave? Whatever his role, leaving the scene was his death knell.


Depending on the objective the victim might be the sole purpose or target of the event, or the victim(s) might just play a minor part. How the victims are treated can be critical to ascertaining if an event is a false flag. The type of victim (age, race, sex, socio-economic level) all important factors to consider, and to a large degree determined by the objective, as well as the number of victims. Will the victims be real? Or will the victims be actors? Knowing-willing fake deaths, or unknowing-unwilling real deaths? Why choose one over the other? Real deaths because of the requisite shock upon the population as a whole, and in particular as a message (warning) to opponents ‘in-the-know’. Why fake deaths? Because the fake dead don’t have any real family demanding answers! The reason the 9/11 Commission Report was created was because of persistent family members demanding an investigation, in particular the four ‘Jersey Girls’. If real children had died at Sandy Hook you would have seen numerous hysterical parents, instead we get Robbie Parker’s infamous performance. If you have never watched the below video you need only watch the first 40 seconds, pay close attention to his behavior.

Instead of angry, incensed, emotional parents who as 9/11 proved can be quite a problem. The worse the real perpetrators have to deal with is persistent investigators. On which they can hang the label ‘conspiracy theorist’ and thus the public has been conditioned to ignore, discount, or ridicule. Therefor much easier to handle the cover-up with fake deaths.


The date/time, participants, and location have been set. Now it’s time to prepare the participants and the location for the Main Event. Is the villain a MKUltra mind controlled individual? Then it needs to be determined that the appropriate level of control can be achieved and on a consistent basis. If it is to be a well scripted/acted event then the participants must practice their roles in as much of a realistic setting as possible. As for the location itself, how much preparation is needed? In the case of 9/11 a tremendous amount of preparation was required, in fact an unprecedented level of preparation. If the location needs preparation, how much can be done before the event? In particular how much can/needs to be done days/weeks/months before, and how much just prior minutes/hours. Just like a professional sporting event, or a concert, or play. The better the preparation the better the chance of success during the actual ‘performance’.

Event Execution

Putting the plan in action. Or more precisely… Showtime! This is it, all the planning and preparation come to head as the Main Event is performed. Everything is in place and simply awaits the go/no-go sign. In fact this is the most critical decision at this moment. There are multiple reasons to give the no-go signal. Non-actors in the wrong position, weather (it was raining the morning of Nov 22, 1963 in Dallas, TX. Hence the occasional umbrellas and why Jean Hill was wearing her red raincoat. If the rain had persisted a little longer, the top would have stayed on the car), equipment failure, target unavailable. It makes one wonder how many planned false-flags were given the no-go signal? A common trait of more recent events is some kind of ‘drill(s)’ occurring at the exact same time and place as the false-flag. The drill provides excellent cover to stage the event without raising suspicion. And if they don’t ‘go-live’, so a no-go, then it’s simply another preparation drill. And for those unknowing participants none the wiser as to how close they came to being thrust into a false-flag performance.


“No battle plan survives contact with the enemy.” -German military strategist Helmuth von Moltke

And thus is the case with any plan, especially the more complex. And thus all good planners therefor have back-up or contingency plans. Plan B, or C. It seems logical to assume that the more control over the participants, the less likely to have the event not go to plan. Which is a strong argument for having the 100% staged event. The classic example of the use of back-up is the JFK assassination. The plan was a single head shot from the rear, the frontal kill shot was the ‘if all else fails’ option.

Official Narrative

As much planning will go into the creation of the narrative, the ‘official story’, as the rest of the plan combined. Not only into the narrative itself but the control of the dissemination of the narrative. The narrative can include; news stories, eyewitness accounts, expert witnesses, talk show host talking points, politician’s opinions, and others. The narrative is as important as the Main Event itself. And in some cases more important. In particular if the event is rushed then the narrative may have to carry the operation. The narrative is what sets the tone, identifies the villain, the victim(s), creates the mood, and pushes the propaganda message for the event. The Official Narrative IS the event for most people, but especially consumers of the news. So it is well planned and crafted. The narrative can also be a tell-tale sign of a false-flag event.

The official narrative is much easier to push and control when the media is controlled, such as 90% of media in the US is controlled by 6 companies. And when there is no legitimate investigative journalism happening from news sources, like what is happening now in the USA.


