An Open Letter to Anderson Cooper

By James F. Tracy

June 15, 2014

Anderson Cooper
C/O CNN
10 Columbus Circle
New York, New York 10019

Dear Mr. Cooper,

Seventeen months have passed since you featured me on your AC 360° program on consecutive evenings to call attention to my commentary and analysis of the December 14, 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre in Newtown, Connecticut. As you may recall, in the prelude to those January 11th and 14th 2013 broadcasts you sent a production crew to my place of employment that proceeded to pursue staff and administrators on my whereabouts.

[The record of Anderson Cooper’s January 2013 on-air attack of former FAU Professor James Tracy has been expunged from YouTube. The video below is provided as a replacement of that video.]

Your staff then repeatedly telephoned my residence, later filming in front of my home and disclosing my address to a national audience without my knowledge or consent. This behavior jeopardized my family’s safety and peace of mind, and included a flurry of threatening and abusive communications directed at me. Further, some observers presumed that CNN and other national news media sought to create sufficient controversy that would lead to the termination of my employment. On the other hand, I understand how you may have perceived this as an act of due journalistic diligence rather than coercion.

Further, if at the time ample proof existed that the Sandy Hook massacre was genuine I think you may have been at least partially justified in such activity. Yet in the time since little evidence has emerged to uphold the notion that the event took place as it had been reported by CNN and other news outlets. In fact, the opinion of many independent experts and a wealth of data point to highly questionable elements of the Sandy Hook narrative that require rigorous interrogation through the intrepid investigative reportage of journalists such as you.

Anderson (if I may), that’s why I challenge you to join me on a reportorial quest to Newtown and Sandy Hook in order to revisit and rigorously question the painful affair that still rests so uneasily on the public conscience—one that is called up in memory with each report of another school shooting. Together let us ferret out and present the relevant information, interview the necessary parties, and get to the bottom of what transpired so that we can put the conspiracy theories to rest!

Anderson (again, if I may), this could very well be a landmark event in investigative journalism. If after a thorough investigation we prove that the event in fact took place as CNN and other major media reported, I will concede that you were in fact correct and seriously consider resigning my post in academe.

On the other hand, if we find holes in the official narrative this may in fact be a scandal requiring journalistic performance on par with the paragon set by Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein over 40 years ago. It will call for—indeed require—the public service of news professionals like you to find out what really happened and bring the culprits to justice! Anderson, at the end of the day it’s just like you say each evening: we truly need to “keep them honest.”

Yet there are some who say that CNN and, I’m sorry to say, even you may have been in on what they call a “hoax.” These suspicious minds say that some of your reportage from Newtown in the wake of the shooting was “greenscreened.” Others point to the time you spent in the Central Intelligence Agency and subsequent involvement in student and activist groups of several foreign countries. Still others bring up CNN’s sometime questionable coverage of major historical events, such as the Persian Gulf and Iraq Wars.

I say “Hooey!” There are many fine young men from extraordinary wealth and privilege yet limited experience or career prospects who serve in our national intelligence services. These include the nation’s 41st president, George H. W. Bush, in addition to littérateurs such as Cord Meyer. In fact, for over fifty years some of our nation’s finest journalists and political leaders have either served overtly with or maintained ties to the intelligence community. Anderson, both you and I know that serving your country is nothing to be ashamed of.

I think you’ll agree that it’s time to put these Sandy Hook “truthers” to rest for good, thereby allowing the Sandy Hook victims’ families to find comfort in the millions of dollars in donations they have received from sincere and goodhearted Americans.

Anderson, let’s reexamine Sandy Hook together to confirm our own professional integrity, while at the same time striking a potential blow at corruption and deceit. Our conscience requires it. Our nation demands it. Won’t you join me?

Yours,

(signed)

James F. Tracy

SENT USPS CERTIFIED MAIL 7013 2250 0002 2334 3915

0

Leave a Reply

102 thoughts on “An Open Letter to Anderson Cooper”

  1. With all due respect, Dr Tracy is dead wrong about his choice for the “paragon of journalism”, this Bob Woodward character. Woodward helped cover up the October Surprise event and vastly over blew the trivial Watergate fiasco. This and many other events like CIA drug smuggling were covered up by Woodward. It is vastly incorrect to exercise such laudatory irrestraint upon this Woodward character, he does not deserve it.

  2. Anderson Cooper, Seems a reasonable request! I valued your recent broadcast where you experienced first hand the “voices” of the bipolar world….you communicated the disorder very well.
    I and many colleagues would value your utmost journalistic skills applied to the dozens of hanging questions of Sandy Hook with a series of discussions with James Tracy.

    1. Ouch. Scathing…
      Dr. Tracy, it is evident he got under your skin- I haven’t heard such sarcasm from you before. Regardless, if you felt you needed to stoop to his level, I totally understand.

      Thanks for taking time out of your life to be a mouthpiece for us little guys that don’t know how or don’t have the courage to do ourselves.

      Couldn’t have said it more eloquently if I tried.

      1. I considered CNN’s behavior akin to stalking. It sort of got under my skin and I wasn’t the one being hounded at my home or having my and my family’s address publicized as some sort of invitation to…why did CNN feel compelled to do that? They announced FAU was the university Dr. Tracy teaches at, so anyone had plenty of information to direct a complaint.

    2. The nurse NEVER SAID NANCY LANZA WAS A KINDERGARTEN TEACHER! She said THE SHOOTER was the son of a kindergarten teacher. When you watch this video you will discover that a kindergarten teacher at SHES had a son that works for MIKE BLOOMBERG- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QaeW2IweTp8
      Play Video
      Sandy Hook Kindergarten Teacher’s Son Is MAIG’s Michael Bloombergs’ Event Director – Scott Vollmer

    3. Officer Cario Document 00026724- stated that when he entered the lobby two Newtown officers were there and one stated that they saw the shooter in the hall and that he ducked into room 10 and there was a volley of shots and it was quiet for 5 minutes. This is very serious because it means that the Newtown officers did not advance or engage the shooter for at least 5 minutes and an additional 5 minutes roughly before they entered the room. There were live wounded children in both rooms and Newtown PD did not engage ? Is this appropriate protocol? Might the children have survived if Newtown Police followed protocol ? It appears that the two officers in the hall way were Lt Vanghele and officer Bahamonde while Officer Penna was clearing the bathroom. If there are any inaccuracies in my assessment please let me know.

