Another unsealed debt ceiling, Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, real and unreal mass shootings, the “corporatization” of America and YOU, “crisis actor conspiracy theory,” the end of the EU?, economic apocalypse not yet …
Free Form Fridays are routinely looked to as a place for MHB readers to discuss what they wish as they please. Previous open threads over the summer and early fall have been platforms for vibrant exchanges that have garnered hundreds of comments.
Here is yet another chance to chime in with other readers on whatever pressing issue may be on your mind . Thank you for your continued interest, participation and support.-JFT
On this program Sofia Smallstorm interviews California optometrist Dr. David Dortch about the SWAT raid on his home and the false criminal charges brought against him by Riverside County, California.
The Dortch family’s life was radically exploded when they became the victims of a fiction created by the state and pursued through the court system to this very day. Desperately trying to learn how to defend their innocence, David and Kim Dortch began a study of contracting in commerce, as today’s Uniform Commercial Code-based “law” really involves. Listen to this amazing man tell his story and what he knows today ofbeing oneself vs. being represented.
Another Casualty in America’s Growing Police State
South Florida media have been abuzz over the past week concerning the shooting death of 31-year old Corey Jones by a plainclothes police officer who reportedly did not show his badge during their encounter.
Yet there’s an especially disturbing wrinkle for major news media, who have expressed reluctance to cover the story because Jones was a licensed gun owner who had a handgun on his person at the time of the shooting.
“The tenor of the coverage has been wait and see,” the Palm Beach Postobserved on October 22.
One national producer … who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the network had not authorized her to discuss the story, said her network lost some of its appetite after Jones was found to have been carrying a weapon.
A new volume edited by Prof. Jim Fetzer and Mike Palecek
Proof it was a drill was right before our eyes:
* the sign, “Everyone must check in!”
* boxes of bottled water & pizza cartons
* Port-a-Potties present from scratch
* many wearing name tags on lanyards
* parents bringing children to the scene
Proof it wasn’t a massacre was also there:
* no surge of EMTs in to the building
* no Med-Evac helicopter was called
* no string of ambulances to the school
* no evacuation of 469 other students
* no bodies placed on the triage tarps
What crisis actor conspiracy theorists believe to be fake implies a much more generous view of the real
During the Sandy Hook shooting, a 69 year-old retired psychologist named Gene Rosen opened his home to six terrified children immediately after the massacre. A month later, Salon magazine published an article on the kind neighbor and his continued harassment by conspiracy theorists. Members of a forum hosted on David Icke’s website (the former broadcaster who birthed the iconic “reptilian conspiracy theory”), had mixed reactions. “Some conspiracy maniacs genuinely believe that they can treat anyone as pawns on the basis that they ‘see the big picture,’” wrote one member. “He is an actor,” wrote another member. “And not a very good one at that.”
The idea of “crisis actors” rose to popularity within conspiracy theory circles after the Sandy Hook Elementary school shooting on December 14, 2012. The idea appears to have originated in a post by Dr. James Tracy on his website memoryholeblog.org, “a forum for news, criticism and commentary on sociopolitical issues and phenomena overlooked or misreported by mainstream media.” In “The Sandy Hook Massacre: Unanswered Questions and Missing Information”—written ten days after the Sandy Hook shooting—Tracy voices his suspicions about the official narrative, specifically focusing on the “bizarre performance” of medical examiner H. Wayne Carver.
Incisive sociopolitical researcher Sofia Smallstorm joins the program to discuss her recent work examining the stealth privatization of individuals, local and regional governments, and the United States itself. She argues that this legal corporatization that has ensued in varying degrees since the late 1800s is a major factor in better understanding recent “mass shooting” drills, some of which are being presented to the public as actual events. In other words, once local municipalities and law enforcement agencies become dependent on federal grants, they are compelled to partake in such exercises to justify continued funding.
News reportage of mass shooting events over the past several years has changed markedly from coverage of such incidents just a few decades ago. Some media critics and researchers have pointed to mass shootings, including those transpiring on January 8, 2011 in Tucson Arizona, July 20, 2012 in Aurora Colorado, December 14, 2012 in Newtown Connecticut, and the recent October 1, 2015 event at Umpqua Community College in Roseburg Oregon, to suggest that these incidents may have been partly contrived with involvement of federal authorities. They reinforce their arguments with an impressive array of conflicting media reports and unrealistic “official” narratives concerning these events as potential evidence of government deception.
Whether or not such claims are true, there can be no doubt that each referenced event has been inordinately sensationalized by corporate news media and national political leaders to advocate for stricter gun control, mental health, and police state measures, even though criminologists maintain that the number of mass shootings has not increased since the 1990s.
Like the curious 1995 mass shootings in Dunblane Scotland and Port Arthur Australia—events capitalized on by political leaders in those countries to pass harsh gun control measures and expressly invoked by President Obama just hours after the Roseburg shooting—researchers and independent news media point to a potential agenda behind the intense publicization of mass shootings throughout the United States.
Doomsday economic predictions, the Umpqua College shooting event, Russian ascendance in the Middle East, Facebook censorship, the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the end of tenure …
“Free Form Fridays” have become something of an institution at MHB. Previous open threads over the summer and early fall have been platforms for vibrant discussions eliciting hundreds of comments on each. These have given readers opportunities to present and discuss topics as they see fit.
Thus here is another chance to chime in with other readers on whatever pressing issue may be on your mind . Thank you for your continued interest and participation.-JFT
MHB reader reconsiders prophetic analysis of Economist 2015 cover (here), Says message transcends mere economics
Submitted by Toni
A MESSAGE FROM THE ELITES
It is argued by Marshall Swing that the January cover of The Economist magazine is a Revelation foretelling Certain Events, mockingly sent by the Elites to affirm the suspicions of those who can “read” the prophecy. Luckily, Swing can and the message is: Apocalypse arrives on October 23rd, 2015.
I think there is both more and less to The Economist cover than Swing’s prophecy indicates. Less, in that Swing arrives at his thesis through coerced logic, a subject covered in Part Two. More, because the meaning that emanates from the cover collage is broader than the Prophet Swing allows.
My read of The Economist magazine cover is that it is an intellectual exercise in spoofing “conspiracy” culture by creating the appearance of a Message from the Elites. The editorial double-bind is that it then actually becomes a coded message from which elite intent can be deduced.