A successful event does not guarantee overall success. Loose ends must be taken care of. Evidence destroyed, which many times is very important. Witnesses silenced (mysterious/untimely deaths). Investigators discouraged. Keeping the official narrative secure and defended can be as much work and take much more time then the entire operation up to that point. JFK and 9/11 are both excellent examples of Cover-up in action. The commitment, number of persons involved, time, media used. In JFK’s event the kill shot was suppose to be from the rear. The frontal shot created the need to suppress/cover multiple items; people hearing gun shots from the grassy knoll, the total number of shots, suppression and manipulation of the Zapruder film, use of Officer Tippit as a body double (he looked so much like JFK he was regularly teased about it). Personally I’m still amazed at the level of commitment for the JFK narrative… 50+ years later. Which also proves that there are long term plans involved and groups whose participatory members have long since died since the event(s). It is my opinion that numerous mysterious deaths post Main Event are those of unknowing-unwilling participants, who figured out enough to know that the official narrative was impossible and whose opinion or testimony would be dangerous.


Some mistakes can be covered with back-up plans, others cannot. Mistakes can blow the entire event. It is probably safe to assume that due to mistakes or poor execution of the plan, that some events are NOT taken live. That they stay just a drill event at the local level, with disappointed knowing-willing participants, and unknowing participants none the wiser as they are told it was just a practice drill. Lets consider Flight 93 of 9/11 fame. I first considered this a back-up plane, that if one of the other three failed it would fill in the gap. But it’s long and erratic flight path from NYC to the field in Pennsylvania, and the ridiculously small hole they claimed it crashed into indicate to me that something went wrong with this plane. It was to have taken off at 8:01 from Newark, but was delayed 41 minutes. Many have speculated this plane was meant to hit Building 7. Whether you believe that the 4 commercial jets were real or did not exist, or whether you believe specially prepared planes were used, regardless something went wrong with Flight 93. Another mistake was the Oklahoma City bombing, not all of the charges were detonated and explosives were found mounted on columns in the building, thus debunking the truck bomb myth. Which of course had to be buried and concealed. Watch ‘A Noble Lie’ documentary about the OKC bombing for much more.


Post-event reactions. One sure way to identify a false-flag but also it’s objectives is to wait and observe the ‘Solutions’ or responses to the event… the ‘effects’. Again, Cui Bono? Who benefits? Taking the Paris Friday 13th event. Does ISIS, ISIL, IS, Daesh (the use of multiple names is done to deliberately confuse) benefit from this supposed attack? The prior 6 weeks Russia has been bombing the shit out of ISIS, and their response is we can’t get enough of our brothers deaths, so let’s piss off another military power who can increase the number of bombs being rained upon our heads?? Maybe they confused Paris with Moscow?…


By identifying and listing the commonalities among false-flag events we will be able to link together the events, and show too many ‘coincidences’ to be mathematically possible and therefor this indicates planning by same/similar groups. Commonalities include; lone gunman, mental instability, SSRI’s, multiple shooters reported become one, lack of evidence (no proof of victims), destruction of evidence, crisis actors, training drills at the same time/location of the event, victim memorial foundations created immediately after event… or before.

Certainly an excellent example of Commonalities is ‘training drills’, happening weeks, days, the morning of or during the event itself, and either at the exact location or close by. A partial list of events in which drills were taking place before or during the event; 9/11, Boston bombing, Charleston shooting, 7/7 bombings, Sandy Hook, Aurora, CO (Batman), Paris Friday 13th,, Oslo, Norway shooting, Madrid bombings, Umpqua Community College, Oregon.


In Connections we take the evidence and known participants of the various false-flags and link them together. To demonstrated not only that these are events carried out by the same individuals and groups, but to prove how they are connected. What organizations, what specific peoples. To prove that there are larger agendas at play of which each false-flag plays a part. Also proving that long term planning is required. In Connections what will be created is a series of threads that connect individual events together and then connect the treads themselves together to show the tapestry of false-flag events.

As a little more obscure example of a thread running through multiple events we have Defense Attorney Judy Clark who represented; Dzhokhar Tsarnaev (Boston Bombing), Zacarias Moussaoui (9/11), Ted Kaczynski (Unabomber), Jared Loughner (2011 Tuscon Shooting).