  3. Anderson Cooper is a highly paid ACTOR , he is not a ‘reporter’, this sub human NPD (narcissistic personality dissordered) sicko would’nt know the truth if it sat on him, cooper & cnn are just part of the plan that the CFR ( counsel of foreign relations) & all the other very sick beasts on the CFR run TV . that are at the head of the sandy hook hoax and all the other hoax’s/false flag events that are meant to take down the United States, If the poor dumb viewing public only knew what these beasts had in store for them with all with their sick lies. the TV is the greatest piece of brain washing equipment ever made & it is working wonderfully, it is amazing that people actually believe the garbage they are fed through that satanic box in their homes . . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMEvIAnFa3w the general public is spoon fed these massive lies daily that the evil machine/TV brings into their homes. Unless you want your children to be brain washed, non thinking zombies like the majority of the people in the world today, you better remove that satanic box of lies out of your homes . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJNgm4kM24s

  4. Congratulations James F. Tracy on yet another (in my opinion) common sense and well balanced writing on the Sandy Hook tragedy. I have followed your comments since Sandy Hook with great interest. I consider it most reggretable that we never had a James Tracy in Australia to bring more attention to the terrible tragedy of the Port Arthur massacre, in which thirty five people died and the Australian Prime Minister wouldn’t even allow a coriner’s enquiry, or other public enquiry. Even to the point of putting a thirty year secrecy on details of these events. The world needs brave people like you, especially in the media. Keep up the good work. Kevin Stiller, Brisbane, Australia.

  5. Let’s just skip the part where you debate on whether Sandy Hook was real or not, as we all know that will not get aired or discussed in any substantial or meaningful way. Let’s just focus on what’s happened since Sandy Hook and where all the money go? What school if any, needs to have the ridiculous amounts of money that were allocated to a school that only has 550 students at best? Where did all the money go? Follow the money! Let’s see some real investigation there, in “keeping it honest”.

  6. That’s a very courtly way to engage Cooper, Dr. Tracy, treating this man as a professional of equal stature, when he is no journalist.

    Cooper doesn’t understand, or doesn’t care, that labeling an argument with pejoratives (i.e., as “conspiracy claims”, “sickening,” “absurd”) is not a substitute for a real investigation and analysis of evidence. A real journalist does such investigation and analysis. He hasn’t.

    His lazy locution using “beyond”–as in “beyond crazy,” “beyond comprehension,” “beyond ignorant”–shows he has a substandard grasp of the English language, as well.

    He mischaracterized the claim about Veronique Pozner, saying that it is that she wasn’t crying enough. I think even at the time of the Tracy interview the claim was that the interview was conducted in front of a “green screen,” meaning it was filmed in advance, since Cooper’s nose disappears as he turns his head. This means he was involved in the staging. Even the Wikipedia entry on Anderson Cooper establishes he is CIA.

    Go get ’em, Dr. Tracy.

    1. I particularly like this part: “I say “Hooey!” There are many fine young men from extraordinary wealth and privilege yet limited experience or career prospects who serve in our national intelligence services….. Anderson, both you and I know that serving your country is nothing to be ashamed of.”

      What a scream. These people’s inflated egos are not poked fun of nearly enough.

  7. Would swear I saw an earlier article that estimated this sale of this property was between 4 & 5 million, no doubt all the chemical spraying has fogged my memory.

    Report: CNN Anchor Anderson Cooper Plans To Buy Litchfield Home For $2.6M …The 10,127-square-foot estate in Litchfield was originally listed at $4 million but had been reduced to $2.6 million, according to the MLS listing. The listing also indicates that the transaction will be a short sale, a transaction in which a lender agrees to accept less than what is owed on the mortgage…..

    Hmmm

    Report: CNN Anchor Plans To Buy Litchfield Home For $2.6M

  8. Ha! Love it!

    One could only dream of having a professor like James Tracy. He is the epitome of professionalism with integrity, a rarity these days to say the least. Hey, the dude’s got guts… And I doubt if he even sees it that way. Just doing his job, ya know…

    I went to Art School. You could get drunk in class, right along with your professor, then later, said professor, makes out with your girlfriend in his office while you’re packing up his gear in the studio.

    Ah, the good old days…

    C’est la vie….

    When I saw the Medical Examiner “Dr. Wayne Carver”, in his press conference that day I knew something was horribly wrong. I’ve seen a million press conferences like that on TV. A Medical Examiner knows or should know, in hyper detail what happened to each and everyone of the victims in a tragedy. Carver, on the other hand, didn’t seem to know anything other than some generalized garbage about the entire event. Simply not possible…

    But, of course, how do you decipher something like that, it’s just a gut feeling right?

    Well that’s when you need someone like Professor Tracy to step in. He knows how to decode what has just happened, he’s a trained professional, that’s what he does. That’s what any good professor would do, or at least you would hope, and rightly so.

    Anderson Cooper pulled a hatchet job if there ever was, it’s obvious… Why? Because Professor Tracy was right on the mark! We can’t have the sheeple getting upset now can we….

    I bet money Anderson won’t even respond. Well, not in any serious way.

    Peace

    waveformalpha

    PS: To JT, I take my payments in weed these days…

    1. Ah yes, the Medical Examiner, Dr. Carver. Did anyone else get the impression he was being prompted or guided by those around him, ensuring he didn’t step out of line? Surely he wasn’t being intimidated by the likes of that smirking, moustachioed, hat-wearing trooper just off to the right…
      Had this event been genuine, everyone would have been very grim-faced.
      The clincher, of course, was those very dodgy $0 property sales conveyanced on Christmas Day 2009. Cui bono? -as ever.

  9. They really overreached. I wouldn’t have heard of Dr. Tracy if not for Andersen Cooper’s arrogance and megalomania. I sensed weird stuff going on, but had concluded that *something* had happened (ie some people got shot) but that it was being exaggerated and had been sort of negligently allowed to happen because the anti-Constitutionalists do what they can to make sure preventive measures aren’t taken to avoid such incidents.

    Andersen Cooper had the hubris to think he could bully and silence the american people and he was humbled; people like me wouldn’t have paid attention to the ‘truthers’ if it hadn’t been the MSM itself that drew attention to someone who had ‘legitimate’ credentials. Their sense of power knows no limits; they literally believe they can dictate reality to us.

    If we don’t do more, though, than just confer on here, they will have that absolute power soon.

  10. He can’t be shamed into responding, he lives in the bubble of privilege. He must know it was a psyop. His job is to sell it, not be a real journalist, holding him to those higher standards is unfair, he’s just a salesman.

