Brendan Hunt Returns to Sandy Hook

So many good comments and insight here !! Please come and visit our page at facebook.com/HoaxAtSandyHook where we continue to investigate and share information daily !!

I commented Hunt may be the “Brietbart” we need

If asbestos is a major concern in the demolition, it was likely recognized before, and the children moved to another school. Sandy Hook 1 therefore being an empty stage prop for the mock drill. But this doesn’t necessarily mean that there was no shooting or killing. Nancy Lanza’s death certificate was filed, there were bullet holes in a car outside, there was a purple van traced to heroin addict gun nuts, there appears to have been a nun disguise. Both fraud and shooting were both possible.

But a fundamental journalist question is not only HOW this scenario was planned, but WHY. It was an historical event in that the president of the USA identified himself with the official media narrative. Why would he go to such lengths and put himself in that situation to abolish assault rifles?

This requires people to think historically and the commenters on this blog, who are very acute in analyzing specialized details, are adamant in evading general historical reasoning. The leftish are afraid to subvert the authorized truth consensus, and right generally put forth drivel. But this mock drill was planned under Obama, and possibly Bush, for many months, and American power obviously had something in mind.

Americans tend to be afraid to think about it, or comment about it, like Mr Low. They are afraid of critical comments, or ultimately the FBI, and are silenced by being conceived Conspiracy Theorists or crazed paranoids. The media narrative are lies piled on lies and, perhaps most important, a media or learned silence of the most important aspects of the American historical process. A gangster police state is being installed in the USA to maintain and increase the monstrous economic inequality, and racism is being used to divide the American people, allowing the pluts to divide and rule. But the increasing class and racial inequality is out of bounds in the American media.

But this can be corrected over historical time. All that it is necessary to do is to make people intellectually braver. That can be done by simply repeating the concepts and words stigmatized by the media, such as ‘socialism,’ ‘racism,’ or ‘conspiracy.’ The operative historical content relating to these words and concepts have been deposited down the memory hole, and it is not only the specific information that must be retrieved, but the entire discourse of past generations.

If one can get Americans to agree that ‘single payee medical care’ is the same as ‘socialized medicine,’ and they are for it anyway, the cloud cover on their brains has been shoved back at least to that extent. The current infirm Affordable Medical Care has been dubbed ‘Obamacare’ by the corporate media to smear it implicitly with racism. This is very effective, since the Dems and left use the concepts and terms developed by the right.

It will take some years to penetrate the Know-Nothingism, and to subvert the authorized Orwellian truth. One can start with empirical facts that even the most fearful and deluded can accept, such as that most homicides occur with handguns, not rifles. So why all the emphasis on rifles?

But there also must be a breaking of the restricted American world-view, of forgetting the past and ignoring the future. This will be harder, since Americans are afraid of general ideological ideas that conflict with traditional American ideology. We are afraid of being called Communists, or Terrorists, or Conspiracy Theorists, or trolls for that matter. But there are worse things, and I fear that we are going to experience them.

The fainting stunt in the garden is illuminating. Apparently Obama has included public relations stunts routinely in his repertoire. And they work! The bin Laden caper was initiated by a famous picture of him and his minions watching the firefight in Pakistan that didn’t occur. There were so many lies that unfolded in the telling that the security chief Brennen had to go on tv with a written list to tell the official story.

Bin Laden, who was reliably reported dead for years, served as the Trotsky figure, Goldstein, in 1984. But Obama got a bump of ten points in the polls, and the fable may have won the election for him. The caper and the fainting fit in the garden makes an Orwellian caper like Sandy Hook more understandable and more believable.

Marilyn, Obama isn’t a socialist of course, he was put in office by the plutocracy to do their bidding. But calling him a socialist and medical care Obamacare tends to de-legitimate the single payer medical care, for which Obamacare is a weak step forward. The pluts finance the Tea Party and the Repubs to shut down the government to stop it, because they are against ANY government medical system. It is labeled Obamacare to make it appear that it is directed primarily to non-Whites.

Mr. Bittman,

1st allow me to say how impressed I am that you have taken the time to make yourself available to answer some of the questions surrounding the Sandy Hook event.

If you could possibly manage a few more minutes I have a couple of questions that are specific to your area of knowledge.

It is well known at this point that Nancy Lanza played a fairly active roll in Adam’s life and in his efforts at school…even volunteering at SHE on many occasions.

My 1st question is this…if Nancy was active at the school in various regards, including Adam’s supposed developmental/emotional issues…then why did your wife say, in respect to the claims that the shooters mother (Nancy Lanza) was an employee of the school………”“No one has heard of her,” said Lillian Bittman, who served on the local school board until 2011. “Teachers don’t know her.”.”

How did she come to that determination? It seems inconceivable that your wife, especially, wouldn’t know Nancy. Surely at least one of your children went to SHE at the same time as Adam.

My 2nd question relates to the first.

How is it that your wife came to be such a prominent spokesperson for this event so soon after? Within a couple/few hours she was giving interviews to, among others, PBS.

She had not been a member of the school board or an employee of the school division for quite some time. It seems quite odd that she would be a spokesperson when there were many members of the school division that could have fulfilled that role.

Was she contacted by media or did she contact media? Who, if anyone, gave her permission to speak for the school and the division?

Thank you for your time.

The thought of Sandy Hook parents feeling pain at our discussions does bother me–a lot. I worry about it. But, firstly, I doubt Robbie Parker is deeply disturbed by “YouTube videos with ominous music.” He, like I, was raised in a small, fundamentalist enclave, and we are taught from birth that the outside world are basically crazed heathens in need of salvation. Evidence of such crazed heathenry is not going to shock him, nor me, anywhere near as much as it might a regular old secularist American. Secondly, I would like to point out that when we’re talking about “conspiracy theories” hurting parents of Sandy Hook children, that knife cuts both ways. I, as a parent, hear myself called a “ghoulish lunatic” almost daily–not by anonymous internet users, but by Anderson Cooper, police chiefs, governors, and self-appointed spokesmen for the parents of murdered children. My crime? Asking questions. I’m a parent, too. Any parent reading this, who thinks about it a it, knows that whatever corruption allowed for Sandy Hook and its subsequent coverup poses a genuine threat to our own children. So, we all agree on one thing: it hurts to be a parent. The difference between us is that I would not fault another parent for asking questions in an attempt to protect his/her own child. And the more I dig into these self-appointed spokesmen, the more I feel that Sandy Hook parents aren’t the ones faulting other parents for asking questions.