The Tuscon shooting, reported 6 killed and 12 injured, which has gotten lost somewhat in the cavalcade of deliberate events, is interesting for several reasons but in particular for the victims. Victim Judge John Roll, a US Federal Judge, who stated that the Brady Bill was unconstitutional, treading on the 5th and violating the 10th Amendment. The Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act mandated federal background checks for gun purchases. The Act was named after James Brady, who was shot by John Hinckley, Jr. during an attempted assassination of President Ronald Reagan on March 30, 1981. U.S. Representative Gabrielle Giffords, who did survive a serious head wound, has gone one to create her own gun control initiative. Her husband is Mark Kelley, an astronaut. Finally victim Christina Taylor Green, the 9yo whose birthday was… wait for it… September 11, 2001. President Obama brought the 9/11 ‘Remembrance Flag’ to Tuscon to spread out over the memorial sight. Many commonalities and connections here. 9/11, terrorism, lone gunmen, mental health, gun control, Reagan assassination, ‘conspiracy theorist’ (Loughner was identified as such).

In this section we will be identifying specific groups. CIA, FBI, Zionist(Talmudic Jews), Freemasons, CFR, etc. I believe it is important to delineate that this does not mean that every member of said organization is in on the take. The reason for this is some people when they hear the CIA was involved in…, maybe it would be easier to list what they weren’t involved in??… I digress. When some hear the CIA was involved in the assassination of JFK they immediately discount it because they can’t believe the ‘entire’ CIA organization was in on the plot. This is valid reasoning. Thus the need to explain that no the entire XYZ organization was not involved. Really in any event, only a handful from any one organization would be the norm. Classic compartmentalization. Key individuals. Also these organizations will deliberately have personnel who are the ‘good’ guys, thus are not ‘in-the-know’. Like Freemasonry, the average low-level Freemason has no idea what is happening at the higher levels. It’s just a fraternal lodge, provides some charity for the community, good for camaraderie and business connections… maybe influence a local election… for a fellow mason.

Untimely/Convenient/Suspicious (Suicided) Deaths

Outside of the Cover-up deaths. Though not necessarily false-flag per se, the untimely or suicided deaths show the same pattern and many times are linked to false-flag events and/or groups involved in creating false-flags. Suspicious or convenient deaths of which these are but a few of many; Danny Casalaro; investigative journalist working on a book involving the CIA, PROMIS software, drug running, BCCI… called ‘The Octopus’. Gary Webb; Dark Alliance newspaper series exposing the CIA’s drug running involving LA gangs (Bloods, Crips), and Honduras Contras. Michael Hastings; investigating the CIA’s Director John Brennan’s witchhunt of investigative journalist. See the CIA trend there? These just happen to be the first three that popped in my mind. And coming back around to false-flag objectives. Certainly one objective of Hastings death was sending a very clear ‘warning’ to other investigative journalists.

Sacrificial Killing(s)

False-flags are normally the operations of secret societies, whether they be private (Freemasons, Milner Round Table (CFR, RIIA, Trilateral), religious based (Rosicrucian, Society of Jesus(Jesuits), Zionist), or state sponsored (CIA, MI6, Mossad). And hence by their very nature deeply involved in the occult. For many serious practitioners of the occult a ‘sacrifice’ is necessary in order to ensure the success of a plan… or event. We know that in some events the ‘sacrifice’ itself is the event. Such as JFK or 9/11. It is my contention therefor that at least one living human must pay with their life in order to ensure success. As an example in Sandy Hook, it’s my theory that Nancy Lanza was the sacrificial killing. For historical context. In Homer’s Iliad, Agamemnon the Greek King sacrificed his daughter Iphigenia in order to ensure success in his war against Troy to recapture Helen, the wife of his brother the King of Sparta, from Paris, the son of the King and Queen of Troy. Not sure if that’s a good example as it reads like a bloody soap opera. Regardless history, especially ancient and more primitive, is replete with human sacrifice being used in order to appease the God(s)… Lucifer?

Authors Note:

I recently heard of several books that focus on a specific false-flag event but get into the bigger issue of false flags being used to shape public opinion, and act as catalysts for change. Because of the sheer number of false-flags events that are occurring today and the amount of good research and books done by numerous persons it seems that what needs to be done is a presentation or book whose focus is on the broader issue of false-flags themselves.