  11. YEA! I knew this was coming to a tipping point, I wouldn’t hold my breath on Anderson doing anything but continuing to lie. (and buy BIG houses)

  12. Yes – this is the most logical and direct approach and I commend you on your courage !
    No – he will not respond in any manner whatsoever, because to do so will either implicate himself in a cover-up or make himself culpable to prosecution for his participation.
    We will get to the bottom of this, but most likely without the help of any ‘reputable’ journalists.
    Thank you for all that you have done to expose this crime. You are representative of what the 1st Amendment is all about.

  13. I pray daily for you, Dr. James Tracy. May God bless you and keep you and your family safe. You’re doing a great job. Let me know how I may help you.

    Stand fast in Grace, K

  14. Thank you for your courage, but watch your back Dr. Tracy. The disturbingly strange A. Cooper is but a front man for a larger organization. He will not, of course, agree to anything resembling what you propose. How could he?

    I sincerely hope they don’t “retaliate”. What you said needed to be said. I’m quite certain that he gets your drift. As Anne said, we’re 100% behind you.

  15. Go for it. The ball is in his court now. Check and check-mate. It’s my belief that the lessor man will decline, but you threw down the gauntlet of challenge. That’s what matters. That’s what will remain at the end of the day. The silence you may hear is the sound of a coward steeped in indecisiveness and hand wringing. Coopy has a way of disregarding his network’s reputation for the staging of news stories for the sake of sensationalism. (i.e. Charles Jaco) CNN’s record stands alone,….much to the chagrin of their 9 nightly viewers…..who happen to be “on the fence” as it were.

    LOL

    Good job, Dr. Tracy!

    1. Sample responses over at Huff Post from two of Cooper’s nine viewers in regards to his latest home purchase. He has several other homes as well.

      “He’s an honest, genuine, hard working guy. Not the easiest life by any means but I believe a good person.”

      “Anderson works very hard & deserves to have an oasis to go to.”

      1. This is the home Cooper reportedly bought. Bantam is in Litchfield County. It was sold on April 3, 2014 for $ 164,212.00. Looks to me like it sold for back taxes, which in 2011 were over $46,000 per year. The mansion was in foreclosure and it was a short sale.

        Not to accuse the good people in Litchfield to harbor Newtown real estate practices, but msm report that it sold for millions – anywhere from 2 to 9 million depending on the source.

        Perhaps some real estate mavens can help out and clarify. After this mansion sold for around $ 164,000 in April, did the buyer turn around, selling it to Cooper for a big profit, or did Cooper buy the dwelling for 164,000?

        When the smoke clears, it should be interesting to check the final documents.

        http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/122-Old-Mount-Tom-Rd-Bantam-CT-06750/82390883_zpid/

      2. I’ll bet i work harder that A.C. and my “oasis” is a bit more “modest”, although perfectly fine. I suppose the wages of sin are high.

        One of the things that I read said it was a short sale, meaning there was still money owed on it. Could it be that he paid the paltry $168K and took over the mortgage?

        Who knows. He is, indeed an actor. I guess he gets to live like one as well. The presstitution business must pay well indeed. Plenty of room for him and his “significant other” to swish around in. Quite the “role model”.

      3. The chain of title record comes from the realtor and is not reliable. In addition, some mortgage transfers are recorded only in MERS and not in the county title books. The official assessed value of Rye House a few years ago was about $2m. So it looks the $164k figure is not a sale price for the house, but a new buyer paying off several years worth of back property tax that had not been paid. Or it’s some sort of transfer tax.
        The previous homeowner started his price at $8m and kept moving it down, to the $6m level. So Cooper probably in the low $5m area.
        If the previous owner was doing a short sale, he had probably paid $6-8m for the house. That purchase was not listed in the realtor’s price record, and/or it was recorded in MERS only and not in the county title books.
        Cooper is swimming in money.

      4. SV Bob, thank you. I went back to this Zillow site. Scrolling down there is a price history, clicking on “more” it shows activities going back to 1997. It seems the now former owners bought the mansion on 3/27, 2001 for $ 2,050,000. It shows asking prices over the last three years while the house was on and off the market.

        http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/122-Old-Mount-Tom-Rd-Bantam-CT-06750/82390883_zpid/

        AC is swimming in money and he’ll get a pool to match. More AC real estate news:

        http://www.newsday.com/classifieds/real-estate/real-li-1.812034/anderson-cooper-puts-other-hamptons-home-on-rental-market-1.7872979

      5. Lophatt, you are stone cold dead on. When you watch the embedded video and are not utterly and totally convinced that Cooper is actually ACTING as a news anchor, then your brain is misfiring.

        When I watch Cooper in this the video I feel as though I am watching a B movie clip from the ’50s. I expect the next footage to be of Godzilla collapsing a high rise.

        I am left dumbfounded at those who take him seriously….seriously.

  16. Andersen’s role is obviously to ridicule what is clearly the truth so that the public of sheep will worry about looking foolish to their peers if they take a critical look at the situation. The mother shown discussing the loss of her child…I know that if I lost my child I would not be wearing make up like I’m off the the opera. And it is a real clue because this is how they detect sociopaths who are trying to fake grieving. It’s surprising the actors are trained only on script and not on emotion or what a grieving parent looks like or how they behave. We may not all grieve the same way but there are certain clues to faking it. Anderson is doing a bad actor job himself. He’s a bad actor.

    1. Exactly! There is little or no truth coming from the MSM! I know where you can find it though. The Genesis Network. Especially the Alex Jones show and Joyce Riley’s Power Hour.

  17. I wonder when Anderson is going to post the video of Robbi Parker laughing, then doing his hyperventilating technique to get into character. And how about his smiling demeanor when he was interviewing that other pair of parents a day after their kid was shot. Anderson should make it clear that it was not only Mrs. Ponzer who wasn’t grieving enough.
    So many of these Sandy Hook parents just can’t seem to shed a tear. In line with this, a few days ago I asked my doctor if the pharmaceutical industry has perhaps devised a new type of “grief pill” that causes this type of behavior where the families would smile a lot instead of being totally broke up like normal humans would be expected to be. He said that in cases of war the new procedure would be to have survivors of a firefight to immediately start taking SSRI, right then and there. Is it possible that these parents were given those powerful antidepressants immediately, and that is why they acted so whacked out and inhuman. Was Anderson on those drugs also when he did his smiling interview ? We need to know what the heck is going on here Mr. Cooper. Things at Sandy Hook were not normal, and that has many people very concerned. Along with about another hundred or so anomalies that we won’t go into right now. Such as the totally unprofessional conduct shown to school safety expert Mr. Wolfgang Halbig who can’t get the simplest of questions answered even after filing FOIA requests in writing.