While working on a basic outline, which really is what this article is, I was struck where the real meat of this project would be. The piecing together of these various false flags to show how numerous false flags are related. By doing so, it is my opinion, that the community at large can prove that the events are not ‘isolated’ incidents. But are part of a much larger plan. That the commonalities of many false flags are too numerous to ignore or dismiss as mere ‘coincidences’, and that there are numerous direct connections of specific individuals, corporations, and organizations among false flag events. By creating such a project we can awaken more that there is a larger agenda afoot. That is being carried out over decades and even centuries. That this can only be done at the very highest levels of government and business. And that because if these plans were publicly known the populace would resist and/or revolt, therefor they must be kept secret and hence the need for secret societies to carry out these plans over long periods of time.

So I am putting this Anatomy of False-Flags outline out into the Internet ether. Hoping that it will cross the conscious and sub-conscious void and inspire someone(s) to create such a report, presentation, book. If I were to do it I would make a point to contact the leading researchers on specific false flag events to get their insight and input on what commonalities and connections they found. So I see it as very much a collaborative project. By being able to source info from specific events from others should then allow the researcher to focus on the bigger picture and identify the commonalities and make the connections across time, places, and people. For the real meat and power of this project is the Commonalities and Connections information.

Some ideas I had while working the outline; it would probably be helpful to create a simple database to track the data and form it into useful information. For instance linking single individuals to multiple events. In the Commonalities section a table listing False-flags on one axis and Commonalities on the other with each intersection checked if a commonality exist would be a powerful visual. Each Chapter could highlight a particular false flag to illustrate the focus of the chapter. This does not mean that other events cannot be mentioned, but that one event in particular is used to support the focus of the chapter. Another idea after each section of the ‘Event Plan’ has been covered take a single event and break it down using ‘The Plan’. Explaining the event section by section, Objective through Cover-up. From a book standpoint each of the bolded titles and accompanying text would correspond to a book chapter.

Why am I not doing this project? Good and fair question. I’ve been wrestling for awhile with exactly where my focus should fall. And have concluded that False Flags is not where my focus is to be. My focus has fallen on that of Social Control, or the manipulation of populations attitudes, beliefs, opinions, and ultimately therefor their actions. Also called social engineering, opinion formation, engineering consent, or more bluntly but quite accurately mind control. Of which the false-flag is but one tool of the social engineers.

Leave a Reply

48 thought on “False-Flag Terror: A Historical and Analytical Overview”
  1. Reblogged this on Today,s Thought and commented:

    Who are these beings, what are they, what is their psychological status, why do they participate in these events, what is their code of ethics? I consider myself a fairly normal human that understands what is right and wrong, good Vs evil, but I just cannot wrap my mind around so many who have knowingly, participated in the lies, drama, traitorous false flag events around the globe with the end game of total darkness for all humanity. No one BENIFITS in the end, not even them.

    1. The planners and participants have a disease – as Beppe Grillo told Financial Times, “They have a kind of illness, it’s called alexithymia, which means difficulty recognising the emotions of others: pain, pleasure, joy.”
      I read this seriously written blog and then got to Effects where King starts swearing and that made me laugh. He then goes on to name the usual suspects without any proof of who-done-it, which happens all the time.

    2. I think there are benefits, when you see the kind of military gear which police forces now can command. Add to it, their training in locations like Israel (though I am not sure they train anywhere else lately), where the population is regarded as untrustworthy because of a rising Palestinian demographic which surely contains people with an ax to grind. The militarization of the police plays into two trends from both ends of the political spectrum: from the right, there is the fear of being swamped demographically by the dark-skinned “other” and from the left, there is the fervent belief that a benevolent government can take care of all of our problems, so it is dangerous to let people have too much choice.

      If you have some well-timed incidents, where are you going to get protest? People are, after all, being protected from the evil ones by the good ones. How can one not just accept that and be full of flag-waving pride? A new war? Why of course, so very necessary. It should not be said that someone else might gain the upper hand of supremacy. The new evil axis of Syria/Iran/Russia now opposes the “good guys” including corrupt NATO member Turkey. But there is no debate or analysis of that – because there was another shooting. Time to step up (throw down your personal arms and take up the ones the government issues you).