    1. SSRI drugs would take several weeks to build up in the system so as to have the desired effect, unless of course there is something new and faster acting available.

        1. SSRI’s do not make you impervious to all feelings of emotion. It makes a depressed person more normal, that is all. A not depressed person would just have the side effects.

      1. That’s a common misconception, likely based on the field of psychiatry postulating that substantial response or recovery to major depression or chronic anxiety will take weeks or months of treatment, close monitoring, and talk therapy. There is a powerful neurophysiological effect within hours of taking SSRIs or SNRIs. Not that I imagine these drugs had anything to do with the inexplicable behaviors in question.

    2. Halbig is actually a complete fraud, sir. We have gone over this before, my patience is wearing thin with those that blindly follow whatever fits their worldview without the slightest inclination to fact check before they espouse the latest con-mans MO.

      Or are you paid to make such ridiculous comments?

      1. Wolf has done more to make Sandy Hook a national concern than the rest of us combined, including Sofia, James and me. Were it not for him, it would have receded into the dustbin of history.

        You are long on smears but short on logic and evidence. If you have an issue with me or Wolf, then spell it out: quote what we say and why we say it, then explain what we have wrong and how you know.

        Here are my latest on Sandy Hook, in case anyone here missed them:

        http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/06/13/sandy-hook-redux-obama-officials-confirm-that-it-was-a-drill-and-no-children-died/

        http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/06/21/sandy-hook-my-pick-of-the-top-ten-articles-videos-interviews/

        1. There is now a little place on the Internets called ” Sandyhookfacts.com “, where they spread rumors like this. Not much facts there, mostly ‘debating the debate’, and a lot of stalking.

          It is strange why they do not come here and debate, instead of making their own little place where they can ban and censor! 😉

  18. Anderson Cooper is of the Vanderbilt Family. He spend a few years working at Langley (CIA Headquarters). He is a mouth piece of the elite families which can be trusted to tow the party line of Agenda 21. This is silly to even address him or ask him to participate in anything with James Tracy. He will simply set you up to look like an idiot and he has the power of the edit. I think this open letter is pointless and a big mistake.

      1. “Scared” he is most definitely not. He is doing what he’s supposed to do perfectly well and has no intention to ‘confront’ anything other than ‘deniers’. Most people here still don’t seem to ‘get it’. The media doesn’t exist to ‘get at the truth’. Figure out the rest.

    1. Maybe it’s just me (I think not), but you are missing the point, Joe, on more than one level.

      First, James is telling a hilarious joke. He knows that the execrable A.C. will never agree to such a thing. He’s reminding the MSM of their cruelty, and in a way mocking them, saying, Hey! I’m still here! Remember how you tried to destroy me for a moment’s bump in ratings? Well, look me in the face, you cowards! Your crime is not forgotten!

      Secondly, if such an adventure ever transpired, James would certainly have his own camera crew with him, documenting the whole thing, so CNN would not have “final cut.”

      Finally, if the two of them set up such an investigation, the CNN brand would force the shrinking violets of Sandy Hook fame to actually agree to real interviews. Certainly, James would insist on full interrogation rights, conducted by himself, and if you want to see liars squirm, that would be the show of the century. This would do three things: force the execrable Vanderbilt scion to actually pretend to try to get at the truth, lest he expose his true nature by obsequiously fawning and prevaricating; enable a genuinely honest man to depose all the culprits before the cameras for the first time, forcing their lies to be exposed for all to see; and it would also force CNN to tell the truth to its, what is is, half dozen nightly viewers, knowing full well that James would have his own footage of the whole thing, and it would be widely seen.

      What James is doing is pointing out one aspect of the hypocrisy that prevails in the MSM. He must have re-watched the embedded clip and noticed that aspect of the charade: the fake umbrage A.C. ginned up, what with him claiming to represent all the noble crusaders in the reporting trade. That’s another pretty good joke here: the reference to Watergate, which all these presstitutes somehow want us to think was the pinnacle of the form

      (it was, in fact a hoax: read what Gary North has to say, and weep: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2005/06/gary-north/how-nixon-was-taken-down/

      Here a the vital excerpt of the article to understand the vastness of the lie:

      Consider the fantastic detail involved in the requests. On August 14th, [1973] for example, Judge Sirica demanded the “entire segment of tape on the reel identified as u2018White House telephone start 5/25/72 (2:00 P.M.) (skipping 8 lines) 6/2:3/72 (2:50 P.M.) (832) complete.’” I don’t know what all the identifying numbers mean — but you have to agree that only somebody very familiar with the tapes would know. These boys knew precisely what to look for! Here is another sample request:

      January 8, 1973 from 4:05 to 5:34 P.M. (E.O.B.)

      at approximately 10 minutes and 15 seconds into the conversation, a segment lasting 6 minutes and 31 seconds:
      at approximately 67 minutes into the conversation, a segment lasting 11 minutes;
      at approximately 82 minutes and 15 seconds into the conversation, a segment lasting 5 minutes and 31 seconds.)

      Although this is my own contribution–that Watergate itself is nothing to do with investigative reporting–the fact is, the news readers of the MSM all like to claim it as their mantle of honor, and James is saying: All right big fella, try it on in real life!

      So James is rubbing those jerks’ noses in it, real good. Good for him.

      1. Agreed, the letter is a well crafted challenge to the vacuous MSM account of SHE. The open letter is an historically relevant document regardless of the response. This is a letter whose content should be flooding MSM editor desks. In the unlikely event of an AG response, it will be predictably be dismissive.
        JT type queries are fair game to any of us who challenge our local powers that be. It seems to me the local PTB may be becoming embolden by the increasing ruling arrogance that is being reported within this blog.
        Thank you Anne B. for bring us the Newtonesque flavor of the AC Litchfield megahouse “purchase”. Yes, further facts needed.

      2. After having read your presentation in it’s entirety,Patrick,may I say…VERY INTERESTING! My disdain for the so called Free Press grows by the minute.

      3. Furthermore, AC and CNN are forced to deny even receiving this letter because if they acknowledge they did, it would warrant a response. And in this case, they lose by responding either way.

    2. Of course AC is not going to respond, that is not the point. The letter is an effective way to communicate some facts about Anderson Cooper in a, I think, entertaining way. To those who may never do their own investigation or back checks on propagandists like AC this may be how they finally learn the truth. And the truth is what the whole thing is about.

  19. I would be very surprised if AC takes this offer. It would acknowledge that there might be something to investigate in SH. They have a story and they will stick to it. Their story is made for a TV studio, their interviews are controlled and scripted.