      It will work like a charm – we have internal enemies lurking amongst us, so by denying everyone’s 2nd amendment rights (hey, the 4th and 5th have fallen and the 8th, against cruel and inhuman punishment, is a “quaint” memory), by voluntarily submitting to armed authority instead of trying to protect oneself from violence, we can move onto the real object: the 1st amendment, once protected by the others. Free speech is on the chopping block – and so is freedom of religion. In our urge to imitate the mistakes of Europe and Israel, to belong to a feeble “West”, we are digging our own grave as a place of freedom and initiative.

      But it is just so appealing to both sides of the political spectrum. It is, as they say, the “new normal” (a top-down imposition of normality) – which creates a society like the one in the Ionesco play, Rhinoceros.

    3. Some are psychopaths, who are without empathy or conscience. Psychologists say 5% of the population are psychopaths.

      Others may go along with a false flag for ideological reasons, e.g., gun control.

      Human beings are limitless in our capacity for deception — self and other — rationalization, and just plain malevolence.

      1. The society values self-interest more than dignity. It isn’t hard to find individuals who will do virtually anything for their own self-interest. That is the big attraction of Satanism.

        The art for the controllers is in selecting those who know how to get diverse groups of self-interested actors to do their assigned parts. The overall plan advances apace with their individual contributions.

        For many of these actors there is no concern with the why. A great many people these days never consider why they do anything, yet alone weigh what they’re doing against any personal moral standard.

        For most it is enough to do as they are told and get paid. They have been trained to respond more like dogs than humans. Their baser instincts are catered to.

        The diminution of faith and societal mores is neither isolated or incidental. Without the fabric that made our societies there is no balance against this. It is a perfect scenario for those who wish to be in control.

        1. A nice, conditioned populace is what 13 years’ (plus) worth of schooling gets. And we pay for it!

          How COULD things be any different, al things staying the same?

  2. “However, at first the Inland Regional Center nurse assumed that was a part of one of the drills that are often held there, LA Times reports.

    “Drill started,” she reportedly texted her husband. She soon realized the active shooting situation was real.

    “Well, it’s real,” Vong texted the husband, adding that she and her colleagues have been “locked up in the office.””

    1. I wonder, given that there are nurses there, how much security the facility normally has. Let’s say there are medications on site which might be of interest to druggies. Wouldn’t there are least be some security guards? I also think there is something about the fire alarm – the question is when was it pulled? I think there may be an anomaly.

      Actually none of this is going to change the public perception, which has been reinforced for a long time by such events. They have stopped probing, they accept the premises of the authorities, and they are behaving like good children who do not question much less defy dad when they are scared by thunder. I believe that this is the real problem: the supine passivity of those who consider themselves adult citizens whose input in the political process matters. That is an illusion which is too pleasing to abandon. What if we are merely subjects, and not citizens at all? How did that happen?

      1. “What if we are merely subjects, and not citizens at all? How did that happen?”

        Welcome to the New World Order. It took a century to transition out of Western Civilization, where we WERE citizens, and free. Now, in this new, as yet unrecognized-much-less-named Civilization, we are subjects.

        The entire 20th century was a social engineering program that created the collective Mind that now prevails in what used to be the West, where servile servitude comes naturally.

        Oldsters like us, whose minds were shaped in the transition phase are somewhat torn. Biblical morality, for us, tends to be a kind of smorgasbord, but for our kids, well, if they’re polite, (sigh). The Millennials simply breathe the air of the new civilization, and can’t really FEEL the thought/Mind of the West–any more than a Saracen could truly feel like the Franks he was trying to conquer.

        Well, that’s exaggerating. It’s more like the transition period between Rome and the West, where there was mutual comprehension. But the distinction is the same. Civilizations are mutually incompatible. Always.

        Which is why the New World Order crafters are so keen on flooding what once was the West with aliens from incompatible civilizations–to accelerate the obliteration. “Let’s get on with it,” they are saying in exasperation.

        Soon, we will have World Government, a World Religion, and a one-world money system. It’s right there in the Book. And we are living it, live.

  3. The article is exceptionally nuanced. These events can range from those having real casualties and manipulated pawns to those that are wholly staged/fully manufactured. Let’s not forget that America and Canada have deeply entrenched mobbing cultures and that there are many organic and very real workplace/campus shootings as well.

  4. a question to ponder as I watch this California “shooting”- Again I see no chaos or screaming and running- but here is an interesting question: Look at the news- (especially sports)- I found video of this basketball player getting into a street fight and then there is another video of a Panther fan getting attacked at a Cowboy game- In each of these videos- You can see a number of bystanders filming/recording-taking pics etc- EVERYONE has a cell phone. In the case of the Panther fan- there has to be 6-7 other people filming- In the case of these alleged shootings- why do we never see any video from 600+ people of any proof a shooting occurred? We seem to have plenty of text messages–

      1. #3 was especially revelatory: the employees were put in fear, taken almost as hostages, and none of them seems to have known what might have happened (as you would know if you had heard gun shots that killed 14 people). Now the “memory” has been bored into them. It’s a good thing someone recorded this. It shows how easily a population can be subjected in the interests of “safety”. Scary.

      2. I watched a few minutes of the house-to-house search. L.E. was opening people’s gates (and leaving them open) to access their property. I wonder why more dogs didn’t get out? I’ve got two myself that would have taken off in a jiff, especially with all the commotion.

        So do people just come home from work to all their exterior gates open? Has there been any photos of that?

        1. Recynd,

          Your asking to many logical questions. Yes, my dogs would have been shot if they opened my gate but Pipe down.

          Keep it simple and stick with narrative.

          Cough up your guns, give up your sovereignty, pay carbon taxes to the UN World Government and submit to your Police state.

          PS: You can’t fly on anymore for asking too many questions……

          Of course I’m kidding but you know that’s the Gig….

        2. Haha. And next violation we are taking away your “Internet Rights” for 90 days……

          Look what they are doing in France and Germany right now, Full Police State, all rights suspended because of the “attacks”.

          Look at Turkey. A Doctor jailed facing 2 years in prison for basically making fun of that scum bag President of Turkey equivalent to us making Obama the Joker on posters and such.

          The left froth at the thought of putting people in prison for insulting them or “denying Climate Taxes/Change…..

        3. There are always multiple levels (modeling) involved in these. The “search” is reminiscent of BMB. Just like the casual use of “lockdown” and “shelter in place”. The takeaway is that police can order you to do anything and you must instantly obey, or else.

          If they enter your property without warrant you should accept that. If they rifle through your underwear drawer, you should thank them.

          Don’t worry, if your dog escapes they’ll shoot him. We are all Palestinians now. We are “the enemy”.

          Think of their definition of “terrorism” and apply that to these events. What are they trying to accomplish? They are using violence (feigned or otherwise) to advance a political agenda.

          Pretend that this is real. It is a crime. Nothing more, nothing less. What are 1,000 law enforcement personnel doing there? If there were a party in the ghetto and fourteen people got shot, how many cops would they send? It’s a word problem.

          I’m gonna go out on a limb here and say “less than 1,000). In fact, for an organic crime it is unlikely they’d release much information at all until they had a chance to look at the evidence and ask the DA.

          I have to admit that rushing off to the alleged perps house, locking down and evacuating the neighborhood, and executing them in the street is more efficient. But is it “legal”?

          God I must be getting old. I remember taking law classes where they taught us that if something like that happened the case would be dismissed. That’s progress for you.

        4. I was disgusted and flabbergasted by the response to Chris Dorner: 1500 LE to track down one guy? Really? And since when is a shooting–no matter how horrible–a federal case? Well, I know since when, but anyway…

          This recent Red Ice Radio show has some eye-opening content re Britain’s stance on One World, One Culture (around the 35:00-40:00 minute mark, I think):

          That says it all.

  5. Good outline for those new to the mass mind control objectives for the rest of us.
    I`m going to create another rabbit-hole to explore. Based on the event in San Bernardino yesterday, one of the local reporters used the terminology of radicalization, which I have notice is the new meme.

    There is an insightful paper that was written about four years ago about the academic/military complex and the psyops that America is currently experiencing and very soon draconian mental health laws to be imposed on us.

  6. James

    That essay is staggeringly good.

    Many thanks.

    I have lots and lots of thoughts …

    Typeology …

    For historical context. In Homer’s Iliad, Agamemnon the Greek King sacrificed his daughter Iphigenia in order to ensure success in his war against Troy to recapture Helen, the wife of his brother the King of Sparta, from Paris, the son of the King and Queen of Troy. Not sure if that’s a good example as it reads like a bloody soap opera.