    I doubt there is anything to be found in Newtown. Even the school is gone! Newtown is an enclave of Hell where brave knights can go and die; visiting is allowed though, if you want to take some pictures and ask a few polite questions at the fire house. But do not unsheathe thy sword without an Army behind you! (We’re not there yet)

    There is so much information on the internet already that clearly demonstrates that the official narrative is a hoax. People are normally not open to such information. Normal people want to feel secure – acknowledging the information that demonstrates that their Gov. is out of control will make them feeling insecure. Becoming a Truther is leaving normalcy behind.

    From 9/11 it took me about 5 years to understand that the World was hijacked by maniacs. And I have been building on that distrust ever since. I have always be anti authoritarian, but the ‘Truth movement’ was what helped me “get it”. I grew up ‘pro Israel’, ‘pro War’… I was a nutcase!

    From each psy-ops and FF, we can start the timers for thousands of new Truthers in the making. Let’s not pour cold water on the others, that did not wake up, it will just ruin their day and we would be their villains!

    My mother often told me; “never talk to journalists”, I’m surprised a professor of media studies don’t know better! 😉 CNN will twist everything in their favor. And they are going to keep pretending it is your own fault.

    And whats this about considering to resign if SHH is proven to be infact real? Is being wrong a ‘just cause’? I do not think so, it is just part of science!

    1. About your point wondering why sandyhookfacts.com made their own site

      You suggested it was to ban an censor

      Tracy hasn’t had the gumption to post my thoughts for awhile. This site is like Pravda

      1. This is because, quite frankly, you have few if any thoughts to offer. The comments I have allowed you to post essentially constitute “sniping” against myself and others, tending to drive discussions in unproductive directions. I would no sooner allow you to partake in comments here than to sit across from me at my dinner table.

  20. And another thing, Anderson, please chuck the empty soundbites that are so comforting to the American people and lull them into sleepy surrender. Also, to meet the professor at Sandy Hook, you’ll need to degoebbelize yourself. Back to basic journalism 101.

  21. Well said and done, Tracy.

    While I don’t comment here (MHB) for the most part, I do consider this site one of the finest on the web. Others include Aangirfan, Veterans Today, Cryptogon, Project for a New American Revolution and Sott, where I do comment.

    Please continue the pursuit of truth and the struggle against censorship, tyranny, injustice, and oppression.

    Ned Lud

    p.s. glad you were able (thus far) to maintain your employment and your life, others (in the struggle) have lost one or both. Fortunately, there is a better life ahead for those who have (struggled and ‘lost’) and a worse ‘life’ awaits those who have chosen the Anderson Cooper route…

  22. I felt nearly giddy after reading your letter to A. Cooper. Tak about throwing down the gauntlet! If not you Dr. Tracy, then who better to challenge this media icon who has become the darling of mainstream news viewers. If he can be exposed or even challenged then there is a chance that more Americans may begin to question their blind trust in the propangada they’re being fed daily. I was surprised that you received negative comments regarding your well written, serious, albeit humorous, letter. It seems that Cooper’s personal attack on you by revealing your home address and exposing you and your family to danger was so unwarranted as to make me suspect that he was fully aware of the potential repercussions for you. Those of his ilk, the fantastically wealthy, have a level of protection that most university professors can ill afford. He made the attack on your credibility personal and in seeking to mount an effort to have your well deserved, tenured position threatened brought his motive in doing so into question. I was once a “believer” in Mr. Cooper and in retrospect it was his emotive style of journalism that appealed to me. It should have been the very thing that warned me, but that was before Sandy Hook and his obvious bias and lack of any investigative role revealed his ineptitude. Once again Dr. Tracy, I applaud you, in fact, I think I’m starting to love you.

  23. Mr. Tracy obviously doesn’t expect a reply from Mr. Cooper. Am I the only one who gets the sarcasm?

    Also, watch the short video at PredPol.com. PredPol is directly linked to Sandy Hook via ‘Sandy Hook Promise’ and Jim Pitkow and the Sandy Hook Innovation Initiative, which was already up and running by March 2013. Pitkow fronts “The Smart Tech Foundation”. This Pitkow fellow is a real whiz: he has founded, co-founded, served as ‘research scientist’, ‘advisor’ or ‘consultant’ to 15 different groups – among them Xerox-PARC and NASA, as well as oddly named organizations such as GroupFire, Pioneers of the Inevitable, and WellnessFX. He started out as a psych major at U. of Colorado and bought his Ph.D. sheepskin in Computer Science from Georgia Institute of Technology.

    Interestingly, in the CBS video at PredPol.com, as the L.A. Chief of Police, Charlie Beck is interviewed, you’ll see Laurel Canyon Blvd. on the map. Laurel Canyon was the focal point for the ‘revolutionary’, some might say, ‘madcap’ 1960s and 70s, which included the murders associated with the ‘Manson Family’. The title of the CBS video is “Predictive Policing: Making L.A. Safer.” The fact that the editors at CBS ensured that Laurel Canyon Blvd. is visible for a few seconds in the video is the insiders’ way of laughing at the profane. Also, at the beginning of the ‘report’ we’re told that PredPol is being used in “the Foothill Missions section, North of downtown Los Angeles,” which is a “largely working-class neighborhood”. We are to draw the conclusion that this is the type of place where ‘real’ or ‘true’ crime occurs. It does NOT occur in an upscale/tony place such as Newtown/Sandy Hook or Columbine. Newtown crime isn’t real. This is part of the processing of the mind. In response to those who are skeptical of such predpol computer programs telling cops how to conduct their jobs, Beck states; (to paraphrase) if this old [street] cop can change the way he thinks, then I know my sons can change the way they think. Beck’s 2 sons are also cops.

    So what it’s really all about is changing the way you think. The program has already moved ahead – you need to “catch up” or you’ll be ‘left behind’. And no one wants to be left behind. http://www.predpol.com/

    Additionally, Laurel Canyon immediately brings to mind the name, Dave McGowan, who is another good researcher and who should be of interest. He’s written extensively on Laurel Canyon, the ‘hippies’, the ‘music’ groups [CSNY, etc.] and tie-in to military intelligence. Dave McGown’s site: http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com.

    As for other great research(er) sites; try revisionistreview.blogspot.com and mauricepinay.blogspot.com. You won’t be wasting your time.

    1. Thank you, Josie. Very interesting. PredPol was founded in 2012 and has its office in Santa Cruz, CA. I saw Tom Bittman connected as well in another article. No surprise. It is safe to assume that the millions going to Sandy Hook will benefit this new industry. Of course one of their targets is mental health. No surprise there either. Mr. Bittman was in the audience during Wolfgang Halbig’s presentation to the Newtown School Board.

      There was only one comment to this article. It asked “Why have all the comments been removed?”

      Excerpt from a Danbury News Times article dated Nov, 9, 2013

      ……Nicole Hockley, whose son Dylan was one of the children killed at Sandy Hook Elementary, spoke at the Fast Company Innovation Uncensored event in San Francisco on Wednesday, where the challenge was announced. FastCompany.com reported on the meeting and quoted Hockley, who works with Sandy Hook Promise.
      “Dylan died when he was 6 years old, so we’ll never know what his contribution to society would have been,” Hockley said. “But if his name can be associated with real change, that’s a legacy I want to help him achieve.”
      Ron Conway — a Silicon Valley investor who has put money into such startups as Google, Facebook and Twitter — was an early supporter of Sandy Hook Promise and its Innovation Initiative. Entrepreneurs Don Kendall, of Weston, and Jim Pitkow, of California, joined as well.
      A new ecology
      But Pitkow said as the group began its work, it found that while there were people with ideas out there, none were ready to move those ideas into the next stage of development.
      “We looked at them and thought `How can we create this ecology,’ ” Pitkow said of the forces needed to move ideas to reality.
      He and others took their inspiration from X Prize, a group that’s rewarding people with innovative, workable ideas in education and the environment, with the money to make them happen.
      This week, Pitkow and others announced the creation of the Smart Tech Foundation — a group dedicated to making America safer. The group will begin accepting submissions in January. To learn more, email the foundation at info@stfdn.com
      It has chosen four areas to concentrate on. The first is smart Tech for Firearms. The second is Smart Tech for Big Data, helping police use data to control gun violence more effectively.
      The third is Smart Tech for Community safety, aimed at finding ways to help towns respond more quickly to emergencies, and the fourth is Smart Tech for Brain Health, aimed at finding new ways to help work on mental health issues.
      Pitkow said the foundation is committed to award “at least $1 million” for each area of work. As the word gets out about the group and more people get involved with its funding, that prize amount could increase.
      Pitkow said such firearms could greatly reduce the number of accidental shootings in the United States. Gun locks and gun safes only work when people use them, he said.
      And Cox, of Sandy Hook Promise, said these ideas aren’t farfetched. It’s just that no one has applied them to firearms.
      “They have biometrics on your Apple iPhone,” he said. “Why not on a dangerous weapon you have in your home? This is a no-brainer.”…

      1. “The second is Smart Tech for Big Data, helping police use data to control gun violence more effectively.”

        I can only assume this one is beginning its life as an “in house” project? The best data to start with would be the increasing number of innocent people the Police shoot, often whilst trashing the wrong address, in addition to the rising number of pets they kill in the owners back yard.

        A third good proposal would be “Smart Brain”, which helps law enforcement understand that a dog will protect its own territory and investigate any visitors. The cop simply needs to request the owner to tether it prior to entering. They may also want to learn how to read a map so as to get the house correct. GPS can suffer from “drift”.

        Aside from…
        Many other “untouchables” need to undergo the “Truth Challenge”. Excellent letter James! If he doesn’t assign you to that slanderous part of the program, I would be sending him monthly reminders by recorded post for six months to emphasise your enthusiasm to meet with him for all the reasons stated. These people need to feel threatened due to the carte blanche that a camera and a slot on TV endows them with.

  24. Ain’t gonna happen James, but nice try. Can you imagine being in the middle of mass murder mayhem and thinking, “you know, we could really use some porta-johns right about now”. A truck and trailer winds it’s way through the emergency vehicles to off load the toilets. Does that seem likely? They had a huge woods to take a whizz in, but they had it together enough to not only think about porta-potties, but order them and have them delivered. These things require purchase orders and paper work and someone to sign for the delivery with a date and a time stamp on the invoice. There’s always two copies and some companies that deliver have a third. They are usually white, pink and yellow. I can hear the order coming in now, “these cops are shitting bricks up at Sandy Hook, get a dozen Johns up there – on the double!”

  25. You’re really gutsy, James; racist, academically prissy, but gutsy. I’m beginning to suspect that courage is more important to truth than intelligence. Intelligence is common in academia and journalism, and it is a cesspool of shit. Excuse me, sh*t; you permit the routine insulting of groups with unabashed vulgarity, calling them ‘darkies,’ or ‘beaners’ but one thing you won’t stand for is Bad Words, the common locutions of the young.

    Perhaps this is a journalistic vice. My niece, before she got a law degree from a top law school (God help us all) knew Anderson when they lived in a fashionable rich neighborhood of Los Angeles. They talked about sexual bigotry, Anderson being gay if what she said was true. Astonishingly, sexual freedom has preceded racial freedom historically, and especially the freedom to tell the simple truth about the frauds of power.

    Perhaps the peculiarities of the truthers of the Free Press have restricted the truth as much as the routine sucking up to power. Nah, but they have undoubtedly played a role. As you are doubltlessly aware, the chance of viable response to your challenge is somewhat less than the lifetime of a snowball in hell. Excuse me, h*ll. But it shows the right spirit and perhaps can help animate other academics to spit in the eye of our oppressors and deluders.

    1. Mark, appreciate the observations re Cooper and the ascendance of the civil rights struggle in other quarters. Yet as has become typical of your remarks, you are now asserting that I am racist and suggest that racial epithets are a frequent occurrence and encouraged on this site. As your remarks suggest, racism is a complex thing that cannot be isolated to upholding a single agenda. With this in mind, I think it would be fairly easy to argue that the most cunning racists profess their “liberalism” at almost every turn.

      You may be slow to realize that not every phenomenon can be reduced to race. However, my spouse and three children–all females of color (“double jeopardy,” as you will be wont to point out)–should get a real kick out of the new kleagle status you’ve christened me with.

    2. “Darkies.” I’m glad you always read me, Mark. Makes the heart swell. (I hope you have purchased my books, too!). I don’t suspect, though, it will do me any good, when your version of Ernesto “Che” Guevara starts selecting people like me for summary execution by firing squad, come your revolution. As O’Brien told Winston Smith, as the torture sessions got under way, “I am taking trouble with you, Winston, because you are worth trouble…. You are mentally deranged.” Oh, boy, can’t wait for you boys to take it to the next level. Yes, quite a different kind of heart swelling comes with that.