    Nick Alexander – one of the alleged victims in Paris, a merchandise seller for the band, EODM.

    “But back to Helen Wilson, the ex that held him in her arms as he died. Nick (Old Nick – The Devil, get it?) Alexander (better known as Paris in Greek mythology who eloped with Helen) ”

    The date and time are both crucial decisions. We know for followers of the occult that dates are VERY important.

    Will someone please try to answer this question:

    “Why is it that every nuance of every event is dissected, forensically, apart from the when ?”

    We do the who, the why, the what, the where, the how, but not the when …

    Why is that ?


  7. “Some ideas I had while working the outline; it would probably be helpful to create a simple database to track the data and form it into useful information.”

    Been doing it for years James.

    Circa 10k “events” on file now …

    Hence the patterns …

    and the insight…


  8. This the most intriguing question, isn’t it. Why do so many participate in these fraudulent events? And secondly why are there no tattlers, squeelers or whistleblowers among them to blow the cover off the false flags? No one seems to have their conscience pricked enough to be a turncoat. There must be very powerful reasons for this. Here are some random thoughts: Huge monetary payouts, threats of death to participants and their families if someone squeels. They all belong to secret groups and societies where they swear blood oaths to each other. They are part of a secret sub-culture in our society that goes unnoticed and undetected. They are all compromised in one way or another like being pedophiles or murderers. Certainly most ordinary Americans would not be able to identify with them. And of course there is a high level of compartmentalization, so no one lower or middle level person knows the whole plan. One key to stopping this insanity is to turn 2 or more of these folks to squeel and blow at least 2 or more of these staged events up to the light of day.

  9. Typeology …

    UK : Operation ( Neither ) Rhyme ( nor reason )

    Spear Shaker …

    Terrorism …

    ( Forgive the nascent illumination )

    “The confused Dromio, sure that he hasn’t said what Antipholus thinks he said, finds “neither rhyme nor reason” in the accusation—that is, neither order nor inherent sense.

    The confusion, though neither knows it, is due to the existence of twin Antipholuses and Dromios;

    Farcical episodes of mistaken identity account for the entire plot of the play. ”


  10. It’s not complicated …

    Re: The alleged shooting at the San Bernadino disabled folk centre.

    A simple lesson in simple deconstruction :


    Which demographic would target disabled folk ?

    There’s only one answer.

    Thus, the event is rooted in Alfred Russel Wallace …

    Much like the Pekka-Eric Auvinen “Natural Selection” shooting at the Jokela School in Tuusula, Finland on 7 November 2007 …

    and the Raumanmeri school shooting

    and Eric Borel, Cuers, France

    and Timothy McVeigh / OKC



    Sandy Hook

    W. R. Myers High School shooting

    Santana High School shooting

    Pacific Lutheran University shooting

    et al …




    You lot, yes you …

    Out there, thinking you might be contributing …

    Need to up your game …

    Time is short.


  11. Kevin, first, where did you get the picture of Obama’s mama for the essay?

    Now that that’s out of the way, that was a GREAT piece. I agree with virtually all of it and you’re correct that it deserves to be a book.

    Each and every category needs to be “fleshed out” as there is much to be said in addition to what you so artfully described.

    I’m very glad to see someone with a real grasp on this. As you said, there is so much more. It is but a piece of a larger whole.

    You hit on most of my favorite themes. We are indeed merely spectators. As you know, that’s what Karl Rove was telling us in that thoroughly arrogant and contemptuous way.

    Our challenge is to indeed make our own reality, not to live in theirs. It is easier to leave the theater than to get them to rewrite the script.

    1. Thanks for the compliment(s), to all. And thanks for taking the time to read it. I sincerely hope someone runs with it. One thing for certain, there will be plenty of ‘fresh’ events to keep it topical.

      “Our challenge is to indeed make our own reality, not to live in theirs. It is easier to leave the theater than to get them to rewrite the script.”

      Could not agree more. We have to stop spending our lives ‘reacting’ to the actions of others. Each individual must write their own script, and create their own ‘reality’.

  12. The news-gasm of “San Bernardino” still rages, and fresh into my email tonight from candidate Bernie Sanders (I receive his emails but I won’t be voting for him) comes his 10-point plan “to make our communities safer from gun violence” along with his alleged context:

    “The crisis of gun violence has reached epidemic levels in this country to the point that we are averaging more than one mass shooting per day.”

    Infowars, citing an FBI report — I think we can trust Infowars on this one — credibly debunks the claims of “more than one mass shooting per day” ( ) but evidently, thanks to many news outlets (not to mention Sanders) the false meme is already going viral.

    And now, for the real story:

    Increasingly, criminal governments will employ their favorite “win/win” tactic of false flags/staged events in the pursuit of multiple ends (distraction, seizing more power, moves toward war, etc.). These events are the gifts that keep on giving, they can be spun, re-spun or even completely re-framed to suit the controllers’ evolving, self-interested and nefarious agendas.

    How many “active shooter drills” are performed in the U.S. on a daily basis? Are there more than one active shooter drills taking place each day?

    If so, shouldn’t Senator Sander’s warning be rewritten as follows:

    “The crisis of active shooter drills has reached epidemic levels in this country to the point that we are averaging more than one active shooter drill per day.”

    I suspect then, that if the active shooter drills are indeed a daily occurrence, the “powers that be” would not hesitate to make a pre-scheduled “drill” instead “go-live” when certain undesirable (real) national or international news events popup unexpectedly. For example, as when the Russian Ministry of Defense on 12/2/15 provides a detailed briefing, complete with satellite reconnaissance photos, documenting how the (criminal) government of Turkey is logistically supporting ISIS (the most evil entity on earth, remember, and the reason for the destruction of your freedoms, in the name of your safety, of course.

    Is this what happened in San Bernardino?

    “Not a word in The New York Times [about the Russian Ministry of Defense briefing], which could fill its front page already the same evening with details of the San Bernardino shootings in California.” (see: )

    Will we ever know?

    1. Mass Shoooting Tracker is a web site deicated to tracking mass shooting events in the U.S. It has been cited by MSM, including CNN and MSNBC, and counts mass shootings in which 4 or more people are injured by gunfire (unlike the bogus FBI definition created arbitrarily in 2013 defining a mass shooting as one with 4 or more deaths resulting). The site reports more than one shooting per day, on average, for every year since 2013:

    2. Yes, Neo, I think these events are major deflectors from important stories which are vital to the public to know, so they can evaluate their leaders propose. I recall that during the time when the US was first said to be arming “moderate rebels in Syria” (“our” Al-Qaeda, and/or ISIS), the Boston Marathon happened. Now one thing such an event did was to deflect from the idea, for the general public, that our government was once again supporting terrorists. How could we be? We are the victim here, aren’t we? If you brought up the Syria thing in discussions on line back then, you were castigated as a crazy (probably by someone guarding the message so that the focus stayed on our victimhood).

  13. I can’t keep up with the pace of comments, but has anyone else noticed that for at least 24 hours the TV news has shown an apparent silhouette of a woman wearing a hijab or veil whenever “Tashfeen Malik” is mentioned , and not a single person has even commented (that I’m aware of) on it or wondered how in the hell a Muslim from a country like Pakistan was able to emigrate to the US, and apparently was not required to provide a verified passport photo?

    I’m pretty sure Pakistan is secular enough that women are allowed to show their face for an ID photo, but even if women are allowed to hide behind a veil there, are we really supposed to believe there’s no official photo of a woman named “Tashfeen Malik”, showing her face, with matching fingerprints somewhere? REALLY? Because this just screams “hoax” at me. Google her name, and you get her husband’s picture – apparently google thought it was just a bit over the top to show a black inkblot as the facsimile of an actual person who supposedly just murdered a bunch of innocent people for no apparent reason.

    (And never you mind the fact that women who are forced to wear veils are so controlled, about the only thing they’re allowed to do without a chaperone is go to the bathroom, and are therefor about as likely to murder a bunch of innocents as a 5 year old – all that matters is that she was “wun ‘o them Mooslim terr’ists!”)

  14. I’m waiting for my husband to get his pre-op testing done at the hospital, and the TV’s on (CNN). The head of the LA FBI is being interviewed at a press conference and a reporter asked a question that had something to do with “the veracity of…reports…”–and the broadcast cut out. Handy.

    The takeaway message: if you see something, say something.

Leave a Reply