      Of course, only the irony-impared could have read my jocular use of the term as anything but a funny joke, but Stalin and Castro and Pol Pot types are conspicuously absent a sense of irony. Only white racists such as yourself could interpret such jocularity as an attack on the negroid contingent among us. I can talk that way, Mark, because O’Brien has not yet got me into Room 101.

      You should consider, Mark; now, I mean this in all sincerity, ironic as it may sound (it is both sincere and ironic, for the irony-impared): you will, under the totalitarian regime you wish to construct, make a great O’Brien, but I would hope that you start trying to stop being that way, ASAP.

      We can jokingly talk about “darkies,” Mark, because it’s nothing to do with racism. We can joke about our collective history. You still have not achieved the power to stop us.

      Speaking of what’s funny, the dead letter you guys have made of the word itself. “Racism.” Tracy’s a “racist”! That’s so gay.

      1. Oops! I didn’t mean to say Mark is a “white” racist–although he is (he’s a white guy who despises whites for being white). I meant to say “leftist” racists–people who lie about non-leftists hating non-whites just because they are not leftists. These people also loathe blacks like Tom Sowell, Walter Williams, Clarence Thomas and Allan Keyes purely because they are blacks who reject leftism.

        Sorry for the slip in last night’s post. Liberals who accuse everyone of racism are saturated in race; they can’t see human beings, only the group the eyeball categorizes them in, and the assumptions they have about those people’s mind states, based on their genetic history and what leftists think they should be thinking. I find it disgusting.

        Another clarification, for the sake of those who have not recently re-read 1984. In the book, The Party holds that everyone under its control (that is, everyone in the country) must agree with what it says to be fact, no matter how ridiculous, otherwise you are “insane.” If you refuse, if you think for yourself, you WILL be made to agree with the party; you will be truly broken, and will have no will left when they are done with you. It is a science, and central to the continuance of the state.

        I believe we are facing this in our future, and I take great umbrage when people like Mark flat out lies about me (my harmless, funny, offhand reference to “darkies” some weeks back) as if this is an example of James condoning a routine disparagement of non-white ethnic groups on this web site. Such comments chill me to the bone.

        My reference was based on the idea that in 1984 everyone must self-police, conforming to insane, arbitrary, ideas, lest they be severely punished. Mark is jumping the gun in trying to enforce such nonsense as if it is already deadly serious, but he will LOVE to see the state enforce these horrifying ideas when 1984 comes to be. It is incumbent upon us to push back against these thugs, while we still have that power.

        Everyone needs to understand that book. I probably make the mistake of assuming everyone around here already does. Thus, this update.

  26. Prof. Tracy’s letter looked to me as part heartfelt explanation of how CNN’s treatment affected him and his family. The other was maybe a “tongue in cheek” exercise of the “we know you know we know” game and aren’t going to forget it. AC is aware his job is to affect public opinion and not honest investigative reporting. BTW, isn’t CNN going to be dropping his show? I’m thinking about all the CNN low to mid level production employees who helped AC facilitate his part in this mess and are now “awake”. How many people do you think they’ve made aware??

    Also wanted to mention the great diversity of responses posted. I once heard–“If we’re all thinking the same thing, we aren’t thinking”. Again, thanks to Prof.Tracy for ALL the time and hard work he’s spent on this. When you do this kind of stuff for your children and the truth, you’re doing it for the right reasons.

  27. The result of the letter is a given. CNN is committed to disinform the general public and takes its orders from the elusive organization that directs the modern global version of Plato’s cave.

    Cooper’s hit piece was to be expected. Listening to it from the perspective of the average CNN viewer, it is a well-delivered and highly convincing summary of what must have been a giant investigation by CNN of Sandy Hook’s “reality” and “crazy conspiracy theories.” This leads to the very important finding that people who want to educate the public on the existence of grand conspiracies need an entry point that is undisbelievable, so evident and simple that not only CNN but also its fellow obfuscators (from Fox to the Chinese TV to Ron Paul to the John Birch Society to etc.) is incapable of not understanding it. Alas, the available documentation of Sandy Hook’s essence as a false flag does not meet this requirement. Independent investigations of Sandy Hook are vulnerable to hit pieces and they will be hit any time they seem to gain popularity.

    This brings the action item of looking for an undisbelievable conspiracy. But this is another story…

    Love,

  28. Brilliant letter! An exercise in reductio ad absurdum? Reminds me of David Ray Griffin’s devastatingly perfect logic in his book Cognitive Infiltration which eviscerated the inane arguments behind Cass Sunstein’s anti conspiracy theory and anti 9/11 Truth propaganda program. Not long after the publication of Griffin’s book, Sunstein left his government position. We can only hope Cooper will be equally embarrassed and retire from “journalism”.

  29. If we understand that Sandy Hook is war ground (local ground in an expansive war), and if we understand, even vaguely, that war is never completely confined to the present, but rather a series of moves and counter-moves, then we must ask ourselves…not only what will the enemy’s next move be, but what will the countermove of those engaged in genuine thought be? Of those who have the highest regard for the truth?

    We all agree here that AC (anyone here truly believe this decision is his?) will not meet JT at the Blue Colony Diner (right off I84 and a couple miles from SH) and then mosey on into SH to commence the hot light sessions. The response will in all likelihood be the same as that of this generations evolutionary hero, Dr. Richard Dawkins, when asked repeatedly why he will never debate a creationist, raises his arrogant eyebrow and declares, “I will not dignify their positions by sharing a stage with them.”

    Mr. Dawkins not so veiled cowardice transcends that “debate” and rears its shameless head in forums such as this…just insert Cooper for Dawkins.

    Tragically for this nation (Patrick, you made this point very well in an earlier post) I am convinced that if made aware of JTs correspondence to Cooper and CNN, Americans would react with similar disdain and condescension towards a perspective joint fact-finding tour of Newtown. They have been beaten so often over their thick skulls with the Sandy Hook Story, and there are simply too many pleasures to avail themselves of here and now in the land of the amused to death. JTs invite would require contemplation of the masses…an oxymoron to be sure.

    The question at hand is…how do we counter the unmitigated dismissal of “whoever?” I say we broaden the invitation. Diane Sawyer, Barbara Walters, Katie Couric….let them all snub their noses and in so doing heap condemnation upon themselves and those whom they “represent.”

    Oh well, even if nothing comes of this, I will still be walking the streets of Sandy Hook at some point this summer…and JT, you are most welcome to join me!

    1. Mr Miroddi:”I am convinced that if made aware of JTs correspondence to Cooper and CNN, Americans would react with similar disdain and condescension towards a perspective joint fact-finding tour of Newtown.”

      The most likely response is for CNN to say; look here is that nutty Dr. Tracy again, he wants us to go to Newtown and pour salt in the wounds of the bereaved! Isn’t he just the most despicable cold hearted asshole around!

      The second most likely response is that they first do the above, then invite Dr. Tracy along to Newtown, where he will meet all the parents who will say the same thing, but with fake crying and holding blown up pictures of their ‘dead children’.

      Newtown will not debate facts, they will debate the debate. All their arguments will be emotions disguised as facts. Officials will “have no time” to meet them, or they will be so offended by Dr. Tracy’s presence they will decline. Or they will have any other reason not to answer a question.

      AC will end the show with a rant explaining how despicable and sub human anyone not believing the official story is. And that they all deserve whats coming to them *hint hint*.

      A show perfect for TV…

      A good opportunity to scare a lot of people into the fold.

      1. CBT, I believe we are in agreement. I don’t disagree with anything you have stated. My point simply, is that AC wont need anyone to have his back on this one. He has been preaching to the choir since 12-14-12.

        Americans are busy these days surfing the endless waves of amusement. And to even stop and consider for a moment that Sandy Hook was in any way, shape or form a ruse would carry along with it bone chilling consequences that they simply will not ponder.

        So again, we are facing the counter-move, because there will be no “official” gathering in Newtown in order to arrive at some sort of mutual “understanding.” (boy, would I love to be wrong about this one..)

        So again, I say…lets keep screaming and kicking. I equate JTs open invite to AC a “mature” tantrum. In other words, you can try to ignore me all you want, but sooner or later you’re going to have to take your fingers out of your ears.

    2. Joseph Miroddi, the food at the Blue Colony Diner is pretty good. Seems you know the place too. What I miss out here in California is the east coast style family diners open all day and all night.

      1. Anne B., Yeah, I know that area of Ct. pretty well for having been there twice. I had lunch at the BCD with a friend during my last trip there. The food is diner food; you wont starve. Sorry to hear there are no such eateries out there in the big state.

        Funny thing about my lunch at the Blue Colony Diner…I spent more time looking around at the patrons than actually chewing, hoping to see one of the characters from the production. No one looked familiar.

        BTW Anne, I saw your question to me re corporate welfare. I haven’t had enough time to respond. Do I have opinions on the article you linked? You bet. I hope to share them at some point.

  30. Those of us who have followed the unravelling story of the Sandy Hook shooting have come to see it as a poorly executed fraud or, as some have said, a hoax. It is clear that no one died, as few if any victims were taken to the hospital. While we can breathe a sigh of relief that all those cute children are still alive, does this knowledge change the culpability of those involved? Does it follow that the perpetrators of this event are any less evil than they would have been had people actually died? I don’t see it that way.

    The vast majority of Americans experienced this event as a cruel tragedy inflicted on innocent children and their families. 300 million people felt the same degree of mental anguish that they would have experienced had these deaths been real. That’s 300 million real people feeling real pain. We should not forget that those who did this traumatized an entire nation and have committed a crime very nearly as evil as the one they have accused their imaginary “Adam Lanza” of doing.

    I suspect that the monsters who staged this spectacle thought that it would go off as smoothly as Columbine and Aurora, with skeptics gaining little traction in the national media. They were caught off guard by the ghoulish laughing coroner and the smirking,’ bereaved’ dad. Damage control was deemed necessary and they chose Professor Tracy to make an example of, perhaps because his blog focusing on some of these anomalies got wide exposure when it appeared in Global Research News.

    It comes as little surprise that CNN’s Anderson Cooper, the CIA connected junkyard dog of the national media was given the job. Instead of allowing Americans to see this ‘tragedy’ for the fraud that it was, as Professor Tracy was suggesting they might, Cooper insisted that all sober and rational people experience this event as a real and painful calamity. By ignoring Professor Tracy and lying about Tracy’s willingness to present his evidence to a national audience, he played a special role in ensuring that all Americans were indeed traumatized by the Sandy Hook story. Professor Tracy and the rest of America deserve an apology from Anderson Cooper.

  31. Sorry if my last comment was a little harsh, but I felt that someone needed to make the point that these hoax shootings staged to promote ‘gun control’ are not victimless crimes, even though no one has died. Those who perpetrate them and cover them up should not be allowed to hide behind the mistaken notion that they are serving a ‘greater good’. Journalists and bloggers, like Professor Tracy, who seek to expose these lies are the true healers of the American psyche.

    1. A little harsh, but with many good points. Coincidentally, I recently had a talk with an independent high school teacher who starts her conspiracy curriculum with Sandy Hook, precisely to assuage her high school students’ fear.

      Love,

  32. Mark Levin just offered Obama 50K if he appears on his show to debate climate change.

    Dr. Tracy, I think you should have offered to march in a gay pride parade in a grass skirt

    If after a thorough investigation we prove that the event in fact took place as CNN and other major media reported…

    NOT your JOB! Andy would have been much more enticed…

  33. “I think you’ll agree that it’s time to put these Sandy Hook “truthers” to rest for good, thereby allowing the Sandy Hook victims’ families to find comfort in the millions of dollars in donations they have received from sincere and goodhearted Americans.”

    I laughed out loud. Such a brilliant use of sarcasm. 🙂

  34. Something tells me he’ll just slither away like the slug he is.
    Crazy how wide awake –and fast –I’ve become.
    They shot themselves in the foot with SH n bean town.
    How long will it take for the masses to awaken

    1. “How long will it take for the masses to awaken.”
      Kathy, you MUST be asking a rhetorical question. You have to know they are not going to “awaken.” This would require a LITERAL MIRACLE. And although I am a Christian who understands the reality of historical as well as contemporary miracles, one will not be forthcoming in this context. Even if cable and internet was cut off, the memory of said would have instilled a longing to return to the “information” saturation they have been exposed to for decades, such that would not allow any possible expansion of thought and reason. In simpler terms, they would be crying out for reruns of Hot in Cleveland, rather than choosing to ponder the serious and resonant issues of life.

      The most difficult and wearying pill for me to swallow with regards to Sandy Hook has always been the understanding that for this event to be exposed as the historic fraud that it is, it is most likely going to require an insider to break down and squeal like the pig they are.

      Perhaps we can gain some understanding into what it must have been like for John the Baptist…one who was “crying in the wilderness.”

  35. It’s obvious that CNN and other outlets “protect” the official story of SH and other shootings by constantly whining about how anyone questioning what happened are “hurting the already devastated families of those killed.”

    Playing on peoples’ emotions will always get you farther then critical thinking will. Keep up the excellent work, James.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *